Category talk:Categories of Italy
Advantages of Category:Italy[edit]
If these categories were renamed to the shorter names things would be simpler. They are valid categories. They don't need to be hidden.
--Timeshifter (talk) 00:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Oppose to rename the Category:Categories of Italy and all the under categories "by". Excepting the geographic categories "by city, province, region", the other categories "by century, period, subject" are all under-categories of architecture or art categories. So I oppose to rename the Categories in the simple form: these categories are not "Category:Italy"", they are "Categories of the Category Italy". They are useful for management of architectural and art categories of Italy. --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- The Italy categories in the table mean the same thing with or without "Categories of". I don't understand (other than English fluency) why some editors want "Categories of" added to those Italy categories in the table.
- People reading this may also want to see Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Countries by category. --Timeshifter (talk) 18:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- I am against the proposal to rename the categories of Italy in the short form because if somebody tell me "Category:Italy by city" I understand "Cities of Italy"; and so "Italy by region" for me it means "Regions of Italy". I think that it's clear: the category of Italy is e.g. Category:Art in Italy; "Art in Italy by century / city / period / region / subject" are not Category:Italy, but categories of a Category of Italy, that is to say "Art in Italy". So simple! --DenghiùComm (talk) 16:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Oppose, category Italy isn't equivalent to the purpose of this category. Category:Metacategories of Italy would be more pregnant. --ŠJů (talk) 15:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Next categories of Italy to do...[edit]
... when there will be at least four subcategories :
- by club
- by geochronology
- by language
- by order
- by patron saint
- by user.
To delete:
- by topic.