Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Dew on a Equisetum fluviatile Luc Viatour.jpg

Image:Dew on a Equisetum fluviatile Luc Viatour.jpg, featured

•  Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by --Luc Viatour 05:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Luc Viatour 05:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support WOW, mirroring drops! Thanks --Beyond silence 08:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support outstanding --Jeses 11:03, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Yes, it is very nice. But there is already a similar FP from the some author wich is better IMO. - Alvesgaspar 13:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Not really! one for the plant. The other for the dew and optical effects (They are not on the same texts) ;) --Luc Viatour 14:21, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Very interesting picture, fascinating optical effects. I would have preferred the plant to be in the center, but that could add a bit to the image too :) Freedom to share 16:10, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Voluntarily not centered to see why here:Rule of Thirds ;) --Luc Viatour 05:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support Vraiment histoire de... mais c'était assez évident :) Benh 21:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  •  Question - C'était quoi évident?... Alvesgaspar 23:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
    • Evident que j'allais voter pour ;) Benh 18:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support I think it is different enough from this one. --Digon3 ^talk 18:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--Seeder 20:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent! ---donald- 09:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support because it is amazing and it has a sufficiently different purpose from the other one. -- Ram-Man 11:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support One of the best pictures on Commons! Though I would have placed the plant a bit more to the center, applying the rule of thirds to the

upper part of the plant. --wau > 23:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support -- MJJR 20:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Je trouve toutefois que vous accentuez trop vos photos. Elles ont en plein résolution un aspect peu naturel. Insectes, plantes, tout a un liseré autour des lignes ou points de contraste. Mais c'est une très belle photo. J-Luc 11:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

vous regardez les photos au rapport 1/1 à l'écran en 72 DPI ce qui est très grand, mais avec un tirage papier photo le résultat est parfait et cette accentuation n'est pas visible au format 20x30cm. J'optimise mes photos pour mes tirages papier.--Luc Viatour 11:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

OK, merci. Je fais aussi des tirages grand format (1200x800) et je n'ai jamais osé pousser l'accentuation à ce point... Félicitations pour tout votre travail. J-Luc 07:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Support --Mihael Simonic 15:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --MichaelMaggs 16:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -Malene Thyssen 18:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Support -- MaiDireLollo 12:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Voting was over Lycaon 17:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Lycaon 17:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Version 2, not featured

 Info A edit by User wau--Richard Bartz 23:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

•  Oppose Nice idea, but for me this new arrangement withdraws the dynamic/tension of the golden section away. It looks slight dull that way. A very nice and artistic thing on the original version is the space, which lets the object breath, plus makes the composition very surrealistic in my eyes --Richard Bartz 23:47, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment Now, there is a unfortunate gradient on the left side of the background, could you fix that, please? Regards --Richard Bartz 00:29, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose Une règle photographique conseille de ne pas centrer le sujet pour garder une dynamique! Voluntarily not centered to see why here:Rule of Thirds ;) --Luc Viatour 07:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
•  Comment I thought about the rule of third before my edit. But the rule does not speak about a plant leaning outwards to the edge of the picture. There is no clear movement or orientation to the right side (the drops at the right side of the plant are not little faces looking to the right, but act as lenses throwing light from behind to your eyes), the plant leans towards the left outside of the picture which lets me think of "The subject should not be facing out of the image". This is why I would place it a bit more to the center with a proporton of the left and right background of about 1/3 to 2/3 (about 1/4 to 3/4 in your picture). I would agree to your composition, if after starting to the left side the upper part of the plant would curve back to the right or if there were another small object like a fly at the right side as a counterweight. --wau > 20:02, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I like that you had the courage, trying to improve this picture. --Richard Bartz 20:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes there is what to discuss, thanks for trying to improve my photograph. Your version is also pretty;) ;) --Luc Viatour 08:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Si Freedom to share n'avait pas voulu que la plante soit centrée, je n'aurais pas eu l'idée de le faire, selon mes réflexions personnelles. Mais on peut bien discuter de cettes choses-là. --wau > 10:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 5th day) Simonizer 22:15, 29 August 2007 (UTC)