User talk:Zblagojevic

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Zblagojevic!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:59, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zapisi

[edit]

Hello Zoran, i found your great project about the sacred trees in Serbia. Thanks for your photos!

i contact you because i am one of the users who regularly sort images and categories about various nature features, and about all types of officially protected areas (including smaller protected objects like individual trees, rocks etc; also see Category:Protected areas of Serbia for already protected objects in your country). Maybe i can help you a little bit with image sorting practices on Commons.

the descriptions of your images include relevant information and location, and are already given in two or three languages. this is very good! but i see some points for improvement:

file names:

  • Most of your images have perfect filenames including Zapis-number-location-date-…. But some images like File:Z 0002 7924.JPG have rather meaningless filenames (even if i can guess that "Z_0002" should mean "Zapis no. 2" and 7924 is the photo ID given by your camera). Names like this are usually unwanted on Commons, so these files might be renamed (moved) by other users. Please see Commons:File renaming. You can also handle this issue yourself, see how to rename a file?

categorization:

  1. At the moment we have 2 big categories: Sacred Trees Serbia for the Wikimedia Project and Zapisi in Serbia as a normal content category. More than 500 images are in both categories (which is ok), but some images are only in one of them, i don't know why. Do you know?
  2. Because of its name, Category:Sacred Trees Serbia might be confused by other users (without connection to WMRS) with normal content categories like Category:Sacred trees in Egypt, so that they wrongly add other/older photos of trees to this category. To make it more clear that it is specific for this Wikimedia project, i suggest renaming to Category:WMRS Sacred Trees Serbia or so. Ok?
  3. Please try to add also location categories whereever possible, see subcategories of Category:Municipalities and cities in Serbia by district. This is wanted to allow users coming from a Wikipedia article eg. about a town to the town's Commons category, to also find these images easily.
  4. Please try to add also biological/taxonomic categories for the trees, see as example Category:Quercus robur in Belarus. If such "by location/country" categories are to complicated or if you are unsure with identification, you can add the species or genus category directly, like Category:Quercus robur (for pedunculate oaks) or Category:Tilia (for lime/linde trees).
  5. When you have several images of one tree, it is best to create a special subcategory for it, see as example Category:Femeiche, an old oak in Germany. I did it for Category:Vezičevo zapis so that you see what i mean (feel free to change it if something is wrong).

Greetings Holger1959 (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Z-0003-754.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Revent (talk) 20:22, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Храст у Шаранима

[edit]

Здраво. Само желим да ти се захвалим за лепе фотографије записа у Шаранима које си избацио на комонс. То је мој крај и већ дуго бијемо битку за њега. Поздрав. --Михаило Јовановић (talk) 12:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква брвнара у Брзану 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

C messier (talk) 10:37, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

File:Mijatovica hrast Cacak.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fix location

[edit]

Hi Zblagojevic, could you please fix the coordiantes in you uploads? See Category:Media with erroneous locations. Thank you for your cooperation, --Arnd (talk) 08:00, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brzansko-Moraviste-20170720-12h52m-Time-Lapse.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheDJ (talkcontribs) 13:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]