Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 2009

• 
  • Nomination Obserwation tower Cvilín (Liechtensteinwarte), Czech Republic --Pudelek 07:36, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Compression artifacts. --Siipikarja 12:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW M3 during race --Spock lone wolf 06:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Well handled motion. --Siipikarja 12:06, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church Sant'Agata alla Fornace, Catania, Sicily --Lucarelli 23:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok. --Berthold Werner 06:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of the Elephant fountain, Catania, Sicily --Lucarelli 23:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition. --Karora 10:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Toy windmill on balcony --Lucarelli 23:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Poor overall quality (sharpness, aberation), also motif is quite dull --Spock lone wolf 12:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sicilian marionettes --Lucarelli 23:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I'm going with no here, for poor composition (chopped off part of one marionete and chopped half of the hands of both) --Spock lone wolf 12:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ophrys speculum in Mallorca --Lycaon 22:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion beautiful and strange flower --Ianare 04:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A future POTY candidate. --Eusebius 21:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment A shame there is not a little more at the left to exhibit the graphic design better. --Karora 01:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
     Info I've cropped just after the (copyrighted) logo of the brand... --Eusebius 05:58, 28 April 2009 (UTC)  Support Fair enough! --Karora 10:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A window broken in two parts. Abigor 20:33, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline The depth of field is a bit too tight, with the blurring of the crack at the top. --Karora 10:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Allium roseum in Mallorca. Lycaon 19:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks great :-) -- Pro2 19:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Patočkova hora (Patočka's Hill) --Spock lone wolf 18:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks like a painting, nice atmosphere and technically OK --Mbdortmund 19:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support I like it. --Harke 20:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 17th century-like window in Chambord. --Coyau 17:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition --Karora 01:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Joseph Fourier. --Eusebius 14:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok IMHO --Berthold Werner 17:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti in Menden, Germany --Mbdortmund 13:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Am rechten und oberen Rand unscharf --Berthold Werner 17:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Graffiti in Menden, Germany --Mbdortmund 13:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok --Berthold Werner 17:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wooden crosses near the entrance to the church of the Holy Sepulchre. --Adiel lo 07:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good light and composition, sharp --Ianare 14:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mouflon (Ovis musimon) --Spock lone wolf 21:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment please add geolocation. Lycaon 19:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
     Done Added --Spock lone wolf 20:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
    Now I can support.Lycaon 22:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Celebrity Summit in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. --High Contrast 21:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment front of the ship imho overexposured, can you provide a little darker exposure? --Mbdortmund 23:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
    Blown highlights and also rather smallish. Lycaon 09:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) --LC-de 20:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good considering lighting --Ianare 14:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Epiphany Cathedral in Noginsk, Russia --S^[1] 12:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Partly overexposed sky. --Eusebius 21:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timaru Municipal Offices --Karora 11:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion The light is a little bit pale, but QI though. -- MJJR 20:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calidris alba my first pano ... --Ianare 22:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn please evaluate edited version above --Ianare 18:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kitesurfing --Ianare 09:32, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI --Mbdortmund 22:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Quiscalus major showing nictitating membrane --Ianare 04:16, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion interesting because of the membrane --Mbdortmund 22:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two Gonepteryx rhamni --Von.grzanka 19:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not enough colors. WB not correctly configured. --ComputerHotline 07:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Slide frame --Harke 18:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks ok. --Eusebius 21:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gastrophysa viridula copulation --ComputerHotline 09:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Best of the set, correct camera settings --Ianare 18:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apis mellifera in fly --ComputerHotline 09:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline A shame your f-stop was so low, otherwise this would have been a nice image --Ianare 18:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination American Beaver in a marsh, Quebec, Canada.--Cephas 22:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice image, but the animal is unsharp. --Eusebius 12:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hygrometer probe --Harke 18:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Neutral Good depth and layout, but possibly the hygrometer could have slightly better detail. -Karora 07:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support I think it is detailed enough for QI. Maybe not the best background! --Eusebius 12:52, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
     InfoI chose the dark background for better contrast to the probe. --Harke 20:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
    I only wanted to point out that it is a bit grainy. But it doesn't affect my vote. --Eusebius 20:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Apache Trail, Arizona --Bgag 03:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review It's a not too sharp --Ianare 15:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
     Request Please geocode --Siipikarja 20:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC).
     Done: Geocoded --Bgag 21:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rudolf Jelínek during vernissage in Brno --Spock lone wolf 08:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I would crop a little bit more, but quality image with good sharpness.--Lucarelli 08:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Germany, Dinkelsbühl, buildings at the marketplace --Berthold Werner 07:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI. --Karora 09:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Taiaroa Head. --Karora 02:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks OK. Geotag would be great. --Coyau 02:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment Done! --Karora 05:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Palazzo Cavalli-Franchetti in Venice, Italy --Massimo Catarinella 22:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion looks good --Mbdortmund 23:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Train station in Krzywda, Poland
  • Decline Picture is below size requirements, not sharp enough, distorted (look at the left pole, use of graduated filter here negatively affected the outcome. --Spock lone wolf 08:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main entry of the Palace of Fontainebleau. --Eusebius 19:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good. --Karora 02:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) --LC-de 18:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good portrait of the eagle --Mbdortmund 19:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Timber framing in Menden, Germany --Mbdortmund 14:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Seems today is the day of old towers. --Berthold Werner 17:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Relief in St. Vincenz in Menden, Germany --Mbdortmund 14:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition, looks fine --Lucarelli 19:57, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Seafood on a market in Italy--Lucarelli 00:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice. I'd swear I could smell it when I was examining that full-screen! --Karora 00:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Paulin, Trier, Germany --Berthold Werner 13:03, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Foreground is not very aesthetical, but general picture quality is OK. -- MJJR 20:49, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main entrance of Roppe fortifications. --ComputerHotline 16:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Fits the QI criteria. --Coyau 02:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Gondola lift in Otupne - Jasna Ski Resort, Slovakia (renomination) --Pudelek 11:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The season has begun --Böhringer 08:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Сircuit board from SDHC card. (Sorry about size - this is crop from minimum possible focus distance) #!George Shuklin 19:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I want to support, but resolution does not meet requirements. Sorry --Ianare 08:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alamo Square, SF --Bgag 03:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Pudelek 10:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Night panorama of Valparaíso--Karora 00:22, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline too noisy, stitching errors --Pudelek 10:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bakery at the Roppe fortifications. --ComputerHotline 17:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion First I thought it's tilted, but it isen't. There is small barrel distortion but i think it is still QI --Berthold Werner 08:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Spice market --Bgag 03:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice colours --Pudelek 10:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gasometer Oberhausen --Mbdortmund 20:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice atmospheric shot. Gasometer rocks! --AngMoKio 18:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dead squirrel --Lucarelli 23:12, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Awesome composition. Excellent depth of field... --Karora 07:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saline on La Palma, Canary Islands --Kunih 13:51, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Horizon is not horizontal and the white balance needs attention. The left of the composition also seems to me to need to end somehow. --Karora 07:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Shopping mall sign --Specious 02:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline This shows that it was a nice day, and the angle on the sign makes that reasonably attractive in a retro kind of way, but the buildings in the background add untidy clutter. Perhaps the composition would be better from a lower viewpoint, or from a different angle with a more interesting backdrop, or perhaps a lower depth of field might bring the focus more cleanly to the sign. --Karora 05:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Danube in Regensburg --High Contrast 20:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline I think this is too dark --Karora 01:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charles Bridge in Prague --Hareco 19:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice lighting and good colours, but was there no chance of getting all of the bridge in on the right? --Karora 01:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stirling Falls, Milford Sound, New Zealand --Gobeirne 07:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice picture, nice mood, but I think the colour balance is too crude. What about this edited version ? Sting 16:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
    New edited version uploaded JJLudemann 17:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    Thanks for your efforts, but the original is how I remember it looking when you're there! I don't mind it you keep adjusting it though - Gobeirne 19:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    * Finally I think the colour balance doesn't make it and I prefer to decline it for a post-processed version. But regardless of the colour balance, a very nice picture regarding the camera which isn't a high-end model. Sting 00:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
    Fair enough :) Revised version nominated above - Gobeirne 03:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chicago Skyline at dawn. --Dschwen 20:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion So you went back to Chicago (didn't invite me though). I suppose it is good enough altough you could try to minimize noise in the darker areas. Dd you notice the UFO to the left of the DNA building? One more thing: it is a sin to wake up so early in the morning. Why not sunset? -- Alvesgaspar 20:20, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Convent of Christ, Tomar, Portugal. Detail of the pulpit -- Alvesgaspar 18:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 20:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Convent of Christ, Tomar, Portugal. Detail of the round church -- Alvesgaspar 18:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 20:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ixodus ricinus 5x magnification --Richard Bartz 15:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice :-) -- Pro2 16:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Watersplash, blue colored -- Pro2 14:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Technical good, the edge of the pot isn't really fancy and the crop on the right side is a bit tight . but .... let's go QI. --Richard Bartz 15:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Watersplash -- Pro2 14:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion certainly QI-material --Mbdortmund 20:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River Odra (Oder) in Zdzieszowice (Deschowitz, Oderthal), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 13:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks ok.Pro2 16:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle and wooden wall in Chudów (Chudow), Upper Silesia --Pudelek 13:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Same here.Pro2 16:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ciconia ciconia in fly --ComputerHotline 10:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good momentPro2 16:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• * Nomination Dale Chihuly: The Nature of Glass --Bgag 23:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC) * Decline Much areas are overexposed -- Pro2 16:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Nomination Dale Chihuly: The Nature of Glass --Bgag 23:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Much areas are overexposed -- Pro2 16:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle in Chudow, Upper Silesia --Pudelek 11:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Technically good, interesting subject, big resolution. Does it only look, or is the subject slightly tilted counter-clockwise? If so, could you please fix it. Please geocode. Good work Pudelek. --Siipikarja 19:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
     Info new version and location :) --Pudelek 09:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Seems like you lost some of the sharpness in the rotation process. The original is sharper. Thanks for the coordinates. --Siipikarja 21:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Upss... 3rd version - I think now sharpness is OK --Pudelek 09:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support Approved. --Siipikarja 01:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Ajaja ajaja --ComputerHotline 17:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Neutral Good composition, but too shallow DOF, the legs are not in focus. Also, overexposure in the middle. --Siipikarja 10:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Training on Rollgliss abseiling device --HBR 15:21, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Petrol station in Skovshoved, Copenhagen, Denmark by Arne Jacobsen--Villy Fink Isaksen 20:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality --Ianare 05:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forrest sunlight and snow by Yann nom Gnangarra 03:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline A very nice view but bad focus on top --Ianare 05:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Museum in Podzamcze --Sfu 21:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Subject is shot from a bad angle. Would be better if it was shot perpendicularly. --Siipikarja 10:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
    The same with tree. Sfu 10:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose per comments. why didn't you simply oppose? --Ianare 05:52, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Donkeys in the Karst of Ljubotič. --High Contrast 20:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Some areas are a little overexposed, but pleasant composition --Ianare 05:49, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination --Alejo2083 15:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Not very sharp, noise --Ianare 05:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Newspaper building in Freising, Germany --High Contrast 06:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Foreground is disturbing. --ComputerHotline 13:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Theatre of Dougga, Tunisia --Bgag 16:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 10:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bamberg Cathedral, Veit Stoß Altar --Berthold Werner 11:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: River-Cruise ship at the Gangway. --High Contrast 11:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Ruins of the castle in Szubin -- Albertus teolog 09:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The Bundesautobahn 3 in Regensburg. --High Contrast 06:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Coragyps atratus in Florida --Ianare 02:19, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Totem pole, Monument Valley --Bgag 21:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 09:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Montezuma Castle National Monument, Arizona --Bgag 02:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 09:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Washhouse of Roppe fortifications. --ComputerHotline 16:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colors and good composition --Lucarelli 23:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Archer in Bydgoszcz -- Albertus teolog 10:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Poor ligting revealed CA, and made background too bright. --Sfu 18:39, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The marine diatom Odontella aurita --Rex shock 11:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good considering subject. Could you add a scale indicator ? --Ianare 14:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
     Info new cropped and cleaned up version with a scalebar --Rex shock
• 
  • Nomination Anuradhapura site, Sri Lanka --Bgag 23:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Interesting place but picture suffers form CA and some noise. --Sfu 06:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tiroler Bergschafe --Böhringer 13:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Excellent composition. TimVickers 19:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Map of Schloss Nordkirchen, Germany by Devilm25 --Mbdortmund 20:05, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality maps are always welcome. A version with English legend would be a bonus. --Siipikarja 20:08, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River powerplant Muehltal, Germany. Power: 70 Mio KWh/jear --Richard Bartz 17:29, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Wow! Beautiful. --Siipikarja 19:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gun turret of Roppe fortifications. --ComputerHotline 16:56, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion interesting picture, good solution of the difficult light-conditions --Mbdortmund 20:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Castle in Chudow, Upper Silesia --Pudelek 11:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Technically good, interesting subject, big resolution. Please geocode --Siipikarja 19:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
     Info +location :) --Pudelek 09:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Headframes at the Houthalen coal mine in Belgium -- Paul Hermans 18:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 16:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sterna maxima in flight --Ianare 01:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 16:59, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Royal tern in flight --Ianare 16:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Correct exposure and details. --ComputerHotline 17:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall in Maciejowice, Poland. --Sfu 21:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion The cars and the rubble are not very aesthetical, but QI though. -- MJJR 18:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: River Gąsawka -- Albertus teolog 06:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 17:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Can you rotate the picture 0.8 degree CW, please ? I'll support, then --Richard Bartz 18:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
    done Danke für den Hinweis --Mbdortmund 20:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
    
