Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 11 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:DSC_6955_-_wikimedia2020_deni_dahniel_tradisi_silek_minagkabau.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Silek Minangkabau performance in Padangpajang City. --Rachmat04 05:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Focus to main persons is for me good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 08:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree, perspective correction necessary, heavy CAs --Llez 08:19, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective correction should not be demanded for such action shots with a wide angle lens. But CA is really way too strong, and colour saturation somewhat too high. --Smial 10:13, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:AEG-Fabriken_Humboldthain,_Berlin_(GIMS9662-HDR).jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Neue Fabrik für Bahnmaterial, Berlin--MB-one 13:41, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Sharpness decreasing towards the top --Ermell 22:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for the review. The decreasing sharpness is due to the perspective correction done and I can't really fix it. However, I think that the amount of detail should be satisfactory even on the upper edges, given the absolute resolution of 22 MPix. --MB-one 14:24, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Worth a diskussion. --Ermell 08:16, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Upper right is not very sharp at only 300% of my 13-inch screen. -- Ikan Kekek 06:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I have actually given up repeating the mantra that any perspective correction performed by software necessarily requires downscaling if you want to achieve a sharpness impression corresponding to the natural impression and evenly distributed over the image as a shift lens would. The fraction of people involved here on QIC, which immediately screams "hue and cry" with every downscaling, is simply too large. You can only achieve two of three goals at the same time, because physics cannot be cheated. --Smial 10:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:43, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Bildstock_detail_Heiliger_Geist_Pfarrkirche_Rodeneck_in_Südtirol.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Painting of the Holy Spirit in a wayside shrine in Rodeneck in South Tyrol. --Moroder 08:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Not sharp enough in the upper third --MB-one 14:29, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I disagree --Moroder 16:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support because of tight crop. I would have preferred somewhat more "context". But very suitable lighting and good colours. Yes, less sharpness towards the top, but this is invisible printed to A3 and larger. We should not demand "images MUST not be downscaled" and at the same time demand pixel-sharp images with such high resolution. Doesn't work with real world cameras and lenses. --Smial 11:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the support. I wanted to emphasize the little and naive trompe-l'œil. I agree fully with your comment on the technical issue --Moroder 16:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support per Smial. --Aristeas 14:23, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:43, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Narvijärvi_ripples.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Ripples in the surface of Narvijärvi, Rauma, Finland. --Kallerna 07:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry, it has no informative value. --Zcebeci 09:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. We also welcome abstract etc. photos on Commons, when they are well-done. --Aristeas 09:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support - Besides, a photo of ripples of water is not devoid of information - it shows ripples of water! -- Ikan Kekek 10:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks, added the photo to the article on capillary waves on Wikipedia. I think the composition here is really pleasing. --Kallerna 10:29, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 00:44, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Full  Support, very good with perfect focus on the subject. --Smial 09:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support It's great as a wallpaper. --Pandakekok9 13:17, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Seven Pandas 23:46, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Khyaras-Nuur_Хяргас_Нуур_01.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Hyargas Nuur is the largest lake in northwestern Mongolia. It is of course the catchment point in the Basin of the big lakes --Alexandr frolov 04:17, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. I like the composition, but IMO DoF is too small. --XRay 06:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
     Weak support - I'd allow it. I'd prefer a sharper foreground and background, but I think this is an acceptable artistic choice. -- Ikan Kekek 10:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support per Ikan. --Smial 09:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have to agree with XRay here. --MB-one 19:59, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose agree xray Seven Pandas 20:10, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Seven Pandas 23:47, 10 April 2020 (UTC)