Commons:گزیدن نگاره برگزیده
گزیدن نگاره برگزیده گزید نگاره برگزیده are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal things[edit]Nominating[edit]Guidelines for nominators[edit]<translate> Please read the Complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
</translate> <translate>
</translate> <translate>
</translate> <translate>
</translate> <translate>
</translate> <translate>
</translate> <translate>
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents[edit]There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." Photographs[edit]On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
</translate> <translate>
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the Complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audio[edit]Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominations[edit]If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
</translate> Adding a new nomination[edit]If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files:
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Recommended: Please add a category from the list at COM:FP. Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify him/her using Voting[edit]Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for his/her own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policy[edit]General rules[edit]
Featuring and delisting rules[edit]A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be polite[edit]Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken. See also[edit]
|
Table of contents
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Others
- Info Northwest view upwards to the pediment, rotunda, and dome of the California State Capitol in Sacramento. I wanted to make the bright dome stand out well against a dark blue sky. The camera location was about 30 meters away from the building. Perspective distortion correction has been applied, more would look unnatural. What do you think, is the chosen gallery Architectural elements#Others appropriate or should Architecture/Exteriors#United States be chosen instead? I was a bit unsure, thanks in advance for your feedback. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The view upwards to the pediment and the dome with the flags in front of it was particularly impressive to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:56:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Leucophaeus
- Info Thousands of gulls come to this beach just after high tide this time of year, just after all the horseshoe crabs have come ashore to lay their eggs. It's a feeding frenzy spectacle. At one point, something spooked them and they took to the air. We were standing out on a mud flat at the time and it sort of felt like they were circling us -- very loud and kind of surreal (and somehow we escaped without getting anything falling on us). This is my effort at capturing the chaotic moment, quickly snapping five frames for a panorama. The vast majority of these birds are laughing gulls (Leucophaeus atricilla), but there are several herring gulls, too, as well as Canada geese and mallards. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support An impressive scene. Reminds me of a famous movie quote: “Have you ever seen so many seagulls? What do you suppose it is?” -- Radomianin (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Mimidae (Mockingbirds and Thrashers)
- Info I was watching this gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) when a red-tailed hawk flew overhead. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Trachiniformes
- Info Sandperch (Parapercis pacifica), Anilao, Philippines. We have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wait, is it that a frog fish I see on the sea floor? Wolverine XI 18:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is so distracting. I can hardly see the subject. wait... Henrysz (talk) 03:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 14:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
- Info Focus-stacked image of a bunch of historical CPUs created by Martijn Boer - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What can I say...except that the crop is a little shaky. Wolverine XI 18:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 23:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support very cool Henrysz (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 10:05:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
- Info created by San Fermin Pamplona Navarra - uploaded by Theklan - nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 06:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Calidris
- Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 05:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Onagraceae
- Info Closed flower of a Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea' (Night bloomer) Focus stack of 54 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 15:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 21:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Екатерина Борисова - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 09:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
- Info A fisherman returns to the port at daybreak in Kerkennah The photo was taken from a fishing tool used to catch octopus; created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What an innovative composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: would support if horizon is straightened; very impressive otherwise. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Skander zarrad: Please correct tilt as noticed above Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to, just I'm not at home for the next 4 days, but I'll take care of it as soon as I get back, I promise, thank you for your comment :) Skander zarrad (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest people vote on the basis that the tilt will be sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to, just I'm not at home for the next 4 days, but I'll take care of it as soon as I get back, I promise, thank you for your comment :) Skander zarrad (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning composition. --August Geyler (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Different and nice. ★ 12:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support !! for an untilted version -- Radomianin (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Creative composition but the blurry foreground ruins it, sorry. Because it makes the whole image too busy and cluttered. Imagine the picture without these distracting elements, it would be much better. Although the contrejour is average, with lack of detail, poor contrasts, and blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 07:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Germany