    Now QI --Richard Bartz 17:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ski lift on Chopok in January --Pudelek 15:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and very interesting Albertus teolog 14:14, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
     Request Please geocode --Siipikarja 20:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC).
     Info done --Pudelek 09:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A canal in Margate --Ianare 06:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good image, lovely place. Yann 16:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
     Request Please geocode --Siipikarja 20:11, 21 April 2009 (UTC).
     Comment Privacy issues prevent me from geocoding. It is also a fairly typical view of canals in that city and therefore not much would be gained anyway. --Ianare 21:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garden under the snow. Yann 22:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion pretty garden --Ianare 14:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A tower near a coal mine in Germany Abigor 18:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review Pls put it into categories. --AngMoKio 21:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
    One big nasty dust spot. Otherwise quite OK. Is it denoised? --Eusebius 08:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: El Gouna (Egypt): Golf Club. -- MJJR 19:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Could be sharper. Nice perspective. The poles in the ceiling create interesting shadows. --Siipikarja 19:24, 10 April 2009 (UTC) --  Done: sharpened -- MJJR 21:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pseudatelus sp --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 04:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 12:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination White Stork --Richard Bartz 15:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good -- Pro2 12:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination House sparrow -- Muhammad Mahdi Karim 13:36, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Richard Bartz 15:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Door in Sidi Bou Said --Bgag 03:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion lovely --Ianare 18:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination roadside shrine in Mizerów. --Iksnigo 23:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok for me --Berthold Werner 06:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View from Bergisel to Innsbruck --Böhringer 20:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice view. Yann 10:24, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tulip (Tulipa) -- MJJR 19:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality -- Pro2 14:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tulip (Tulipa) -- MJJR 19:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Same here -- Pro2 14:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Singer and guitarist Marina, Hautecombe. Yann 12:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Should be cropped --Mbdortmund 16:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment Further cropped. Yann 21:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    looks good now, good atmosphere --Mbdortmund 18:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Venusinsel Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 21:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good and nice Albertus teolog 07:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Good, but does not have sufficient information on its copyright status. --Siipikarja 10:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    What is with Panoramafreiheit? And i think the Author is longer dead than 70 years. -- Pro2 11:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    Sorry, license added --Mbdortmund 16:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support Definitely a QI. (Pictures without a copyright status get automagically deleted, nothing to do with freedom of panorama. --Siipikarja 21:27, 19 April 2009 (UTC))
    Oh sorry. I have not seen that the license was missing. The word "copyright" was confusing me. -- Pro2 14:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 3-pic panorama of the Civita di Bagnoregio --Alejo2083 08:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks ok --High Contrast 11:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 21:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Common Woodsorrel (Oxalis acetosella) --LC-de 19:56, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good, shows plant and environment --Ianare 18:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Super Mirage 4000 --Pline 16:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chairlift in January 2009. Late afternoon, Chopok, Slovakia --Pudelek 15:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: TV station on Chopok, Slovakia --Pudelek 15:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chopok, Slovakia. Old chairlift - excluded from use. --Pudelek 15:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chairlift, Jasná Ski Resort, Slovakia --Pudelek 13:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review A bit on the dark side, but snow is a difficult subject. Hmm... --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Piston valve of a trumpet. --Eusebius 21:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks clear and sharp. QI. But may be better to crop it more tightly? It will be less nice, but more situable for illustrative purposes. #!George Shuklin 01:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Three Graces in Bydgoszcz -- Albertus teolog 06:47, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline unfotunate lighting, sculpture on the right hand to dark --Mbdortmund 16:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Colorful dreidels --Adiel lo 16:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline DOF, distracting foreground --Mbdortmund 16:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Butterfly on Lady's Smock --Paul Hermans 16:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline much too small (take a look at the Guidelines), too noisy --LC-de 17:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mallards (Anas platyrhynchos) --LC-de 20:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion exif-daten? --Böhringer 18:25, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
    Wozu? --LC-de 20:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC) zum lernen? --Böhringer 20:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Syrian brown bear (Ursus arctos syriacus) --3268zauber 08:59, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline A bit noisy, slight CA. --Eusebius 11:04, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 01:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination A hungry squirrel --Dellex 16:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Downsampled too much: the size of the details in the tail and on the head are below current resolution, it doesn't look so good. --Eusebius 10:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Pompeii with Mount Vesuvius in the background --High Contrast 08:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment looks slightly tilted to the right --Mbdortmund 20:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
     CommentSame remark as for the second version of the latest nomination of this picture: I think the foreground should be sharper. --Eusebius 21:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Angel on Ponte Sant'Angelo in Rome --Unacerilla 01:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment The sky could be digitally smoothened to get rid of the slight noise. The pigeon on the bottom has been cropped to half. --Siipikarja 19:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC) Oppose tilted, cropped pigeon is distracting --Ianare 16:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
    It is good enough to invest some time in it --Mbdortmund 17:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Passes through the river in Bydgoszcz -- Albertus teolog 22:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Interesting subject. Could be better technically: some overexposure in the background, lighting is not ideal, would benefit from a shallower DOF. Excellent composition. A good presentation of the subject anyhow. --Siipikarja 10:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tulip (Tulipa) -- MJJR 20:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good enough. --Siipikarja 10:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Archer in Bydgoszcz -- Albertus teolog 19:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Unfortunate lighting, the main subject is too dark. --Siipikarja 10:53, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Forrest sunlight and snow. Yann 18:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Not sharp enough from the top. --Siipikarja 10:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination PCI Network Card --Harke 18:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good job --Mr.checker 18:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support Well done. --Siipikarja 10:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Acinonyx jubatus --ComputerHotline 18:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Artistic approach, but the main subject is too small. Too much black/dark regions. --Siipikarja 10:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pelecanus crispus --ComputerHotline 17:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Some CA in the wing. A QI nevertheless. --Siipikarja 10:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aegypius monachus --ComputerHotline 17:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Ianare 20:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support Minor overexposure in the tree stump and in the tail, but still a QI. --Siipikarja 10:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eudocimus ruber --ComputerHotline 17:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Main subject too small. --Siipikarja 10:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Penny Market store in Germany. --High Contrast 11:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Too dark, jpg-noise, bad possition -- HBR 15:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mono Lake, CA, USA --James J. Ludemann 08:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment The horizon seems to be slightly inclined clockwise. --Siipikarja 10:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Rotated 0.9 deg. CCW. --James J. Ludemann 12:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support Definitely better now. Passes for me. --Siipikarja 09:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination en:Kamehameha I statue in Honolulu, Hawaii. Frontal-J JMesserly 07:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn  Comment Good, but the perspective should be corrected. The vertical lines in the background wall are inclined. --Siipikarja 10:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
    Seems OK to me, difficult to solve the problems better --Mbdortmund 20:39, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
    I'm going to reshoot this with tripod. -J JMesserly 01:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Better now, but still a little blurry (see the fingers). Reshooting with a tripod is a good idea, the subject is indeed worth photographing. If you plan to reshoot, why not withdraw this entry? --Siipikarja 09:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    Sorry, I would have, if I was more familiar with process. Thanks for the assistance. -J JMesserly 09:50, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sautadets Waterfalls. --High Contrast 20:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great shot! Kallerna 15:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination I think it will be rejected, but an attempt is it worth. This guy was really small..--Pro2 17:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Composition is good. DOF is 2 shallow - aperature of f/5.6 is insufficient. Focus isn't tight - motion blur can be avoided, sorry. Da siehst du mal selbst wie schwierig es ist messerscharfe Makros hinzubekommen. Weitermachen das wird schon --Richard Bartz 18:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
    Ich hoffe doch. Es war halt 1. sehr schwierig, da überhaupt noch was gutes hinzubekommen da es schon recht dunkel war. 2. hab ich als Schüler nicht soviel Geld, ich spare immer noch auf ein Makroobjektiv. Da ist das schon ein gutes Ergebnis! *g* --Pro2 22:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
    ... mach dir keine Sorgen --Richard Bartz 13:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC) Beachtliches Ergebnis ohne Makro--Harke 17:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Statue of Heavenly Guardian, Shanghai Museum --Lošmi 08:22, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Nice composition, but EXIF data missing. Too much noise. Yann 11:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bardenas Reales, Spain --Wenkbrauwalbatros 16:27, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting subject, nice composition, good lighting despite the rather gloomy weather. -- MJJR 21:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Map of Lorentz National Park, in Papua, Indonesia. --Sémhur 12:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good map, but the North arrow is redundant with the grid lines and unnecessary. Sting 16:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support Very well done. --Siipikarja 10:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winery in Sonoma Valley --Bgag 03:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Compression artifacts. --Siipikarja 09:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: The Mirage Hotel in Las Vegas --High Contrast 16:23, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Television tower on the Brotjacklriegel --High Contrast 16:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination "St. Jobst" church in Rehau, Bavaria --Mr.checker 10:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sky is overexposed in some small parts, and it's too bright as for me. I suppose you have taken the picture in not very late afternoon. What about taking the picture in the summer in later afternoon? According to map lighting conditions should be much better then. But I think the picture is technicaly good anyway. Sfu 09:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment Yes, it was around 3 to 4 pm.. --Mr.checker 22:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose The sky is distractingly bright on the right. --Siipikarja 09:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chairlift in the fog. Chopok, Slovakia --Pudelek 14:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose No clear subject, lack of focus, a bit of CA on left. --Siipikarja 09:28, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Henry's Elfin (Callophrys henrici) --Meganmccarty 13:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline excessive noise --Ianare 20:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ensemble of buildings in Baden-Baden --3268zauber 11:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment perspektive should be corrected --Mbdortmund 21:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Perspective distortion. --Siipikarja 09:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Miyagawa River, Takayama --Bgag 04:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky and buildings --Ianare 20:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Franziskanerkirche in Dortmund, sky --Mbdortmund 20:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Neutral I see the point in the composition but I'm not convinced, I think it lacks a clearer subject. --Eusebius 08:53, 16 April 2009 (UTC) Support I like the 'ordered chaos' in this image --Ianare 20:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Southern Crowned Pigeon -- Pro2 10:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Definitely a QI. Love the pastel background. --Siipikarja 10:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination en:Kamehameha I statue in Honolulu, Hawaii. 3/4 view-J JMesserly 07:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Too tight crop at the bottom. Washed out sky. --Siipikarja 10:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination en:Kamehameha I statue in Honolulu, Hawaii. Detail.-J JMesserly 07:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Image has become blurred because of hand shaking, see the fingers of the statue. --Siipikarja 10:15, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Elephas maximus, Sri Lanka --Bgag 00:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Chromatic aberration, overexposed water. --Siipikarja 10:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mining rescue stretcher, German Mining Museum --HBR 00:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline There is low level of light and not much detail on it. Lots of interference with colour: not very smooth etc. Jolly Janner 02:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Head of Pelecanus occidentalis --Ianare 05:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline the beak is also part of the head and should be complete Gnangarra 03:22, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment but then you would not get the same amount of detail --Ianare 13:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruins in Podzamcze, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland. --Sfu 21:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Ok --Berthold Werner 10:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The River Stour in Canterbury, England. --High Contrast 20:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Technically perfect. --Massimo Catarinella 10:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Knole House in Kent in South East England. --High Contrast 20:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Maybe perspektive is somewhat curious on the left side, but IMHO still ok for QI --Berthold Werner 17:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Avebury Manor in Wiltshire, England. --High Contrast 20:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion QI, yes of course --Richard Bartz 20:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
