Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2016/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Holstentor, frontview[edit]

   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Dr. Chriss (talk) on 2016-01-05 10:36 (UTC)
Scope:
Holstentor, frontview
Reason:
tighter crop, better weather and (i know, it's not a criterion) higher resolution in full view. -- Dr. Chriss (talk)

 Info i'm sorry to tell you, that the picture does not have any perspective or tilt problems. As u can see here, the buidling is lopsided, not the picture. It is nearly "perfect" straigtened (look at the street lamps or other references like the salt store on the right). Verticals are nearly vertical. Greets Dr. Chriss (talk) 10:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Do u mean in the name of the picture? Cause its a Stitching of several images, but not a panorama in his right meaning (panorama means u have a wider perspective as usual), this picture could be also done in a single shot. I did the stitching because just the reason os a better quality and higher resolution for the picture. --Dr. Chriss (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support It is advisable to put the image fusion band, but it is not a rule. This is the best picture we have. Thank you for the explanations --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question How long should be a MVR take? 2 weeks? Less or more? --Dr. Chriss (talk) 22:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @Dr. Chriss: MVRs can be closed after the latest of: (a) 7 days after the last candidate was added, and (b) 48 hours after the last vote on any candidate. → unless somebody casts another vote, I guess it can be closed tomorrow. Concerning your other question: I was suggesting to put the template {{Panorama}} somewhere on the file description page. That's currently the best way to indicate that an image has been stitched together from multiple shots, even if it's not a real panorama. But you could of course just enhance the normal description with something like "This image was stitched from X single shots". (Ich fänd's sinnvoll wenn auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite irgendwo vermerkt würde dass es sich um ein zusammengesetztes Bild handelt – einfach nur der Vollstänigkeit halber. {{Panorama}} ist eine Möglichkeit das zu tun.) --El Grafo (talk) 09:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Schon, das kann ich gerne machen, muss nur schauen, da es ein Zuschnitt eines Stitching ist, kann ich nicht auf das Bild genau angeben, aus wie vielen Bildern dieses hier besteht. Mich hat es nur eritiert das es Panorama heißt und nicht Stitching, ein Panorama hat ja üblicherweise einen breiteren Blickwinkel als man es normalerweise mit einem Singelshot erreichen würde. Ich hab hier ein Stitchings wegen der höhere Auflösung und Qualität gemacht, nicht aufgrund des Blickwinkels. --Dr. Chriss (talk) 10:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Wir haben derzeit (soweit ich weiß) halt keine entsprechende Vorlage für nich-Panorama-stitchings, da war die genannte halt das nächstbeste. Kannst es wie gesagt auch gerne einfach als Text in die Bildbeschreibung packen. Die genaue Anzahl an Einzelbildern spielt für mich auch nicht wirklich eine Rolle, ein "ca. X" oder gar einfach nur "several" reicht ja schon um klarzumachen, dass es eben kein Einzelbild ist. Mach's wie du's für sinnvoll hältst … --El Grafo (talk) 11:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Habe mal die Vorlage eingefügt, aus wie vielen Bildern das Bild letzten Endes besteht kann ich gerade nicht einsehen (bin unterwegs) aber ich denke der Hinweis ist auch schonmal gut :).  Question was muss ich eigentlich dann alles machen um das MVR zu closen? Dank deiner Anleitung ich das MVR eröffnen, habe aber jetzt keine Ahnung wie ich sowas close. Kann mir (oder du) da einer helfen (ggf. ja mit Anleitung zur Vorbeugung von weiteren Fragen meinerseits) .... Grüße --Dr. Chriss (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I want to do well but I need time I do it tomorrow. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like Dr. Chriss would like to learn how to do it, so I've left detailed instructions (in German) for learning by doing at User_talk:Dr._Chriss#MVR-Auswertung. Normally I wouldn't recommend closing your own nominations, but I promise I'll have an eye on it. --El Grafo (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to ask and do it by my own, because i know how much work it is to close a MVR. I will never abuse this. It's only i wanna make it for the other user more comfortable by closing the MVR's by my own. I don't want to make other Users more work ː). Thanks for your instructions, I will do it right now --Dr. Chriss (talk) 16:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. Holstentor in Lübeck Frontseite - Zuschnitt.jpg: +2 <--
2. Holstentor-Lübeck-DSC 0429w.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) 
=>
File:Holstentor in Lübeck Frontseite - Zuschnitt.jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Holstentor-Lübeck-DSC 0429w.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
--Dr. Chriss (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
P e z i (talk) on 2014-08-16 11:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Holstentor, West view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
re-opened for MVR against Holstentor in Lübeck Frontseite - Zuschnitt.jpg on 5 January 2016‎ --El Grafo (talk) 15:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 
1. Holstentor in Lübeck Frontseite - Zuschnitt.jpg: +2
2. Holstentor-Lübeck-DSC 0429w.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Holstentor in Lübeck Frontseite - Zuschnitt.jpg: Promoted.
File:Holstentor-Lübeck-DSC 0429w.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
--Dr. Chriss (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Anemone coronaria[edit]

   

View
Nominated by:
MathKnight ✡ (Talk) on 2016-01-09 22:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Anemone coronaria
Used in:
en:Anemone coronaria, he:כלנית מצויה, fr:Anemone coronaria, de:Anemone coronaria
Reason:
Shows the entire plant with typical red flower and the "circle" of leaves few centimeters below it, high res and geotagged -- MathKnight ✡ (Talk)

For "habitus" this picture file:Kalanit-white001.jpg is better --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you suggest a better scope? e.g. flower or plant. MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 12:42, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest changing photography ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the scope, it is better than the previous VI File:CalanitMagenDavid002.jpg. MathKnight ✡ (Talk) 20:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In that case we need to start a Most Valued Review → I'm moving this to Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list. --El Grafo (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 

1. Anemone-coronaria-2016-Zachi-Evenor.jpg: 0 <--
2. CalanitMagenDavid002.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope)
=>
File:Anemone-coronaria-2016-Zachi-Evenor.jpg: Undecided. <--
File:CalanitMagenDavid002.jpg: Undecided so remains as VI.
--DeFacto (talk). 07:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View
Nominated by:
MathKnight on 2010-01-23 13:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Anemone coronaria
Used in:
he:כלנית מצויה, he:ישראל, en:Anemone coronaria, de:Kronen-Anemone, fr:Anémone couronnée, nl:Anemone coronaria
  •  Support While File:Anemone_coronaria_L_1.JPG shows the cauline leaves, stem and basil leaves, the last are badly out of focus, the overall technical quality is low, and it is not geocoded. Red is a common flower color. This one shows the flower well and the basil leaf shape although partially shadowed and obstructed. So, it satisfies all criteria in my opinion. Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 16:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
voting re-opened for Most Valued Review against Anemone-coronaria-2016-Zachi-Evenor.jpg – previous votes are discarded. --El Grafo (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scores: 

1. Anemone-coronaria-2016-Zachi-Evenor.jpg: 0
2. CalanitMagenDavid002.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:Anemone-coronaria-2016-Zachi-Evenor.jpg: Undecided.
File:CalanitMagenDavid002.jpg: Undecided so remains as VI. <--
--DeFacto (talk). 07:19, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Closed_most_valued_reviews/2016/01&oldid=185561702"