User talk:Tambo/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tambo!

Copyright status: File:Jedlik motor.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jedlik motor.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Iaaasi (talk) 08:35, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jedlik motor.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Jedlik motor.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Iaaasi (talk) 08:36, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Tambo!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Kategória

Szia Tambo! Kérlek fordíts kicsit több figyelmet az általad feltöltött képek kategorizálására. Más:Olvastam a magyar kocsmafalon a kurzoros képről. Van még kettő. Ez meg ez Kérlek javítsd. Köszönöm! Üdvözlettel: Tamba52 (talk) 08:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Kedves Tambo!

Nyugodtan válaszolj magyarul a commonsos vitalapomra (ugyanúgy kell mint a magyarra) mert azt hamarabb észreveszem és gyorsabban tudok reagálni rá. A kategorizálással az a gondom, hogy: vagy túlkategorizálsz (pl. Magyarország, Hungary, Budapest, Budapest District XIX ezek közül egy elég, a legutolsó) vagy magyarul írsz be olyat ami egészen máshová mutat (pl.Kalvin1914.jpg-nél Category:Terek), vagy magyarul írsz be olyat ami úgy nem létezik (piros lesz) de angolul van olyan (pl. Városliget) City Park (Budapest). A commonson kategoria csak angolul vagy latinul lehet. Segítség:[1] Ha elfogadsz egy tanácsot: Ne hidd el mindig amit a CommonSense megad. Keress egy kategóriát ami értesz és csak azt add meg.(aztán majd valaki finomít rajta) Ha gondod van írj, ha tudok segítek (én sem tudok angolul). Ui. Megint feltettél egy kurzoros képet File:Budavár ostroma 1686.jpg Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Képek

Szia Tambo! Ezen az oldalon [2] nézd meg az azonnali törlés fejezetet. Katt.(2.2 Azonnali törlés)→ bad name . Üdv:--Tamba52 (talk) 10:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

hibák

Szia! Láttam a feltöltött mai képeidet, és láttam, hogy néhányat Magyarország kategóriába tetted. Az angol wikin az a szokás, hogy a ketegóriák angol nyelvűek, míg maguk a cikkek nemzeti nyelven vannak. Ezért kérlek, hogy a Magyarország kategóriába ne tegyed be, de ha már pl. Eger kategóriába betetted, akkor a Hungary-ba felesleges. A magyar wikin sem szoktunk így kategorizálni. Baráti üdvözlettel Szajci pošta 13:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Kész. Szajci pošta 19:39, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Te is meg tudod könnyen csinálni :D Be lehetne tenni History of Budapest és Budapest 18. Nem kell ám ezeket túl bonyolítani :D Szajci pošta 17:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Ő nem is azért írtam, hogy azonos, hanem a XVIII. kerület része. Ez olyan, mint hogy Budapest Magyarországon van és így kategorizáljuk. Szajci pošta 17:32, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Munchen1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rudolph Buch (talk) 12:20, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Re:Vízjel

Szia Tambo! Igen, a szöveg miatt van. Célszerű eltüntetni, de erre nem biztos hogy a levágás a legjobb megoldás. (pl. Megváltoznak a kép arányai) Általában akkor vágunk ha nagyon a szélén van a szöveg. Ezeknél a színész képeknél más megoldás kell. Ha Te nem tudod másképp eltüntetni csak vágással, akkor inkább hagyd rajta. A sablon miatt nem fogják bántani a képedet, ez inkább csak figyelemfelhívás a grafikusoknak. Vagyunk egy páran akik ezzel is foglalkoznak. Ha valami nem világos írj! Üdv:--Tamba52 (talk) 14:55, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 05:46, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Tambo, what does that mean, when the file carries an OTRs-ticket? --Túrelio (talk) 22:23, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Zalán kép

