User talk:Taiwania Justo/Archive/2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 21:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC) @Taiwania Justo hello dears, I do own the pictures.And I tried really hard to help completing these wiki info. Plz tell me what should I do? And why is that you're target on me? thanks.陳彥可 (talk) 04:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

File:泰國肝吸蟲蟲卵.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droxiang (talk) 15:20, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:泰國肝吸蟲形態.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droxiang (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:牛羊肝吸蟲.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droxiang (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:牛羊肝吸蟲形態.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droxiang (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:牛羊肝吸蟲蟲卵.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droxiang (talk) 15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:衛氏肺吸蟲形態.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Renewal (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:衛氏肺吸蟲蟲卵.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Renewal (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

File:轉蛋.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

G I Chandor (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

File:魏徵.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 15:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Maitreya Emei Miaoli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Majora (talk) 02:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

File:007 logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:41, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Category:UT Bo'ai Campus

Anout move Category:UT Bo'ai Campus to Category:Bo'ai Campus, University of Taipei, Read Commons:Rename_a_category , please !--111.250.21.218 13:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Taiwania Justo. You accepted this permission, but the file is such an obvious copyright violation that I'm afraid your decision to accept the ticket without even attempting to clarify calls your judgment into serious question. I've demoted the ticket back to "received", please confirm with the sender how they came to hold the copyright, and why they are using a free email address provider. Thank you. Storkk (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

@Storkk: Thank you. I will checked and talk to the provider. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 00:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
@Storkk: I originally passed the permission because I couldn't find the picture on the Internet. I'm sorry about my bad judgment. I will be patient about these paintings. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 00:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

您好,Taiwania Justo。請問透過 email 得到版權持有人親自授權的話,是否直接將那段對話 email 發送給 OTRS 團隊就行? Gm King (talk) 03:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@Gm King: 建議還是由原始攝影者親自以其粉絲專頁上的電子郵件地址寄授權信件到OTRS,我們才能夠查證身份。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 03:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
@Taiwania Justo: 版權持有人已在其社交網站上標明個人電子郵件地址,並以相同電子郵件地址授權給我。那麼屆時將對話 email 連同他的社交網站地址一起發送予 OTRS 團隊應該沒問題。謝謝您的指導。Gm King (talk) 03:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
@Gm King: 理論上看起來沒問題,但保險起見,請攝影者直接用授權信產生器產生授權信件後寄到OTRS才比較妥當。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 04:01, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
@Taiwania Justo: 請問如果原始攝影者不願發送授權信件到 OTRS 團隊,而確實取得其授權許可的話,那麼會否考慮酌情處理? Gm King (talk) 03:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@Gm King: 這種情況,恕無法處理,因為我們必須要確保原始著作權持有人完全理解釋出至維基共享資源所代表的意義。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 03:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@Taiwania Justo: 原始著作權持有人剛通知本人,已發送授權信件到 OTRS 團隊,請閣下檢查。謝謝。 Gm King (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@Gm King: 他必須要找到原攝影師,由攝影師發送授權信,或是有和原攝影師達成著作權轉移的相關法律文件或對話紀錄。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 08:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
@Taiwania Justo: 原始著作權持有人已在圖片來源中添加「This photo is released by " CC BY-SA 3.0 "」[1],所以不用再申請 OTRS 。抱歉,浪費了閣下的時間。 Gm King (talk) 01:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Taiwania Justo, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! AntonierCH (d) 11:18, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Merlion in Singapore.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

I've looked at your edits. I think there is a problem why you are writing "Cultural Park" instead of "Zhongzheng Park"? Looking at this edit, clearly you can see that the description was originally written as "Zhongzheng Park" by the uploader(User:Mk2010).--Kai3952 (talk) 05:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Hex-G00001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 14:28, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

您好,請問閣下有否考慮使用「License Review」形式解決問題?既然版權持有人願意在其圖像描述中加入釋出授權語句,那麼可如以下照片一樣處理 [2],這就不會再耽誤閣下時間。未知意下如何? Gm King (talk) 06:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