- Info Coat of arms and portrait of Cardinal Augustin Bea, ceiling painting, parish church St. Genesius, Riedböhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth 1.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 04:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande, Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The Cosmonaut in Portugal! World traveler! ★ 12:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info: portal of the Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose While I see this photo as a superior to full scale chapel (if you can't step further from the object — shoot the details), this picture is lacking wow and is blurred on the top. Maybe a QI but not a FP IMO, sorry. Красный wanna talk? 09:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info: square crop without the oculus. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 14:47:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Tettigoniidae (Katydids or Bush Crickets)
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral -- Berthold Werner (talk) 14:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 90 % of the picture is blurred because only the head is in focus. And the animal is bad cropped. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop doesn't sit right with me. Wolverine XI 21:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support In macro photography Sebring12Hrs if you don't stack images with different depths of field you can't have all the animal in focus especially if it is not parallel to the lens. The photo was taken at f13, he couldn't do better--El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You don't have as big a depth of field as you do with focus-stacking though this was not taken with a macro lens. The depth of field is worse if you get in too close. Naturally, an animal in profile will have more of its body in focus than this sort of threequarter view, but Orthoptera legs and Tettigoniidae antennae are very tricky. There is seldom a reason to crop off part of an animal unless the objective is a close up. In this case a tighter crop just to show the head would make it look better, but the head isn't especially sharp so it might not be worth it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:51, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- This was taken with a macro lens of this kind: https://www.grainlab.com/images/product_images/original_images/pen_f_28-50_1a.jpg and is done without focus stacking because it's a living animal in nature. --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, yes it is. I've only done test photos using 50mm macro. I had to get too close, so not much good for the insect macros I take. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The animal was cut (leg and antenna), additionally the problem of depth of field, here you can see an image of a similar subject in focus and not cut --Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- In the photo you mentioned the subject is parallel to the lens so that's normal. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, this makes it easier to solve the depth of field problem but I was referring to the problem of not cutting the animal. Wilfredor (talk) 23:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- In the photo you mentioned the subject is parallel to the lens so that's normal. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose (regretfully) – makes for a good QI and VI, but not FP with that specific crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment With this crop it would fail at VI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 11:45:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tanzania
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good light and colors but nothing seems to be really in focus. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your message. The focus was at infinity. The house on the hill for example seems in clear focus to me. Maybe because of the huge resolution of the file it was still rendering when you zoomed in? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very atmospheric. The mountain and also most of the trees on the plain are in focus. I guess the impression of softness is just due to some haze which may be inevitable at these distances. – Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas; very impressive when viewed in full size. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 10:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
- Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I see it hopping...Wolverine XI 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not a huge fan of the open field, but everything else works. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, kangaroo's mouths are adapted to cut grass really short, which is why their habitat often looks like a mown lawn. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tanzania and Tasmania! ★ 13:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Where is Tanzania coming from? Wolverine XI 18:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:29:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Harsh light at right. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor technically with very bad lighting. Wolverine XI 21:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 05:28:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Support★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)- There're many lens flares on the photo. ★ 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technical issues. Blown highlights, blue flares, lack of sharpness in the corners-- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 20:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)
- Info Ribbon eel (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:34:09
- Info The image quality is significantly worse than existing FP File:Mount Rushmore detail view.jpg. It is only a tenth of the resolution in each dimension not to mention worse dynamic range and detail. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- dllu (t,c) 17:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This wouldn't be promoted now, after someone has uploaded a 600 megapixel behemoth view of the same subject, but on its own it doesn't fall short enough of FPC standards to need delisting. It's not like this is is VIC, where there can only be one image per subject. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as the original nominator. ★ 21:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Even though the pictures portraits the same subject almost from the same placement, light and colors are slightly different. I agree with to others to keep both as FP, too. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:05, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as per Rhododendrites and Harlock81. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep --Mile (talk) 11:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 17:27:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_outdoors
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (t,c) 17:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 16:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
- Info created by skander zarrad - uploaded by skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This other image from Tunisia is not quite FP but I much prefer it to this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
- Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good fow factor. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resolution could be better, really good composition. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Am I crazy? I don't think this is a photograph at all.. Look at how the lines differs in thickness when they're being stretched VS when being compressed... this is just a bunch of lines with a swirl filters on it and blending layers Henrysz (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:15:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
- Info created by Lunna Campos - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Symmetrical impression could be better. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes of course, but the arrangement of the elements doesn't appear to be symmetrical, so there's not much to do. ★ 15:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think a more describing file name would be appreciated --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:59, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per COM:I: "Images should have a meaningful file name [...] and have an accurate description on the file page" -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 11:51:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MB-one (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very low resolution by modern standards especially for an architectural subject; and the composition could be better in my opinion. For example, the way a lamp post in the foreground is occluding one of the main pylons of the bridge. dllu (t,c) 17:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 10:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 10:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:18, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support All relevant areas are naturally in focus without artificial oversharpening. Attractive subject. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 08:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info Barbary macaque father and mother with baby; created by Llez| - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No focus on the eyes, and the shadows are quite annoying. Wolverine XI 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadow in the background, I'd also prefer lower point of view. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak supportThe shadows are a downside, but the baby steals the show.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 16:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 03:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 05:31:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Faj2323 - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MB-one (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 12:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
- Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Adam. He knows what he is doing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 17:02:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Paradisaeidae_(Birds-of-paradise)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The right side is very blurry. ★ 20:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not one of the rarest birds, though amazing to get a photograph; but so tricky to ignore serious technical shortcomings. I much prefer several of the other images on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:48, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is insufficient even for QI. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There are many things wrong with this. We got quality, the distracting stuff on the right, technical problems. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 02:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support It's AI upscaled isn't it. but the subject and overall effect is so impressive Henrysz (talk) 03:14, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Upper right corner and strong blue hue. Maybe over-processed -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 16:40:29
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). There is a distressing amount of chromatic aberration in this photo. Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist : very blurry --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Indeed poor quality even for its time. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per Schierbecker and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per others. --August Geyler (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 12:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For FP this should be identified and categorized as a juvenile Papio anubis Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the comment, caption, description, category and file name edited -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support
JJGiles, you've done it again! --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC) - Support ★ 12:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support No words. Wolverine XI 14:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 05:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 05:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Incredible specimen. Wolverine XI 09:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Plozessor (talk) 15:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing contrast between the butterfly and the background. --MB-one (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Skander zarrad (talk) 21:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 09:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support as per MB-one. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- J.Stalin S Talk 19:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Vanellus
- Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for the nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp Judging by how you replied to this nomination, I'm assuming there's something wrong with the image. Is part of the animal out of focus? I would love to know. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Of course it looks lovely at first glance, but I am not sure it has the sharpness and feather definition for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty boring to say the least. Wolverine XI 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary. Just a man with his sheep. Or am I missing something? Wolverine XI 10:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine, also some parts (like the sheep's neck) are blurry without an apparent reason. --Plozessor (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support great composition. --MB-one (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: the light is not ideal, but very expressive somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition! Henrysz (talk) 03:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu (t,c) 22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, and subject in shadow, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful peafowl but a less than stellar composition. Wolverine XI 10:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)
- Comment Banded mongoose (mungos mungo)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'd prefer the background to be all black. Wolverine XI 10:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 15:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info created by Hernan Irastorza, uploaded by Jeff G., nominated by Yann
- Info Ruben Andon: Make up, Body art & hair: Barbara Rizzuti
