User talk:Zorro2212

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File tagging File:Big_cyc.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Big_cyc.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Big_cyc.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Herr Kriss (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo_filmpolski.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo_filmpolski.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Herr Kriss (talk) 16:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wrzosowisko_olej_deska_1976.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Herr Kriss (talk) 16:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ulica_Kunitzera_olej_1978.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Herr Kriss (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plotno_olej_1969.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Herr Kriss (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pilsudski_olej_deska_1935.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Herr Kriss (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Autoportret_Feliks_Paszkowski.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Herr Kriss (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Rokosz.jpg[edit]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rokosz.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rokosz.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Herr Kriss (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reklama Lodz MFK 2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Masur (talk) 13:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tytus[edit]

Jesli bannery, logo etc nie sa glownym motywem zdjecia tylko pomijalnym elementem ogolnego ujecia (jak na budynku) to jest ok. Masur (talk) 08:48, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: categorization[edit]

Nice to meet you!! Thank you for the info. I will do it next time I upload something. Sorry if I made you change my categories ;) --MaryG90 (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tablica z Zachodniej 2[edit]

Cześć. Jesteś autorem fotki http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tablica_J%C3%B3zef_Pilarski_%C5%81%C3%B3d%C5%BA_Zachodnia_2.jpg Czy zatem możesz mi powiedzieć gdzie ona się dokładnie znajduje? Bo formalnie budynku przy Zachodniej 2 nie ma, nie ma na mapie http://www.mapa.lodz.pl Możesz mi pomóc? HuBar (talk) 14:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Zorro2212!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję za zdjęcia![edit]

Dzięki za fotki bieżące z Łodzi. Co siadam do wikinews, aby napisać jakąś wiadomość, to okazuje się, że na commons mam już odpowiednią ilustrację. --Ixtlilto (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Agata Pura 2010 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Agata Pura 2010 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:29, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Agata Pura 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Aleksandra Liniarska 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 21:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Malgorzata Lis 2010 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Malgorzata Lis 2010 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Malgorzata Lis 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 22:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Zorro2212, why does this upload have no EXIF/meta data? Where (location) did you shoot it? --Túrelio (talk) 22:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Katedra na stokach[edit]

Prosze o kontakt pod adresem biuro.prasowe@4kultury.pl - chodzi o mozliwość zrobienia zdjęć w katedrze na Stokach. --Ixtlilto (talk) 13:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kategoryzacja[edit]

Dziękuję za uwagi. Całkowicie zgadzam się z potrzebą dodawania maksymalnej (w granicach rozsądku) ilości kategorii. Nie przesadzałbym jednak z bezużytecznością plików bez kategorii, jeżeli mają właściwą nazwą pliku :) Wpisując w szukaczu na commons np "Ozorków Wyszyńskiego" otrzymujemy listę plików, a nie kategorii, więc jest wielka jest szansa, żeby ktokolwiek do nich dotarł, zatem także użył w Wikipedii :) Czy się mylę? Ale nie ma co dyskutować nad potrzebą kategoryzowania! Trzeba i już. Masz rację, że rankingi zmobilizowały mnie do dodawania dużej ilości plików, ale starałem się zawsze nadawać im przynajmniej jedną kategorie. Korzystałem kiedyś z wyszukiwarki kategorii, ale często występowały tam błedy. Wrócę do niej. Obiecuję kategoryzować w miare możliwości czasowych i chęci. Co to znaczy "zgodnie z ostatnimi trendami" ? Gdzie znajdę nowe trendy kategoryzacji ? Pozdrawiam i czekam na wszelki uwagi dityczące mojego wkłady w projekty Wiki --Jacek Bogdan (talk) 13:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC) Czy jest jakiś sposób na znalezienie wszystkich zdjęć bez kategorii mojego autorstwa? --Jacek Bogdan (talk) 14:06, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Big Cyc[edit]

Co za pytanie! :) "Praca własna" i tak jest w rzeczywistości. Ok 20 lat temu zrobiłem te zdjęcia na koncercie na Lumumbowie, gdzie mieszkałem podczas studiów na farmacji. W tym roku dopiero wysłałem Krzyśkowi to zdjęcie http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Krzysztof_Skiba_1988.jpg. Niesamowiecie sie ucieszył. To bardzo wyjątkowe zdjęcie z synem na reku. Wywiązała się mała wymiana maili. Zaproponowałem korektę biografii na Wiki. W końcu w sierpniu udało mi się spotkać u mnie w mieszkaniu. Mam zdjęcie pamiątkowe jako dowód :) A Ty skąd znasz zespół?

