User talk:Vasmar1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vasmar1!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:12, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter decoration hen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M351 Otra in Bergen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M916 Bellis and M860 Schiedam in Bergen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed --Ermell 20:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
CA? (Sorry!) --Vasmar1 21:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Chromatic aberration. The purple and green along the edges especially in the left half of the image. --Tagooty 02:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Thanks, you taught me something new! :) --Vasmar1 15:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 13:49, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter bunny decoration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9196723 Aurora Explorer in Begen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Suggest you increase detail in shadows. --GRDN711 20:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the advice! Does it look better now? --Vasmar1 13:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Acceptable but an overall exposure raise of 1/3 stop plus more of a boost in the shadows may improve the image further. --GRDN711 14:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5128417 Georg Stage in Bergen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9417684 Siem Pearl in Bergen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check the verticals. --Ermell 20:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but I am having a hard time spotting the actual problem here. Can you give a bit more info? Sorry again! --Vasmar1 13:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The building right side should be vertical. --Ermell 19:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, now the ship seem tilted. --Vasmar1 20:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The buildings at both sides should be vertical. --Ermell 22:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done! I hope the barely visible building is vertical enough now. – Very nice photo and good quality. -- Spurzem 21:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Spurzem! --Vasmar1 15:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9684859 Tjelden in Storebø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9684859 Tjelden leaving Storebø, stern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:10, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ola Ryggefjord in Salthella, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image and good quality -- Spurzem 15:30, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! U⁠grasløvetann - T⁠araxacum officinale agg. in Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hordafor VI at Salthella, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Mostly good quality, but noisy sky - fixable with some noise reduction? --Mike Peel 20:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Is it more pleasing now, or should i do even more? --Vasmar1 09:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. This one is good now, thanks! --Mike Peel 15:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hordafor III in Storebø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Same issue as the other, noisy sky, but fixable? --Mike Peel 20:07, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback. Better now? --Vasmar1 09:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This needs a bit more ... or perhaps you're over-sharpening? Look at the top-left sky in particular. --Mike Peel 15:55, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed it some more. Still practising on the editing part. --Vasmar1 17:51, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Much better now. :-) Thanks. Mike Peel 20:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hordafor II in Krossfjorden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:16, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! L⁠inerle - M⁠otacilla alba in Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diplom-IS isbilen på Hufthamar fergekai 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:25, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jack Russel side profile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 257103600 Toranes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:25, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QI criteria[edit]

Hi there, I noticed this edit at QIC. Just to let you know, the rule is 2 megapixels (photo size) not 2 megabytes (file size). Both of the photos you opposed there were over 2MP. Hope this helps, BigDom (talk) 20:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To BigDom: Oh, my mistake! Terribly sorry and thanks for reaching out to me! Regards Vasmar1 | Marius Vassnes (talk) 20:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I made the same mistake before, that's how I learned the difference! Cheers, BigDom (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted. Thanks again! Regards Vasmar1 | Marius Vassnes (talk) 20:14, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parafintanker.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mathieu Kappler 12:40, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purse seine in Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volt Harvest I in Krossfjorden 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volt Harvest I in Korsfjorden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nothav in Storebø 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! H-140-AV Morten Einar in Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! H-140-AV Morten Einar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! H-140-AV Morten Einar in Austevoll 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
the light is not so good compared with the other nomination --Charlesjsharp 11:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
True, because of the changed angle. I'm not sure, but I had a feeling it was ok for a QI-image. Thanks for the review. --Vasmar1 12:47, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Given that the image view was made into the shadow side, this is good quality. --GRDN711 07:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unidentified work boat in Bakkasund, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:34, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brutus in Krossfjorden 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 22:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gerda Marie in Torangsvåg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 22:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fosna Power in Krossfjorden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fosna Power in Krossfjorden 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:00, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral and Askeladden C76 Cruiser in Krossfjorden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 21:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral in Krossfjorden 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:08, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral in Krossfjorden 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:33, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral in Krossfjorden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:16, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMHO this is the best of the lot as you have isolated the ship in a good, full view without any