Kedves Tambo! Köszönöm! :o)) Fauvirt (talk) 00:51, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Vittorio Alfieri (katona).gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 07:56, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:John Turnbull.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 07:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Koháry István országbíró.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 07:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Koháry II. István.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Kriza János.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:01, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Kukorica Jancsi Fedák Sári.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

File:LatabárEndre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 08:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Kategória

Szia Tambo! Kérlek hogy kategória hozzáadásakor ne egy rejtett kategória helyére (pl.Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard törlésével) írd be az újat. (Pl.File:Munkacsy Kuenstlerhaus Vienna 2012 Foto Copyright Michael Nagl 04.jpg). Új kategória létrehozása előtt pedig tanulmányozd a A "Commons magyar nyelvű irányelvei és tájékoztatói -->Kategóriák --> 3.3 Új kategória kialakítása" c.fejezetet. Köszönöm! Üdvözlettel:Tamba52 (talk) 08:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thomson-híd

Kiemelt/kiemelendő cikket lefordítani borzasztó hosszú munka, nem érdemesebb-e inkább 2 nap alatt 1 helyesírás + 1 forráspontosítás kérésnek eleget tenni? Látom, bele is kezdett Karmela, rajta hát! Oliv0 (talk) 21:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

De most ha jól értem a kiemelési lapot, az egész csak attól függ, hogy a polaritáscsere módszer (nem értek hozzá) mindenhol használatos vagy inkább laborban? Ha menthető a kiemelés egy ici-pici módosítással (főleg labori körülmények, vagy ezt a mondatrészt ideiglenesen kihagyni, amíg nincs meg a pont erről szólo forrás), akkor szerintem csináld és kész, messzebbre nem kell keresni. Oliv0 (talk) 10:35, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Szia Tambo! Ezt a képedet úgy hoztad át a Wikipédiából, hogy a forrás, szerző stb. lemaradt, sőt, még az eredeti feltöltési bejegyzésben is csak a forráscím fele van meg. Tudnád javítani? Köszi, tacsipacsi (talk · contribs) 08:42, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Nagyvarsány

Próbáltam ügyelni, hogy ne keverjem. Szándékaim szerint mind Nagyvarsány. --Képíró Gépíró (talk) 19:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Tirgu Mures

Szia Tambo! Már van ilyenkategória:Târgu Mureş

Emlékeztetőül: Új kategória kialakítása

Egy új kategória létrehozásához:

  • Először alaposan nézz utána, hogy nem létezik már egy kategória, ami megfelelne a feladatnak.
  • Keresd meg azt galéria lapot vagy képet, amit az új kategóriába szeretnél felvenni. Szerkeszd a lapot, és a lap aljára írd be az új kategória nevét: . Ments el a lapot. Az új kategória pirossal megjelenik a lap alján.
  • Kattints a piros hivatkozásra, és máris az új kategória üres lapját szerkeszted, mint bármilyen más lapot. Ide is be tudsz írni egy felsőbb szintű kategóriát.

Egy kategória lapnak fontossági sorrendben az alábbi adatokat kell tartalmaznia:

  • Kategória hivatkozások egy vagy több felsőbb kategóriába rendeléshez.
  • Egy rövid leírása annak, hogy mi legyen a kategóriában. A leírás preferált nyelve az angol - magyarul a {{hu|...}} sablon kitöltésével tudsz szöveget beszúrni. A galéria lapokon használható sablonokat lásd itt: Commons:Templates for galleries.
  • Interwiki hivatkozások a más nyelvű Wikipédiák azonos témájú lapjaira vagy kategóriáira: [[en:...]] az angol Wikipédiához, [[hu:...]] a magyarhoz, stb.
  • Ha a kategóriát más betűrendben szeretnéd megjeleníteni a felsőbb kategóriák listájában, akkor használd a {{DEFAULTSORT:}} sablont. Ha például azt szeretnéd, hogy IV. Béla a „B” betűnél jelenjen meg, és ne az „I”-nél, akkor a sort használd. Bővebb tájékoztatásért olvasd el a meta:Categories#Sort key-t.
  • A lapot vedd fel az összes kapcsolódó kategóriába. A lap alján a felsőbb kategóriákát a módon adhatod meg.

