User talk:ZxxZxxZ

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ZxxZxxZ!

Please protect Patrick Paul Jakubik. I come in peace <3 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:387:0:803:0:0:0:71 (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, ZxxZxxZ!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added category[edit]

Hello. I see you added "Category:Politicians" to File:Saddam rumsfeld.jpg. I wonder why. I see the image already has categories for "Donald Rumsfeld" and for "Saddam Hussein". Is the category for one of the other men seen in the background? If so, do you know their name? If not, why do you think this category should be added here? Thank you for your time. -- Infrogmation (talk) 11:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Yes, the person on the right is Tariq Aziz. In this video, he appeares in the first milliseconds (the one who raises his hand) as well as seconds 40–45, and, since Saddam shaked hands with that American person next to Rumsfeld (see the video), I thought he may be a politician. — Z 15:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I see we didn't have a category for Tariq Aziz, so I've started one. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 16:02, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry Blossom illustration request[edit]

Hi, just to let you know I've done a (probably not very good) illustration for your request at the Illustration Workshop. let me know what you think and if any changes are required. --Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I left a note there. --Z 00:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Latuff-iran.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Americophile 04:38, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient ?[edit]

Hi, ZxxZxxZ. What do you think of Category talk:Poets from (Ancient) Persia‎, Category talk:Poets from (Ancient) Persia ? Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 04:54, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Takabeg, I left a note over there. --Z 05:15, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I oppose the renaming you suggest. It should actually be the other way round, see Category talk:Sasanian art. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jastrow, sorry, I should took a look at talk page before tagging it for move, I'll talk to you there. --Z 18:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quranic Manuscript Writtern by Ali (as)[edit]

Hi, do you know whether there is any picture of the Qur'anic manuscripts that are thought to be written by Imam Ali (as) in com.wiki? Regards, Taha (talk) 04:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Taha, as far as I know there are two manuscripts believed to be the Mushaf, one is in the Library of Imam Ali Shrine in Najaf and another one is in Astan Qods Razavi museum,[1] we can't upload the latter because of its permission (unless we take a picture ourselves), but I found two image of that of Imam Ali Shrine's Library and uploaded them here and here (Btw we can crop the image and remove those writings later) --Z 13:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Thanks. I'll crop and use them. One more question: After croping, should I upload in Commons or Fa.Wiki? Taha (talk) 15:19, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, in Commons (click on "Upload a new version of this file" at the end of file's page) --Z 15:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Sorry, one last question: Regarding the captions for the pictures: do you have a reliable source saying the manuscripts date back to 1st century AH? Because Mahmoud Ramyar says many of the manuscripts known as Mushaf Ali can't be authentic. Taha (talk) 15:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately not (I just wrote that based on the information here) --Z 16:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No Problem. Thanks.
BTW, there are a couple of other manuscripts (incorrectly) thought to be written by Imam Ali, like the one in Egypt. You can find a list of them in Ramyar's book. Taha (talk) 22:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iran ethnoreligious distribution 2004.jpg[edit]

Hi! Would it be alright if you added a Persian language description to this file? Also would it be alright if you provided the Persian equivalents of the English, so I can make a request for somebody to make a Persian version of File:Iran ethnoreligious distribution 2004.jpg? Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 10:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! WhisperToMe (talk) 16:06, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wonder why you have redirected this category. There has been a trend in Indonesia since the 1980s to impose Arabic architecture on new mosques. You can see that there is a vernacular Islamic architecture with indigenous features. Today only mosques built by the government retain the traditional three-roofed Indonesian style. Not all Muslim in Indonesia, especially the educated ones, are happy about this "arabisation" of Islam in Indonesia. This sensitivity has to be taken into account. This is why I created the category. By removing it, you are only vindicating those Muslim in Indonesia who want to "arabise" Islam in the country, Humboldt (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you're right, forgive me for the mistake. --Z 20:48, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Well, I suppose that being Iranian, you understand the issue... :-) Humboldt (talk) 20:51, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes bro --Z 08:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Sunset at Imam Ali Shrine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 11:19, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your inbox.and see my pictures.--Sonia Sevilla (talk) 10:09, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear ZxxZxxZ,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skin of a Persian lioness, belonging to an endangered subspecies of lions, brought to Dublin by King Edward VII in 1902[edit]

