Commons:Closed most valued reviews/2008/12

Imperial College London

View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-11-22 22:04 (UTC) Scope: Imperial College London Scores: 1. Imperial College.jpg: 0 <-- 2. Tanaka Business School - Imperial College 24-06-2004.jpeg: 0 3. Imperial College London Exhibition Road frontage.jpg: +1 => Image:Imperial College.jpg: Declined. <-- Image:Tanaka Business School - Imperial College 24-06-2004.jpeg: Declined. Image:Imperial College London Exhibition Road frontage.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-11-22 22:04 (UTC) Scope: Imperial College London Scores: 1. Imperial College.jpg: 0 2. Tanaka Business School - Imperial College 24-06-2004.jpeg: 0 <-- 3. Imperial College London Exhibition Road frontage.jpg: +1 => Image:Imperial College.jpg: Declined. Image:Tanaka Business School - Imperial College 24-06-2004.jpeg: Declined. <-- Image:Imperial College London Exhibition Road frontage.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-11-25 10:17 (UTC) Scope: Imperial College London  Support This is the best out of the three. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:17, 2 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Imperial College.jpg: 0 2. Tanaka Business School - Imperial College 24-06-2004.jpeg: 0 3. Imperial College London Exhibition Road frontage.jpg: +1 <-- => Image:Imperial College.jpg: Declined. Image:Tanaka Business School - Imperial College 24-06-2004.jpeg: Declined. Image:Imperial College London Exhibition Road frontage.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 21:47, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library

View opposition Nominated by: Mr. Mario (talk) on 2008-11-21 04:03 (UTC) Scope: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library Used in: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library  Info It's the only image of the front entrance. --Mr. Mario (talk) 04:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Fails criterion on geocoding (haven't checked the rest yet). Lycaon (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC) Geocoding acknowledged. Lycaon (talk) 08:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC) I geocoded it. --Mr. Mario (talk) 11:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Insufficient info in the image page: you should precise in which city/state/country (I guess it's in the US) the library is situated, and categorize the picture accordingly. I'm a bit bothered about the crop (top missing), but I'm not sure it would motivate an oppose on its own. --Eusebius (talk) 13:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)  Done --Eusebius (talk) 14:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) It's not really a crop. I was crossing the street while checking if there was tilt but I forgot to check the top. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)  Comment The closest competitor is this one, which fails to show the general shape of the building. --Eusebius (talk) 14:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC) What is this one? --Mr. Mario (talk) 00:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC) Hehe, sorry about that! --Eusebius (talk) 08:12, 22 November 2008 (UTC)  Neutral Framing bothers me. Otherwise I would have supported. --Eusebius (talk) 12:29, 22 November 2008 (UTC) What do you mean by framing? --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC) Maybe it's not the right word. The frame of the picture should be higher wrt the subject: here there is "too much road" and "not enough building" (which is the problem). --Eusebius (talk) 15:53, 23 November 2008 (UTC) Is this better? --Mr. Mario (talk) 00:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC) Yes, much better in my opinion (the white car is a bit distracting but overall it's ok for me). You can either modify the "image" parameter in this nomination (and notify reviewers) or set up an MVR with both pictures. --Eusebius (talk) 08:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC)  Comment Please use the heading attribute when geocoding. --Kjetil_r 00:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)  Oppose I prefer the other picture. --Eusebius (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. MLK-SJSU Library.jpg: -1 <-- 2. Kinglibrary.jpg: +1 => Image:MLK-SJSU Library.jpg: Declined. <-- Image:Kinglibrary.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Mr. Mario (talk) on 2008-11-26 15:17 (UTC) Scope: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library Used in: Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library  Support I think this one is better: better lighting / colours, and the whole building is shown. Cars are slightly distracting, but still ok for me. --Eusebius (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. MLK-SJSU Library.jpg: -1 2. Kinglibrary.jpg: +1 <-- => Image:MLK-SJSU Library.jpg: Declined. Image:Kinglibrary.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Ernest Rutherford