File:Sundial in St Mohor & Fortunat church in Groblje, Slovenia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 23:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:Postojna 2010 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 08:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ul. Kilińskiego[edit]

Witaj - gdybyś był kiedyś przypadkiem w pobliżu Kilińskiego 46 mógłbyś poświęcić kilka minut na tę tablicę [1] :) - Darekm135 (talk) 13:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC) P.S. - to zdjęcie na stronie biblioteki pedagogicznej jest chyba Twoje? [2][reply]

Północna/Ogrodowa[edit]

Witaj – przy tym zdjęciu [3] w opisie jest Północna róg Ogrodowej – czy to jest fizycznie możliwe / a może miało być Północna/Nowomiejska. Podobno te ruchome pomniki Tuwima mają stać również w innych miejscach - pozdrawiam - Darekm135 (talk) 21:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feliks Paszkowski[edit]

Witaj - dawno, dawno temu :) wrzuciłeś ten plik: [4], jest to oczywiście rezultat artystycznej wizji, ale zastanawiam się, czy można dodać go do kat. "Łódź in art" – klimatem przypomina stary Widzew. Pozwoliłem sobie zmienić kat. tego pliku: [5] z Żeromskiego na Gdańską. Źródło mówi o Żeromskiego, ale przecież torowisko tramwajowe na Politechniki i Żeromskiego na całej długości od Ronda do Kopernika jest oddzielone od jezdni, no i zabudowa nie pasuje. Tutaj mamy Gdańską przy Zielonej, z prawej strony widać kamienicę z położonym obok przystankiem T (tam zatrzymuje się 12 w drodze z Retkini nim skręci w Zieloną, napisałem zatrzymuje się i miałem na końcu języka brzydkie słowo, na Retkini nie ma 10, 12 i 14, jest tylko 8, którą mogę dojechać do Kaliskiego i potem na Aleksandrowską – na Teofilów to ja mogę dojechać 76, szybciej i wygodniej. Przed chwilą przeczytałem na stronie mpk o autobusie zastępczym Z10, jeżeli jeździ z Kaliskiego do Tulipana to dlaczego nie mógłby jeździć z Retkini na Widzew Wschód skoro nazywa się Z10), pisałem nie na temat, sorry. Za tramwajem widać kamienicę na rogu, niedawno zburzoną – ciekawe jakie będą losy pustego placu? Obok nieistniejącej kamienicy jest taka "obrośnięta" posesja – kiedyś była tam żandarmeria. W nazwie pliku jest nadal Żeromskiego, ale nie wiem jak to zmienić – chyba nadchodzi zima, znowu nie na temat – pozdrawiam. Darekm135 (talk) 21:40, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Watercolors of Nikifor of Krynica - Villa Cichy Kącik.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

WTM2 (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Watercolors of Nikifor of Krynica - Orange Villa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

WTM2 (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Watercolors of Nikifor of Krynica - Train station.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

WTM2 (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Watercolors of Nikifor of Krynica - Train station 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

WTM2 (talk) 23:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Carli Lloyd 2012.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was a non commercial image. --Natuur12 (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Zorro2212. You have new messages at ww2censor's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 23:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Siatkówka[edit]

Witaj – zauważyłem, że bot wstawił do kat. Bydgoszcz trochę zdjęć dotyczących siatkówki [6] / jestem pewien, że Tobie będzie łatwiej umieścić je w odpowiednich kategoriach – pozdrawiam, oby do wiosny – Darekm135 (talk) 20:59, 5 February 2014 (UTC) PS – we Wrocławiu są również [7] i w Bełchatowie [8], Pile [9], Muszynie [10], Gdańsku [11], Białymstoku [12], ale na pewno się powtarzają – Darekm135 (talk) 21:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dobry wieczór – tutaj seria zdjęć bez opisu [13], wygląda jak reprezentacja Niemiec, na tym zdjęciu na górze jest [14] napis Halle Euro 2013, więc chyba Mistrzostwa Europy w Piłce Siatkowej Kobiet 2013 – po drugiej stronie siatki chyba (?) Turcja, na tym zdjęciu "16" [15] to może być Büşra Cansu, a tutaj "17" [16] Neslihan Demir, DarnelDarekm135 (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS – stworzyłem taką kategorię Poland at the Olympic Games – aż dziwne, że jeszcze nie było – Darekm135 (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fotki aktorów[edit]