Salam, check out this image of the skin of a Persian lioness (literally, a lioness from Persia): http://www.museum.ie/The-Collections/Documentation-Discoveries/July-2013/A-Persian-Lioness Leo1pard (talk) 05:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red categories[edit]

Please, learn Commons:Categories #Creating a new category. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:10, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, now see that you can create them. But IMHO you leave too much redlinks, e.g. in this run of edits. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but I think adding categories, even red categories, is an improvement and better than nothing. --Z 17:41, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No, red categories are absolutely not necessary at all! Please check my blue categories of File:Kunstobjekte aus Iran, Susa, 1 Jts. v.C. (2).jpg, to which you added very similar red categories. In some occasions it might be necessary to add a new category, which is initially red but should be made blue by adding the appropriate higher level category. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:01, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Foundation slab of Xerxes[edit]

Hi ZxxZxxZ,

how do you know, that it is limestone?--Cameron Kay (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added that based on this description: File:Foundation_slab_of_Xerxes_in_Babylonian_language,_Iran,_Persepolis,_Garrison_quarters,_Achaemenid_Period,_reign_of_Xerxes,_486-465_BC,_limestone_-_Oriental_Institute_Museum,_University_of_Chicago_-_DSC07978.JPG and the fact that pretty much every stone artifact in Persepolis is limestone. --Z 13:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear ZxxZxxZ,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Hezareh Castle[edit]

Hi ZxxZxxZ, you created Category:Hezareh Castle. Can you check if the category can be linked to fa:قلعه میناب (d:Q5905158) OR to fa:قلعه هزاره (d:Q5808002)? They use the same image, but names and locations are different. Or maybe both articles describe the same castle? I wasn't able to find more information. --Te750iv (talk) 05:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, they are indeed the same subject and should be merged, I've just tagged the former to be merged with the latter article. --Z 12:18, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Bayazid Bastami has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Two Shahdiz castles[edit]

There are two namesake castles:

Now, this image illustrates a wrong castle in following articles:

You can replace it with two proper images from Isfahan. :) --Orijentolog (talk) 22:18, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for notifying, I replaced the photo in those articles Z 08:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flags of Nizari Ismaili state[edit]

Hello, I have a request for you. You have uploaded two flags of the Nizari Ismaili state. Please tell me the sources where the information about these flags is indicated. I've searched, but haven't been able to find it yet. Thank you in advance for your help. Гусейнага (talk) 10:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I searched in my sources but I couldn't find it unfortunately. I had read it in either Lewis' or Daftary's works that the flag was green, and was changed to red after the appearence of the first ruler Imam Hassan II of Alamut. --Z 11:41, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the answer. But still, if you can tell in which specific works this is mentioned, I will be grateful to you. Гусейнага (talk) 12:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for language template for Northern Kurdish (kmr)[edit]

On Commons:Translation requests I tried making a section for Northern Kurdish or en:Kurmanji but it has not shown up yet. It is OK if you make a version for that?

Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliefs[edit]

Hi ZxxZxxZ! :) Two little questions:

  1. Do you have sources for dating (254 AD) of Bishapur relief II and Bishapur relief III? I found a source for the first one.
  2. Does Persian Wiki have articles of these reliefs?

Excuse my laziness, but I don't want to spend time for searching now. Anyway, even if they don't have articles, and if you give me some proper refs, I'll make comprehensive Wikidata items as soon as possible, like I recently did for Sar Mashhad relief and Sarab-e Bahram relief. --Orijentolog (talk) 18:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Orientolog, yes, my source is the paper from Bruno Overlaet, which is apparently the link you provided:

Bruno Overlaet: A Roman Emperor at Bishapur and Darabgird. Uranius Antoninus and the Black Stone of Emesa. In: Irania Antiqua. Volume 44, 2009, pages 461–530

in Persian Wikipedia, there is an article for Shapur I relief in Darabgerd: w:fa:نقش شاپور. There is also an article for all reliefs belongjng to Shapur I: w:fa:نقش‌برجسته‌های شاپور یکم --Z 19:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]