Nem kötekedem, csak segíteni szeretnék! Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 07:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

re:File:Tőkés Anna kb. 20 évesen.jpg

Szia! Válasz nálam. Tamba52 (talk) 06:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:03, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Szia, ebben az esetben, ahogy írtam a fájl vitalapjára, több Google-találat van 1944-re, mint 1940-re, és sok találat is van halálozási év nélkül. Vagyis csak akkor maradna a fájl, ha kimutatható lenne elég meggyőzően, hogy az 1940-es adatok megbízhatóbb forrásokból valók, ami szerintem elég lehetetlen feladat. Oliv0 (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorrend?

Szia Tambo! Kérdezem hogy a magyar színésznőket, színészeket miért a keresztnevük szerint teszed be a kategóriákba? Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 08:27, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Szia! Azt hittem, jól csinálom. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 08:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

De nem teljesen. Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 08:44, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Caproni Ca 101 bombázó.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Szia!

Ennek a képnek a magyar Wikipédiáról történő átmásolásakor elfelejtetted átmásolni a forrást, szerzőt és a dátumot. A forrást és dátumot sikerült kihámoznom, de a szerző nem látszik (esetleg ismeretlen?). Légy szíves ezt pótolni. Köszi!

tacsipacsi (talk) 16:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Joseph Stalin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mormegil (talk) 13:00, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Refuelling a Macchi C.200.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Szia, Commons:Licencsablonok#Közkincs szerint a {{PD-Art}} biztos nem megfelelő, mert az "kétdimenziós közkincs műalkotás hű fényképes reprodukciójára" való, vagyis ha fényképezel egy régi képet. A többi ott felsorolt sablonok közt kéne találni megfelelőt, pl. arról, hogy "névtelen szerzőtől származó mű", ha tényleg névtelen a fényképész vagyis név nélkül adta ki (de ha kukacoskodni akarnak, azt tudják mondani neked, hogy ez a névtelen többet jelent annál, hogy egyszerűen nem tudod a nevét). Mivel ez nem EU, hanem Oroszország, nem az {{Anonymous-EU}} kell, hanem úgy látszik {{Anonymous work}}, viszont ennek a dokumentációja szerint Oroszország esetében nem ez a jó, hanem a {{PD-Russia}} - aminek nincs magyar dokumentációja, de angolul azt mondja a 2. pont, 1943 eleje előtt névtelenül kiadott műre használható (de a névtelen kiadás megkérdőjelezésén kívül megint azt tudnák mondani, hogy nem tudod, hogy nem maradt-e fiókban egy darabig és csak 1943 után adták ki). Eszerint válaszoltam a törlési megbeszélés lapján. Oliv0 (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

"Óvatosságból" törölte egy admin: mivel egy olasz katonai egység vette fel Oroszországban, a {{PD-Russia}} orosz szerzői jog nem jó, de az olasz szerzői jog mellett ({{PD-Italy}}{{PD-1996}}) sincs szerinte "kifejezett bizonyíték" (explicit evidence), szóval nem tűnt biztosnak. Oliv0 (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Kutassy Ágoston.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 11:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hegedűs László karácsony Namíbiában.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

El Grafo (talk) 12:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nemzeti Múzeum a reformkorban.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nemzeti Múzeum a reformkorban.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 00:40, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Eggerth Márta-Jávor Pál.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oliv0 (talk) 08:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Watermarks and frames

First of all, i want to thank you for your picture uploads until now. This images would, however, be even more useful if you did not add digital watermarks, Text captions and frames in the pictures. In Wikimedia Commons, credits to the author are given at the pictures description page, not in the form of digital watermarks in the picture itself. If you add watermarks, it is likely to have following outcome:

  • the use of the picture in articles is stongly disencouraged in most language versions
  • the watermark will be deleted (if not today, then later) with loss quality.