    Adding geolocation would be nice --Berthold Werner 11:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Silhouette shot of a balloon over Luxor - Egypt. -- Marcosleal
  • Promotion nice motive and atmosphere --Mbdortmund 21:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support Very well done! --Siipikarja 10:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination panorama at Rurberg, Germany --Tobi 87 12:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice stitching job but unfortunately the image is too dark, with many underexposed areas. --Ianare 15:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A "postbox" for anonym denunciations in Venezia --Berthold Werner 09:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details and lighting --Ianare 15:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Expressway-Church Baden-Baden (St. Christophorus) --3268zauber 22:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Poor lighting condtions. Perspective makes the monument tilted. --Sfu 09:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Entrance to Hypernova, Ružomberok, Slovakia --Pudelek 14:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Seminole Theatre, Homestead, Florida --Dschwen 17:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Nice composition. Lot's of nothing in the sky, roughly 1/4th of the picture is plain black. Color noise in the wall on right. --Siipikarja 19:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC) Support good composition and exposure --Ianare 16:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Golden Virgin on Notre-Dame des Doms, Avignon. Yann 22:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Main subject unsharp? -- Pro2 14:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment Unsharp, really? Compare with this one: File:Virgin Mary - Avignon Cathedral - 20050823.jpg. The sky is nicer, and we don't see the lightning conductor, but I think mine is sharper and we see more of the base. Yann 10:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support it's sharp enough, everything else is good --Ianare 16:42, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruins of the castle in Szubin -- Albertus teolog 07:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed, blurry. It would help, if you retake the photo with better light condidtions. --LC-de 10:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town Hall, Annemasse, Haute-Savoie, France. Yann 00:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline the weather vain on the roof is cutoff and the foreground statue falling away from the centre image, the dull weather doesnt help all combined sorry. Gnangarra 03:28, 17 April 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the comment. I corrected statue perspective. Yann 09:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panorama from Islands Brygge in Copenhagen --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Wonderfull quality! Almost featured quality, although I wouldn't know, but really valuable photograph as well. --Jolly Janner 20:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trees covered in frost. Yann 17:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion There are some problems, but I love the light at the trees.--Mbz1 17:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heart urchins --3268zauber 17:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise, too much blue --Ianare 18:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grimspound circle by user:Herbythyme--Mbz1 16:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC))
  • Promotion Clear photograph. Very good considering the weather. --Jolly Janner 16:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yulan-Magnolie --Böhringer 15:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good!--Mbz1 17:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Furcifer oustaleti --Bgag 14:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion IMO could be FP too.--Mbz1 17:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Glass-made Christmas bauble. --Eusebius 13:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice.--Mbz1 17:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Hummingbird Hawk-moth --FF23-fr 11:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Please sort file into categories. --AngMoKio 15:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
    *Well focused and good detail. It has now been categorised. --Jolly Janner 20:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pertisau am Achensee --Böhringer 07:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful!--Mbz1 16:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen Westtor --Mbdortmund 20:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality's just fine, a little bit of noise on the bottom of the image, but in an acceptable amount --Mr.checker 11:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old church in Gończyce, Poland. --Sfu 20:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion looks good --Pudelek 23:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ruins of the castle in Szubin -- Albertus teolog 08:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion It's Ok for me --Pudelek 23:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Woman of Madagascar --Bgag 17:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks like some sort of dust/sand spot to the bottom left of her left eye. If this isn't a camera problem and is a marking on her skin, then I will promote. --Jolly Janner 14:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC) It is bizarre. I have corrected the spot and imported a new version. --Bgag 21:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ogimachi Village, Japan --Bgag 04:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion sharp, clear --Ianare 06:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: A crossing tower in Dijon. --Eusebius 19:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Might benefit from increased contrast. There's a strange halo effect between the roof and the sky. Is it a result of CA removal? --Siipikarja 19:49, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
     InfoNope, no CA removal, no other postprocessing that the one stated: "tilt, vignetting, colours adjusted". --Eusebius 19:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
     Neutral Okay, thanks for the info. I stay neutral with this one. --Siipikarja 20:02, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: baby alligator closeup --Ianare 22:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment Might benefit from cropping. Lower right corner is overexposed. --Siipikarja 19:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Looking east down North Ave. in Chicago. --Dschwen 17:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Nice perspective. There are identifiable persons on the left, the image should be tagged with a "Personality rights warning" template. There's perhaps a little too big contrast between the bright sky and the rest of the picture. --Siipikarja 19:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC) -- Nice perspective indeed. The sky is bright, but not overexposed. The identifiable (?) persons are no problem IMO. This is QI for me. -- MJJR 21:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Losslessly cropped version of File:Fly Agaric mushroom 04.jpg which has been already approved but some users complained about its composition while being nominated for a featured picture. --Miraceti 08:30, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good details, I supported already the FPI --Mbdortmund 09:29, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination male mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) --LC-de 22:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion The colours on the waves aren't smooth at low resolution, but the duck is of high quality, which is the most important thing. --Jolly Janner 22:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gate to Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall --AngMoKio 21:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good quality vielleicht ne Warnung zu den Persönlichkeitrechten wegen des Kindes? --Mbdortmund 00:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
    Ich denke das sollte noch ok sein, wenn aber jemand das Kind wegstempeln kann wäre ich dankbar - ich bin da leider kein Experte --AngMoKio 08:19, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Ol rectory in Gończyce, Poland. --Sfu 20:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. Is this a stitched pano? Why? ---donald- 20:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
    Just copy&paste from another picture. Sfu 20:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laufwasserkraftwerk Aschheim Speichersee --Richard Bartz 17:50, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very well done! Machst du eingentlich ein Praktikum im Wasserkraftwerk oder ist das ein neues Hobby von dir? ;-) --AngMoKio 18:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
    Die Kraftwerke stehen hier alle immer so rum wenn ich mit dem Hund spazieren gehe (Huskie - braucht viel Auslauf, ohne Verkehr). Durch die Komplexität (Zäune, Dachschindeln usw.) eignen die sich bestens um Panos zu üben, bevor ich bald an die dicken Dinger in der Stadtmitte drangehe. --Richard Bartz 18:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An ink eraser. What do you mean, "no wow"? --Eusebius 20:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion No Wow, but QI -- Pro2 22:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
    Perspective correction needed, horizon is tilted --Richard Bartz 22:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC) and washed out sky and background... --Mbdortmund 23:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
    ... HDR would have worked best --Richard Bartz 11:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
    It is a conspiracy. With a comment every 24h, this wonderful image will mechanically never be promoted. Do you think I don't see what you're doing? Plain anti-stationery censorship. --Eusebius 12:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC) This is no conspiracy. I never told anybody to lie, not a single time; never. These allegations are false. --LC-de 11:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Prunus cerasus -- Pro2 19:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad lightning. ---donald- 20:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Windmill in Belgium --High Contrast 18:42, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--AngMoKio 21:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 17:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I fixed the barrel distortion (17mm!) for you, now it's ok --Richard Bartz 18:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC) thx, should have seen that, too many pictures at the moment, need a pause --Mbdortmund 21:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Flatiron Building, Manhattan (New York City) --FF23-fr 16:31, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed clouds. --Sfu 20:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view from the top of Chacaltaya (5421m), Bolivia --Chmehl 15:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great view, perfect stitch as far as I can see. But doesn't it have a small ccw tilt? --Dschwen 19:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
    Hmm, really hard to say because elevation of the land is increasing to the right (La Paz to the left is at about 3500-4000m, the mountain to the right is over 6000m high). When stitching, I tried to orientate myself at the bottom of the clouds which should be fairly horizontal... What do you think? --Chmehl 20:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
    OK, I checked the pano again. Now, I also think there was a tilt and also a little bend in the horizon. I uploaded two new versions of which I think the last one is the best. What do you think now? --Chmehl 21:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
    Agree. Looks great now. Ultimately you (or someone who knows the subject) have to decide on the tilt. --Dschwen 21:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Entrance East at the Leipzig Book Fair 2009 --High Contrast 16:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky. ---donald- 20:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Sculpture in Schloss Nordkirchen, Germany --Mbdortmund 04:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Grave of three lightning victims, Veenhuizen, The Netherlands -- Wutsje 17:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Quality good enough for me, I like the colours and the lighting. The panorama ratio is a strange choice given the subject, but it's nice. --Eusebius 09:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• * Nomination: A Cross-Country class 221 passes through Parson Street station on its way southwards. Mattbuck 20:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)~ * * Review needed
  • Nomination: A Cross-Country class 221 passes through Parson Street station on its way southwards. Mattbuck 20:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)~
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Female Mallard (renomination) -- Pro2 13:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review  Comment imagine, somebody would publish a picture of you in such a position ;) --Mbdortmund 14:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
    Wäre ja quasi anonym ohne Kopf :D -- Pro2 21:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nordkirchen castle, Germany --Mbdortmund 10:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Crop is a bit tight on the left side. Details are good for the given size, perspective on the roof is a bit strange - 2nd opinion ? --Richard Bartz 12:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Charles Bridge tower at night/Turm von Karlsbrücke nachts --Wind 17:46, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion beautiful night photo --Ilya78 11:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, eastern part --Mbdortmund 17:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like it --3268zauber 19:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument Valley (Arizona,Utah/USA) --FF23-fr 09:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Below 2 MPix, artifical colours --Berthold Werner 12:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common Woodsorrel (Oxalis acetosella) --LC-de 05:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice Bukeh and good impression of the flower --Mbdortmund 12:43, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leiocephalus carinatus Last lizard pic for a long while I swear :-) --Ianare 06:47, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion DOF a bit shallow but has the quality --Richard Bartz 23:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 01:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok --Berthold Werner 12:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wattled Crane --Ltshears 18:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice details --Ianare 14:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bryce Canyon National Park --FF23-fr 18:41, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Way below 2Mpix, weird colors. --Dschwen 21:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A night shot in Schepdaal Belgium Abigor 19:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. Mattbuck 18:55, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Parking in Donovaly, Slovakia --Pudelek 18:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Footbridge in Donovaly, Slovakia --Pudelek 18:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: State road 59 in Donovaly, Slovakia. --Pudelek 18:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Champaign police car, Champaign, Illinois. --Dschwen 15:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Downtown Sidney! Well.. .. Sidney, Illinois :-) --Dschwen 15:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Sheraton Miramar Resort. -- MJJR 21:04, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Tamr Henna Square. -- MJJR 21:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Anıtkabir (Mausoleum of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk) in Ankara --Darwinek 20:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too much noise reduction, little detail left and edges look very soft. --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winding tower of a former coal mine in Dortmund, Germany --Mbdortmund 19:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Dschwen 21:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Neptunbrunnen in Baden-Baden --3268zauber 07:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review * Comment perspektive should be corrected --Mbdortmund 23:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC) - Sorry, but I have no equipment to do so --3268zauber 19:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)* Comment What do you think about File:Baden-Baden Neptunbrunnen 1885a.JPG, there is still a little distortion in it, which is difficult to kill... --Mbdortmund 22:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC) * Comment What a difference! It looks much better in your version! --3268zauber 18:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC) If you like it, exchange the picture, perhaps someone promotes the edit, I cannot, because of my edit --Mbdortmund 00:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC) * Comment Many thanks! But it´s your edit, so you may nominate it, if you´d like to --3268zauber 08:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC) ** Comment it stays your picture, the edit was very simple --Mbdortmund 21:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 01:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion godd composition and textures --Ianare 06:45, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination (Inachis io) on (Salix caprea) --Richard Bartz 23:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well done --3268zauber 00:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laufwasserkraftwerk Oberföhring Isarwerk 3, Munich, Germany --Richard Bartz 22:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion saubere Arbeit --Mbdortmund 01:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Robert De Niro -- Pro2 21:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well done, good quality --Richard Bartz 22:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Almond blossoms (Prunus dulcis) --3268zauber 14:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Sieht gut als Thumb aus, in der Vollansicht leider nicht mehr -- Pro2 15:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fritillaria meleagris on Ljubljana marsh, Slovenia --Yerpo 13:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. -- Pro2 15:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A James's Flamingo at Laguna Hedionda in Bolivia. --Chmehl 08:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great shot. --Dschwen 19:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination James's Flamingos at Laguna Hedionda in Bolivia. --Chmehl 07:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion personally would add a little more contrast, but good regardless --Ianare 09:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