distracting background and foreground elements. Slight dehazing might further help. I fixed your IMO category issue. --GRDN711 19:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fitjar aldershjem og sykehjem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjark (wooden small fishing boat) in Fitjar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 19:46, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Although it is not mandatory, adding geolocation could be useful here. --Terragio67 20:09, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks. --Vasmar1 12:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 14:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronja Queen in Krossfjorden 05 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset over Lifjord in Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ronja Queen in Krossfjorden 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Should be lighter/brighter. Suggest lightening the overall image by 1/3 stop and further lifting the dark tones by a further 1/3 stop. --GRDN711 20:04, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I'll try! --Vasmar1 20:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Brightness adjusted. Thanks! --Vasmar1 11:10, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Improved. --GRDN711 16:51, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fosna Power in Krossfjorden 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Generally good but a bit hazy. Should be fixable. --MB-one 08:26, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Googled it, does not seem like Canon DPP4 support de-hazing..? Might have to take this nomination back. --Vasmar1 17:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's too bad, because the potential for QI is definitely there. You could try Darktable (free) or Lightroom. --MB-one 20:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I did a dehaze for him --Grunpfnul 13:14, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! H-365-AV Gerda Marie in Krossfjorden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! H-365-AV Gerda Marie in Krossfjorden 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Work boat Hevrøy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:07, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fitjar brann- og redningsstasjon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. An image with the door open will be useful --Tagooty 02:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, i will try that the next time I'm around there and they have the door open. :) --Vasmar1 05:35, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support The comment by Vasmar1 undid my Promotion, so am redoing it --Tagooty 06:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storeknut in Krossfjorden 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A good ship image that could be improved by correcting ccw tilt, a slight de-hazing and an overall tighter crop to the ship. --GRDN711 14:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tilted and cropped. I googled the de-hazing part, seems like Canon DPP4 doesn't support that. Might have to take this nomination back. --Vasmar1 17:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support You have addressed the main issues. I use the de-haze tool in Lightroom as being useful for images where the morning mist gets past the UV filter. --GRDN711 19:57, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I tried Darktable after your advice, the dehazing was really great, but the struggle of editing the other parts in the same way as i do in DPP4 (different ways to do things), it's not worth the struggle. I will absolutely look into if Lightroom is worth the cost! Thanks again. --Vasmar1 08:07, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Promoted by GRDN711, my comment reset the promotion. --Vasmar1 14:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! H-365-AV Gerda Marie in Krossfjorden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergen Energy in Krossfjorden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komatsu PC 290LC on sandboat Roslagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TB Toranes in Storebø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AQS Marine in Krossfjorden 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems(!) to tilt to the left, maybe 1-2 degree to the right would improve the image? --Grunpfnul 16:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tilted and did some light corrections. Thanks! --Vasmar1 20:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! With Frohavet passing Austevollshella 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! With Frohavet passing Austevollshella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunnøy passing Austevollshella, Austevoll 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:43, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunnøy passing Austevollshella, Austevoll 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 16:42, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komatsu PC 290LC on sandboat Roslagen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, but can you fix the red category link please? --Mike Peel 11:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed: I forgot, thank you for reminding me! --Vasmar1 11:47, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komatsu PC 290LC on sandboat Roslagen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunnøy passing Austevollshella, Austevoll 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Hjort passing Austevollshella, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Hjort passing Austevollshella, Austevoll 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:39, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! With Frohavet passing Austevollshella 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Like this one best as having the best focus on the ship and best separation from the background. Would lighten slightly, particularly the mid-tones. --GRDN711 16:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, this made me discover some new functions in DPP4. Is this version better? :) --Vasmar1 19:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. The best and easiest post-processing is to avoid or minimize it by implementing best practices in making the original image (good exposure, focus, shutter speed, dof, good separation of ship from background, if possible). A good option is to make a test image of the location first before the ship gets there, and check it on play back in the view finder, particularly noting dof and histogram. It's much less work than post-processing. A day with lots of light also helps mightily. --GRDN711 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baardsund in Krossfjorden 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inter Nord passing Austevollshella corrections.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kim passing Austevollshella, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inter Nord passing Austevollshella 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, but could you crop out the green haze at the bottom right? --Mike Peel 18:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, thanks! --Vasmar1 09:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunnøy passing Austevollshella, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 21:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Hjort passing Austevollshella, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 11:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9781932 Lovart Viking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 11:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden seahouse in Lundøy, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:00, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terneskjær fish feed loading system.