The same applies for digital frames and text captions inside images. They are allways removed now or later. - Andy king50 (talk) 12:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

So, please do not add watermarks, text or frames in further picture uplads ans possibly reupload the last images as new versions without them. Thanks. Andy king50 (talk) 12:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File:003a Bp.II.Bimbó u.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnex (talk) 20:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Tihamér Nemes

Szia! Már nem látok a kategóriában semmit, mert törölték a képeket, csak a magyar WP cikk laptörténete alapján arra tudok következtetni, hogy a két említett kép File:Nemes Tihamér.jpg és File:Nemes Tihamér kísérleti berendezéseivel.jpg, ahol a törlés indoka "The man in the picture, Tihamér Nemes, was born in 1895. Description says pic was made in the 1930s. No source hints at this at all, and besides, the man is evidently more than 30-35 years old here, so the picture might...", vagyis: a dátumról nincs forrás és a képen az 1895-ben született férfi inkább több, mint 35 éves (=1930) és így a kép esetleg... [ki van vágva de valószínűleg: nem 70 éves = 1944 előtti]. Látható-e valahol a két kép, és főleg olyan szöveg kíséretében, ami arra enged következtetni, hogy mikor készült, esetleg ki készítette? Mert az, hogy a dokumentumod szerint 1930-1938-tól már foglalkozott azzal, ami a képen látható lenne, az gyenge érv, mivel később is foglalkozhatott vele. Oliv0 (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

File:IV. Károly és családja.jpg

Mitől lenne a szerző ismeretlen, amikor a forrásnál is írja, hogy az Szamossy Ferenc?? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 10:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Ezt tényleg benéztem. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 11:12, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Tambo, it is quite unlikely that this image should fall under Hungarian copyright. It was very likely not shot in Hungary, but in Italy. So, Italian (or Vatican) copyright should apply. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

File:XII. Pius pápa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Szia!

Ezért akarja töröltetni: A kép egy képeslap reprodukciója, állítólag 1938-ból. Az eredeti PD-Hungaryt most PD-Italyre változtatták. De mivel a Vatikán önálló állam, hogy illik ide az Italy? Az en:Copyright_duration#Table leszögezi, hogy a Vatikánban 70 év a pma. PD-Italyként a kép sok más törvénykezés szerint nem használható, ezért más indoklás kellene.

Szerintem vagy csináld azt, hogy visszateszed a PD-Hungaryt vagy áttöltöd a huwikire a képet közkincs-ismeretlennel. Szerintem tedd meg az előbbit és a másodikat tartsd meg biztonsági lépésnek. Úgyis van elég sok kép Piuszról, valószínűleg a Commons meglesz enélkül a kép nélkül, és így a munkád sem vész kárba. Egyébként az a baja, hogy az olasz törvények szerint nem használható a kép ezzel a licenccel. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:59, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Kincsesbányának látszik

Szia!

Találtam egy oldalt, amely neked jól jöhet feltöltéshez: [3] Úgy látom, mindegyik kép közkincs, de csak futólag néztem át. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Szerintem történelem, de ahogy gondolod. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Még két gondolat: Képek feltöltése nem politizálás. Ha az is lenne, akkor sem lennének politikusabbak mint XII. Piusz. De ezt csak elmélkedés szintjén mondom, nem meggyőzésképpen. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Szia! Két megjegyzésem lenne ehhez a képhez:

  1. a Rapid transit és Athens kategóriák fölöslegesek, ennél pontosabb az Athens Metro (amit szintén hozzáadtál) pontosabb (ezért külön nem szóltam volna, csak ha már úgy is írok);
  2. a fontosabb pedig, hogy a {{Kladosengedély}} és {{GTM-engedély}} sablonok alapján nem hiszem, hogy te készítetted volna a képet, ezt légy szíves, javítsd.

