Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lady in Hemis Gompa, Ladakh, India in the year 1981.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Lady in Hemis Gompa, Ladakh, India in the year 1981.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2011 at 21:14:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)- Support For film, this is great. --Jovian Eye storm 00:14, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Oppose Bad wight balance.Jacopo188 (talk) 05:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)- I tried to correct the white balance (File:Lady in Hemis Gompa, Ladakh, India in the year 1981.jpg). However, the forehead is overexposed. Yann (talk) 06:37, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Comment I added a note of a new suggest crop over the image (in order the subject to be less centered). I would like to ask you (if you remember because it is an image from 1981) if the yellowish light is due to the butter-candles that Buddhist monasteries usually have inside. Keep uploading more images like that. Ggia (talk) 13:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, Yann and Ggia. I took the image in a nearly dark room in the Hemis Monastery illuminated by many yak-butter lamps. This is the reason for the yellow light in the face by the lady. My camera Olympus OM-1 had 30 years ago no possibility to make spot exposure. The Olympus OM-4 had two years later (1983) the possibility to make spot exposure like other cameras later on. Therefore is the forehead and a part of the nose by the lady in the dark room overexposed. Ggia, I made your crop, the lady stands now on the left side of the image. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support nice image, the image has no problem with white balance.. the yellow light inside a Buddhist monastery is due to the yak-butter yellow lighting. Ggia (talk) 22:32, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support White balance seems to be ok. The expression is worth a support. Quality is good for film, as Jovianeye said. --Paolo Costa (talk) 19:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support Good stuff. Had it been a 2011 photo I would have opposed due to technical issues, but considering it is somewhat historic, and the mood and authenticity is great, I am happy to support. Like the light, the details in the hair and the clothings. --Slaunger (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Tamba52 (talk) 11:56, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
