Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Joan Baez Bob Dylan.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Joan Baez Bob Dylan.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2011 at 14:20:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by U.S. Information Agency, uploaded by Movieevery, nominated by Yann (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)- Info Joan Baez and Bob Dylan, Civil Rights March on Washington, D.C., 28 August 1963.
Support -- Yann (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2011 (UTC)- Support --Tsui (talk) 20:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 05:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:12, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 04:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Takabeg (talk) 08:32, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support--Paolo Costa (talk) 13:41, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Lošmi (talk) 16:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support Yarl ✉ 17:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support Gamaliel (talk) 20:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Raghith 06:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Oppose -- Come on guys! Yes, it is Joan Baez with Bob Dylan and the picture has obvious historical ev (which was already acknowleadged in two wikis). But so what? I see no quality here and the human expressions are not interesting. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)- Oppose I'm forced to agree with Alves Gaspar. What is so special about the "picture" (not the subject, but the picture itself) who justify FP status? -- Béria Lima msg 14:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, the picture might not be of extraordinary quality, but it is quite good. The reason is proposed as FP is that it is a historical picture of 2 famous artists taken at a famous event. I think that's quite enough to be featured. Yann (talk) 15:05, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Neutral - high encyclopaedic value, but as a photograph, good but unexceptional. --Simone 17:24, 9 November 2011 (UTC)- Support - Multichill (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Comment I'm not interested by the subject, therefore I will not vote. But I globally agree with Yann. Here it is not QI. A picture can be FP without to be a (technically speaking) quality image...--Jebulon (talk) 10:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)- Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:25, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose There are many images of them (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc) this one strikes me as photographically less impressive than several of them. Particularly having their hands cut off is a shame. --ELEKHHT 19:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I uploaded the other one from the same event (File:Joan Baez and Bob Dylan.jpg), unfortunately we do not have a high resolution copy. Other images are taken at different times, and not during a famous event. That's my point, and you failed to understand that. Yann (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for uploading the other version with a more interesting facial expression (IMO). But I don't understand how you assessed my failure of understanding something I haven't expressed an opinion on? To clarify: I do attribute value to the image, but that is not the only criteria. We are not going to feature all images from that event. --ELEKHHT 00:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I uploaded the other one from the same event (File:Joan Baez and Bob Dylan.jpg), unfortunately we do not have a high resolution copy. Other images are taken at different times, and not during a famous event. That's my point, and you failed to understand that. Yann (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per all other contras. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special, too tight crop. --Karelj (talk) 12:27, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:31, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. พ.s. 11:21, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- May I remain the naysayers that we can't go back in time to take this picture again. Yann (talk) 14:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- But no one here is trying to destroy the picture, or any other in the series, or to deny its encyclopaedic value! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
