Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 02 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Hasora badra by V K Chandrasekharan.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Hasora badra by User:Vkchandrasekharanlic --Jkadavoor 15:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support I think okay.--Famberhorst 15:46, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The glare from the blown area is too distracting for me. Charlesjsharp 21:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charlesjsharp.--Peulle 10:59, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Fischer.H 06:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 17:54, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Girandinia diversifolia Anamudi shola Kerala IMG 1848.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Girandinia diversifolia --Firos ak 14:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Not sharp, sorry. Maybe Valued Image. --Peulle 14:50, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support. Sharp enough for QI as I think. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose IMO too unsharp. --Basotxerri 17:58, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Basotxerri. --Fischer.H 06:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
  • @Firos ak: FWIW I think it is a little camera shake (exposure time likely not enough speed) --Christian Ferrer 18:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 17:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Salle_des_Illustres_(Journées_du_Patrimoine_2017).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Salle des Illustres, lors des Journées Européennes du Patrimoine 2017 --Ant°AM 06:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Tilted. Perspective may be OK for this kind of shot, but some work is definitely needed.--Peulle 21:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
✓ Done Thanks, I slightly changed the tilt. For me and for a picture from the ground level, perspective is voluntary. --Ant°AM 09:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
 Comment I'm still not sure. I'd like to get more opinions - let's take it to CR.--Peulle 14:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Although I perhaps could understand the arguments, I'd prefer to see a corrected perspective. --Basotxerri 08:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

File:2018-03-25 (105) Icicle at Fischbachgraben in Frankenfels.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Icicle at Fischbachgraben in Frankenfels. --GT1976 04:51, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  OpposeLacks sharpness. Sorry. --Ermell 07:45, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I think it is sharp enough for QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 13:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I'm with Ermell. It's 2018 and the current standard should be more sharpness than this for such a nature shot, IMO. --Peulle 21:56, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Ermell and Peulle --Michielverbeek 22:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Kein QI für mich. --Fischer.H 16:51, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 17:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)