User talk:Wikibusters/Archive/2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramica Firenze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Visible noise at 70% and larger, but looks good at 60% on my 23.5-inch monitor, so I think it deserves to pass. -- Ikan Kekek 23:48, 11 June 2022 (UTC) I have uploaded a version with less noise,I hope it is better,thank you.--Wikibusters 00:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 Comment That's a somewhat more extensive panorama. There's clearly less noise in the sky, but the amount of noise in the Arno, the Ponte Vecchio, and the hills and buildings on the hills is comparable. -- Ikan Kekek 04:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi Wikibusters/Archive/2022, According to the guidelines you need at least 50 edits to be allowed to vote. Thanks --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 09:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

OK, tut mir leid, dass ich es nicht gelesen habe, 50 Bearbeitungen nur bei Commons? Ich danke Ihnen. Wikibusters (talk) 09:38, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Das nehme ich schon an, da die Qualitätsbilder ein Commons-Projekt sind. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Vielen Dank und nochmals Entschuldigung. Ich wünsche Ihnen einen schönen Abend.--Wikibusters (talk) 20:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mura di San niccolo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The file is tilted and/or needs a perspective correction, the right side is leaning out. And please, reduce the file size, it is ridiculously big for an image of this resolution --Poco a poco 11:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
Better? Thank you --Wikibusters 15:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 Support Indeed --Poco a poco 07:26, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Leonardo da Vinci (Uffizi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontana del Nettuno (Firenze) left.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 13:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture of Saint Antoninus in Florence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:42, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Dante Alighieri (Uffizi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:00, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Michelangelo Buonarroti(Uffizi Gallery).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:49, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Francesco Petrarca- Uffizi Gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Terragio67 11:14, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bronze replica of Michelangelo's David in Florence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilt --Wilfredor 14:25, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Now? Thank you Wilfredor--Wikibusters 18:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Florence from Piazzale Michelangelo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality, but brighter first version looks better, I think. --Milseburg 13:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Now Milseburg? Thank you--Wikibusters 22:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC) GQ and QI now in my eyes. --Milseburg 09:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jet d'eau de Genève (swiss).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot --Jmh2o 14:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Where Jmh2o? Thank you--Wikibusters 15:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
In the rectangle I drew. But it may be the trace of a removed dust spot. --Jmh2o 17:10, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. The spot is not disturbing. --Jmh2o 18:30, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bateaux sur le lac de Genève.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI for me --Jakubhal 19:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

A.Savin 13:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "why?I am Swiss I don't know this guy"
Decline reason: " Confirmed. Эlcobbola talk 14:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)"
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

User:Elcobbola But confirmed what? --151.35.12.105 14:46, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Lascia perdere scrivimi sulla mia mail livioandronico@gmail.com e ti spiego come risolvere --LivioandronicoNew (talk) 14:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

User:Poco a poco Entschuldigen Sie, dass ich mich an Leis gewandt habe, ich habe gesehen, dass er ein Administrator ist, ich wurde blockiert und sagte, dass ich ein blockierter italienischer Benutzer sei, aber ich verstehe das nicht. Können Sie mir eine Erklärung geben? Ich bin ehrlich gesagt überrascht. Tut mir leid, dass ich Sie störe.--Wikibusters (talk) 14:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have no checkuser rights to confirm or not that your account is a sockpuppet and I do have to trust the criteria of those who can confirm that, sorry. --Poco a poco (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
User:Poco a poco Can you tell me who has these rights? At least to understand, thank you. I am in Florence at my girlfriend's and I didn't think that having the Italian IP was so complicated. Thank you. Wikibusters (talk) 14:50, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

User:Fitindia Sorry to bother you, but I was told to contact a check user. I was blocked because they say I'm a sockpuppet of User:Livioandronico2013 but I'm Swiss and I'm in Florence at my girlfriend's and I don't know how it works but my only fault is that I'm on holiday in Italy. I was in Geneva, my city, until 2 days ago. Can you help me? Thank you and sorry to bother you.--Wikibusters (talk) 15:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand, if one connects from an area or an operator here is blocked for no reason? Just because he has that operator? I am now connected with my mobile, so do you have to block all users with that operator? Also you are not a check user how did you check the "zone"? I don't understand--Wikibusters (talk) 15:57, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

User:Krd Can you explain it to me? Thank you--Wikibusters (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

The duck test does not apply to non-obvious cases. Unless there is evidence which proves otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt, editors must assume good faith from others So it is written. Thank you. Wikibusters (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
However I honestly don't understand, I have never given any trouble, I have never complained, I have never protested......how can you think it's that other users just for 'local' talk. I honestly find it a bit racist.--Wikibusters (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
@Benh: What do you say? Duck test passed or not? See contribs, uploads. Regards --A.Savin 17:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
I honestly don't understand what I have in common with them sir. A couple of photos in Italy? I have more than 3,000 in Switzerland. If I had known I wouldn't even have taken them.--Wikibusters (talk) 17:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry @A.Savin, I'm not at home now, but from a quick look the ban is very very likely justified (I'm like 99,99% sure it is). Congrats on you guys for spotting it so fast. - Benh (talk) 09:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
and I'm not sharing details why, but I think we have similar reasons for thinking so. - Benh (talk) 09:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
I honestly don't understand how one can go so nosey, I think, maybe, probably? But why don't you check with a check user? Besides, guys take pictures in churches or museums where I don't even go. I do mostly panoramas. It's incredible!--Wikibusters (talk) 09:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)