    Lovely. Please keep it just like it is, contrast is fine, it does not need any sexing-up. --Dschwen 19:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, gate --Mbdortmund 15:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)--
  • Promotion Ansprechende Bildkomposition --3268zauber 09:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Trier, Konstantinbasilika --Berthold Werner 17:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Flagler Beach, Florida. --Dschwen 15:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion What happend to the upper left corner, did you use a pol-filter? --Berthold Werner 18:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC), yes, but the sun is close to the right edge of the frame. This, combined with the light coastal haze also contributes to the gradient. --Dschwen 18:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC) -- I opened that pic several times, and finally I think it's really a QI. Moreover, I like very much the special atmosphere in it. -- MJJR 21:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Opale Coast, Pas de Calais --Pline 12:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Mission Santa Barbara --Bgag 03:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 17:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Because of the perspective. --Eusebius 21:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kusakabe House, Takayama --Bgag 03:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review slightly tilted to the left, perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 00:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Brihadeeswarar Temple, Thanjavur --Bgag 03:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks ok --High Contrast 10:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sea tractor. --Jolly Janner 21:44, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality.--Mbz1 01:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Another sunrise at North Point park, Milwaukee Dori 20:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion An interesting one.--Mbz1 01:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC) Lovely. Yann 08:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laguna Colorada in Bolivia. --Chmehl 09:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion well done! --AngMoKio 12:48, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Appliance 669 Gnangarra 06:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality and composition. kallerna 12:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Løvøy old trading center with Engeløya in the background. The image was taken by user:finnrind --Mbz1 00:04, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details --Mbdortmund 01:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support loneliness and freedom, very good --Dellex 09:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, chinese sculpture --Mbdortmund 16:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Die Dame hat einen schönen Schwung --Dellex 17:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mussel culture, Wissant Bay, Pas de Calais --Pline 10:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great composition, interesting image. kallerna 12:37, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Grave sculpture, Ostfriedhof, Dortmund --Mbdortmund 10:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: The tough life of the alligator --Ianare 03:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: School bus interior detail: body fluid cleanup kit :-). --Dschwen 22:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Anti-Sarko graffiti. --Eusebius 21:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Winding tower of a former coal mine in Dortmund, Germany --Mbdortmund 19:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Inflorescence of Aloe hereroensis, Namibia.--Marco Schmidt 12:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review DOF is a bit too shallow. The center of the flower should be in focus too. --Dschwen 16:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trier, St. Paulin --Berthold Werner 14:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks ok --High Contrast 19:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination TV station on Chopok, Slovakia --Pudelek 14:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting --High Contrast 19:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Versetalsperre Lüdenscheid -- Pro2 22:32, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Blown out sky, lack of sharpness --High Contrast 07:45, 11 April 2009 (UTC) Die Idee ist halt die Spiegelung des Kondensstreifens, schon interessant aber doch ein wenig dunkel. --Mbdortmund 10:45, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
    Ok, danke. Jetzt weiß ich zumindest endlich wie der Streifen heißt -- Pro2 11:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC); Was die Idee des Bildes ist, ist von subjektiver Dimension ;-) --High Contrast 13:25, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Alcea setosa. --MathKnight 18:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Question Have you done a clone work on the image? The tree branch on the left hand side seems to be hanging in the sky.Thank you--Mbz1 00:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC) * I did not retouched the image. I put it as it is. --MathKnight 10:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC) really good details on the main object, the background is not perfect, did you try a tighter crop? --Mbdortmund 10:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
    * Support A nice one.--Mbz1 12:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Round barn in Urbana, Illinois. --Dschwen 14:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion not the most exciting subject but well taken photo --Ianare 09:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Striking the colors. --Dschwen 14:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Great subject, nice colors!--Mbz1 05:57, 11 April 2009 (UTC) [1]
• 
  • Nomination Chicago police car, fast pan. --Dschwen 22:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Ianare 09:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jerusalem, Dome of the rock --Berthold Werner 13:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very good --Ianare 09:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Kiasma, contemporary art museum located in Helsinki. kallerna 11:12, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Straßburger Münster, Damen --Mbdortmund 02:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Daffodil (Narcissus) --3268zauber 20:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Main subject is a bit underexposed. --Dschwen 15:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
    agree --Ianare 09:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Assisi, Basilica San Francesco --Berthold Werner 08:56, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good exposure and the dove/pidgeon is a nice touch Gnangarra 09:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Appliance 671 Gnangarra 06:49, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion upper parts of the heli slightly overexposured, but else good management of the contre-light-situation. --Mbdortmund 10:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Leiocephalus carinatus --Ianare 05:54, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I would prefer a little tighter crop but good details and colours --Mbdortmund 10:43, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Victoria Crowned Pigeon. ----Ltshears 20:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion A little noisy but otherwise OK --Ianare 05:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, chinese sculpture --Mbdortmund 16:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like it --3268zauber 20:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, main building --Mbdortmund 15:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)--
  • Promotion Well done. --AngMoKio 16:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination King Alfred's Tower from the west --High Contrast 11:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK --Mbdortmund 17:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pulteney bridge in Bath --High Contrast 11:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good -- Pro2 15:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Goethe University in Frankfurt --High Contrast 11:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Low resolution, below 2 MP -- Pro2 15:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC); The 2-MP-criteria is not a knock out criteria. This rule is more for 'easy to take'-images which this one isn't. --High Contrast 16:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Panoramic view of the Ostrachtal in Bavaria --High Contrast 11:56, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice -- Pro2 15:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Das Backhaus in Croya --High Contrast 11:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks nice -- Pro2 15:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An abandoned Coal mine in Belgium Abigor 19:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline too small --Ianare 06:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tap in form of a duck head --3268zauber 08:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Camera has a noise problem, but subject disguises this enough to pass requirements. You have some very nice photos, would like to see what you could do with a SLR type camera. --Ianare 06:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower of Melanchthon-Church in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 20:57, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK. --Berthold Werner 08:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination BMW Welt, Munich, Germany --Richard Bartz 01:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice -- Pro2 11:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
    Beautiful! Why is the EXIF missing camera data? --Siipikarja 19:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hippo tail --3268zauber 13:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline overexposed --Ianare 06:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Piatt County Veterans Memorial. --Dschwen 00:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details, good exposure --Mbdortmund 18:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church San Lorenzo, Fauglia, Tuscany --Lucarelli 23:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion looks good --Mbdortmund 18:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gravesculpture in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 21:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline tis unfortunately over exposed on the statue Gnangarra 08:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): garden -- MJJR 20:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good composition Gnangarra 08:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Art Village -- MJJR 20:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion OK --Mbdortmund 18:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lantern, Kenroku-en garden --Bgag 17:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline lantern obstructed by the tree Gnangarra 09:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saguaro, Arizona --Bgag 17:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Compression artefacts, can you upload a less compressed version? --Berthold Werner 18:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment I have imported another version. Hope it is better --Bgag 11:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
    Now ok for me. --Berthold Werner 09:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An Aldabra Giant Tortoise --Yotcmdr 21:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Blurred from the corners. --Siipikarja 19:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support subject is in focus --Ianare 06:15, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stout Arch, Mystery Valley --Bgag 20:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Comment Aggressive lighting - a very strong contrast between the darks and lights. --Siipikarja 19:54, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
    * Support For the location composition might be as good as it gets.Lighting is OK with me--Mbz1 03:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus) --Bgag 20:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose The main subject is too small in relation to the whole picture. --Siipikarja 19:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): lagoon house. -- MJJR 19:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Details have been washed out from the upper part of the wall. --Siipikarja 19:18, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination baby alligators --Ianare 22:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Overexposed rocks on right. --Siipikarja 19:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose after downpour --3268zauber 10:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline nice idea but leaf is cropped on the right.. -- Pro2 15:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose Lovely colors, but an unfortunately tight crop. Also, a bit noisy. --Siipikarja 19:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lewis Hamilton 2008 --AngMoKio 00:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Neutral Good composition, quality OK, but the other photographer ruins it. --Eusebius 15:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
     Oppose What Eusebius said. A regrettable decline as this is a very good picture otherwise. --Siipikarja 19:45, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Chairlift - Jasná Ski Resort, Slovakia --Pudelek 22:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Information table in Jasná Ski Resort, Low Tatras, Slovakia --Pudelek 22:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: El Gouna (Egypt): lagoon houses. -- MJJR 20:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Chairlift - Jasná Ski Resort, Slovakia --Pudelek 16:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Narcissus pseudonarcissus -- Pro2 12:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Computer simulation of heat sink temperatures --Harke 14:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Tamr Henna square. -- MJJR 20:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Fine with me.--Mbz1 03:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Frühling am Sulzberg --Böhringer 14:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Composition is good, but Quality.. (unsharp in the corners?) -- Pro2 14:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
     Support The place is very beautiful, the composition is great and the sharpness is good enough.--Mbz1 03:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Operations room in a NATO old base at the Salbert hill. --ComputerHotline 09:11, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Black areas top left and left bottom --High Contrast 11:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Domestic Goose -- Pro2 23:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 02:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Unidentified crocus --3268zauber 15:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nicht schlecht, früher hatte ich mal die TZ1. :-) -- Pro2 21:27, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Exercise in contre-jour. S. Martinho do porto, Portugal. -- Alvesgaspar 10:29, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Sunset in the Everglades with decorative Lensflare ;-) --Dschwen 17:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like small doses of flare. Thank you for not making it into an atmospheric condition. -- carol 19:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Nantes castle, tower of the Old Keep. --Eusebius 14:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Anas platyrhynchos, male, female --Richard Bartz 01:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Auf dem Weg von der Mikrobe zum Elefenaten eine gelungene Ente... --Mbdortmund 01:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
