Category talk:Animalia in right lateral aspect
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Category:Animals facing right[edit]
See above under "Category:Animals facing left". - MPF (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Keep I see no problem, and some people seem to find these useful in finding types of images they with to reuse. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:24, 21 May 2010 (UTC)- Keep --Starscream (talk) 20:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Delete completely useless if every animal facing right is categorized. I could understand to have a category with generic images only (drawings, silhouettes), but as it stands, this category is not only useless but also generating category clutter. --Elekhh (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)- Keep It seems to be useful when it is full of pictures, more than 200. It is another category, and if pictures and categories are well categorized, it will be as usefull as any other. --DPC (talk) 12:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept, no consensus against keeping, seems to be useful. --rimshottalk 22:07, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Category:Animals facing left[edit]
This and the next below (Category:Animals facing right) have both just been created in the last 2 or 3 days. They don't serve any useful purpose; also, if kept, each would ultimately contain close on a half of all the animal photos on commons. I propose deletion of both. - MPF (talk) 21:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- If you want to delete these both categories, you also should delete: Category:Facing left, Category:Facing right, Category:People facing left, Category:People facing right, Category:Men facing left, Category:Men facing right, Category:Women facing left, Category:Women facing right ... We will have more and more of these combined categories because of the weakness of the user interface, not being able to combine two or more categories in a simple query, such as e.g. select x from y where category='Animals' and category='Facing left'. So, cause we cannot combine in queries we do combine in categories.--Frank C. Müller (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I see no problem with these at all, and some people seem to find these useful in finding types of images they with to reuse. -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:23, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep --Starscream (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Delete completely useless if every animal facing left is categorized. I could understand to have a category with generic images only (drawings, silhouettes), but as it stands, this category is not only useless but also generating category clutter. --Elekhh (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- Keep It seems to be useful when it is full of pictures, more than 200. It is another category, and if pictures and categories are well categorized, it will be as usefull as any other. --DPC (talk) 12:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept, no consensus against keeping, seems to be useful. --rimshottalk 22:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)