Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cote Emeraude Fort La Latte.jpg

Image:Cote Emeraude Fort La Latte.jpg, featured

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Benh (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Info Sky is very bright because I was facing sun. I do not want to correct because I think this is how it should look like (if one faces sun, he won't see deep blue sky). Horizon shouldn't be curved, but I chose fish-eye like projection for artistic purpose. One could achieve the same with a fisheye lens. Hope you'll like it this way.
•  Support -- Benh (talk) 20:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good Muhammad 05:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support. An incredible picture. Really detailed and thoroughly informative.--Simba123 (talk) 14:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC) Vote of blocked user struck. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Well done. --S23678 (talk) 17:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 18:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support L'effet "contre-jour" est un peu osé, mais le résultat est magnifique. Netteté et qualité des détails sont excellents. Il faudrait envoyer cette image à Thalassa, le programme de FR3 qui à la rentrée commencera une série d'émissions sur les côtes françaises, illustrées notamment par des photos et des vidéos envoyées par les téléspectateurs. -- MJJR (talk) 20:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
  • c'est flatteur, mais non voulu. Malheureusement, je fais avec la lumière qu'il y a au moment où je suis sur place. En fait, j'aurais bien aimé que la lumière vienne un peu du côté. Le seul moyen aurait été de prendre la photo le matin. Une prochaine fois peut être ? j'ai des amis en Bretagne :) Benh (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose, poor composition. --Aqwis (talk) 09:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
  • You were supposed to be on holidays !! ;) Benh (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
    • FPC addict visiting a cybercafé? :-) -- Korax1214 (talk) 00:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
      • ^^ --Aqwis (talk) 10:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Thermos (talk) 22:06, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Well done technically but I'm not liking the fisheye look. --Dori - Talk 04:27, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support-- MartinD (talk) 12:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Support - Special picture, I like it very much! //moralist (talk) 19:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose (weak). Wonderful, beatiful panorama, but the sky seems to be overexposed, which is just lame. It is unfortunate the focus of the picture - the castle has its facade shadowed. If anyone can convince me the sky is not overexposed, I will change my vote. Crapload (talk) 01:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

• As I said to user:MJJR I'd have prefered a light litting the scene from aside, I believe it would have made the scene looks better. But I got there at the wrong time and got that contre-jour lighting as a result. The sky is blownout for sure, and it shows on the histogram, but I think the picture is faithfull to what I saw. So I'm not trying to convince you the sky isn't overexposed, but that this is how it should look like at that time of the day (4:00pm). Maybe I could have tried some multiple exposures shots for HDR purpose, but I couldn't use tripod because I had to "lean over the wall" (don't know how to say in english) to get the unobstructed view. Or maybe it's been taken the wrong way and to be fair, I'd certainly have raised the point if the picture hadn't been mine. Benh (talk) 08:10, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Zimbres (talk) 20:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC) I like it
•  Support Great quality even in all dark corners!--Mbz1 (talk) 04:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer (talk) 10:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)