Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

55,166 closed valued image candidates
Closed as				Nominations
Promoted			49,590 (89.9%)
Undecided			3,085 (5.6%)
Declined			2,491 (4.5%)

New valued image nominations

Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Shougissime (talk) on 2024-05-22 21:11 (UTC) Scope: Tadej Pogačar - in race Used in: fr:5e étape du Tour de France 2023, en:Tadej Pogačar,et:Tadej Pogačar; nl:Tadej Pogačar, ca:Tadej Pogačar Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: WildMouse76 (talk) on 2024-05-24 01:16 (UTC) Scope: Cygnus olor (mute swan) swimming (juvenile in November)  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus Tried my best. Let me know if it still needs tweaking. WildMouse76 (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Oppose Scope format is now fine but the month of November being a defining sub-scope is concerning. While yet to be determined I am OK with a scope for this VI nomination being a Cygnus olor (mute swan) with sub-scopes of this being a juvenile engaged in swimming. Both subscopes are behavioral characteristics of the species. What seems too narrow is to have a further 3rd sub-scope being the month of November. Per COM:VIS, specifically the section on animal scopes, why would this image of a swimming juvenile mute swan taken in November be more valuable than one taken in say, October or December? --GRDN711 (talk) 12:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC) @GRDN711 The months are probably due to the excessive images of this species and its stage of maturity. If you want to, I can change the scope. WildMouse76 (talk) 14:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC) If the scope is still too wide or a better picture is found, will it be acceptable to add the location to the scope? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment @GRDN711: For the hemisphere concerned there is a variation in the appearance of the animal depending on the month. This reduction in scope is not necessary, it is true, but it is entirely legitimate.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus Thank you. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment This is a good image but the second part of attaining a VI rating is being the best, and therefore most valuable, image within a defined scope. Per COM:VICR (1), a Valued Image is "the most valuable illustration of all images on Commons which fall within the scope of the nomination". Further, per COMVICR (2), a "scope is not a simple description of the image. Rather, it defines a generic field or category within which the image is the most valuable example. The scope must be broad enough to be realistically useful to somebody who wishes to search the VI repository". This also means that the scope must be a sufficiently generic subject field (not too wide or narrow), also allows another photographer with a similar image, to challenge an existing VI-rated image within that generic scope in MVR. For an acceptable scope, start with the direction found in COM:VIS section on Animals (also applies to birds) of one VI scope per species. Ok, if the image is identified as a distinct sub-species, good on that too. And then there are the sex and general age differences that may affect species appearance - male, female, LGBQ (?), pairs, flocks, adult (assumed if not specified), juvenile, cygnet, hatchling, egg - fine there as well. And let's not forget the various behavioral characteristics of the species - flying, swimming, procreating, resting with eyes closed etc. - fine there too. Location is only relevant if it affects the visual appearance of the swan in the image. If such a distinction exists, the bird is usually defined as a sub-species as there is always a lively debate in avian circles about the definitions of bird taxonomy. All species, including humans, change appearance with age but by date/time stamp goes too far as part of a generic scope. I accept the general chronological avian benchmarks of egg, hatchling, cygnet, juvenile and adult. By my rough count, there are about 50 possible and valid possible VI scopes. IMHO, find one of them that works within the COM:VIS framework. Be aware that even if you do find a suitable scope for this image, there may be others that may be just as good (there are about 200 images of swimming juvenile mute swans). There also needs to be an appropriate scope-link category identified. This is the VI nomination challenge. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC) @GRDN711 Then what scope do YOU think best fits this image, since you think my suggested scope isn't good enough? WildMouse76 (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC) The choice of image and scope definition falls to the nominator, @WildMouse76. If I had an easy answer I would have suggested it. The most obvious that comes to mind is Cygnus olor (mute swan) - swimming juvenile, wtih appropriate scope-link. However, with about 200 images of swimming juveniles to review to see if yours would be considered the most valuable, the result remains uncertain. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC) @GRDN711 What if the scope was changed to Cygnus olor (mute swan) swimming (juvenile) - right side? Would that be better? WildMouse76 (talk) 05:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment WildMouse76 - IMHO, there is nothing in the species description of Cygnus olor that indicates that one side of a mute swan is visually distinct from the other. IMHO "right side" is not an acceptable 3rd sub-scope for this nomination as it just adds extra description that unnecessarily narrows the scope. There are cases (vehicles, ships, cars, motorcycles, buildings, even wing configurations on butterflies and moths), where viewpoint is relevant but IMO not here. You should note that there are some subjects (seagulls, squirrels, swans, dogs, cats etc. come to mind) that are quite common and thousands of images are taken annually, with many uploaded. A good image may be QI but finding a "just right" scope in VI where it is the best and most valuable, can be a challenge. I will review your nomination again once the final scope is set. @GRDN711 How about this one? (Birds swimming facing right - Cygnus olor (mute swan; juvenile)? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Drow male (talk) on 2024-05-24 07:07 (UTC) Scope: Bernardo Penabade is a Galician philologist, teacher and writer. Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-24 10:38 (UTC) Scope: Dacia Jogger Hybrid - left rear view  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: WildMouse76 (talk) on 2024-05-24 14:39 (UTC) Scope: Milvus migrans (black kite) in flight with prey  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-24 16:56 (UTC) Scope: Moche pottery in the Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera, Lima (Peru)  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-05-24 20:39 (UTC) Scope: Immanuel Kant by Johann Gottlieb Becker Used in: en:Immanuel Kant, de:Immanuel Kant, en:History of philosophy  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-05-24 20:54 (UTC) Scope: Phoenicopterus roseus (Greater flamingo)  Comment We must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. and : We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Is there please a tutorial that explains how to do this? here are the coordinates 34.692063, 10.749685 El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment Ok for the name of the bird which is perfectly formatted. I added the geocoding in your image: look at the changes. For the rest, open the competing images and get inspired by what is done. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Useful and very used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-24 22:24 (UTC) Scope: Nazca pottery in the Museo Larco.- Code catalogue ML031895, Lima (Peru)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:11 (UTC) Scope: Reformierte Kirche Vnà South side. Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:37 (UTC) Scope: Saint Peter and Saint Andrew by Jacobello di Bonomo - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:38 (UTC) Scope: Le Christ aux liens (Christ in Bonds) - Musée Goya  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:40 (UTC) Scope: Mia moglie by Lino Selvatico  Support Useful and used--Pierre André (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-25 05:08 (UTC) Scope: Malleus albus (White hammer oyster), left valve  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-25 10:10 (UTC) Scope: Moche pottery showing episodes from the mythological epic of Ai Apaec, in Larco Museum.- Code catalogue: ML018882, Lima Peru Used in: Global usage  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-25 15:56 (UTC) Scope: St. Simon und Juda church in Trier Stained Glass Window in the church with an image of St Simon & St Judas.  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-25 20:06 (UTC) Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Chovnovytsia Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 26 May 2024 Scope: Charaxes solon sulphureus (Sulphur Black Rajah), ventral  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-26 04:28 (UTC) Scope: Martyrdom of Mammes of Caesarea - Francesco dei Franceschi - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-29 05:15 (UTC) Scope: Fraxinus ornus (flowers)  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-26 04:33 (UTC) Scope: The little cloister of the Church of Santa Caterina dei Servi di Maria  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-26 05:02 (UTC) Scope: Senilia senilis (Senile Ark), right valve  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 26 May 2024 Scope: Lethe vindhya vindhya (Assam Black Forester), ventral  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-05-26 09:05 (UTC) Scope: Thomas Paine by Laurent Dabos (1792) Used in: en:Thomas Paine  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-26 15:29 (UTC) Scope: Stele of Pacopampa in the Museo Larco.- Code catalogue ML300025, Lima (Peru) Used in: Global usage  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 00:55 (UTC) Scope: Clothing designed by Iris van Herpen, Nautiloid dress  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 01:02 (UTC) Scope: Clothing designed by Maria Grazia Chiuri, New Junon dress  Comment It appears that there is a copyright on the author's works....