Hej, brak zdjęć naszych aktorów w wiki był dla mnie sporą bolączką. Z kolei jak wspomniałeś ze zdjęciami prosto z netu może być problem. Po długich poszukiwaniach znalazłem jednak fajne wolne źródło: np. http://www.kino-teatr.ru/kino/acter/m/euro/111989/bio/ . Co do zdjęcia Andrzeja Krasickiego jest ono prawidłowe, zmyliło Cię pewnie do, że Jesiukiewicz jest bardzo do niego podobny. W Krzyżakach Krasicki grał Hughensa a Jasiukiewicz Ulryka. Pozdrawiam Maciek Kwiatkowski (talk) 18:48, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hej, dzięki za wsparcie. Wprawdzie nie sposób dyskutować z adminem ale miałem dobre chęci. Mój tok rozumowania był następujący: zazwyczaj Rosjanie oznaczają swoje strony np: "Copyright © 2013-2014 Все права защищены" czyli "wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone". Ta strona jako jedyna (z tych co nas interesują) miała oznaczenie: "© 2006-2014 kino-teatr.ru При использовании материалов ссылка на сайт обязательна" czyli po naszemu "przy wykorzystaniu materiałów wskazać źródło (dać odsyłacz do źródła)". Ucieszyłem się, uznałem to za carte blanche i zacząłem wyszukiwać, obrabiać i ładować zdjęcia. Nie spodziewałem się, że będzie z tego taka afera. Została mi tylko spora kolekcja zdjęć (nie wszystkie zdążyłem załadować). Pozdrawiam, Maciek Kwiatkowski (talk) 18:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

rok ?[edit]

Witaj – to „r” w nazwie kat. dla osób nie znających polskiego może być zagadkowe [17] – pzdr. – Darekm135 (talk) 19:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj, ten pomnik jest poświęcony ofiarom UPA, a nie ofiarom mordu katyńskiego, poprawisz nazwę pliku i jego opis? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:58, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bałtyk[edit]

Cześć – gdybyś był przypadkiem na Narutowicza w pobliżu Bałtyku zrób proszę kilka zdjęć kina – może uda się też wnętrze – nie wiadomo co tam będzie po zamknięciu przez Helios kina we wrześniu – Darekm135 (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Najbliższe dni to oczywiście 1 i 3 maja – 3 wygląda ubogo [18], a jeśli chodzi o 1 to nawet nie wiem, czy w Łodzi coś się w tym dniu odbywa związanego ze Świętem Pracy [19]Darekm135 (talk) 19:37, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plaques at Szymel & Helena Wileńscy tenement house, Łódź Sienkiewicza 41[edit]

Cześć – dlaczego Sienkiewicza 41? / sprawdzałem w necie i fakt niektórzy piszą o Komuny Paryskiej 1 i Sienkiewicza 41, ale to chyba błąd – numeracja jest z północy na południe, kamienica vis-à-vis kościoła Św. Krzyża jest pod numerem 47, a następna za domem Wileńskich to nr 51, więc prawidłowy adres to Komuny Partskiej 1 (oficjalnie) i Sienkiewicza 49 / na marginesie – moja spostrzegawczość jest bardzo słaba, nigdy nie zauważyłem tej tablicy, a nic jej nie zasłania, to tragiczne :) – Darekm135 (talk) 09:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC) P.S. to też [20]Darekm135 (talk) 19:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rzeźby[edit]

Witaj – czy masz w swoich zasobach zdjęcie rzeźby znajdującej się przed Wydziałem Zarządzania UŁ (na tym zdjęciu jest słabo widoczna, lepiej na stronie autora)? – przydałoby się do tej kat. [21] – pozdrawiam – Darekm135 (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry za zawracanie głowy :) – może masz zdjęcie lwa z kamienicy róg placu Wolności i Nowomiejskiej? do tej kat. [22]. // Wesołych Świąt i dobrego następnego roku!! – Darekm135 (talk) 21:40, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

military[edit]

Cześć – wybacz ignorancję, ale dlaczego taka kategoria [23]? z przymiotnikiem na „m”? – Darekm135 (talk) 00:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

animalsy[edit]

Dzięki – o tym lwie kiedyś pisałem – tutaj z całą kamienicą; muszę się przyznać – nigdy nawet nie próbowałem zrobić zdjęcia lwa, gdy jestem w pobliżu to albo nie mam aparatu, albo zapominam o kotku. Niestety często znam Łódź tylko na poziomie parteru – nie chce mi się unosić głowy – więc jeśli mam rozpoznać obiekt (np. kamienicę) na zdjęciu, a nie jest to budynek powszechnie zanany, mam duże problemy jeśli autor fotografii pominął parter i skupił się na górnych partiach – Darekm135 (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2016 (UTC) Czy fikcyjne zwierzęta typu dragon, pegasus mieszczą się w kat. Animals? – Darekm135 (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tak, piękne lwy – Darekm135 (talk) 23:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć, która to jest dokładnie stacja? Therud (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zwierzaki w mieście[edit]