--tacsipacsi (talk) 14:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Köszi a szerzőt, de még forrás is jó lenne (jelenleg csak az van ott, hogy te hoztad át a huwikiről). --tacsipacsi (talk) 07:07, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
Ez most azt jelenti, hogy közvetlenül tőle kaptad e-mailben, papíron (majd beszkennelted) vagy hasonló? --tacsipacsi (talk) 18:16, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Mária Novák

Szerintem tedd ki a képekre a Licenc szakaszba a licenc sablon alá a {{Personality rights}} sablont, aztán vedd le a kategóriáról amit kihelyezett. Szerintem az a baja, hogy élő személyekről készültek a képek, és nincs rajtuk ez a sablon. Bár jobb lett volna ha megindokolja. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Nem igazán értem, hogy milyen engedélyre gondol, amikor ezeken rajta van az OTRS-sablon, amely alátámasztja az engedély meglétét. Azt mondja, hogy minden ilyen jellegű kategóriára kikerül ez a sablon. Momentán én eddig sehol sem láttam ilyen sablont. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

A képekre kellett volna. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Besegítsek? Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Pay attention to copyright
File:Barényi Béla-biztonsági fejlesztés.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Pedig itt is egyértelműen jelzik, hogy 1939-es kép, és mivel több forrásból sem derül ki a szerző, így ismeretlen szerzővel megjelölhetőnek kéne lennie. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:23, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Szerinte azért jogsértő, mert az EXIF-ben az szerepel, hogy minden jogot fenntart valaki. Hát egy 1939-es képre már nemigen lehet, ha a szerző ismeretlen. Nem tudom, mit fog lépni, mindenesetre levettem a sablont, azzal az indoklással, hogy az EXIF szerkeszthető, de egy 1939-es képnek nem lehetnek EXIF adatai, mivel 1939-ben még nem létezett digitális fényképezés. A leírást kiegészítettem angollal és spanyollal és a dátumra tettem egy plusz forrást. Lehet, hogy ezután törlési megbeszélésre viszi. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 14:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Fájl:The Night of Love (1927).jpg

Szia!

Szerintem erre nem felel meg a Pd-Hungary licenc. Franciaországban jelent meg egy francia magazinban. Ennek megfelelően nem lehet magyar licencet megadni neki. Csak azért szólok, hogy ne lepődjél meg, ha valaki vitatni fogja a licencet. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Rátettem a francia megfelelőét. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Persze, szívesen! Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Krémer Ferenc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 15:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Krémer Ferenc.jpg

Ez mind nagyon szép és jó, és egyben pusztán találgatás is. Azt kell(ene) végre megérteni, hogy az számít, mikor publikálták először a képet (ha nem ismert a szerző), minden más csak és pusztán körítés. Milyen számottevő információ támasztja alá, hogy a képet publikálták az 1920-as években? Ahogy látom, egyelőre semmilyen. Mint mondtam, minden más csak találgatás, amely nem számottevő. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

És még még nekem vannak szövegértési problémáim... Sehol sem írtam, hogy ilyet mondtál. Azt mondtam, hogy ezt kell biztosra tudni. Nem elég a találgatás és a tippelgetés, hogy valószínűleg már ekkor meg akkor megjelent. Valamint a szarkasztikus megjegyzések sem segítenek, hogy "azért rejtegették 44 utánig, hogy most jogsértő legyen". Nem. Senki nem mondta, hogy rejtegették. Az a tény, hogy nincs forrás, sem semmi más bizonyíték arra, hogy valóban publikálták több mint 70 éve. Pl. lehetett egy magánkép is akár, amit nem jelentettek meg. Ha van pontos forrás a publikálásra, akkor aszerint maradhat vagy nem maradhat, ha nincs, akkor nem maradhat, mert nincs bizonyíték arra, hogy 70 évnél régebben publikálták. Nem véletlenül az a törvény és a sablon szövege ami. Most - jó szokásodhoz híven - szaladhatsz segítségért Oliv0-hoz. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 05:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Erről a képről a Commonsba másolás közben lemaradt a szerző. Amúgy ha ismeretlen, akkor 1945 óta {{PD-HU-unknown}} a licence és nem {{CC-BY-SA-3.0}}, akármit is mond a Budapestcity.org. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 18:48, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Dr. Serényi Béla.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 14:32, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Andrássy Katinka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iaaasi (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Gobbi Hilda 1935 előtt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iaaasi (talk) 11:49, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Moiret Ödön.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iaaasi (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Latabár Árpád jr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iaaasi (talk) 11:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Latabár Kálmán-Fejes Teri-Latabár Árpád.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iaaasi (talk) 11:52, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Skála Demján Sándor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beroesz (talk) 08:47, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