--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: COM:CLOTHING - the only copyright to consider with clothing are separable graphical elements, typically. — Rhododendrites talk |  11:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC) OK I understand correctly and it's good news  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 01:04 (UTC) Scope: Clothing designed by Iris van Herpen, Physalia dress Reason: Not in use yet, but notable dress selected for a current fashion exhibition at The Metropolitan Museum of Art. -- — Rhododendrites talk |   Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 01:09 (UTC) Scope: Voss (Alexander McQueen collection), razor clamshell dress  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-27 03:57 (UTC) Scope: Detail Alter Krahnen (Trier) Detail (barred window)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:05 (UTC) Scope: Anthony the Great, 17th century Spanish school, Musée Goya of Castres  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:07 (UTC) Scope: Signora in giallo by Lino Selvatico - Musei civici Santa Caterina Treviso  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 08:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:37 (UTC) Scope: Senilia senilis (Senile Ark), left valve  Support Best in scope.--Pierre André (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:39 (UTC) Scope: Sonchus hierrensis (Hierro goose thistle), habitus  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:41 (UTC) Scope: Sonchus hierrensis (Hierro goose thistle), inflorescences  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-27 07:37 (UTC) Scope: Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) - right rear view Used in: de:Land Rover Defender (L663), nl:Land Rover Defender (L663)  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-05-27 Scope: Calinaga aborica (Dark Freak) - ventral  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-27 15:40 (UTC) Scope: Idole Chincha Museo Larco nr ML400670 (Lima), Peru  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Shougissime (talk) on 2024-05-27 16:38 (UTC) Scope: Jaakko Hänninen - portrait Used in: da:Jaakko Hänninen, de:Jaakko Hänninen, en:Jaakko Hänninen, es:Jaakko Hänninen, fa:Jaakko Hänninen, fi:Jaakko Hänninen, it:Jaakko Hänninen, no:Jaakko Hänninen, no:Jaakko Hänninen, pl:Jaakko Hänninen, pt:Jaakko Hänninen, ru:Jaakko Hänninen Reason: At this time, most recent picture of this rider available on Commons with a good quality and last jersey of the team. -- Shougissime (talk) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-27 19:11 (UTC) Scope: World War II memorial in Cherniavka Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-28 04:21 (UTC) Scope: Church tower of the Baselgia rifurmada, Ardez Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:13 (UTC) Scope: Salvator Mundi - Quentin Metsys - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:09 (UTC) Scope: Stories of Alatiel - Arrival of the Bride - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:14 (UTC) Scope: Well head in Campiello S. Maria Nova - Venice  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:18 (UTC) Scope: Lioconcha lorenziana (Lorenz's Pitar Venus), right valve  Support Best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-05-28 Scope: Polyura narcaeus lissainei ( Naga Nawab) - ventral Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-28 15:52 (UTC) Scope: Moche portrait ceramic in Museo Arqueológico Larco, (Lima).- N° ML000174  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-28 17:30 (UTC) Scope: Pulpit of the Reformierte Kirche San Bastian (Zernez) Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland  Support Best in scope. --Pierre André (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-28 19:44 (UTC) Scope: World War II memorial in Frontivka Used in: Global usage Open for review.

Closed valued image candidates

• Promoted valued image candidates
• Declined valued image candidates

Pending Most valued review candidates

Remote view of Florence Duomo by night

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Mile (talk) on 2015-03-11 15:22 (UTC) Scope: Remote view of Florence Duomo by nigth Reason: So far best nigth/dusk photo from Michelangelo hill, would say best remote view in general (dusk view is far more beneficial - colors). -- Mile (talk)  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 17:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: dllu (t,c) on 2024-05-22 20:30 (UTC) Scope: Remote view of Florence Duomo by night Reason: In my opinion technically superior to existing VI File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg -- dllu (t,c)  Oppose The left tower is less visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London Used in: en:Bertrand Russell, de, es  Comment This is the most valuable image in scope, but only if the scope does not include the base. If the scope includes the base, we have to consider whether the dark File:Bust of Bernard Russell in Red Lion Square (01).jpg is better than File:I feel I almost know this guy - geograph.org.uk - 1656321.jpg, which is fenced off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC) I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London  Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 00:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.