Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg

File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2011 at 21:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quito calle García Moreno.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Cayambe --Cayambe (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Info Street in the historic centre of Quito, capital of Ecuador. Altitude: 2,850 m. Quito is a UNESCO-World Cultural Heritage Site since 1978.

From en:Wikiepdia: According to UNESCO, Quito has the largest, best-preserved, and least-altered historic centre (320 hectares) in Latin America

•  Support -- Cayambe (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. This image provides lots of information, such as type of building materials, architecture, installations, topography, etc. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Good one, even though the pole at the right is a bit distracting.--Snaevar (talk) 23:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 02:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice composition, and excellent encyclopedic value. --ELEKHH^T 03:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overall it's pretty good quality-wise and so is the background I almost want to support, but I don't like the dark alley foreground. Could you have maybe photoed when the Sun was higher in the sky? The sky seems strange, too, like darker and not white and blue where it should be. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sky is blown. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I find this one beautiful, and believe the sky and dark areas are results of playing with curves to compensate for short dynamic range from camera (although a D700 !). However this was done, it was in an enough pleasant way to me. Very nice composition. - Benh (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Great composition, but the lighting/exposure seem off. Steven Walling 06:23, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --SHION (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

• account is too young --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:28, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Very nice. --Bgag (talk) 21:44, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:44, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Claus (talk) 14:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Well done --LeavXC (talk) 23:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:00, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Excellente! Royalbroil 02:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Brilliant! --TFCforever (talk) 04:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Well perhaps it is a bit pale picture, but the composition and contrast level makes it great! --Aktron (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I like the colours, the hill, the long street, and the architecture, but the wires upper left (and perhaps the satellite dish) spoil it for me. A shot from a few metres further down the road could have been much better IMO. --Avenue (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Iadrian yu (talk) 12:29, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Jujutacular ^talk 01:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture