Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2013/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Closed most valued reviews 2013/02

Ortaköy Mosque, exterior[edit]

   

View opposition
Nominated by:
Darwinek (talk) on 2011-06-07 21:58 (UTC)
Scope:
Ortaköy Mosque, exterior
Reason:
Very good photo of one of the most popular Istanbul landmarks. -- Darwinek (talk)

Previous review

  •  Comment - Could you add a camera location please. Nice photo but it is difficult to choose one image in this category. Here (1, 2) other two good competitors. --MrPanyGoff 23:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I added the camera location. It is taken from the shore, while those two images from the boat. - Darwinek (talk) 09:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment - Yes, it is beautiful but the main body of the mosque cannot be seen well.--MrPanyGoff 06:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. İstanbul 4228.jpg: +1
2. Mosque of Ortaköy.JPG: +0 
3. Istanbul - Mesquita d'Ortaköy.JPG: +0 
=>
File:İstanbul 4228.jpg: Promoted.
File:Mosque of Ortaköy.JPG: Declined.
File:Istanbul - Mesquita d'Ortaköy.JPG: Declined.
--MrPanyGoff 08:48, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renominated because two VIs exist for the same scope --Myrabella (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
=>New review: 

Scores: 
1. İstanbul 4228.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope) <--
3. Büyük Mecidiye Camii - Ortaköy Mosque.jpg: +2 (current VI within same scope)
=>
File:İstanbul 4228.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former. <--
File:Büyük Mecidiye Camii - Ortaköy Mosque.jpg: Promoted and kept.
--Ikar.us (talk) 11:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Eusebius (talk) on 2011-07-19 20:42 (UTC)
Scope:
Ortaköy Mosque (exterior)

Previous review

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 18:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renominated because two VIs exist for the same scope --Myrabella (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
=>New review: 

Scores: 
1. İstanbul 4228.jpg: 0 (current VI within same scope)
3. Büyük Mecidiye Camii - Ortaköy Mosque.jpg: +2 (current VI within same scope) <--
=>
File:İstanbul 4228.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Büyük Mecidiye Camii - Ortaköy Mosque.jpg: Promoted and kept. <--
--Ikar.us (talk) 11:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

The Bronze Horseman[edit]

   

View
Nominated by:
Godot13 (talk) 07:50, 19 January 2013 (UTC) on 2013-01-19 07:50 (UTC)[reply]
Scope:
The Bronze Horseman

 Oppose Sorry! A very good quality image. But many images in the category give a closeup view of the actual Horseman. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:07, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
:  Comment Understood. However, many of the images showing closeup details do not include the entire sculpture and base. My nomination may not be the best but could you please pick a specific example that better exemplifies a VI. Thank you. Godot13 (talk) 12:24, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bronze Horseman002.jpg or File:Der Eherne Reiter.jpg are better as VI in my opinion. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 03:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you are proposing these then please open a MVR - Godot13 (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have to. If you want, i can take back my opposition. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:08, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure how to respond to that. If you truly feel that the images you suggested are more valuable image representations of The Bronze Horseman then I do not want you to change your vote. I think, aside from its better image quality, the present image at full size provides more details than the others, but I may be somewhat biased... Godot13 (talk) 05:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well.... moved it to MVR now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Find the complete monument and its surrounding situation more important than fine details of the object.  Question Is the given position really the camera point of view? --Ikar.us (talk) 02:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The camera did not have GPS ability so I provided the position of the object itself. Should I estimate my position for the location? - Godot13 (talk) 02:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In that case you would use {{Object location}} to indicate the position of the object. cmadler (talk) 13:28, 28 January 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Object inserted for Camera location. - Godot13 (talk) 18:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd nevertheless prefer the camera position and heading. Easy to locate, gives more information and better presentation in the map (if it works...) --Ikar.us (talk) 00:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Exact camera position entered. Angle was SW, but that doesn't show up. -Godot13 (talk) 05:23, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Finally it does. (in the map) --Ikar.us (talk) 23:44, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment This might be a good situation for a set of images. Or, alternatively, we might seek separate Valued Images for the statue alone, the rock ("Thunder Stone", purportedly the most massive rock ever moved) and the monument as a whole. cmadler (talk) 14:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. The Bronze Horseman (St. Petersburg, Russia).jpg: ±1 <--
2. Bronze Horseman002.jpg: -1
=>
File:The Bronze Horseman (St. Petersburg, Russia).jpg: Undecided. <--
File:Bronze Horseman002.jpg: Declined.
--Ikar.us (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by:
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} on 2013-01-29 08:58 (UTC)
Scope:
The Bronze Horseman (Saint Petersburg)
Reason:
Closeup of the actual sculpture that gives better view when used in the thumbnail sizes on various Wikipedia. Inscriptions clearly readable. Also used extensively on various Wikis for illustration of the scope subject as well as other concerned subjects. -- §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C}
  •  Comment VI guidelines define review size as relevant for judging. If really needed, one could try a set nomination with both overview and detail. Still don't find it necessary. Inscription is larger here, but due to oblique view and undulated surface, not better readable than in the front view. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I don't think this is a good angle to show the statue/monument. cmadler (talk) 13:52, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Scores: 
1. The Bronze Horseman (St. Petersburg, Russia).jpg: ±1
2. Bronze Horseman002.jpg: -1 <--
=>
File:The Bronze Horseman (St. Petersburg, Russia).jpg: Undecided.
File:Bronze Horseman002.jpg: Declined. <--
--Ikar.us (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Closed_most_valued_reviews/2013/02&oldid=90500681"