[[File:|160px]] View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-16 14:49 (UTC) Scope: Ernest Rutherford  Info I take it as a studio shot and consider geotag as not applicable. --Eusebius (talk) 14:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination Ouch, pixellated at review size, sorry I withdraw. --Eusebius (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Result: Withdrawn by nominator => declined. --Eusebius (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-16 14:49 (UTC) Scope: Ernest Rutherford  Info I take it as a studio shot and consider geotag as not applicable. --Eusebius (talk) 14:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)  I withdraw my nomination Ouch, pixellated at review size, sorry I withdraw. --Eusebius (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Result: Withdrawn by nominator => declined. --Eusebius (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Dijon Cathedral (interior)

View Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-04 21:42 (UTC) Scope: Dijon Cathedral (interior)  Info This one is larger, maybe of better quality. --Eusebius (talk) 21:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)  Support This is sharper, I think the otherone lost sharpness due to noise reduction --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)  Weak oppose A bit too dark here. I guess this is OK, but I prefer the other one. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Cathédrale de Dijon - nef.jpg: 0 <-- 2. Einblick Chor Saint-Benigne Dijon.jpg: 0 => File:Cathédrale de Dijon - nef.jpg: Undecided. <-- File:Einblick Chor Saint-Benigne Dijon.jpg: Undecided. --Eusebius (talk) 11:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-04 21:42 (UTC) Scope: Dijon Cathedral (interior)  Info This one has a better light and shows the vaults better. --Eusebius (talk) 21:42, 4 December 2008 (UTC)  Support This one shows more details, making it the better representative of the Dijon Cathedral. --Mr. Mario (talk) 15:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)  Oppose I cannot see more details here. On the contrary it seems that a lot of details are removed by noise reduction --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:23, 10 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Cathédrale de Dijon - nef.jpg: 0 2. Einblick Chor Saint-Benigne Dijon.jpg: 0 <-- => File:Cathédrale de Dijon - nef.jpg: Undecided. File:Einblick Chor Saint-Benigne Dijon.jpg: Undecided. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 11:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Ailurus fulgens (Red Panda)

View opposition Nominated by: Mr. Mario (talk) on 2008-12-14 23:49 (UTC) Scope: Ailurus fulgens (Red Panda)  Oppose It's so fuzzy. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:25, 15 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: -1 <-- 2. Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: +1 3. Red Panda b.jpg: 0 2. Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: 0 3. Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: 0 => File:Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: Declined. <-- File:Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: Promoted. File:Red Panda b.jpg: Declined. File:Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: Declined. --Eusebius (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Mr. Mario (talk) on 2008-12-14 23:53 (UTC) Scope: Ailurus fulgens (Red Panda)  Support I think it is the best one (good angle, colours, quality...). Too bad the tail is not entirely shown. I've just geotagged it with the zoo info. --Eusebius (talk) 15:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: -1 2. Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: +1 <-- 3. Red Panda b.jpg: 0 2. Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: 0 3. Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: 0 => File:Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: Promoted. <-- File:Red Panda b.jpg: Declined. File:Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: Declined. --Eusebius (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View opposition Nominated by: Mr. Mario (talk) on 2008-12-14 23:58 (UTC) Scope: Ailurus fulgens (Red Panda) Used in: Ailurus fulgens  Support OK for me. It's very beautiful. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Missing any kind of geographic information (crit. 5), as well as the information template (crit. 4). --Eusebius (talk) 15:09, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: -1 2. Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: +1 3. Red Panda b.jpg: 0 <-- 2. Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: 0 3. Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: 0 => File:Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: Promoted. File:Red Panda b.jpg: Declined. <-- File:Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: Declined. --Eusebius (talk) 21:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View opposition Nominated by: Mr. Mario (talk) on 2008-12-15 00:04 (UTC) Scope: Ailurus fulgens (Red Panda)  Support OK for me. It's very beautiful. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)  Oppose Fails to illustrate the body of the animal. --Eusebius (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: -1 2. Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: +1 3. Red Panda b.jpg: 0 2. Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: 0 <-- 3. Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: 0 => File:Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: Promoted. File:Red Panda b.jpg: Declined. File:Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: Declined. <-- File:Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: Declined. --Eusebius (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View opposition Nominated by: Mr. Mario (talk) on 2008-12-15 00:19 (UTC) Scope: Ailurus fulgens (Red Panda)  Support OK for me. It's very beautiful. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 12:28, 15 December 2008 (UTC)  Comment Hum, to be consistent with the first criterion, you should only give your support to one candidate in a single scope. (PS I will review this MVR later). --Eusebius (talk) 23:29, 15 December 2008 (UTC)  Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. --Eusebius (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: -1 2. Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: +1 3. Red Panda b.jpg: 0 2. Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: 0 3. Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: 0 <-- => File:Ailurus fulgens RoterPanda LesserPanda-2.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Syracuse Zoo.jpg: Promoted. File:Red Panda b.jpg: Declined. File:Red Panda in a Tree Y A W N I N G!.jpg: Declined. File:Ailurus fulgens - Kang 6.jpg: Declined. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 21:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