    .. und die hundefressenden [Killergänse] --Richard Bartz 11:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Puncak Jaya's glaciers evolution. --Sémhur 18:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion well done animation, documented --Ianare 21:47, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rose with hoarfrost --3268zauber 09:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice image. Yann 12:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Bourget Lake and Revard Mountain from Hautecombe Abbey. Yann 16:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Review I'am wondering why the tree is in focus and not the coastline --Richard Bartz 16:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gravesculpture in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 21:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice shot --AngMoKio 21:49, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination New Yorker Hotel. --Dschwen 19:39, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion ugly building, good photo -- Pro2 22:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gravestone of the Holocaust victim Fritz Wohl at the National Cemetery in Terezin, Czech Republic. --Faigl.ladislav 19:04, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion interesting motiv, good details --Mbdortmund 00:00, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Everglades NP Ranger Station in Flamingo, Florida. --Dschwen 15:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion All ok, but where are the flamingos ;-) --Berthold Werner 18:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Effect of shutter speed --Nevit 09:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Love it. Mattbuck 15:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Nice, but useless without the actual shutter speed values. --Eusebius 08:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chicago "L" sign. --Dschwen 22:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Strange picture, nice quality -- Pro2 15:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Unidentified crocus --3268zauber 20:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good for me. Yann 21:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hyacinthus orientalis by Hedwig Storch. --Anna reg 12:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Focus too soft. --Eusebius 08:26, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Opening buds --Unacerilla 01:59, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unclear composition. --Eusebius 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Two glass silos in the Autostadt in Wolfsburg --High Contrast 06:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Looks tilted. I think the vertical axis should be the centre of the building (because the borders do not appear as parallel). --Eusebius 15:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bernd Schneider 2008 --AngMoKio 00:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion perhaps reality is tilted, but maybe it would look better, if you turn it to the left... good picture --Mbdortmund 12:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
    the guy in general is straight just the background is moving in the wind. On first sight it might seem tilted but i dont want to rotate it although it is not necessary. --AngMoKio 21:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC) The picture is good --Mbdortmund 23:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lewis Hamilton 2008 --AngMoKio 00:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Too much centred for my taste, but the quality is ok. --Eusebius 15:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bavarian Town Vilshofen a.d. Donau --High Contrast 22:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline perspective should IMHO be corrected --Mbdortmund 01:25, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
    See other -- Pro2 13:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Blooming tulips, Moscow. --Unacerilla 16:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline A bit noisy. --Eusebius 14:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Point Walter panorama Gnangarra 15:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline e.g. -- Pro2 14:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Heidelberger Friedenskreuz, Heidelberg-Kirchheim, Germany --3268zauber 11:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too noisy. --Eusebius 14:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cemetery in Key West, Florida --Dschwen 17:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good -- Pro2 14:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Lagoon house. -- MJJR 20:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Pro2 14:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a gopuram, Chennai --Bgag 11:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline overexposed -- Pro2 14:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• * Nomination: A Cross-Country class 221 passes through Parson Street station on its way southwards. Mattbuck 12:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC) * * Review needed
  • Nomination: A Cross-Country class 221 passes through Parson Street station on its way southwards. Mattbuck 12:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Tower of Melanchthon-Church in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 16:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Franziskanerkirche in Dortmund, sky --Mbdortmund 16:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Landscape near Collesalvetti, Tuscany --Lucarelli 22:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. Looks good. --High Contrast 22:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination United Airlines Airbus close-up. --Dschwen 22:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unsharp in the image center Botzeit 07:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination University of Illinois police car. --Dschwen 22:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nicely done --Ianare 03:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination East entrance to Everglades NP. --Dschwen 22:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion --Botzeit 07:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road sign in Amish contry with farm in the background. --Dschwen 22:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Botzeit 07:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination M109 self-propelled howitzer of the Israel Defence Forces -- Hovev 17:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Noise, contrast, sharpness (Why ISO 800?!) -- Pro2 19:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC) the projectil looks lake a fake... --Mbdortmund 20:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)  Info I'm assuming the high ISO setting was to ensure the exposure could be short enough to capture the projectile. --Notyourbroom 20:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC) It is copied in the picture at home, isn't it? --Mbdortmund 00:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jasná Ski Resort - view from ski slope --Pudelek 13:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad composition, blurry. kallerna 15:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Red (medium) ski slope Jasná Ski Resort, Slovakia --Pudelek 13:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Bad composition, blurry. kallerna 15:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Pasque flowers in the botanical garden of the Goethe University, Frankfurt.--Marco Schmidt 12:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice -- Pro2 14:23, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Itsukushima-jinja torii at sunset --Bgag 03:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Pudelek 13:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gassho-zukuri farmhouse, Japan --Bgag 03:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details --Ianare 18:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Deep sea NOAA photo of a swimming Nudibranchia mollusk. --J JMesserly 19:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline This is a great photograph for many reasons, perhaps an example of an acceptable amount of noise for the situation even, but it was not taken by a commoner which is one of the requirements. -- carol 20:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Apache Lake, Arizona --Bgag 23:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks good. --Dschwen 16:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination by Hedwig Storch --Mbdortmund 23:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment Das Stück rechts stört, wirkt unscharf. Pro2 11:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
    Same here - poor crop, sorry --Richard Bartz 17:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Abu Tig Marina. -- MJJR 19:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice. Solid quality. --Dschwen 15:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View into the inner court of Neues Schloss in Baden-Baden --3268zauber 15:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion I like the composition. Quality is borderline though. --Dschwen 15:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Facho, view from the lighthouse. São Martinho do Porto, west coast of Portugal - Alvesgaspar 11:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Dschwen 15:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination winding towers in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 01:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline A bit too dull, underexposed. --Dschwen 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination winding towers in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 01:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Dschwen 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination winding towers in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 01:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Dschwen 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination winding towers in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 01:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. --Dschwen 15:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Edit with perspective correction and slight tweak --Richard Bartz 17:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion sieht doch gut aus --Mbdortmund 00:43, 7 April 2009 (UTC) (The subject of this nomination, File:Vilshofen an der Donau, Vilsbrücke edit.jpg, was subsequently reuploaded as File:Vilshofen an der Donau, Vilsbrücke.jpg)
• 
  • Nomination Weir Auer Duecker, Munich.jpg --Richard Bartz 23:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion erstaunliche Details --Mbdortmund 02:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Isola Bella, Stresa, Italy--Mbdortmund 22:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Harte JPG-Artefakte, zu stark komprimiert? Horizont wirkt ungerade (?), Sorry -- Pro2 11:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The castle of Óbidos, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 20:44, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very nice, interesting object, good details --Mbdortmund 20:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination baby alligators --Ianare 22:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion It would be nice to name the location, the picture is good --Mbdortmund 18:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
    done --Ianare 02:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
    OK --Mbdortmund 22:38, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lighthouse at Point Reyes. --High Contrast 18:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion IMHO o.k. --3268zauber 19:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eisenhower Expressway and Chicago skyline. --Dschwen 17:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 18:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stresa, Italy, funivia Mottarone --Mbdortmund 11:59, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice, good detail. Jonathunder 17:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Trumpet stand (is it the correct word? The word stand is used in French). --Eusebius 11:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Yes, "stand" is the correct terminology. Pbroks13 18:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Homoneura sp flies --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 06:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details --Mbdortmund 12:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): lagoon. -- MJJR 20:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 13:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination River Isar, Munich, Germany --Richard Bartz 10:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good overall --Ianare 23:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Confuscius temple Kaohsiung --AngMoKio 08:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline It's tilted --Ianare 23:43, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Saint-Nazaire bridge. Yann 22:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Colors could be better, but it is ok. Pro2 12:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination jewish grave sculpture in Dortmund, Ostenfriedhof --Mbdortmund 04:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Die untere Hälfte ist fad. Fingalo 20:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC) Ist das Kritik an der Skulptur oder am Foto? --Mbdortmund 02:01, 3 April 2009 (UTC) An der Beleuchtung. Fingalo 14:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC) stimmt, schade, war sehr hartes Lich, was die sehr ausgewaschenen Formen der Skulptur hervorhob --Mbdortmund 18:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 143621 stops at Bedminster station with a service to Weston-super-Mare. Mattbuck 12:49, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks good, --Dschwen 18:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): downtown shops at night. -- MJJR 20:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good atmosphere --Mbdortmund 01:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jasná Ski Resort, Slovakia - bistro and ski lift from Zahradky. --Pudelek 16:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Too dark, snow is blue - it should be white. --Lestath 20:31, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Cologne Panoramic View --Ahgee 16:40, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Really Good.--Pro2 16:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Iguana on the Florida Keys. --Dschwen 18:08, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good. -- Pro2 15:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination (Anser anser) --Richard Bartz 23:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Absolutely to the point Fingalo 14:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Old Town Hall, Bamberg, Germany --Berthold Werner 11:21, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Könnte ein bisschen schärfer sein, dennoch gut. -- Pro2 15:07, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Mini Cooper--Matthias93 14:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review On the cars roof there is a heavy overexposure. Same for the door mirror --Richard Bartz 22:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Feeding of water power plant, Munich, Germany --Richard Bartz 22:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion erstaunliche Details --Mbdortmund 09:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winding tower in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 20:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion well done --3268zauber 22:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Police cruiser in Daytona Beach. --Dschwen 17:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion solid shot. Is this a Chevrolet Impala? --AngMoKio 10:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Evening at Loxahatchee national Wildlife Refuge, Florida--Dschwen 17:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion beautiful --3268zauber 17:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Honeyclumb. !George Shuklin 16:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion A little soft on the bottom, but meets QI requirements --Ianare 17:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Musical group "Passage", Hautecombe, 2008. Yann 14:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice composition --Mbdortmund 23:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mercedes-Benz prototype --AngMoKio 12:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion didn you have a permission to make the picture? --Mbdortmund 23:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
