Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 1/archive 2

12, 25, 88, 122, 284 - not necessarily in that order - diff JP06035 00:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
314, 275, 255, 159, 30 - Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 00:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
36, 65, 125, 194, 238 - diff Picaroon9288 00:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
38, 61, 80, 103, 249 - 206.138.130.3 00:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous votes please --MichaelMaggs 16:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
281, 183, 171, 114, 57 - diff Modest Genius 86.21.14.113 00:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
8, 121, 180, 194, 300 - diff Betsythedevine 00:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
257 - for now -Arad 01:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
184, 272, 254, 266, 122 - Nerval 01:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC) (diff)[reply]
138, 116, 16, 38, 149 - (diff) - · fcn × talk · 01:34 · 2 February 2007 01:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
254, 99, 71, 61, 55 - diff 01:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Unsigned vote - Alvesgaspar 12:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]
298, 243, 249, 257, 284 - the last one is so good, it almost looks like it can't be real - diff -YK Times 02:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
281, 266, 53, 67, 194 - diff --138.89.127.52 02:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
38, 78, 46, 71, 252 - the last one is my favorite - Rlbberlin 02:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
206, 243, 265, 279, 315 - VaGla 03:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]
104, 109, 112, 176, 186 - Nihonjoe 03:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
99, 150, 194, 281, 298 - are some of the best. It took me many hours to narrow it down to twelve, and the last seven to go were really painful. - diff 24.167.165.20 03:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
11, 99, 118, 209, 291 - the first image is so impressive, the second just lovely blue and those remaining three excellent illustrations; alas, the limit is five, not ten :-( - Miaow Miaow 04:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
56, 75, 217, 241, 254 - all images are stunning! Royalbroil<;/font>^T : C 04:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

15, 27, 66, 57, 117 - diff --Regenspaziergang 04:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

46, 72, 130, 254, 291 - diff Pruthvi.Vallabh 04:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

72, 121, 130, 159, 254 - Changed mind diff --- Pruthvi.Vallabh 16:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

57, 121, 137, 254, 281 - #1 choice is 281 - Zaui 05:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

114, 137, 11, 56, 254 - Wow! When will the coffee table book be available? - diff Rholton 06:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

303, 272, 284, 125 - Cap-in-hand artists diff Nepomuk 07:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

116, 99, 183, 8, 59 - The best. Nut-meg 07:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC) diff Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

19, 58, 91, 315, 130 - Good ones User:Leningrad 61.14.21.131 diff Invalid diff MichaelMaggs 16:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

118, 262, 56, 199, 241 - The Optimum 220.69.190.159 08:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous votes, please Alvesgaspar 09:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

14, 46, 61, 260, 268 - In no particular order. - diff 199.74.75.109 08:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

307, 242, 147, 53 - just four. 67.46.0.13 09:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC) diff Err, that didn't work diff Please make proof as explained in the instructions - Alvesgaspar 09:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

62, 77, 94, 208, 281 - but others are too very-very nice! Why only five? :( — Kalan 10:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC) (confirmation diff)[reply]

103, 217, 249, 265, 303 - Alas! I can only choose five. diff AndonicO 10:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

187, 61, 284, 176, 303 - Falense 11:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC) (also de:Falense) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

209, 307, 270, 272, 321 - In no particular order. Romary 11:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

16, 137, 254, 267, 316 - in alphabetical order. :-P V-Man737 diff 71.219.43.14 11:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

288, 243, 20, 229, 230 - Harald Hansen 11:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

184, 43, 9, 272, 150 - and not in order. That was hard, there are many very good pictures here --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

99, 315, 112, 161, 187 - in order. The London Eye in particular is very striking, and the animated desk toy is a very clean animation. diff Syrthiss 14:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

134, 212 - no optional comment - Boereck 14:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

307, 309, 8, 53, 203 - good FAs. -- Zanimum 14:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

116, 217, 266, 300, 315. Wow. WJBscribe 15:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

82, 142, 28, 311, 318. - Neuceu 15:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

4, 38, 276, 315, 316 - AZH 15:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC) (de:AZH) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

272, 266, 258 , 94, 83 Stunning images, no particular order Freedom to share 16:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

46, 84, 27, 236, 308 - 46 is my fav, looks like it's raining into a giant bowl. - Hedwig in Washington 16:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

147, 103 - (I don't have more than 100 edits on Commons, I don't think, but I certianly do on the English Wikipedia diff). ONUnicorn 17:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

183, 284, 265, 240, 76 - All excellent stuff, made my Friday afternoon. - diff Merlinme 17:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

147, 248, 284, 252, 321 - Wst ^question 17:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

56, 104, 90, 84, 159 - Nevit 17:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

36, 125, 240, 254, 303 -Wing-Chi 17:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

11, 114, 128, 171, 87 - Pics speak for themselves - diff Roadmr 17:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

91, 208, 33, 45, 137 - great work! - Alessio Damato 18:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

50, 56, 69, 243, 286 - Rmhermen 18:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

241, 69, 266, 302, 284 - diff [1]24.66.94.141 19:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

6, 21, 178, 182, 254 - diff since I have less than 100 edits here. GRBerry 19:19, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

123, 69, 77, 82, 192 - (>100 edits at simple.wikipedia; see diff for statement regarding confirmation of identity.) Anthony cfc 19:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

263, 237, 117, 56, 246 - diff Krasniy 19:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

201, 266, 257, 89, 68 - Digon3 20:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

266, 245, 38, 138, 318 - smial 20:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