請您尋找有license review權限的任何一位第三方人員進行驗證。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 07:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
若這個方法可行,為免瓜田李下,可否由閣下以「License Reviewer」身份添加「License Review Needed」模板和刪除「提刪要求」模板,然後待第三方人員驗證,謝謝。 Gm King (talk) 07:43, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
提刪要求不得刪除,其他我得考慮看看。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 07:47, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
管理員 Thibaut120094 已協助檢查版權標籤和援引 Commons:Own work/Bystander selfie 証明何遠東為照片版權持有人,但是 Wcam 及 Guanaco 仍對其版權持有人身份有所質疑,請問還需要什麼來幫助証明? 是否需要繼續用 OTRS 上載照片 (由何遠東本人提供) 給閣下驗證? Gm King (talk) 02:17, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
由於Bystander selfie是提議方針而不是正式方針,請轉告何先生盡量尋找到原來的攝影師;此外,您也可以自行找何先生拍攝照片,然後上傳到維基共享資源,一次解決問題。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 02:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
問題是他在當日返回母校參觀時,隨便找外人拿著他的相機拍攝該照片 (像遊客觀光),照片版權持有人當然是其本人,而且他並沒有分享到其他地方,Thibaut120094 認為理由可靠才批出「Reviewed License」和建議用以上方針解決。另外,既然本人亦已獲得其書面授權。倒不如用電郵上載原照給你驗證,再以原來 OTRS 方式處理? Gm King (talk) 02:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
再次說明,由於提議方針的位階比正式方針為低,必須經過社群討論後才能確立。因此即使提出Bystander selfie的理由,仍然有可能會依據目前的正式方針為由刪除,除非維基共享資源社群討論通過將之成為方針。如果原攝影者仍然不清楚,維基共享資源就無法接受這類照片,還請理解。如果您能找到何先生,並由您親自拍攝他的照片並上傳到共享資源,這樣就可以解決目前的僵局,我相信以您與何先生的暢通溝通管道,應能做到。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 03:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
何遠東已答允本人要求,並以本人替他準備好的資料上載一張從未曝光的旅遊自拍照 [3],現時管理員 Guanaco 已接納照片,所以再次勞煩閣下檢閱,謝謝! Gm King (talk) 03:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
File:悬链线工程常用的函数图像.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Apocheir (talk) 03:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

你好

很非常的抱歉,我的中文不是非常的好,但我需要你幫助File:170724 WINNER at the Music Core's 2017 Ulsan Summer Festival.png這項是我創造的作品,我已將Copyright notice發送E-MAIL到OTRS,[Ticket#: 2017110210005715] Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddie Rice (talk • contribs) 02:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

@Maddie Rice: Hi, I received your ticket, but I cannot confirmed that the original published webpage, because your photo or video was published to many websites. Please provide your webpage you firstly uploaded to, and make sure the webpage has a CC-by-sa 4.0 mark or text. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 03:26, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
但是這項作業在上傳時未標示授權,若重新標示文件我必須重新發布是,這樣是批准的嗎....?我盡可能的熟悉Wikimedia的作業,發現他是困難的,若這項作業不行請刪除.我還有上傳其他的,然而不是我的作品,File:블랙핑크(BlackPink) - 마지막처럼 171001 코리아뮤직페스티벌.jpgAccording to the source page, this file is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license.(reuse allowed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddie Rice (talk • contribs) 05:18, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
我的熟識的語言是日文,然我找尋不到有會這項文字的Wikimedia朋友幫助,我盡一切的可能會與你使用中文,謝謝你的幫助感謝你 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddie Rice (talk • contribs) 05:22, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
@Maddie Rice: 首先,您要在您的留言最後加上~~~~作為簽名,這樣才能更容易追蹤這串留言紀錄。然後,我已經在日語維基百科發文尋找日中或日英精通的維基人來當中介翻譯,如果有找到並願意翻譯的話,之後您可以用日語回應,由中介翻譯來協助進行整個授權流程。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 06:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
@Maddie Rice: 接著要說明您的檔案出現的問題點。由於這張圖在很多個網站出現過,因此無法判定您原來在哪個網站發表過這張圖片或影片。請您提供您第一次發佈此張圖片或影片的網頁網址,而這個網頁也要標示CC-by-sa 4.0的授權標示或文字。This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 07:48, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
我用日語簡單地把問題說一遍。翻訳のリクエストが来ましたので、Taiwania Justoさんの質問を日本語に翻訳します。かいつまんで言いますと、当該ファイルは多くの場所で発表されていますが、はじめて発表されたのはどこですか。はじめて発表した場所でCC-BY-SA 4.0のライセンスでの公開を許可していると書いてありますか。--ネイ (talk) 08:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Shidaimanhua modernsketch vol01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zanhe (talk) 20:41, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Yu Kuang-chung Signature.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 12:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)