User talk:Unify~commonswiki
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) |
File:Berlin_Population_Development_1880-2007.svg[edit]
Ciao. Die Beschriftung der Y-Achse ist komplett verkorkst. Beim alten .jpg-File stimmts.
Beschreibungen[edit]
Hallo, bitte ordentliche Bildbeschreibungen anlegen, also mit Links auf Urheber sowie originale Bildversion. Ausserdem mal lesen: Commons:Ownership of pages and files#Don't allow possessiveness to lead to the creation of redundant files MfG --BLueFiSH 05:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
stock.xchng photos[edit]
You have uploaded some photos from sxc.hu. Please note that the site is on the Commons:Bad sources list because of odd site-wide restrictions, and new uploads without author's permission aren't accepted. Could you please ask the photographer permission for having them on Commons as Copyrighted free use? Otherwise the images will have to be deleted. There's at least Bronze Statue Potsdam.jpg, Fontaine Sanssouci Potsdam.jpg, Freundschaftstempel Sanssouci Potsdam.jpg, Park Sanssouci Blick vom Schloss.jpg, Park Sanssouci Passage.jpg, Reihe Büsten Potsdam.jpg and Statue Frau Potsdam.jpg. Thanks. --Para 19:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Potsdam, Gliederung[edit]
Hallo Unify, hast Du die Karte zur Potsdamer Gliederung eigentlich auch als SVG oder in einem anderen Vektorformat? Damit wäre mir wirklich sehr geholfen. Wäre nett, könntest Du sie mir mailen (masin_aldujaili@yahoo.de). --89.247.41.216 18:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Die obige Frage ist von mir. --Masin Al-Dujaili 18:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hallo, leider habe ich sie im Pixelformat erstellt... --Unify 17:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Macht nichts, habe sie mittlerweile vektorisiert -- kann ich sie Dir schicken? Dann kannst Du sie entsprechend einpflegen, ist ja auch nur ein Derivat Deiner Arbeit :-) --Masin Al-Dujaili 19:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Rigapanorama[edit]
Thanks a lot for editing the panoramapic over Riga! It got much better, so thanks! //moralist 10:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
No Problem, you can do that too very easy with photoshop. --Unify 14:00, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Bild vom Palast der Republik, aufgenommem aus dem Fernsehturm[edit]
Hallo! Bisher habe ich so gut wie keine Ahnung von Bildbearbeitungsprogrammen. Wie und womit hast Du das [1]gemacht? Es ist prima geworden! Danke & Gruss --Sir James 10:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hallo, das ist sehr einfach mit Photoshop. Das Telecafe hat eine grünliche Wärmeverglasung und deshalb haben alle Bilder einen Grünstich. Um dies zu korrigieren geht man unter Bild->Einstellen->Gradationskurven->Auto->OK und schon wird fast jeder Farbstich automatisch korrigiert. Zudem wird dadurch auch der "Nebeleffekt" behoben. Dann kann man noch etwas mit Helligkeit, Kontrast oder Farbbalance nachjustieren. --Unify 13:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi! Photoshop ist mir für den Anfang zu mächtig. Es gibt auch eine Art "Light"-Version mit Namen Adobe Photoshop Album SE. Kann man sowas auch damit machen? Aus der Programm-Beschreibung: Mit Doppelklick auf ein Foto gelangen Sie in das "Fotokorrektur-Fenster", in dem sich das Bild mit verschiedenen Tools bearbeiten lässt. Zur Verfügung stehen "Auto-Farbe", "Auto-Tonwertkorrektur", "Auto-Kontrast" und "Scharfzeichnen". Ach so: es wäre auch nett, wenn Du einen kurzen Hinweis über die Art dieser Bearbeitung in das Kommentarfeld der Commons-Bildversionsbeschreibung setzen würdest. Danke & Gruss --Sir James 14:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hallo, die SE Version ist leider ziemlich begrenzt. Mit der Auto-Tonwertkorrektur/Farbe kann man eventuell Farbstiche korrigieren und Autokontrast kann theoretisch etwas "Brillanz" ins Bild bringen. Im Endeffekt brauchst du aber das Werkzeug Gradationskurven, mit dem man jede einzelne Farbe in ihrer Helligkeit bearbeiten (oder das gesamte Bild professionell aufhellen) kann und das gibts nur mit teuer-Photoshop. Kleine Erklärung hier: http://www.elmar-baumann.de/fotografie/ebv/grundlegend-01.html . Eventuell tuts auch Gimp, ein kostenloses und funktionsreiches Programm - habe ich aber noch nie benutzt. --Unify 16:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Bestens. Danke! Gruss --Sir James 17:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Siehste—schon kann ich hier [2] —dank Deines Tips— nach ein paar Klicks in Gimp prahlen! ;-)) Gruss --Sir James 13:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- NA dann Willkommen in der Welt der Bilderbearbeitung. Es gibt viel zu tun.... --Unify 19:20, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Statue_Frau_Potsdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 16:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Park_Sanssouci_Passage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Teofilo (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
File:Potsdam Babelsberg Kleines Schloss.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Tip: Categorizing images[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 04:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Berlinalepress.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Römische Bäder Potsdam.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Schenkungsurkunde Potsdam 993.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:Javier Solana in Einsatzführungskommando in Potsdam.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
File tagging File:Glienicker Brücke Luftansicht.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Glienicker Brücke Luftansicht.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Glienicker Brücke Luftansicht.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Masur (talk) 07:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A.Savin 18:34, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Berlin-luftbild10a.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Berlin-luftbild10a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 20:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed[edit]
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Unify. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Unify~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
23:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed[edit]
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
06:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Lage Postdam Babelsberg bei Berlin.jpg[edit]
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lage Postdam Babelsberg bei Berlin.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Lage Postdam Babelsberg bei Berlin.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 06:56, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm) (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2023 (UTC)