    I made it in the Mercedes-Benz museum where taking pictures is explicitly allowed. --AngMoKio 08:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC) the picture is good --Mbdortmund 09:05, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Focus on a flower Kyro 15:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Distracting background, subject too small --Ianare 17:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grosshesseloher Brücke, pedestrian passage --Richard Bartz 20:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice image, like its sharpness. Meets the QI-criteria. --High Contrast 15:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grosshesseloher Brücke und Schleuse --Richard Bartz 20:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Überzeugt mich voll. Tolle Schärfe bei der Entfernung. Welche Linse? --AngMoKio 13:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)  Comment 70-300mm, novoflex pano pro, sva, fernauslöser --Richard Bartz 14:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grosshesseloher Brücke, Munich, Germany --Richard Bartz 16:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion On the upper left and right corner are stiching errors above the trees. Da muss nachgearbeitet werden! :-) --AngMoKio 18:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)  Question Wo genau ? Das Bild besteht aus 3 Bildern, und die Kanten sind erst hinter den Zügen .. Ich find nix, hilf mir mal - mach Kreise rein, plz ... --Richard Bartz 20:00, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
    Jetzt ! FIXED --Richard Bartz 20:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
    so gefällt mir das :-) --AngMoKio 20:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC) Es freut mich, dass ich ihre Gespräche lesen kann, weil ich so viel Deutsch vergessen habe. Ich soll mehr praktizieren :) --Notyourbroom 17:46, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A Loader at work in an open pit mine. --High Contrast 22:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Absolutely to the point, awakens greediness .. feeling like a 8 jr old boy, again :-) P.S could be a tad more brighter --Richard Bartz 23:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC) * It is not a loader but a wheeled-bulldozer. --MathKnight 16:04, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Swimming pool at one of the lagoons. -- MJJR 20:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition, good quality --Simonizer 22:01, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Numenius arquata --AngMoKio 17:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sharp --Ianare 22:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Otaria byronia (Mähnenrobbe) --3268zauber 10:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline far too right. cut left. Fingalo 10:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
    The unfortune crop was allready adressed plus the overexposed reflections is k.o. then (A bit of glitter would be ok but here it's 2 much - 2 harsh) --Richard Bartz 16:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Edinburgh George Harriot's-SchoolFingalo 08:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Overexposed sky + color noise (maybe caused by oversharpening - 200 ISO shouldn't cause that ammount of CN) --Richard Bartz 16:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A barn in Quebec --Skeezix1000 15:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice composition and colours --Mbdortmund 18:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC) + Sehr schön Fingalo 19:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment I would have put the barn on the other side of the composition. --Eusebius 16:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wrought iron sculpture in Dortmund, Ostfriedhof --Mbdortmund 21:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Gute Komposition Fingalo 19:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Too much centred for my taste (and nice web, btw). --Eusebius 16:53, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roasted spare ribs with garlic and pepper. #!George Shuklin 09:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Left cut, right not in focus. Fingalo 10:45, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Victim lights (Opferkerzen) --3268zauber 06:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline left candle cut, to the right lot of the room.--Fingalo 08:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Zeytouna Island. -- MJJR 21:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Brillant durchgezeichnet mit hellen Lichtern und tiefen Schatten. Gute Komposition. Fingalo 21:26, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): laguna home. -- MJJR 21:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Der abgeschnittene Baum stört. Fingalo 21:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Yellow Admiral on thumbnail by User:Tony Wills --Mbdortmund 19:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Der unscharfe Flügelrand links stört. Fingalo 19:32, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination wrought-iron flower on cemetery "Ostfriedhof" in Dortmund, Germany --Mbdortmund 18:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Der Schatten ist tot, der Kontrast zu hart.
• 
  • Nomination wrought-iron flower on cemetery "Ostfriedhof" in Dortmund, Germany --Mbdortmund 18:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Die Schatten sind tot, der Kontrast zu hart. Fingalo 19:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A fursuiter interacting with a child. –Diti 17:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Comment This was a COM:FP candidate, but it was opposed with comments such as “this just seems like a tourist snapshot, albeit a much higher quality one”, so I’m trying COM:QI. –Diti 17:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
    Hinter den Köpfen der Hauptpersonen ist ein zu unruhiger Hintergrund. Fingalo 19:30, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main entry of the fortifications of the Salbert hill. --ComputerHotline 11:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sehr ausgewogen und gleichmäßig beleuchtet. Symmetrischer Aufbau. Fingalo 19:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tachinidae --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 05:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good --Mbdortmund 06:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC) -- Schöne Komposition. Fingalo 19:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bian Lian of Sichuan opera --Shizhao 13:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Die Objekte sind ungünstig abgeschnitten, Maske am Hinterkopf und irgendetwas links unten. Fingalo 19:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Calico she-cat with short hair. Yann 18:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Zu geringe Tiefenschärfe und störende Spiegelungen in den Augen. Fingalo 19:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The El Gouna (Red Sea) branch of The American University in Cairo. -- MJJR 21:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Gute Komposition. Fingalo 19:50, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Golf Club. -- MJJR 21:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Saubere Arbeit. Fingalo 19:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination church portal in Dortmund, Franziskanerkirche --Mbdortmund 19:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Technisch einwandfrei. Fingalo 19:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination An old bicycle in the staircase to access at the old NATO station. --ComputerHotline 14:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Unausgewogen, linkslastig. Fingalo 19:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Grave family Klönne, Ostfriedhof Dortmund --Mbdortmund 22:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Haunting image, nicely done. Jonathunder 02:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC); Saubere brillante Arbeit. Fingalo 21:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Kazuyo Sejima --Rama 21:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Having the subject only in the bottom of the frame with a large empty space above is not the best crop. Jonathunder 17:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC); schlechte Komposition. Fingalo 21:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): Golf Club. -- MJJR 21:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Die farbigen Elemente sitzen links, das Bild ist linkslastig. Fingalo 21:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Main entry of the Monceau fortifications. --ComputerHotline 07:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Die Senkrechten kippen nach links. Fingalo 21:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Intrados of the porte Saint-Denis, Paris. Previously unassessed. --Coyau 22:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Die Bildmitte ist zu dunkel. Fingalo 20:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daffodil (Narcissus). -- MJJR 21:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Zu geringe Tiefenschärfe. Fingalo 20:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna, Egypt: Golf Club. -- MJJR 21:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Brillante Komposition. Fingalo 20:52, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Teddy Bear cholla --Bgag 15:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Schön durchgezeichnet. Fingalo 20:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arve river, Annemasse. Yann 14:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Gute Komposition, gleichmäßig ausgeleuchtet, brillant. Fingalo 21:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road nr 59 in Staré Hory, Slovakia --Pudelek 10:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Das Haus links ist zu klobig. Fingalo 20:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Supermarket in Turčianske Teplice, Slovakia --Pudelek 10:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Farbstich. Fingalo 20:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Turčianske Teplice (Stubnyafürdő, Bad Stuben), Slovakia. Blue bath. (renomination) --Pudelek 19:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Linkslastig durch das angeschnittene Haus. Fingalo 20:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gas station in Turčianske Teplice, Slovakia (renomination) --Pudelek 19:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Brillant. Fingalo 20:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Assisi, Piazza del Comune --Berthold Werner 11:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Dunkle Fahnen und schwarze Ecke stören. Fingalo 20:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Haifa panorama --Berthold Werner 07:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion good details, crop a bit tight. --Mbdortmund 10:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)-- sehr brillant. Fingalo 20:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Skyway in waterpark Turčianske Teplice, Slovakia --Pudelek 21:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Die Mitte kippt nach links. Fingalo 20:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Staré Hory, Slovakia. Road from Banská Bystrica to Donovaly --Pudelek 21:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Schöne Komposition. Fingalo 20:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination World War I monument in Turčianske Teplice, Slovakia --Pudelek 21:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Comment It looks to me like it's slightly tilted clockwise. Also, this is more the weather's fault, but the top looks underexposed to me. --Notyourbroom 16:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC) Comment In my opinion is exactly OK, but I uploaded new version --Pudelek 19:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
    Der untere Teil mit Blumen und Glas ist unscharf. Fingalo 20:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Road (number 65, near Blatnica) and Veľká Fatra mountains, Slovakia--Pudelek 21:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Vordergrund passt nicht zum Hintergrund. Fingalo 20:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Winter in Żywiec Beskids. February, late afternoon --Pudelek 15:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline  Question What distinguishes this image (and the two similar ones) from any other photograph with snow and trees? What are you attempting to illustrate that is unique in these images? --Wsiegmund 17:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
     CommentThere are just three good quality photos with snow and trees. Nothing more. This is QI, not FP --Pudelek 22:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
    You should fix the CA at the trees at the left side --Simonizer 14:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
    Decline because of the CA --Simonizer 17:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)-- Decline: Schlechte Komposition, linkslastig durch die Bäume am Rand. Fingalo 20:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Citrus Swallowtail --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 05:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Withdrawn already QI --Mbdortmund 06:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
    Oops :) How do I withdraw? --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 08:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC) I have done it 4 you -ComputerHotline 11:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): genuine decorated bus from Karachi, Pakistan. -- MJJR 21:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion funny --Mbdortmund 21:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bavarian state chancellery, minister president's office, Munich --Richard Bartz 17:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nix zu meckern --Mbdortmund 19:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunflower macro --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 07:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very good --Richard Bartz 17:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Memorial for murdered restistants in Dortmund, Bittermark --Mbdortmund 04:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good --Richard Bartz 17:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination American alligator (cropped) --Ianare 04:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Crop is a bit tight but good enough --Richard Bartz 17:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna, Egypt: the library (rear side). -- MJJR 21:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok, nice colours --Berthold Werner 15:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
     Comment Maybe the palmtree bit on the left could be cropped out. -- Eusebius 13:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)  Done -- MJJR 21:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bathing goose --3268zauber 06:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice shot --Mbdortmund 10:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): the Turtle House by the German architect and designer Kurt Völtzke. -- MJJR 21:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion very nice House --Böhringer 21:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination relief of Philipp Melanchthon in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 16:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion lighting could be better (?) but good details --Ianare 03:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): the mosque. -- MJJR 21:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion ok. --Berthold Werner 17:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Daffodil (Narcissus). -- MJJR 21:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion IMHO OK --Mbdortmund 22:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Canale Vena in Chioggia, Italy --Berthold Werner 18:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition - may be a bit too dark in the left side. --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
    there are details in the dark parts, so its possible to lighten it ulp a little bit; the composition is nice --Mbdortmund 23:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
    Dark parts a bit lighter. --Berthold Werner 07:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
    I think it looks better --Mbdortmund 17:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Farm in Schoppernau --Böhringer 19:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Schöne Farbabstufungen.
• 
  • Nomination United Nations main conference room, Geneva. Yann 14:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Less than 2 MPix --Berthold Werner 17:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt): street at Abu Tig Marina. -- MJJR 22:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion interesting composition, no tourists :-) --Ianare 03:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Common Hollihock (Alcea rosea). -- MJJR 22:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline soft focus : slower shutter and higher fstop would have been better --Ianare 03:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zeche Gneisenau, Dortmund by smial --Mbdortmund 21:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion Looks good. --Coyau 21:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination El Gouna (Egypt). -- MJJR 21:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 23:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Bavaria. High Contrast 14:45, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline blown out sky --Mbdortmund 23:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Monument Valley, Arizona --Bgag 16:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline Heavy compression artefacts (especially between rock and sky) --Berthold Werner 12:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Detail of a hôtel particulier in Dijon. --Eusebius 07:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Decline unfortunate lighting concerning the main object. --Mbdortmund 23:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Railway on Constitution hill at Aberystwyth by user:Herbythyme --Mbz1 04:56, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination: Assisi, Rocca Maggiore --Berthold Werner 18:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Review needed

