Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2016 at 16:17:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Prohvet Eeliase kirik Vasknarvas 2014 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prohvet Eeliase kirik Vasknarvas 2014 01.jpg
Qualified support Slight distortion on the onion dome at the top of the steeple, but again I suspect that was the result of a more-necessary perspective correction. Otherwise a very well-composed image of a country church. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral — the quality is good, but the half of the photo are leaves. For example, the photo on the right is more valuable for Wikipedias. --Brateevsky {talk} 08:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - In my opinion, the photo you link, while perhaps more likely to be a Valued Image, doesn't have a featurable composition. This one might; I've been undecided on that, though I certainly like several things about the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Info created and uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 16:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 16:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Comment it isn't mandatory but english description may be useful Ezarateesteban 21:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Neutral — the quality is good, but the half of the photo are leaves. For example, the photo on the right is more valuable for Wikipedias. --Brateevsky {talk} 08:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