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:54, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosedoktoren in Leirvik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tranen arriving Leirvik, Stord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosedoktoren departing Leirvik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is some tilt in ccw direction --Poco a poco 20:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, thanks. --Vasmar1 17:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mullard duck in Kvamskogen-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I recommend you to get rid of the cropped duck at the top right --Poco a poco 19:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed --Vasmar1 05:34, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tjelden leaving Lundøy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The image tilts to the left --Ermell 19:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Tilting is one of the things I have the most trouble getting right, does it look better now? :) --Vasmar1 20:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Work boat Hevrøy in Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RS 120 Sundt in Leirvik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 20:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosedoktoren departing Leirvik 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 14:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosedoktoren in Leirvik 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:27, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:QIC Image Page Requirements (4), an improved image description would help this image have value for future use in Wiki projects. Suggest you explain what this specialty ship is and provide enough further detail so that someone could research it if they had an interest. Suggest an image description something like “Found in Leirvik, Norway, the Rosedoktoren is a catamaran-style, marine ambulance operated by GulenSkyss AS under contract with Vestland county.” --GRDN711 19:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, done. --Vasmar1 13:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 12:36, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tranen arriving Leirvik, Stord 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hordagut in Leirvik 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teletårnet i Leirvik, Stord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Møkstrafjord departing Austevollshella for Hufthamar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sveasund passing Austevollhella 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sveasund passing Austevollhella 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Done, although I liked that detail, thx for the review. --Vasmar1 15:47, 19 August 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 18:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sveasund passing Austevollhella 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sveasund passing Salthella 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Like this one best as it isolates and focuses just on the ship, without background clutter. --GRDN711 18:08, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underwater reef, Lundøy Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 12:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underwater reef, Lundøy Austevoll 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 12:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skjær utenfor Lundøy, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --多多123 12:25, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheep in Lundøy, Austevoll 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waves hitting rocks in Skansen, Austevoll 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marsteinen lighthouse seen from Skansen, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johannes R Kalve 1909-2005 statue in Kalve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:08, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fox Power at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral, Seiskjer, Hybrid One and Fox Power at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seihaust at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seibris arriving Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 23:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seibris arriving Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 22:33, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seibris docking at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Slightly noisy but good quality. --Terragio67 21:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seibris arriving and Seihaust departing Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 16:38, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiskjer at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral, Seiskjer, Hybrid One and Fox Power at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 11:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)--Virtual-Pano 11:27, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fox Power at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seihaust at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:00, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pica Pica in Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 16:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergen tank in Storebø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea Admiral at Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seihaust departing Naveide fishfarm, Austevoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:23, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestgar in Bergen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestgar in Bergen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 20:33, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jekteviken seen from Fløyen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Kallerna 06:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amalie Skram videregående skole (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose Disturbing objects in the top right corner. I don´t think that´s fixable. --Ermell 23:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've cropped the picture. --Vasmar1 15:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:25, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Amazing photos of interesting things! -- RZuo (talk) 06:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you RZuo! Regards Vasmar1 | Marius Vassnes (talk) 06:40, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aktiv Tollbodkai, Buksér og Berging seen from Fløyen, Bergen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Red link categories. --C messier 13:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, thanks! --Vasmar1 15:56, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lifeboats in Bergen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorbus aucuparia in Bergen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slorkjen, Austevoll 120324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:50, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brøyt gravemaskin på Lundøy 120324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge over Drønsstraumen, Austevoll 120324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]