Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nazare 001.jpg 2

File:Nazare 001.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2010 at 13:25:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nazare 001.jpg 2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nazare 001.jpg 2

•  Info created by MRB - uploaded by MRB - nominated by George Chernilevsky --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Nice photo, was found and noticed as good candidate by Murdockcrc
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 18:59, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Naturally it has my vote! --Murdockcrc (talk) 20:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support mine too! mgeo talk 23:13, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- I know very well the place and this is a nice view indeed (please see here). However the image quality is not up to FP standards: overexposure (affecting the detail of the houses) and geometric distortion are the obvious flaws. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:20, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm frustrated (on both photos) by the missing of the left part of the city. There is surely a rational and rationale explanation, but I think the composition is not good: could support a crop right, and needs an extension left.--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
  •  Info - Not possible due to the geometry of the terrain (please check the geographic location of my picture) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:17, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition doesn't quite convince me.--MASHAUNIX 17:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Martin Kozák (talk) 16:08, 24 December 2010 (UTC) – Rather nice, but light and contrast is quite strange.

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:51, 25 December 2010 (UTC)