3 March 2007 lunar eclipse

View opposition Nominated by: ComputerHotline (talk) on 2008-12-15 18:45 (UTC) Scope: Lunar eclipse of March 3rd 2007.  Comment Nice animation, but the variable tilt is disturbing and the details could be better. I don't vote since I set up an MVR with this picture. --Eusebius (talk) 11:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 1. ComputerHotline - Lunar eclipse of 2007 March 3 animation (by).gif: 0 <-- 2. Lunar eclipse March 2007.jpg: +2 => File:ComputerHotline - Lunar eclipse of 2007 March 3 animation (by).gif: Declined. <-- File:Lunar eclipse March 2007.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 21:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-16 11:03 (UTC) Scope: 3 March 2007 lunar eclipse  Support - This one is much better because it is possible to inspect in detail the various stages of the eclipse. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC)  Support Agree with Alvesgaspar. BTW, shouldn't this picture be lunacoded ;-D ? Lycaon (talk) 00:45, 23 December 2008 (UTC) 1. ComputerHotline - Lunar eclipse of 2007 March 3 animation (by).gif: 0 2. Lunar eclipse March 2007.jpg: +2 <-- => File:ComputerHotline - Lunar eclipse of 2007 March 3 animation (by).gif: Declined. File:Lunar eclipse March 2007.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 21:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Richard Stallman

View opposition Nominated by: ComputerHotline (talk) on 2008-12-15 17:20 (UTC) Scope: Richard Stallman  Comment - Please categorize with the proper cat -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)  Comment @Alvesgaspar : It's already categorized. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Yes, but only for French speakers who know the guy's nickname. Now better (I hope). --Eusebius (talk) 09:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC)  Oppose The picture is interesting because it shows the face well, but the composition and position of the subject are not very interesting. I think we have speech photographs that could do better than this one. I like these ones, for instance: The second one shows the face quite well, and seems unexpectedly representative of the character... --Eusebius (talk) 09:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC) 1. ComputerHotline - Richard Stallman (by-sa) (12).jpg: -1 <-- 2. Thomas Bresson - Photo 035 (by-sa).jpg: +2 => File:ComputerHotline - Richard Stallman (by-sa) (12).jpg: Declined. <-- File:Richard Stallman Belfort.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 21:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Commons:Valued image candidates/Thomas Bresson - Photo 035 (by-sa).jpg

Messier 45 - Pleiades star cluster

View opposition Nominated by: ComputerHotline (talk) on 2008-12-21 08:53 (UTC) Scope: M45 open stars cluster  Oppose I think we have much better pictures: Plus, I would have found a wah to add the word "Pleiades" to the scope. --Eusebius (talk) 12:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)  Comment @Eusebius : Yes of course, but it's a HST image. -- ComputerHotline (talk) 13:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC) Life is unfair... ;-) I set up an MVR, so I remain neutral and retract my opposition on this one. --Eusebius (talk) 13:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: 0 <-- 2. Pleiades large.jpg: +1 => File:ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: Declined. <-- File:Pleiades large.jpg: Promoted. --Eusebius (talk) 13:15, 31 December 2008 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Eusebius (talk) on 2008-12-21 13:37 (UTC) Scope: Messier 45 - Pleiades star cluster  Support Fulfills relevant criteria. Lycaon (talk) 21:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC) Scores: 1. ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: 0 2. Pleiades large.jpg: +1 <-- => File:ComputerHotline - M45 (by).jpg: Declined. File:Pleiades large.jpg: Promoted. <-- --Eusebius (talk) 13:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)  Support per my remarks on the suggested replacement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC) Scores: 1. Pleiades large.jpg: +1 (current VI within same scope) <-- 2. Pleiades large.png: -1 => File:Pleiades large.jpg: Promoted. File:Pleiades large.png: Declined. -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)