Consensual review

File:Thomas_Bresson_-_Stal-2_(by).jpg

• Nomination Stalactite inside the Salbert fortifications. --ComputerHotline 13:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Not bad for a difficult subject.--Mbz1 15:30, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Needs some noise reduction in the background and is a tad underexposed. Lycaon 19:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per Mbz1. The background could probably use some noise reduction, but that's entirely unrelated to the subject. If the question is "is this a quality image of a stalactite," then my answer is yes. --Notyourbroom 17:46, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Ianare 03:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - nice photo. Jonathunder 16:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 16:35, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Waldschafe.jpg

• Nomination Waldschafe --3268zauber 06:00, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Supportgood details and composition --Mbdortmund 06:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Stimme zu. Fingalo 19:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy. --Eusebius 16:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Vandtårnet ved Ringgadebroen 2.jpg

• Nomination Old Water Tower in Århus, Denmark--Villy Fink Isaksen 11:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support high quality shot --AngMoKio 13:24, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Compression artefacts (look at the left end of the roof) --Berthold Werner 13:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)--Berthold Werner 15:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment uploaded a new with less comprssion --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support looks OK --Mbdortmund 17:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very good --Simonizer 17:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   --Eusebius 10:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Information table - Jasna Ski Resort.JPG

• Nomination Information table - Jasná Ski Resort, Slovakia --Pudelek 16:17, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose composition, main object to small --Mbdortmund 20:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Question what is wrong with composition? --Pudelek 20:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment You called it "information table" and that table doesn't fill 10% of the picture and is unreadeble; what else is the object? --Mbdortmund 20:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'am afraid but Mbdortmund is right --Richard Bartz 16:52, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 06:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Orgia recens.jpg

• Nomination Orgyia recens --Ivengo(RUS) 18:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Comment DOF is a bit 2 shallow --Richard Bartz 19:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Die Raupe ist scharf und kontrastreich durchgezeichnet. Fingalo 21:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortune focus (DOF), lacking sharpness for the given size -Richard Bartz 19:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad focus, head is unsharp -- Pro2 12:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 06:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Superphénix.jpg

• Nomination Superphénix, a fast breeder reactor, France. Yann 19:30, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose Der Reaktor kippt nach links. Fingalo 21:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I am sorry, but that's not true. Yann 23:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment There is indeed an angle in the verticals of the left side of the reactor building. --Eusebius 16:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment 1,43 Grad to the left on the left corner, could be corrected. --Mbdortmund 19:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I corrected a slight tilt (0.80°). Yann 13:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support It's o.k. Fingalo 14:59, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Focus on main building is soft, not convinced by composition --Ianare 23:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support not bad, good for QI --Pudelek 14:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 06:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support good enough for QI-status --High Contrast 08:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Already closed as promoted. --Eusebius 08:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Stokroos_R03.jpg

• Nomination Common Hollihock (Alcea rosea). -- MJJR 22:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Brillantes Bild Fingalo 20:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed. --Eusebius 16:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Eusebius, sorry --Richard Bartz 16:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 06:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Sunset lüdenscheid germany.jpg

• Nomination Sunset in Lüdenscheid, Germany. -- Pro2 14:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  SupportCorrect colors. --ComputerHotline 14:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - No details, too dark, poor composition, unfocused horizon -- Alvesgaspar 14:56, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Too dark. Jonathunder 16:29, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Farben gut, Horizont scharf, sauberes Schrerenschnittrelief. Fingalo 20:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. Meets the QI-criteria. --High Contrast 21:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support difficult decision, but its interesting someway --Mbdortmund 00:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 06:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Franziskanerkirche-Dortmund-2009-0012.JPG

• Nomination church portal in Dortmund, Franziskanerkirche --Mbdortmund 19:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support ok. --Berthold Werner 09:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted, slightly distorted (perspective correction not perfect, but would not warrant an oppose on its own), not centred (I think it should be). --Eusebius 16:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good enought 4 my taste --Richard Bartz 16:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support that's ok for me. --AngMoKio 21:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 11:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Mer de nuages dans le Rouergue.jpg

• Nomination Cloud sea in Rouergue area, Aveyron, France. Yann 12:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  SupportBrillantes Stimmungsbild. Fingalo 20:42, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy. --Eusebius 16:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree to Fingalo --3268zauber 20:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise and jpg artefacts --Simonizer 14:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's a pity - wrecked by heavy postprocessing --Richard Bartz 16:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

  There is no postprocessing here. Yann 22:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

There are no exifs, which camera do you use ? IMO even a handycam would have lesser noise without sharpening/tweaking :-) --Richard Bartz 16:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

That's mentioned in the description. The photo is from 1989. There was no digital camera at that time. It is a slide taken with a Canon T70, and then digitized. Yann 09:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Digitizing is a kind of postprocessing, too - anyway - the quality is not the best, I'am afraid --null 14:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 09:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Bryggen panorama.JPG

• Nomination Panorama of the World heritage site of Bryggen in Bergen, Norway. --Sveter 16:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose I don't like this perspective --Pudelek 08:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I rather like it, it has a certain Escher-esque quality to it ... --Ianare 03:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:56, 31 March 2009 (UTC)--Villy Fink Isaksen 09:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Great --Simonizer 17:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it ----Ltshears 17:36, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Macht die grade Straße krumm. Fingalo 20:12, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose ac Pudelek --Lestath 20:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quality is good, perspective in this case is so to speak ... artistic freedom --Richard Bartz 19:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good overall. I find the perspective ok --High Contrast 20:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• weak  Support interesting, but I would not like to promote many examples for this possibility --Mbdortmund 00:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quality is good enough. Should be enough votes for Promotion. -- Pro2 11:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like the artistic impression. :) --Siipikarja 20:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 9 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 09:08, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Lacock Abbey view from south.jpg

• Nomination Lacock Abbey in the village of Lacock, Wiltshire, England --High Contrast 11:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Opposee.g. -- Pro2 15:20, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment FP-decline should be no agrument for QI IMHO --Mbdortmund 15:41, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

True..but the pic is distorted. --AngMoKio 16:38, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

mainly on the right side --Mbdortmund 16:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Guys, here we evaluate quality-images and not featured images! --High Contrast 16:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Flaw is flaw, a proper perspective correction is a quality feature, too --Richard Bartz 19:17, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Park_Ranger.jpg

• Nomination Park ranger with car in the Everglades.Dschwen 14:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose composition, has a snapshot feel to it --Ianare 09:27, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

How so? --Dschwen 15:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

It 'feels' like a tourist pic for some reason ... the ranger has something to do with it. --Ianare 14:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

60% of all pictures nominated at QIC and FPC are tourist pics :-) This feels more like a reporter or documentary report picture --Richard Bartz 22:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment please disregard my vote, QI reviews should be based on technical merits, not feelings. Apologies --Ianare 15:42, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Quality is acceptable. --Richard Bartz 22:50, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 11:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Perugia 030.JPG

• Nomination Fontana Maggiore detail, Perugia, Italy --Grifomaniacs 21:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Too strong noise reduction and/or compression in my opinion, geolocation neccessary --Berthold Werner 08:05, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Sharpness, luminosity is good and definition OK. Nice contrast also, take a look at the water drops. Altough unnecessary to meet quality images criteria - this is not a valued images matter - I added the geolocation. --Grifomaniacs 13:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Stranahan_House_1.jpg

• Nomination Stranahan House, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. --Dschwen 14:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Looks clockwise tilted. --Berthold Werner 18:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
  
•  Support Good quality. I do not think it is tilted. --Mbz1 00:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose good quality, but needs slight CW tilt fixed --Ianare 09:50, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info rotated by 0.55deg CCW. Purge cache to see new version. --Dschwen 15:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Ianare 14:44, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 11:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Ostenfriedhof-Dortmund-2009-0157.JPG

• Nomination Gravesculpture in Dortmund --Mbdortmund 21:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment would support if framed similar to this one, ie no trees on left Gnangarra 08:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Info done (x) --Mbdortmund 01:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Gnangarra 00:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 11:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Weintraube 2008-2-20.JPG

• Nomination by Hedwig Storch --Mbdortmund 23:06, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
   SupportSieht gut aus. Pro2 11:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry but the image is poorly cropped --Richard Bartz 17:10, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
   Comment hatte der Autorin schon gesagt, dass sie die Bilder etwas zu eng beschneidet, aber dieses finde ich dennoch sehr ausdrucksstark --Mbdortmund 19:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

 Oppose Welche Rebsorte? "Weintraube" ist zu unspezifisch. --Berthold Werner 13:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 11:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Melbourne Skyline and Princes Bridge - Dec 2008.jpg

• Nomination The Melbourne skyline and the Princes Bridge. --High Contrast 20:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline Obvious QI --Richard Bartz 20:55, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
   Support Very good indeed. --Siipikarja 09:59, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
   Oppose Sorry to play the devil's advocate here, but there is a substantial tilt and a lot of CA. It may be sharp, but that's no excuse. --Siipikarja 10:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
   Comment Now that you mentioned it, yes there is CA. Not sure about the tilt though. --Siipikarja 10:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Héron cendré.jpg

• Nomination Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea) --Bgag 22:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Obvious quality image material--Jolly Janner 22:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose is it ? I see noise and slightly off focus on head. --Ianare 15:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Focus --Richard Bartz 18:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Kirche in Wallerdorf.jpg

• Nomination Church in a German village in Bavaria --High Contrast 18:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Good colours on the church make it stand out and look very clear and crisp. Looks like it needs more sharpness in full resolution, but I'm no expert. --Jolly Janner 20:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ooops, needs perspective correction, sorry --Richard Bartz 21:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose What Richard Bartz said. --Siipikarja 10:50, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Trichterspinne01.JPG

• Nomination Araneomorph funnel-web spider on the hunt for a blowfly --Böhringer 07:02, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support I'll promote. Not the best quality but at least I really like the composition. -- Pro2 14:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree on the composition. As much I love the works by Friedrich but I have to say that the quality isn't really good, I'am afraid. Needs consensual review IMO, as sad it is. --Richard Bartz 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

My oppose is mainly because of DOF/focus problems on the spider --Richard Bartz 21:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Quality looks good enough to me --ianaré (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:MichelangeloDavid.jpg

• Nomination Vertical panorama of the David by Michelangelo --Massimo Catarinella 17:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose it's a good shot but... the wall in the background is bright and the statue is in dark shadow, it should be the opposite. --Alejo2083 08:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The shadow doesn't obscure details and isn't distracting in my opinion. I would like more feedback. This is a technically sound image and I didn't nominate it for FPC. --Massimo Catarinella 15:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support the main object ist centered in the lower part of the center and sharp *g* think it is OK for QI because of the details, although lighting is not perfect --Mbdortmund 21:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good details, sharp. If lighting was better would suggest FP --Ianare 15:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Schloss-Nordkirchen-DSC 5766.JPG

• Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, main building --Mbdortmund 11:07, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Photo not from the center taken, not symetric. Can you take it again?
•  Info I have a symmetric one but I wanted to have the lusters on both sides --Mbdortmund 21:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Amgoldfasan Nahaufnahme Kopf

