Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thor's Hammer-Bryce Canyon.jpg

File:Thor's Hammer-Bryce Canyon.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2010 at 08:55:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Thor's Hammer-Bryce Canyon.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thor's Hammer-Bryce Canyon.jpg

•  Info created by Tobi 87 - uploaded by Tobi 87 - nominated by Patriot8790 -- Patriot8790 (talk) 08:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Patriot8790 (talk) 08:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! --Aktron (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Pjt56 (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 11:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support looks like it might be fractionally tilted but a good image. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 13:32, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

* Support Nikopol (talk) 14:47, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support We have an existing FP from Bryce Canyon with almost the exact same view: File:USA 10654 Bryce Canyon Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg. That one is good, but I think this one is better. If this gets promoted, I will nominate the "old" one for delisting. --Slaunger (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Camera EXIF?   ■ MMXX  ^talk  00:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Nice image, but is it possible to lower the exposure (or just the highlights) a little since the clouds are burnt? (Do you still have the raw file?) --MattiPaavola (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMO Lucas version is better, mostly because of the lightning. —kallerna™ 12:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with kallerna --Simonizer (talk) 18:23, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I´m afraid I also like the old FP better in terms of light and colors, although the resolution / sharpness is better on yours. Since it´s exactely the same view, I think we´ll have to choose one picture. Sorry Nikopol (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Mulazimoglu (talk) 19:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose This is featurable, but I prefer the already featured one, sorry. --99of9 (talk) 23:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose: very nice image, but I prefer the lighting in the one already featured. Jonathunder (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
•  OpposeWhile this FPC has a better quality the the current FP, colors and lightning are not. Per others. --S23678 (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:26, 1 February 2010 (UTC)