Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Azulejos Parque Eduardo VII-2.jpg

Image:Azulejos Parque Eduardo VII-2.jpg, featured

•  Info Panel of glazed tiles by artist Jorge Colaço (1922) representing an episode of the battle of Aljubarrota (1385) between the Portuguese and Castilian armies. The Ala dos Namorados (Wing of the fiancés) was the left wing of the Portuguese defense formation. Lisboa, Pavilhão Carlos Lopes. Created and nominated by Alvesgaspar --Alvesgaspar 22:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Alvesgaspar 22:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting --MichaelMaggs 08:29, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support--João Carvalho 13:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Nice! It reminds me the church of São Lourenço dos Matos at Almansil, near Loulé. -- MJJR 16:13, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect colors and definition. Paulo Juntas 20:39, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Vassil 21:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Bergwolf 22:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 22:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Oppose and  Delete Jorge Colaço died in 1942. This Azulejos is not in the public domain. In Portugal it's 70 years after the author's death. Please wait 2012. Petrusbarbygere 05:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Thats irrelevant cause of the freedom of panorama. The mentioned Pavilhão Carlos Lopes is in a puplic park. --Simonizer 08:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  •  Info - Simonizer is right. Portuguese law ("Código do direito de autor e dos direitos conexos", 2004. Article 75º,2,g) explicitly considers the right of reprodution of artistisc works when they are exposed in public spaces (right of "panorama"). That is exactly the case of this one, which is in the outside wall of a building, in a public park. - Alvesgaspar 08:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support Ok, if everything is cleared ... --Makro Freak ^talk 10:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Neutral Dont know exactly how to handle this. Should i judge the photo or the piece of art? --Simonizer 12:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  • The photodrapher is secondary, here. --Makro Freak 13:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
  •  Comment - My opinion is that reprodutions of works of art should be evaluated here on their illustrative value (in this case as an example of the Portuguese "blue glazed tiles") and photographic quality, with the artistic componenent contributing (or not) to the necessary "wow factor". - Alvesgaspar 13:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• Please Freedom of panorama isn't a freedom of reproduce. Where is the paronama here ? Please consider this picture is ok for speedy delete. Please, we need trust in Commons's medias. I have nice Picasso who can be avalueted here on their illustrative value. If we want some I can upload this. Petrusbarbygere 23:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Info - Please check the article on Freedom of panorama more carefully. In the Portuguese law, "freedom of panorama" means exactly freedom to photograph and publish. I don't understand what Picasso works have to do with this issue. Did he make any glazed tiles? - Alvesgaspar 00:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Ok sorry. I  Support it now. Thanks for your explications.05:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
•  Support --wau > 22:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Simonizer 07:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)