Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Louvre Museum Wikimedia Commons.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2010 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Benh - uploaded by Benh - nominated by me -- Orsay Lover (talk) 09:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Orsay Lover (talk) 09:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)- Support here the centered composition works very well for me. --AngMoKio (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- U really don't have to justify (u do, but I think u see what I mean), and I understand your point about that. Hope this is not "compensation" support for what have been said below... :) - Benh (talk) 21:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, this is at least as straightforward as the temple below for composition. - Benh (talk) 22:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- this is not a compensation vote at all. In this photo the symmetry makes the centered composition a very good choice. --AngMoKio (talk) 23:22, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support Those darned, blurry people - but in this case, I think it's a good thing. It conveys movement and activity. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 15:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I wish I could get it people free. But I think it's definitely an improvement over the previous, already featured, version. I can repeat this shot, so I will try again an again... :) - Benh (talk) 21:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good shot. The centered composition and the moving (blurred) persons don't bother me at all. Question: what about the copyrights on representing the Pyramide du Louvre? -- MJJR (talk) 19:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Same as previous FP : context around it wins over central subject (similar place des terreau case settled). Benh (talk) 22:03, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:24, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Neutral This kind of picture needs a perfect centering and it is not absolutely perfect (look at the metallic structures inside the pyramid, not symmetrical, and look at the windows of the building in the background). But it is a very nice picture, and I don't want to oppose : my vote doesn't have any value now against this natural and justified consensus. It's only a comment.--Jebulon (talk) 00:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)- Neutral Slightly tilted? For the rest, same review as Jebulon right above me. Diti the penguin — 00:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - that copyrighted thingy (which I consider an eyesore anyway!) is central in the pic, makes the pic very dubious under France's lack of freedom of panorama. Also slightly tilted and a bit fish-eye distorted. - MPF (talk) 17:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- You've long been away from FPC, and it shows. This issue has been discussed over and over, and the consensus is that it's fine in that case. I'll let you dig more to find why (nomination of current FP of same subject is good starting point). Also that "bit fish eye" distortion is only on horizontal axis this time, and is unavoidable to squeeze this much FOV into the frame. Please oppose on basis on something you know, at least... I would have been better with your usual "don't like night shots", which is as smart as a "I oppose Obama portrait, I voted republican party". - Benh (talk) 19:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 19:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support amazing quality with nice colours! --mathias K 06:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik (my contribs) 18:09, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 10:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas
