Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bubo bubo 1.jpg

File:Bubo bubo 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2011 at 01:27:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Bubo bubo 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bubo bubo 1.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Lycaon (I think) - nominated by IdLoveOne (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- IdLoveOne (talk) 01:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Great picture! Why did you think this might not be Lycaon's work? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Just wasn't positive from the author info on the image, seems there was some drama I wasn't aware of -- IdLoveOne (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support lovin' it! --McIntosh Natura (talk) 01:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I prefer to see the feet. W.S. 15:30, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • But part of the appeal of the image is the unusual composition of an owl seemingly seated on stone. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Background is very similar color. --Mile (talk) 15:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
  • It's totally bokehed and not ambiguous with the subject IMO. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like the background -- Marmoulak (talk) 04:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose the sharpness could be better--Citron (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Because of composition, an owl on a stone is quite unusual. --Gaendalf (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Weak support --Snaevar (talk) 15:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is a nice owl. I would like to see its legs and claws. Presumably, it is easier to photograph a bird in an aviary than in the wild. Zoo/aviary environment and unnatural background reduces educational value. Snowmanradio (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the background and composition are more than fine, but I agree with Citron. Sharpness could be much better. Steven Walling 01:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jujutacular ^talk 07:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)