- Support Artsy portrait. -- Yann (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Rainbow? No. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 17:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Perfectly in time for June :-). --SHB2000 (talk) 00:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not a good file name per Commons guidelines. Please think of such things before you create nominations. Something like "Woman with rainbow-hued body makeup" would be better. Plus the description is inadequate, I'll fix that one for you. --Cart (talk) 09:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- No urgency per se, but people may be more inclined to support the nom if everything is top notch for it, plus nominators tend to forget such "minor" things once they've got their star. --Cart (talk) 18:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @W.carter: OK for renaming it after closure. I don't think it is that urgently necessary to do it now. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This image is technically fine, but I don't like the left-leaning nature of the subject. A centered subject is preferable, and a more expressive face is desirable. Overall, not FP in my eyes. Wolverine XI 10:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review, Wolverine XI. As far as I know, this kind of image composition is often used in documentaries to create suspense and attention. The usual harmonious placement on the right would be the less conspicuous standard. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Support-- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)- Comment: there are a bunch of artifacts along the upper edge of the table that need to be fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- True there's a weird rectangle and an unexplainable blurred orange zone close to it. I will support again once it's fixed. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Improvement done (3rd editing) (SwissTransfer link) @Jeff G., Yann, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I have removed the above mentioned artifacts and probably unnatural appearing editing marks. If you are satisfied with the improvement after checking, you are welcome to use this version for an update. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Much better thank you! There seems to still be a blurry area close to her right shoulder (so the shoulder that appears on left on the image). There is also a blurry area close to the thumb and close to the other hand. Also, I'm wondering, is it over a table that she's placing her arms or is just a soft surface? Because it is a bit strange how the sort of white table is extremely linear just bellow the body but on the left it becomes a bit wavy (so I think it's a soft surface but that there was a white rectangle applied in postproduction bellow the body) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks for the quick feedback, Giles. The messy spot on her right shoulder has been fixed and the link above has been updated with the 2nd edit. As for the table, I think it's either a soft blanket or a mattress that the model is resting her elbows on. The area in the middle at chest height was probably straightened afterwards by the creator. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Jeff G., Radomianin, The Cosmonaut, and Giles Laurent: I uploaded the version edited by Radomianin. Yann (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the update, Yann. Sorry I wasn't that fast :) Updated the link above: I removed the messy spot on the right shoulder that Giles mentioned. I'll leave it up to you if you want to do another update. If so, thanks in advance :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 19:11, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you and very good job Radomianin! I support the third edited version with the hands blur fixed that I guess will be uploaded soon to update the actual version Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Yann (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Yann, unfortunately in my haste I forgot to edit two spots mentioned by Giles, namely those on the right thumb and the left hand. I apologize that you have to take action again, but you can wait until tomorrow after Giles has checked again. I think all the spots are fixed now. The link above has been updated. It's the best we can do to rescue the nomination :) Sincerely, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: much better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Many thanks for your improvements, Radomianin! – Aristeas (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 14:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 14:14:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 14:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional in any way. Wolverine XI 19:59, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
NeutralNice but tilted at the top. ★ 00:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The roof. ★ 14:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Support ★ 15:52, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thx Cart for the clarification! Yes, the ceiling is crooked, though I think that this is because the roof is crooked ;) --Plozessor (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support after clarification. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- The ceiling (ceiling/teto is what you see inside a building, and a roof/telhado is what you see from the outside) is not horizontal, it is leaning and it is higher on the right side than the left side. There is nothing the photographer can do about it; unless he brings in a building team and have them reconstructing the station. --Cart (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @ArionStar: Sure? The roof is crooked. The picture is straight as can be seen from the handrail. Or are you referring to something else? --Plozessor (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clean work on a difficult object. Thanks to Cart for the analysis :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: I can see where Remedy Entertainment got inspiration for the Oldest House... --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:45, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting contemporain architecture with concrete and space, and not easy to capture without any people. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Sebring12Hrs --MB-one (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If the disruptive moiré on the escalators and the cut-off entrance are removed, I am also in favour.--Ermell (talk) 10:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Ermell: Don't want to remove the entrance because it would kill the symmetry of the upper part, but I managed to reduced the moiré at least. --Plozessor (talk) 05:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 09:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
