Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 24 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Wolf Creek valley, Ivvavik National Park, YT.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Looking up the valley of Wolf Creek, one of the Firth River tributaries in Canada's Ivvavik National Park --Daniel Case 05:43, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I´m not totally convinced. In my eyes the colors are too saturated. Are the trees really tilted at the same angle or is the picture tilted to the left? --Milseburg 19:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  • First, as I've said about a lot of these other pictures from the Canadian Arctic, it was the "day" after a rainstorm and the sky was extremely clear and clean, so yes it was that blue. As for the trees, they tend to be rather scraggly on the tundra and tilt every which way. Daniel Case 04:43, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Kein QI für mich - Blaustich --Fischer.H 11:51, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Basotxerri 18:37, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Warnschild an einem Autobahnparkplatz in Baden-Württemberg bei Bickelberg 02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Multilingual warning sign in Germany because of the african swine fever --Verum 13:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeThe composition isn't quite good enough for QI, I feel. There's a cropped sign at the top, for instance. --Peulle 14:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  • @Peulle:new v ersion with smaller crop. look at the text of the sign with the opeb trash container --Verum 08:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me --Ermell 20:33, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment I really wasn't anticipating this going to CR, but since it's here I'm still at oppose, given the disturbing garbage bags in front of the subject.--Peulle 10:08, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Peulle. --Bgag 13:57, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Erm... the garbage is essential for this image and belongs to the composition. --Smial 22:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Catedral_de_Oporto,_Portugal,_2012-05-09,_DD_16.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Cathedral of Porto, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Light too harsh --Daniel Case 19:46, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  • To be honest, I see no problem with the light here, I'd like to discuss this one. --Poco a poco 17:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support It's OK for me. --Bgag 15:50, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me, although a local correction would make it better. --Basotxerri 16:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
    Basotxerri: what do you mean by "local correction"? Poco a poco 19:14, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Lowering the highlights locally using the adjustment brush (talking in Lightroom terms). --Basotxerri 07:56, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Nothing wrong with it.--Ermell 20:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Maybe it's a bit bright in some places, but that's not a reason to deny that it's a photo of quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 22:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Basotxerri 18:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Teatro_Don_Pedro_V,_Macao,_2013-08-08,_DD_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dom Pedro V Theater, Macau --Poco a poco 07:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Strong purple fringes and I don't like the way perspctive distortion is handled and the blurring that comes with it.--Tobias "ToMar" Maier 15:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Strong perspective correction. Excessive perspective correction. Unnatural image--Lmbuga 23:42, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - Good enough quality, perspective OK to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek 07:02, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Took me long time to decide.... but at the end per Lmbuga. It looks too unnatural due to the excessive perspective correction. -- DerFussi 17:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:51, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 10:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective is ok but didn't anybody else notice the sky is completely blown out? --Code 19:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too strong distortet. --Ralf Roletschek 21:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 20:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)