User talk:WhyHellWhy

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, WhyHellWhy!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning[edit]

العربية  বাংলা  čeština  словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  עברית  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  македонски  norsk bokmål  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tok Pisin  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−


float 
You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits, as you did to File:BlankMap-World-v2.png, you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Denniss (talk) 10:29, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop pushing you pro-russian agenda, here's not the place to play the politics game. If you continue to violate NPOV on that many maps you'll be blocked. --Denniss (talk) 10:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Denniss, I didn't push any "pro-Russian agenda" Crimea has always been interpreted that way on the newer maps! If you didn't know that please take a look at all of the updated maps. The way Crimea is interpreted on the old maps is wrong. Crimea is not that physically connected to Ukraine. This has nothing to do with a "pro-Russian" side. If you continue to revert all my edits concerning this issue, I will have to report you.--WhyHellWhy (talk) 13:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you. For vandalism, POV-pushing, purpose-created account to editwar with others. Your claim with Crime not connected that way is a blatant ly.

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Denniss (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "The user Denniss blocked me for my alleged POV-pushing and pro-Russian agenda without fully discussing the issue. In my attempt to have a discussion with the Wikipedia page of this user regarding this incident I was ignored. I feel that this is not fair as I did not have a chance to support my reasoning. Blocking a user simply if their edits don't correspond to your view is not fair."
Decline reason: "You can support your reasoning on your talk page. Until this is resolved I will not unblock. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

--WhyHellWhy (talk) 04:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Denniss: Aloha! Could you please respond to the unblock request? Thanks! :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:08, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christians distribution.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.162.15.61 16:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]