- Info created and uploaded by Kevinpaulscarrott - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support This has got to be one of the best city directory maps created by a Commons user out there. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:37, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question There seem to be quite a few problems with the detail; naturally maps are all about accurate detail. It needs consistency of use of Norwegian/English (e.g. Gata/Gate; use of Ceramist (a person) as opposed to Ceramics/Pottery). Accommodation should be Hotel. Huset Vart seems to be a shopping centre in a converted bicycle factory, not a science factory. Do Norwegians translate Vinmonopolet as Liquor Store; the American term? I've heard them using alcohol store or using vinmonopolet when speaking English. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Most maps of larger areas are outdated as soon as they are published. --Cart (talk) 14:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Whatever it should be called, the Vinmonopolet is nowhere near the shown location from 2022, so you'd never find it using this map. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Just a note from a Scandi. These days the languages (Norwegian/Swedish/Danish) spoken and written by Scandinavians contain a lot of English words and expressions, and most of us don't know the difference between pure American and British English. We learn and use a hodgepodge from what we pick up in media, films and tv shows, and try to adapt what we say so that people will understand the meaning rather than true translations. It's sort of the Scandi version of Pidgin English. Hence we use the real names of companies like 'Vinmonopolet' (in Sweden, Systembolaget has the same function) when speaking among foreign friends, but terms like 'Liquor Store' when describing it to the public in general. --Cart (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Leaning keep, but a few comments/questions: 1) why not go with the svg version? 2) It looks like File:City map stavanger.svg is the user's masterwork (in its 24th edition!). 3) Since it looks like the creator regularly updates these, does promoting it to FP prevent that updating? Would it have to be a separate file? I would support a rare exception to the prohibition on changing FPs once they're promoted in a case like this, since updates are likely just going to make it more accurate (and remove mistakes/out of date locations). — Rhododendrites talk | 17:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is fine, but nowhere near today's FP standards. Wolverine XI 18:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 06:41:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info created and uploaded by Shitadevi - nominated by Desertasad -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Desertasad (talk) 06:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you please add a description in English (even with Google Translate, native speakers will fix it if needed). Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I've made an attempt at machine translation but it's up to native speakers to fix it. dllu (t,c) 22:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support outstanding. --MB-one (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:15, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- J.Stalin S Talk 19:19, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:MiG-29 38.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:35:18
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft It's a grainy image of the undercarriage of a fighter jet. We've all seen one before. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 04:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nominator. Красный wanna talk? 19:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak keep: I feel this can be improved with careful post-processing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Per nom. --August Geyler (talk) 16:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2024 at 04:18:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#China
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (t,c) 04:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Why does the water appear very grainy? --SHB2000 (talk) 04:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- I can only see slight grain when pixel peeping the 100 megapixel image, which I don't find distracting at all. Are you perhaps referring to the ripples reflecting the sky? dllu (t,c) 05:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fair enough – Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those mini-ripples on the water look fine to me. It's what you get when you have a breeze blowing on a lake with no rolling waves. --Cart (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe – I'll wait and see what others have to say. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Support Desertasad (talk) 05:11, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but per the header, only "[e]ditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Your account only has 24 edits as of 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow, that is super high resolution. Toadspike (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support LGTM -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:25, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Resokution is great and the motif interesting, but the lighting and composition/POV are not at FP level for me. Poco a poco (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty uninteresting light and strangely washed out colours on the building. The sharpness could also be better.--Ermell (talk) 13:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)- I agree about the light. Regrettably, the sky was hazy. The colors are slightly washed out since it's very far away, but I've already applied aggressive dehazing compared to the original [1]. I'm surprised to see sharpness being mentioned since the sharpness seems fine to me on the 100 megapixel photo except perhaps for the extreme corners of the image. dllu (t,c) 20:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment To be fair, I was wrong about the sharpness.--Ermell (talk) 10:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco an Ermell. --Milseburg (talk) 19:38, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 19:59:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Podicipedidae (Grebes)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak support I think the center side of the organism is a bit out of focus. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 09:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:24, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 18:32:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 18:32, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing! ★ 23:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Weak opposefor the purple glare near the sun, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Tried to fix that purple glare, please take another look. --Plozessor (talk) 04:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Still something, but almost gone - Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: Updated it once more. --Plozessor (talk) 14:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, yes nice autumn but otherwise nothing special for me. --A.Savin 08:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Contre-jour very well handled. --MB-one (talk) 12:20, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful autumn scenery. It could be worth trying to brighten up it further – underexposing was necessary here, but is to be compensated in post-processing. Of course it’s a matter of taste how bright it should get … – Aristeas (talk) 07:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thx, I did brighten the dark parts according to my taste. Actual look depends on the monitor setup ofc ... Plozessor (talk) 08:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. As I said, a matter of taste. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thx, I did brighten the dark parts according to my taste. Actual look depends on the monitor setup ofc ... Plozessor (talk) 08:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support lovely autumn colors! --SHB2000 (talk) 12:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 17:39:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Chile