Cześć – trudno jest ogarnąć w jednej kat. np. psy i pszczoły, te drugie to raczej nie są pets. Kategoria, która zawierałaby miski dla psów w miejscach publicznych (chyba widziałem ją również przy wejściu do Gal. Łódzkiej – po prawej obok GW, po lewej jest pies, który próbował uciec od psiej natury), karmniki, budki lęgowe, hotele dla owadów to coś pośredniego między Animal-related equipment a Animal welfare. "Care of animals in the city" pomija wiele rzeczy – bud dla psów jest więcej na terenach wiejskich, schroniska dla zwierząt mogą być wszędzie. Troska o zwierzęta w mieście tak zrozumiana to raczej idea, życiowa filozofia, którą ciężko zdefiniować krótkim, encyklopedycznym tytułem kategorii – Darekm135 (talk) 11:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bartoszewskiego[edit]

Cześć – wytłumacz mi, czy nazwa aleja Władysława Bartoszewskiego dla Trasy Górnej już obowiązuje, czy wiąże się to z jakąś datą wejścia uchwały w życie? Zmiana nazwy cat. i pozostawienie „Trasa Górna” jako redirect ma już sens czy należy poczekać? Darekm135 (talk) 11:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

neony – pietryna[edit]

Cześć – o co chodzi z tymi neonami, np. Kaskada [24], dlaczego Piotrkowska? Darekm135 (talk) 23:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tuwim[edit]

Cześć. Widziałeś to [25] ? Darekm135 (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mural na Skłodowskiej[edit]

Dzień dobry w nowym roku – masz to może [26] / Curie-Skłodowska na zachód od kościoła – ściana od strony kościoła, teren ogrodzony, widziałem tylko jadąc autobusem, trudno zrobić zdjęcie – przeszkadzają drzewa – Darekm135 (talk) 22:07, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spojrzałem na mapę – oczywiście nr 26 / nieparzyste są po drugiej stronie – na rogu Lipowej i Skłodowskiej jest przychodnia (dawny szpital) [27] po numerem 15/17, ale przypomniało mi się coś – obok, według mapy 17a, ~2 lata temu powstało przedszkole – budynek to typowa oficyna, jego obecne przeznaczenie powinno wiązać się z czymś artystycznie radosnym, więc może w ramach dostosowania budynku tam również powstał mural – Darekm135 (talk) 11:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:01. Łódź Fabryczna 2011-2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:34, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:The battle of Thermopylae information table, Thermopyles Greece.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Glorious 93 (talk) 11:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maja Tokarska4 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

203.153.101.244 21:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maja Tokarska2 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

203.153.101.244 21:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cebulica syberyjska[edit]

Witaj! Zauważyłam, że wrzuciłeś piękne zdjęcia cebulic w parku. Nie na wszystkich jednak jest cebulica syberyjska (Scilla siberica), widzę tam co najmniej dwa gatunki, z czego jeden to rzeczywiście Scilla siberica, a drugi to jakiś śnieżnik - Scilla luciliae lub może Scilla forbesii. Różnicę między nimi widać choćby tutaj, gdzie są obie w centrum zdjęcia - śnieżnik ma kwiaty większe, szeroko otwarte, z jasnym środkiem i żółtymi pylnikami, a cebulica syberyjska mniejsze, skierowane często w dół i z niebieskimi pylnikami (albo tutaj - w środku kępa śnieżnika, dokoła cebulice syberyjskie). Salicyna (talk) 14:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nie wiem, jak dokładnie chcesz zmienić opisy, ale Scillae mi nijak nie pasuje. Jeśli masz na myśli liczbę mnogą od Scilla, to nie tworzy się jej. Salicyna (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:Big Cyc 2018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

31.0.125.62 09:14, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zorro2212 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

31.0.125.62 10:13, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 03:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justyna Sosnowska 2016 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 18:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Francesco and the bird in Franciscan Monastery in Kamnik, Slovenia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 18:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Big Cyc 2018.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: The real author did not accepted the licence ticket:2018032110012211
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Polimerek (talk) 14:24, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jacek Jedrzejak.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This is not a selfie - no agreement from real copyright owner.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Polimerek (talk) 12:38, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Big cyc.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: False authorship - this is not a selfie. No agreement from real copyright holder.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Polimerek (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Big Cyc-swe- 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polimerek (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rokosz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Polimerek (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jacek Jedrzejak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 13:09, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monument of Ignacy Lukasiewicz and Jan Zeh - part with Jan Zeh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 100 Years of Poland Regaining Independence in Łódź 2018-11-11 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality of the picture is ok, but some further explanation would be nice. --Imehling 13:50, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Andrew J.Kurbiko 23:43, 30 November 2019 (UTC) Good quality. Thank you. --Imehling 12:33, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Witcher TV series adveritsment in form of a mural in Łódź, Schillera Passage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License error[edit]

Unless you are quite old, File:Samuel Hirszenberg 'Szkoła talmudystów'.jpg is not your own work. It's PD, but it still needs to be tagged appropriately. I've fixed the license there, and I strongly encourage you to fix all others in similar situations, as otherwise the images may be deleted. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 14:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Clothes hanger as a symbol of illegal abortion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Brainy J (talk) 00:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]