File:A Budavári Palota tornyából 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beroesz (talk) 13:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ratkovszky.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ratkovszky.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Forrás pótolva. Azonban azt nem látom egyértelműnek, hogy miért biztos, hogy több mint 70 éve készült (Ratkovszky a Szjt. szerinti számításban 48 éve halt meg, a kép '43 előtt kellett, hogy készüljön). Kérlek, ezt pótold! --Tacsipacsi (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Horthy-Istvan 1943 2nd Commemorative.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Horthy-Istvan 1943 2nd Commemorative.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Teemeah (talk) 12:21, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

A magyar wikin a képek kocsmafalon van megbeszélés róla. A postai jegyzék szerint ezt egy olyan művész tervezte, aki 1994-ben hunyt el. Vagyis a bélyeg nem közkincs. Teemeah (talk) 10:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Ilona Tasnádi

Szia Tambo! Kicsit kiegészítettem a lapot engedelmeddel. Úgy látom olvastad előző kérdésedre adott válaszomat. Ha megkérhetlek a DEFAULTSORT ne hagyd ki, mert különben a Tasnádi Ilona az "I" betűhöz kerül. (új kategória létrehozásakor nem fontos szerk.összefoglalót írni, a gép megcsinálja) Remélem segítettem. További jó munkát:--Tamba52 (talk) 15:29, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Bergendy István.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Derzsi Elekes Andor (talk) 14:30, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aszszony'orvos.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aszszony'orvos.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 18:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Farbaky István.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Amitie 10g (talk) 17:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Creator template

Szia! Sajnos nem tudok átirányítást készíteni neki. Nem értek hozzá.--Szenti Tamás (talk) 14:09, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Archiválás

Szia! Látom, beraktál egy archívumdobozt. Ha azt szeretnéd, hogy automatikusan archiválódjon a vitalapod tartalma, akkor ez nem elég: szükség van egy archiválás metódusát leíró sablonra is (ugyanúgy, ahogy a huwikin). Ez a következő:

{{User:MiszaBot/config 
| archive             = User talk:Tambo/Archive %(counter)02d<!-- archívum neve, az archívumdoboz alapján kitöltöttem neked -->
| algo                = old(xx)<!-- xx helyett az kell, hogy mennyi idő után archiváljon: pl. 24h vagy 365d, nálam 40d, alapértelmezetten 24h -->
| counter             = 1<!-- a jelenleg használandó archívum száma -->
| maxarchivesize      = <!-- archívum maximális mérete 100B, 100K vagy 100M formátum, nálam 100k, alapértelmezetten 1000M -->
| minthreadsleft      = <!-- a mindenképpen megmaradó szakaszok száma, érdemes 0-nál nagyobbra állítani, mert különben hülyén néz ki :) alapértelmezetten 5 -->
| minthreadstoarchive = <!-- a legalább archiválandó szakaszok száma, alapértelmezetten 2, így ha csak 1 szakasz elég régi, vagy csak eggyel több van, mint minthreadsleft, akkor nem archivál, nálam 1 -->
| archiveheader       = <!-- archívum fejléce, jó úgy, ahogy van -->
}}