- Info created by Pedro Szekely - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The cloud obscuring parts of the mountain isn't visually appealing IMO. Also, the quality of the mountains isn't worthy of a FP, especially when the resolution and size are near 20 MB -- WildMouse76 (talk)20:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)- Neutral Now that I think about it, the fog isn't really a problem. I'm still disturbed by the quality of the mountains. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:03, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think that is precisely the theme, excellent cover for the book "the fog" --Wilfredor (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback! Personally, I believe the clouds add drama and enhance the scene :) JustEMV (talk) 01:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral a bit much noise. Otherwise FP worthy. --MB-one (talk) 12:21, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like the scene. It's true that the quality of the mountains could be better, but there are many details in the foreground. --Harlock81 (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Noisy ! But what a composition. Lights and colors are amazing. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 15:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Croatia
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Main subject in the shadow. And low wow factor in my view because the architecture is not incredible -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 07:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 05:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 11:22, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support somehow --Mile (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. – Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Per Basile Morin. --August Geyler (talk) 16:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
File:La Défense, Paris April 2012.jpg (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2024 at 00:50:50
→
- Info Blown-out/overexposed sky on the horizon; replacing to File:La Défense at night, 24 June 2014.jpg (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- ★ 00:50, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace -- -donald- (talk) 06:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wrong file? this image was promoted, the other is supposed to replace, right? At first sight, the crop at the left was better in the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- But the photo-processing of the latter is better. ★ 16:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. ★ 11:29, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- The rythme generated by the curved light rail is also visually much more interesting. In any case, the photo is misleading. Reviewers might think the picture displayed in the nomination will replace the other one with a link. Whereas it is the contrary -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Too tight crop, and the curved light rail playing with the curved façade has disappeared. Composition and rythme more interesting in the promoted version -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Basile Morin, left version with curved light strings seems better.--MZaplotnik(talk) 16:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral A stalemate; each image has got its advantages. Perspective, colours and atmosphere may be better in the 2014 version, but the 2012 version has a better left crop and that great curved light rail. One could want to feature both of them, but for that they are too similar. – Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per Aristeas. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2024 at 09:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- InfoRelief, carved with the effigy of Ste Cécile represented with her zither, to the right of the portal of the Saint-Martin church. Oxelaëre (Nord, Fr).
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 09:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition. ★ 16:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice photo. Красный wanna talk? 08:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice photo, but in my opinion it lacks a wow factor. Also it seems slightly off center --- there's more room on the right than the left. I think the composition might be better if it were slightly wider so that the two pillars, with the cherubs on top, were fully visible. Also, the chemins des retables flag feels a little out of place but I suppose it's part of the building so there's no removing it. dllu (t,c) 20:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2024 at 21:15:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info No FPs of this species. I think the garden tree may be an exotic. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support - WildMouse76 (talk) 03:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but something is off here. I think it's the bird's positioning. It's not facing the camera and we can't really make out it's physique. Had the bird faced the camera in a classic stance, I'd have supported this image. The composition and crop are not a problem if you're wondering. Wolverine XI 11:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The classic stance image has FP potential, but the nominated image is more dynamic. No idea what you mean by 'not facing the camera'. Classic bird photos have the head in profile; like here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:08, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
[edit]Mon 03 Jun → Sat 08 Jun Tue 04 Jun → Sun 09 Jun Wed 05 Jun → Mon 10 Jun Thu 06 Jun → Tue 11 Jun Fri 07 Jun → Wed 12 Jun Sat 08 Jun → Thu 13 Jun
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
[edit]Thu 30 May → Sat 08 Jun Fri 31 May → Sun 09 Jun Sat 01 Jun → Mon 10 Jun Sun 02 Jun → Tue 11 Jun Mon 03 Jun → Wed 12 Jun Tue 04 Jun → Thu 13 Jun Wed 05 Jun → Fri 14 Jun Thu 06 Jun → Sat 15 Jun Fri 07 Jun → Sun 16 Jun Sat 08 Jun → Mon 17 Jun
Closing a featured picture promotion request
[edit]The bot
[edit]Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
[edit]Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
[edit]- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
[edit]- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.