Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Trinity Cathedral - Niš.jpg/2

File:Holy Trinity Cathedral - Niš.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2016 at 11:59:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Trinity Cathedral - Niš.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Trinity Cathedral - Niš.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 11:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- MrPanyGoff 11:59, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment fix the FPC category Ezarateesteban 23:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - That's a really good example of good photography. Congratulations! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 04:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Small but that's not a problem for this image. Nice symmetry and detail. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose I find the symmetry quite boring, and I do not like the crop left and right. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - I find the symmetry beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support In this case I find the symmetry correct --Llez (talk) 11:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose as for symmetry, both towers should be in bright light. And this sky is very dark and weird. And as for educational purpose, we don't have scale. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton 14:34, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton. --Karelj (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose QI, yes. But I have personaly dozens of such pictures of similar views to submit here... This is not original neither outstanding. For those who don't know, FP reviewers are kindly requested to review some quality image candidates, then they could see the difference, and what is expected here in FPC.--Jebulon (talk) 08:00, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - That request is certainly well taken. However, I do look at QIC quite regularly. We simply have a difference in taste. I'd like to see the dozens of similar photos you've taken. Perhaps I'd find them more appealing than other photos that have been featured. And so be it. Differences in opinion make things much more interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support INeverCry 19:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 02:27, 30 July 2016 (UTC)