Ha szeretnéd, szívesen el is helyezem a sablont a megfelelő adatokkal a bevezetőben. Ha kézzel archiválsz, akkor természetesen erre nincs szükség. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 19:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Beállítottam ugyanúgy, mint magamnak, egyúttal /Archive 01 helyett az itteni standard /Archive 1 lett az elnevezés, így azt is be tudtam állítani, hogy a századik archívumig automatikusan jelenjenek meg a linkek. Az üdvözlősablont magadnak kell archiválnod (ha az első botos archiválás előtt teszed, akkor helyezd el a lap tetején a {{Talkarchive}} sablont, különben a bot az archívum létrehozásakor automatikusan berakja), ha nem szeretnéd, ajánlom a Template:{{Tambo/Archive 1}} sablont elhelyezni előtte, hogy ne essen szét. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 08:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Most látom, hogy a botot üzemeltető Fastily épp másfél hete vonult vissza, úgyhogy jelen pillanatban nincs archiválásunk. :-( --Tacsipacsi (talk) 08:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Na, most már van, viszont az üdvözlősablont nem fogja archiválni, mert a bevezetőben van, a felső két szakaszt pedig szintén nem, mert azokban meg nincs dátumbélyeg. Ha szeretnéd archiválni őket, egyszerűen kivágás/beillesztés módszerrel lehet (mondjuk én a TUSC account üzenetemet nem őriztem meg, szerintem ilyenért itt sem köveznek meg). --Tacsipacsi (talk) 14:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Szóval szerintem az üdvözlősablont archiválnám kézzel, az alatta lévő két szakaszt meg kivágnám a kukába. Megtehetem/megteszed? --Tacsipacsi (talk) 13:33, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Mint láthatod, megcsináltam; a két sablon helyét a fejlécben azért cseréltem meg, mert különben üres hely keletkezett fölül. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 17:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:005 Bp.II.Berkenye u.12.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:005 Bp.II.Berkenye u.12.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Joint.png

Now you can translate easily Joint.svg to Joint_hu.svg. I use InkScape. --Jmarchn (talk) 16:12, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

File:Várady Szabolcs-001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Austriantraveler (talk) 11:51, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Módos Gábor-001.jpg

Ezzel a módosításoddal: Revision of File:Módos Gábor-001.jpg kapcsolatban ajánlom figyelmedbe: Commons:Kategóriák#Túlkategorizálás - ezért volt addig csak az egyikben. Fauvirt (talk) 20:11, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Semmilyen más kategória nincs. Mint minden más fényképésznek, Módos Gábornak is van egy, a személyes kategóriáján belüli az általa készített képeket tartalmazó alkategória. Nézz körül, meg fogod látni. A kategóriák: Gábor Módos (ezt gondolom nem kell külön magyarázni) és Photographs by Gábor Módos (azaz Módos Gábor által készített fotók). Ez ugyanígy megvan pl. a francia Category:Félix Nadar →alkategóriája Category:Photographs by Nadar. Előbb tájékozódj máskor... Én csak felhívtam a figyelmed, hogy a személy és a személy fotói kategóriába is besorolni ugyanazt a képet túlkategorizálás, ahogy azt a fentebb linkelt leírásból is láthatod. Rád bízom, hogy melyikben tartod meg. Tehát az egésznek semmi köze hozzád, vagy hogy te vagy más hova-hogyan töltött fel bármit. Fauvirt (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Nem kioktattalak... vannak szabályok, amik akár tetszik, akár nem, illik betartani. Csinálj egy saját Wikimédiát, próbáld meg hasonlóan működőképessé tenni és akkor majd te hozhatod a szabályokat, vagy vitasd meg a commons közösséggel a problémádat. Addig viszont te is, én is be kell tartsuk azokat és nem anarchiát gyakorolni és azokra megsértődni és/vagy haragudni, akik próbálnak szabálytisztelő módon tevékenykedni.

