User talk:Vamps

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Vamps!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 19:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments!

	WLM super uploader
	Thanks for uploading already more than 100 photos to Wiki Loves Monuments! Keep going, like this mill at Kinderdijk :) -- Effeietsanders (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keila-Joa mõisa peahoone, 1831-33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 16:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keila-Joa mõisa köök, 1801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The clock tower is still leaning a bit after correction, but QI nevertheless.please correct the spot un the sky...--Jebulon 00:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:09, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tallinna Meremeeste Kodu, 1926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Never use a higher ISO than you need (higher ISO is more noise). You do not need IS0 400 when shooting in daylight. The colors are great, composition is good, but the picture has a lot of noise (quite unnecessarily). Some noise in the sky is usually okay here, if the picture is otherwise sharp (but it's too much here IMO).--ArildV 16:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Have you seen current PotD (FP) File:Leeds Castle, Kent, England 3 - May 09.jpg? --Sfu 14:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Denoised sky, panoramic image->the individual images are downsampled->less visible noise. Or should I put my Nikon D80 at ISO1600 the next time I shoot in daylight? Also a big difference between EOS 400D and EOS 50D. But the point (and that we judge) is the image quality, and it is too much noise. And I am convinced that it could have been avoided with different settings. Regards--ArildV 14:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Nikon D80 at IS0100 File:Styckekranen och torpedverkstaden september 2011.jpg (much less noise, no noise reduction). Nikon D80 and EOS400D have similar resolution and similar noise levels.--ArildV 14:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC) for me ist is QI. --Ralf Roletschek 16:19, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Vamps, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg

File:Tallinn, Jaan Koorti monument.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Túrelio (talk) 22:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Naissaare kitsarööpmeline raudtee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:32, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse 2012

Fotovõistlus Kultuurimälestised Vikipeediasse toimub ka sel aastal. Pilte saab lisada septembrikuu lõpuni. Oled oodatud osalema! --WikedKentaur (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niitvälja raba Keila-Paldiski raudtee ääres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

FoP Latvia

Hello, I'd really appreciate it very much if you create ONE deletion request page for the FoP in Latvia (as I did here) instead of creating one for each picture, since the argument is the same for them all and I don't need the same message 100 times in my page. Thanks and regards, --Poco a poco (talk) 08:42, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, after you took care that all my pictures of Vanšu tilts are gone, I'd like to ask you why were there exclusively only picture of my authorship, whereas in the project there are many others and even a category for the bridge. The FoP does not apply there?. I agree that we have to attach to our policies but it is the first time that I see that they are author-centered instead of subject-centered. Maybe there is a reason for that. Regards, Poco a poco (talk) 07:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Poco a poco (talk) 10:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Paisley Abbey

What are your thoughts, FP wise, on File:Paisley Abbey from the south east.jpg? -- Colin (talk) 08:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Umgebindehaus in Dittersbach, Böhmische Schweiz, Tschechien.JPG

Please see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Umgebindehaus in Dittersbach, Böhmische Schweiz, Tschechien.JPG. You wrote: "perspective distortion, strong NR, oversharpened". I answered: "Thank you, Vamps, I made a better update. Please check it. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)". Please have a look to this image. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates

Igaks juhuks mainin, et esitasin 2 sinu fotot eeskujulike piltide kandidaatideks. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mukri raba 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Tallinna kunstihoone, 1934.a., 1961.jpg

File:Tallinna kunstihoone, 1934.a., 1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.131.126.74 15:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Tallinn, tuletõrjehoone Raua 2, 1938-1939.jpg

File:Tallinn, tuletõrjehoone Raua 2, 1938-1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.131.126.74 15:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg was recently deleted

File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg was recently deleted by Missvain for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tallinn, uus Raadiomaja Gonsiori 21, 1972 (2).jpg

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Põllküla raudteepeatus.jpg

File:Põllküla raudteepeatus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Tallinn, elamu Väike-Karja 1 - Sauna 1, 1924.jpg

File:Tallinn, elamu Väike-Karja 1 - Sauna 1, 1924.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)