Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dent STS 1881.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Dent STS 1881.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2010 at 05:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Archaeodontosaurus - uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Archaeodontosaurus -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Strong support Rare view, Very high scientific, educational and encyclopedic values, emotional testimony of very far ancestors (hmm not so far of some I know...). Perfect photographical technics (details, light, composition, background). It honors the FP project, IMHumbleO. Thanks ! Sure, that's not flooding !! --Jebulon (talk) 10:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)- Support Good example for an attractive kind of scientific documentation. --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:19, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support - ditto to Mbdortmund - MPF (talk) 14:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support interesting view with the black reflective background. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:50, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support I'm reading about these 'guys' now, so of particular interest to me. The image is exceptionally well detailed imo. --ianaré (talk) 18:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Steven Walling 21:16, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --George Chernilevsky talk 09:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Neutral It's very nice at thumbnail and even full screen size, but looks strange to me at full size. I see some fringing beside contrasting light and dark features, and the texture seems odd in places (e.g. around the dark "z" on the upper surface). I suspect it's a bit overprocessed, which seems a shame. I can't bring myself to oppose it though.--Avenue (talk) 10:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Not so sharp, I see some noise and maybe some posterization. I second Avenue's remarks and I find quality not sufficient for a FP studio shot. --Eusebius (talk) 11:16, 28 May 2010 (UTC)- Support Very nice picture. Great work. Per Jebulon. Iadrian yu (talk) 19:30, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- no anonymous votes. It's a fossil tooth, BTW. --ianaré (talk) 06:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
