Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kamp Vught B&W.JPG

File:Kamp Vught.JPG, not featured

Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2009 at 12:12:06

Black & White

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Tfioreze -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 12:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 12:12, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question I really think it is a thought-out and nice composition. But why did you use f/19 and as a consequence of this iso 800? --AngMoKio (talk) 12:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
  • My idea was to bring details beyond the barbed wired fences in order to lead to a feeling of being imprisoned there (as if you would be standing right next to the fence). That was the main reason for a narrow aperture (f/19). My personal opinion is that the noise produced by the high ISO sensitivity (800) just creates an old atmosphere (let's say back to the 40's) for the scene. Tiago Fioreze (talk) 13:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much noise, and oversharpened. Good idea on the composition, but I think you've taken it too far with trying to make it look old. I'd prefer good quality. --Dori - Talk 15:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Same photo with colours and better quality would get my vote. —kallerna™ 07:36, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose flat B/W -- Dcubillas (talk) 12:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as others. --staka.^talk 22:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured (rule of 5 days). --Karel (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Colors

•  Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Tfioreze -- Tiago Fioreze (talk) 14:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Tiago Fioreze (talk) 14:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose overexposed sky, noisy, CA --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:28, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose overexposed sky. --staka.^talk 22:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Come on just a sky like here is on 40 % of commons images. --Aktron (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured (rule of 5 days). --Karel (talk) 10:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)