Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thomas Bresson - Couch-sol (by).OGG

File:Thomas Bresson - Couch-sol (by).OGG, not featured

•  Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
• Support Obvious educational use, and nice sunset. →Diti the penguin — 17:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Georgez (talk) 21:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, not an image Lycaon (talk) 01:25, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • A video is a motion picture so technically it is an image. 41.222.30.20 10:22, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • I transformed your {{FPX}} template into an {{Oppose}} template, since there are for now only support votes for this video. →Diti the penguin — 14:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Question Why does the image pulse like that? Is that a result of the camera's exposure changing, or some astrological phenomena? J.smith (talk) 03:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • “It's not the autoexposure. I have only modified the Time Value (Tv) sometimes. --ComputerHotline 19:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)” (quoted from the “Quality images candidates” page). →Diti the penguin — 14:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment There is a consensus that FPC will only judge still images (and animated gifs) untill specific guidelines are set up for assessing other type of media (video, sound, ...). Lycaon (talk) 14:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Can you link me to this consensus please? I don't see why the “image” word should design only still images (what about .gif files then?), moreover I'd like to know why File:Apache-killing-Iraq.avi.ogg shouldn't have been featured on en:Wikipedia:Featured pictures if it hadn't been by taking the definition that a video is a image set. →Diti the penguin — 22:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Not featured per out of scope (absence of guidelines). Lycaon (talk) 14:13, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

•  Support Out of scope is something completly different. And why shouldn't we have a featured file here? abf /talk to me/ 22:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

• It is out of the scope for FPC. Do we really have to have the same discussion all over again :-(? Lycaon (talk) 22:50, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment made on Commons:Valued image candidates/Thomas Bresson - Couch-sol (by).OGG as well, this file being a video. I see “Not featured per out of scope (absence of guidelines)” above: does an absence of something automatically ejects them from a nomination, or, if we were logical, we shouldn't care about that? Like, I see no reference to the word “SVG” on this page, however SVG files were already nominated. →Diti the penguin — 22:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Premature nomination IMO. I provided feedback on COM:QIC. The jumps in exposure time lead to brightness jumps in the video. This could easily be corrected for. --Dschwen (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Support One-of-a-kind sunset file on Commons at this moment. Elfix (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose —kallerna™ 16:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Simonizer (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2009 (UTC)