• Nomination Amgoldfasan --3268zauber 20:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support sharp, good colours --Mbdortmund 23:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose ... but excessive noise --Ianare 05:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very nice! --Dellex 09:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment It's fine until you zoom in all the way -- at which point you see the problem with modern point-and-shoot cameras: excess noise and heavy-handed noise reduction. --Carnildo 21:06, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy, unsharp. --Eusebius 09:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Eusebius --Richard Bartz 18:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Hew and cry hut, Burgh Island.JPG

• Nomination Remains of a chapel and huers hut on Burgh Island. Not sure if a crop is required. --Jolly Janner 16:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Person should be cropped out --Ianare 21:46, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Which person? There are five people in the picture. Jolly Janner 00:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad cropping. The person on the right is halved. --Siipikarja 10:48, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

I have now cropped the person on the right out of the picture. --Jolly Janner 13:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

 Comment Better, but I'm still not convinced. The persons on the right are a bit distracting. Also, the photo is a bit blurry from the corners. Minor chromatic aberration on the left. --Siipikarja 09:38, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

 Support Wow, you managed to make it really crisp and clean. Good work! --Siipikarja 21:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

I'll crop the person standing up on the left out later today. I think the three people sitting down are not a distraction. I will also revert to the version which had the original sharpness. I thought it was too sharp, so blurred it. Excuse my lack of knowledge, but what is CA? Jolly Janner 13:00, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done I also noticted the chromatic aberration to the left, although mainly on the person standing, so I didn't think it was such an issue. He's been cropped now anyway. Jolly Janner 18:26, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Clear image, good subject. --Herbythyme 15:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --Ianare 20:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 08:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Refueling panorama gnangarra.jpg

• Nomination refueling a helitanker Gnangarra 11:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support Looks good in preview but a bit weak in full size, except the fuel truck (sharpness). But QI, yes --Richard Bartz 12:00, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• It also has some strange sharp/unsharp areas on the helicopters windows. --AngMoKio 12:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  oops....thanks Richard! editing QIC can be confusing :) --AngMoKio 16:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• The unsharp areas are caused by focal plane differences when stitching .. Should we send it to consensual review ? --Richard Bartz 17:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• I just found 2 stitching errors: one the far left side near a rotor and also on the rotor on the right. This should get fixed i think. Composition-wise i really like the pic! --AngMoKio 18:14, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
• thx...dam I introduced the stitching error in the second version, will redo tonight. Gnangarra 00:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

 Done I've uploaded the fix for the stitching issue, and reduced the number of images across the craft which has reduced the distortions on the windows noting that the windows at the front are cone shaped to enable the pilot a greater field of view Gnangarra 01:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --AngMoKio 09:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment there's some weird things going on with the focus in the middle of the choper, you can see the image boundaries. I'm not aware of the technical difficulty of panoramas so will refrain from voting. --Ianare 16:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
  • I can see what you mean diagonally across the FESA logo interesting there isnt an image boundary in that area all that include the area are clear, that means its been introduced by the software, I'll redo and see if I can reduce the amount of images that overlap in that region. Gnangarra 01:18, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Done Gnangarra 22:04, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 08:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Fitness Böhringer 1.JPG

• Nomination Kleinkind in einem Eschenbaum --Böhringer 12:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion No interest, I think. --ComputerHotline 09:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Seems to be QI-material --Mbdortmund 19:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
   Comment Technically good, but has little encyclopedic value. --Siipikarja 21:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Has the quality. Valuable for physical strain. Image name says all, isn't it ? --Richard Bartz 13:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Water strider Gerris lacustris.jpg

• Nomination Water strider (Gerris lacustris) --Richard Bartz 23:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose It's little noisy. --ComputerHotline 13:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I think noise is on a acceptable level for 400 ISO --Richard Bartz 14:15, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support the noise-level is acceptable and the details of the body are good --Mbdortmund 19:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support no noise on main subject, acceptable overall --Ianare 20:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good! -- Pro2 13:45, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Snow and light in the forest.jpg

• Nomination Snow and light in the forest. Yann 23:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support nice composition Gnangarra 03:30, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unsharp upper edge, uncorrected perspective distortion --Mr.checker 10:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Perspective corrected. Yann 18:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp enough from the top. --Siipikarja 19:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment maybe there's something going on with the lens ? Many of your pictures have the top (on vertical) or left (on horizontal) blurry ... --Ianare 18:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Oslo Voksenopplæring Sinsen 1 TRS.jpg

• Nomination Oslo Voksenopplæring Sinsen --High Contrast 08:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment
  Nice perspective. Fix the CA and crop away the redundant space (~1/5th of the image) at the bottom and this passes for me. While working on it, you could also run a noise reduction filter for the sky. --Siipikarja 09:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I'm ok with the framing and I don't think you should denoise. --Eusebius 11:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment If you run a noise reduction filter, run it only on the sky and not on the whole picture. --Siipikarja 19:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Unfortunately I have to agree with Siipikarja about the chromatic aberration - noise isn't a issue here IMO. Do you know how to do it ? A tutorial can be found here --Richard Bartz 23:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)~

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Versetalsperre Lüdenscheid HDR.jpg

• Nomination Klamer Brücke, Versetalsperre -- Pro2 20:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support good --Rammsteine 05:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but images were not properly aligned during HDR merge. --Eusebius 11:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose HDR merge: see trees on the left and right areas of the image --High Contrast 06:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Urbana_Miss_America_sign.jpg

• Nomination Miss America sign in Urbana, Illinois, with dairy farm in the bg. --Dschwen 15:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Oppose picture are displayed with a brown tint and vignetted. Fingalo 20:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  InfoIt was taken at sunset... --Dschwen 00:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support tagged as discuss, I like the photograph the colours are that which one would expect at sunset, the signs is in focus and meets QI requirments. Gnangarra 08:47, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Mach doch die Vignettierungen am oberen Rand weg --Mbdortmund 10:50, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
  •  Info Vignetting removed. Purge cache to reload new version. --Dschwen 15:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Good -- Pro2 11:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support QI --Richard Bartz 19:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The pole is distracting. Would be better from another angle. Yann 11:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Angle is chose to show the farm in the bg. And please remember that this is not FPC! --Dschwen 21:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good enough for QI --Muhammad Mahdi Karim 13:46, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Illinois_State_Bar_Association_HQ.jpg

• Nomination: Illinois State Bar Association - no drinks though :-( --Dschwen 21:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
• Review
•  Comment wouldn't bet on that. -- carol 22:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Impressive quality, good colors. How about the perspective? --Siipikarja 09:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

  Perspective is used as a compositional tool to achieve a looking up effect. I do not believe in mechanically flattening each and every image. --Dschwen 21:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Neutral Fair enough. I like the picture, but not the perspective. I stay neutral with this one. --Siipikarja 19:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose -> draw --Eusebius 09:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Parson Street Station 15.jpg

File:Parson Street Station 15.jpg

• Nomination A Cross-Country class 221 passes through Parson Street station on its way southwards.
  Will someone PLEASE review this. It's been a month now. Mattbuck 15:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Support Not crazy about the composition, but quality is good. --Ianare 20:30, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Main subject (which seems to be the train, although the photo is named as 'station') is too small. Composition is not ideal, there should be more of the town on the top and less of the rails at the bottom. If the pic has been a month under review but has received no votes, perhaps you should read in between the lines that this is not a QI. --Siipikarja 10:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I look at it as a month and no one has declined it. I just want an answer, that's all. Mattbuck 14:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

  It's not so easy to review because there are no big faughts in the picture, I think the main problems are the lighting, that makes it look slightly unsharp, and the missing of a clear composition. --Mbdortmund 17:11, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment I look it this way: the pictures default as non-QI. There must be something that makes the image an QI, not the other way around i.e. there must be some faults that cause rejection. I think no-one really wants decline an image but sometimes it is just necessary. Then there are the difficult cases, such as your image in question, that really do not have anything wrong but either do not have anything that would make the image a QI. Thus it is just easier to remain silent and not review at all. --Siipikarja (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The Colours and the light are not so good. --Berthold Werner 15:06, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 09:46, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Metro Paris - Ligne 8 - Porte de Charenton w.b.c.jpg

• Nomination Paris underground tunnel near Porte de Chareton station on line 8. --Greenski 10:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  SupportGood photo in spite of the difficult lighting condition (I corrected the color balance). Yann 22:11, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose To noisy and not sharp. There is a tripod necessary. --Berthold Werner 08:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Well, if you use a tripod, you can't get the train motion in that way, and that's what is interesting here. Yann 22:41, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice view but quality is not good enough as per above --ianaré (talk) 03:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Podzamcze pałac.jpg

• Nomination Palace in Podzamcze. --Sfu 21:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Comment Subject is shot from a bad angle. Would be better if it was shot perpendicularly. --Siipikarja 10:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

  The bushes would have cover some part of the building. Sfu 10:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support It's a matter of taste, of course, but I like the perspective. The quality is good: colours, light... and no distorted vertical lines. One inferior point however: some minor dust spots in the sky. -- MJJR 19:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose True about the dustspots. They should be removed. --Siipikarja 19:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC) --Siipikarja 11:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

   Done --Sfu 18:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Support --Ianare 16:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karora 00:00, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 10:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Cemetery in Donovaly.JPG

• Nomination Cemetery in Donovaly, Slovakia --Pudelek 18:13, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Question what do you think about taking out some blue like in File:Cemetery in Donovaly-a.jpg? --Mbdortmund 21:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Looks good, but mayby to much contrast? --Pudelek (talk) 09:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment new version with less contrast copied over my first proposal --Mbdortmund 15:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment This second version is fine --Pudelek 16:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I made a second try, which I believe to be acceptable, but I cannot vote for my own edits ... --Mbdortmund 17:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Question So which one of the three is nominated? --Siipikarja 10:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Cemetery in Donovaly-a1.jpg TimVickers 19:26, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose until versions are separated and a clear support is possible. Lycaon 15:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose while I think that 'Cemetery in Donovaly-a1.jpg' is the right way to go, closer examination reveals way too many artifacts (which are not present in the original). The metadata has also not travelled well. Geocoding would be nice too. --Karora 12:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 10:02, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Lima Lima Flight team flying Beechcraft Mentors.jpg

• Nomination Lima Lima flight team --JMSchneid 18:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
• Promotion
•  Support crop a little tight but good composition and colours --Mbdortmund 14:19, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose At least 11 dust spots. --Eusebius 20:58, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• indeed, thought they were on my screen.... --Mbdortmund 00:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I uploaded another version after cleaning up the spots.JMSchneid 12:59, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I remove my opposition, it looks at least better. The sky is a bit noisy and none of the planes is really sharp, but I guess this kind of picture is difficult to take so I won't assess. --Eusebius 12:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support With those dust spots gone this is fine. --Karora 22:18, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote?   Eusebius 09:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

File:University of Otago Registry Building2.jpg

• Nomination University of Otago Registry Building --Benchill 12:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• Decline
•  Oppose Oversaturated sky --Berthold Werner 17:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - I think is Ok --Pudelek 23:32, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - As well as being mildly oversaturated, the image is fairly small for something that is relatively easy to photograph. Apologies for not signing. Karora 22:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Please sign your vote. Thank you. --Berthold Werner 06:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment - maximum resolution from this camera (3.2MP), reuploaded with slight saturation reduction. Benchill 08:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   Eusebius 09:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)