Szerény véleményem szerint is marhaság, ugyanis a kép elsősorban őt ábrázolja, bőven jó volt az egyel feljebbi kategóriában. (Nem véletlenül hoztam Nadar kategóriáját amúgy, ahol van egy önarckép (Category:Self-portraits by Nadar‎) kategória is.)

Azt meg végképp nem értem, hogy mi a bajod a Wikidatán Barna Ilona képével, de ezt ott beszéljük meg. Fauvirt (talk) 07:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Drága Tambo! Az engedélyen az van, hogy "Módos Gábor fotóművész", miszerint azt kéri, hogy így nevezzék meg. Te milyen alapon változtattad ezt meg? Még ha zárójelben mögé írod, arra azt mondanám, hogy oké és gondos... de így... Fauvirt (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:A négyigenes népszavazás plakátja.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Rlevente (talk) 18:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

File:A négyigenes népszavazás plakátja.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 19:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Rudolph Valentino.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rudolph Valentino.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 14:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Rudolph Valentino.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 00:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

He is not Péter Scherer. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Jakab Zoltán.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jakab Zoltán.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Szia! Sajnos nem voltál elég körültekintő. Ez a kép még pár évtizedig nem szabad, ugyanis attól, hogy a mke.hu-n nem tüntették fel a kép készítőjét, az egy önarckép és mivel Benkhard Ágost 1961-ben halt meg. Sajnálom. Föltettem a copyvio sablont. Üdv, Fauvirt (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Törölték is... De ugyanez a helyzet: a File:Glatz Oszkár.jpg képpel is... :o/ Sok képet töltöttél fel a mke.hu-ról? Fauvirt (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Bocsánat, a Glatz kép nem azonos a másikkal... azért jó lenne valamivel többet megtudni ezekről a képekről, honnan, miből vannak, mert ahogy a Benkhard képnél is írtam, attól még, mert valahol nincsen feltüntetve szinte semmi, még nem azt jelenti, hogy ismeretlen, vagy nem tudható valami. Fauvirt (talk) 01:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Tehát szerinted amit a szent Google keresője nem hoz ki, az máris ismeretlen és felhasználható? Mert pl, ha a mke.hu hozta először nyilvánosságra, akkor a felrakás dátuma+70 év... Szóval amennyiben első ránézésre/keresésre nem találsz információt, a minimum, hogy írni kell a forrásodnak, mielőtt közkinccsé nyilvánítasz valamit csupán feltételezés alapján (a nem találtam meg, nem jelenti azt, hogy nincs... + a Magyar Képzőművészeti Egyetem oktatási intézményként szabadabban mutathat be szerzői jogi alkotásokat). Neked, aki ráteszed a jelzést kellene tudnod bizonyítani, hogy jogszerűen teszed. Fauvirt (talk) 12:45, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
File:Devecser-001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Monika Mann.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alinea (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Épp ez a baja, mivel az USÁban csak az 1923 előtt publikált művek szabadon felhasználhatóak (lásd: Template:PD-US), tehát a kép jogsértő. Fauvirt (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

PD

Köszi szépen, már én is rájöttem hogy ez nem elég, a Csontváry-képeknél már nem ezt használtam. Régen azért jó volt, és még ma is több a semminél. Attól tartok, sok száz alkalommal használtam így régen, remélem, valaki majd bottal kijavítja. Üdv --Szilas (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Kornis Gyula.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Savoia Marchetti SM.81 in action.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Márkus László.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

— Racconish ☎ 12:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Forte Pan License

The Forte Pan web site specifies as follows the terms of its license : "Fortepan is an online photo archives. All of the images are licensed under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-3.0 and can be freely used. If you wish to publish any of them, please give the credit in the following format: FOTO:FORTEPAN / name of donor". I think you should therefore include the name of the donor. Also, please note you can use the template {{Fortepan}} which categorizes in Category:Images from Fortepan. See here an example. — Racconish ☎ 13:48, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Kocsis János-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 16:15, 30 April 2016 (UTC)