Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2014/04

View opposition
Nominated by: Velvet (talk) on 2013-08-07 22:32 (UTC)
Scope: Duomo di Santa Maria Assunta in Naples, italy (facade)
Support Good and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)`[reply] Support This one is much better than rival in the MVR. Halavar (talk) 22:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Naples duomo facade.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Napoli BW 2013-05-16 11-40-12.jpg: +2 => File:Naples duomo facade.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Napoli BW 2013-05-16 11-40-12.jpg: Promoted. --Halavar (talk) 18:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Berthold Werner (talk) on 2014-03-27 14:52 (UTC)
Scope: Duomo di Santa Maria Assunta in Naples, italy (facade)
Reason: Shows the whole facade. -- Berthold Werner (talk)
Support OK for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply] SupportThis one gives better idea of the whole space. I also like the notes in the picture. Jan Kameníček (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Naples duomo facade.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Napoli BW 2013-05-16 11-40-12.jpg: +2 => File:Naples duomo facade.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Napoli BW 2013-05-16 11-40-12.jpg: Promoted. --Halavar (talk) 18:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side[edit]

View promotion
Nominated by: Paris 16 (talk) on 2014-04-14 17:56 (UTC)
Scope: Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side
Best in Scope--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Agree, best in scope. Halavar (talk) 18:30, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support I think we could close this case quickly...--Jebulon (talk) 18:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014 B.jpg: +4 2. Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014.jpg: 0 3. Hotel-de-Salm-Paris.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- => File:Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014 B.jpg: Promoted. File:Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014.jpg: Declined. File:Hotel-de-Salm-Paris.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --Halavar (talk) 09:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Paris 16 (talk) on 2014-04-14 17:56 (UTC)
Scope: Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side
Scores: 1. Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014 B.jpg: +4 2. Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014.jpg: 0 3. Hotel-de-Salm-Paris.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- => File:Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014 B.jpg: Promoted. File:Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014.jpg: Declined. File:Hotel-de-Salm-Paris.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --Halavar (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Paris 16 (talk) on 2012-04-04 20:22 (UTC)
Scope: Hôtel de Salm, exterior, Cour d'honneur side
Comment Okay, the other side is already promoted, should be added "exterior" for buildings. Okay Archaeodontosaurus, comme tu veux.--Paris 16 (talk) 13:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] Support Good with the new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:59, 8 April 2012 (UTC)`[reply] Scores: 1. Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014 B.jpg: +4 2. Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014.jpg: 0 3. Hotel-de-Salm-Paris.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- => File:Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014 B.jpg: Promoted. File:Paris Palais Légion-d'Honneur Cour 2014.jpg: Declined. File:Hotel-de-Salm-Paris.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- --Halavar (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2013-08-12 06:16 (UTC)
Scope: Eisbach surfing in Munich
Used in: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisbach
Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 10:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)`[reply] Scores: 1. Urban Surfer1.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Eisbach Surfer3.JPG: +4 => File:Urban Surfer1.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Eisbach Surfer3.JPG: Promoted. --Halavar (talk) 09:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Martin Falbisoner (talk) on 2014-04-20 09:13 (UTC)
Scope: Eisbach surfing in Munich
Reason: Superior to my earlier Eisbach picture which already has been promoted to VI -- Martin Falbisoner (talk)
Support : OK for me. --JLPC (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Certainly better than the previous picture. Jan Kameníček (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support I think so --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Support Nev1 (talk) 22:24, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] Scores: 1. Urban Surfer1.JPG: 0 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Eisbach Surfer3.JPG: +4 => File:Urban Surfer1.JPG: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <-- File:Eisbach Surfer3.JPG: Promoted. --Halavar (talk) 09:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)