241, 280, 254, 104, 26, 176' - .diff- hotspot Invalid diff --MichaelMaggs 07:21, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

79, 86, 91, 171, 290 - Gerbil 20:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

254, 50, 58, 209, 173 - beautiful work! - diff Miguel Andrade 20:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff --MichaelMaggs 07:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC). It is OK now - Alvesgaspar 15:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

300, 298, 297, 16 - diff --Albertsab @cawiki 20:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

224, 229, 230, 293, 294 - no order /odder 20:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

242, 172, 201, 36, 254 - I have 101 edits here, but just to be sure: diff. --Core desat 20:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

245, 53 - all are beautiful - Wim van Dorst 20:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

320, 130, 116, 129, 75 - diff --J-PG ¬_¬ 21:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff[reply]

320, 130, 116, 129, 75 - diff, now the correct one, sorry - J-PG ¬_¬ 13:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

138, 254, 321, 125, 117 - As much as a like all the old PD images the real strength of Commons lies in new pictures, such as these - Husky 21:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

139, 53, 224, 96, 316 - Vilallonga · (digui digui) 22:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

30, 50, 71, 137, 254 - 68.223.201.167 22:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC) diff[reply]

203, 146, 215, 11, 316 - Futurebird 22:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

308, 272, 254, 142, 63 - diff Warlordjohncarter 23:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

137, 75, 114, 118, 85 - I tried to vote for pictures I learnt from rather than merely admired. I think I failed. - diff Jnestorius 23:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

10, 137, 159, 224, 309 - voting not for something pretty, but for something useful ;) Renata3 00:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

180, 61, 160, 228, 66 - diff Unint 00:37, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

11, 5, 122, 183, 138 - diff Aleichem 01:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

63, 106, 112, 82, 39, 104 - diff 67.23.5.74 02:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC) normalized the format here: see below. Verdy p 00:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

63, 106, 112, 39, 104 - diff 67.23.5.74 02:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

5, 154, 112, 290, 114 - diff 200.50.72.156 02:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

85, 314, 297, 273, 53 - diff MKay 03:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

94, 104, 184, 256, 296 - Dual Freq 03:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

272, 284, 56, 316, 99 - in descending order. Verification diff at Wikipedia.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

11, 94, 237, 245, 318 - diff--长夜无风 04:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

39, 105, 106, 308 - Vocoder 04:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC) diff Invalid diff --MichaelMaggs 07:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

310, 172, 296, 243, 60 - 124.189.226.174 05:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)No anonymous votes please--MichaelMaggs 07:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

174, 110, 162, 201, 46 - diff Rkitko 06:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

60, 83, 164, 212, 266 - Snowwayout 07:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

23, 57, 118, 250, 321 - Wodup here 07:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

54, 171, 281, 242, 99 - diff Mr. Bouncy 07:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

266, 267, 14, 56, 171 - diff--88.239.49.10 09:32, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

36, 170, 82, 315 - Koernerbroetchen 09:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

68, 77, 83, 224, 315 - Acf 10:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

15, 31, 122, 254, 284 - Willtron 10:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

136, 133, 281, 159, 71 - Prefer Image:Ant worker morphology numbered.svg to 159 tho. Voting for encyclopedic images instead of eye candy. - diff -- Jeandré, 2007-02-03t10:51z

diff2 -- Jeandré, 2007-02-14t19:16z

99, 128, 258 - nicest -- Motorsportmcmxc, 2007-02-03 Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page

5, 82, 114, 237, 284 - Karelj 12:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

22, 237, 238, 240, 276 - CharlotteWebb 12:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

33, 36, 75, 91, 196 - 75 is the nicest -- Monsterxxl 13:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

21, 41, 60, 179, 273 - One because cidadas are one of my favorites :) - [2] -- 24.67.72.118 diff 13:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

257, 16, 184, 194, 23 - RedPoptarts 13:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

118, 286, 46, 53, 254 - in no particular order - 201.59.1.129 13:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

93, 145, 216, 305, 308 - Mysid 13:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

176, 62, 250, 128, 116 - Ziga 14:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

87, 315, 58, 181, 265 - Erina 14:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

33, 100, 110, 200, 206 - LasseG 14:51, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

209, 55, 11, 270, 91 - honourable mention to #7 which I almost voted for except the whitespace on the tail, and #43 which just wasn't large enough-- Sherurcij 09:45 , 3 February 2007 Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page

119, 203, 128, 278, 237 - SBT 15:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC) - (diff)[reply]

315, 305, 61, 53, 95 - Lerdsuwa 15:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

99, 154, 170, 84, 276 - In no particular order. (Newish commons user, but 200+ edits on English Wikipedia: diff ) Rmkf1982 15:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

321, 60, 237 - _→AzaToth 16:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

30, 5, 118, 94, 257 - In no particular order. feydey ^(talk) 17:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

127, 103, 61, 171, 194 - The first one is the best. Tooga 17:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page[reply]

254, 317, 184, 15, 33 - Amrum 18:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

43, 56, 112, 267, 315 - Tsui 19:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

185, 54, 192, 14, 256 - Wing045 20:52, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits Alvesgaspar 22:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

53, 149, 122, 217, 250 - Dannycas 20:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

194, 14, 318, 125 - I really like the last one. [3] - 75.5.9.244 21:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

21, 71, 114, 203, 224 - Conti|✉ 22:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Picture of the Year/2006/Voting phase 1/archive 2

Navigation menu

Search