Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EnterpriseBurningHellcat.jpg

Image:EnterpriseBurningHellcat.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by US Navy - uploaded by Cla68 - nominated by Flamurai -- – flamurai 22:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- – flamurai 22:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Great display of heroism, definitely deserves to be featured due to the Zeitgeist and the wow involved. Freedom to share 19:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Haros 16:56, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 17:13, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 20:01, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but I don't like the quality. Its Valued image voting is on. --Kimse 00:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Photo quality. --Nevit Dilmen 09:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject." I would consider a burning plane yards/meters from the photographer a difficult subject considering the risk to human life involved and the fact that, well, planes don't crash on aircraft carriers every day, and people don't climb up on a fuel tank that could potentially explode to pull people out of burning planes every day. Can't you forgive the overexposed sky? FP is not QI+. The emotional response to a photograph should be considered, as well. – flamurai 11:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• I am very glad that somebody, but me brought that rule up. Thank you, flamurai.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Oppose I like historical shots, and can certainly forgive technical flaws in them, but the shot has to tell its own story with clarity. I didn't feel like this shot does a good enough job of that to be an FP. --JaGa (talk) 13:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose per JaGa, exacerbated by poor quality. Lycaon (talk) 19:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Lycaon (talk) 12:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

•  Support "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject." is all I need to say --Booksworm (talk) 11:27, 18 June 2008 (UTC)