User talk:Wyslijp16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Wyslijp16!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:29, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cityscape of Gwangju.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proszę Cię, nie używaj kryterium #4 we wnioskach o zmianę nazwy. Harmonizacja może być zaakceptowana TYLKO, gdy 1) jedno zdjęcie podzielone jest na wiele części (zdjęcia w wysokiej rozdzielczości podzielone na kwadraty) 2) obrazki dla szablów takie jak BSicon i.t.p., 3) książki dla Wikiźródeł w formacie jpg (jeden tytuł, kilkaset stron). I koniec. NIE WOLNO HARMONIZOWAĆ kategorii, żeby wyglądały "ładnie"!!!
Co do polskich znaków: kryterium #3: typo (literówka). Ale proszę Cię, nie rób tego w pośpiechu. Poprawiasz literówkę w "Żwirko", nie czytając dalszej części nazwy... a tam pozostają następne nie zmienione literówki, np. portret MLODEJ kobiety, itp. Była też sytuacja, gdy słowo "Lodz" poprawiasz na "Lódź"... "Konoppnicka" też wygląda źle :( Tak naprawdę zgodnie z zasadami Commons, to powinnam wszystkie te wnioski poodrzucać, bo nie są poprawne :( Albo poprawiasz wszystkie literówki w nazwie, albo nie poprawiasz żadnej...
Pozdrawiam :) Wieralee (talk) 19:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Do not create invalid requests. I create more work for reviewers and admins, who are already overloaded. If you would have checked, the Copyright watermark is from the photographer, so no issue here. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]