User talk:Svens Welt/Archives/2008

Keep up the good work!

I've noticed that your doing a grand job adding categories, and today you also identified some rather severe personality rights violations. Keep up the good work! Regards, Finn Rindahl 17:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, Finn. Greetings, --Svens Welt 09:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Dupe tagging

Hi Svens. Please delete the tagged image from the duped pages every 50 or so. Otherwise CommonsDelinker also starts replacing those images, which is unneeded. Cheers! Siebrand 16:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I saw it in the bot-log, too. I'll do it the next time. Greetings --Svens Welt 20:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Luciana Leon images

Hi svens the owner give me the picture tu put it on wikipedia, in really dont understand how to put the licenses but a friend of mine is helping to do it in the correct way. Thank a lot.

regards. --Constia 00:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Constia, obviously both of you aren't the images author who is the person actually taking the picture. The author is the only person who can allow the use of the image on Commons. It is therefore not sufficient that you tell me that you got the picture from him/her. Please let the author send a confirmation mail to the Permissions-team. Details can be found found at Commons:OTRS. Regards --Svens Welt 11:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

DRs

In deletion requests, please don't refer to "the request above" or "the request below" as that is meaningless once they are archived. Instead please link to the actual deletion request you are referring to. Thanks. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 17:09, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Why?

Hi Svens Welt, I wasn't uploaded those images on Commons, they was uploaded by the bot. Regards. Petr Tomasovsky 17:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

See Wikipedia in Esperanto. They are deleting all images there, that are not on Commons. They are deleting there the images with licence "fair use" (with adress), but because the images are not on Commons, they must to be deleted. Why? Many of these images it can be find anywhere on internet without any licence. Petr Tomasovsky 14:01, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I tried to answer this at his user talk here, and also asked a question here to clarify if there's a misunderstanding. Regards, Finn Rindahl 14:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the hint. I hope that the misunderstanding is soon solved, too. Regards, --Svens Welt 10:20, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Niklas Strömstedt Dubbletter

Niklas Strömsdt Igen.JPG och Niklas Strömsdt.JPG vill ja få raderade. De är dubbletter av (och så råka de bli felstavade), dessa bilder är de Rätta, Niklas Strömstedt Igen.JPG och Niklas Strömstedt.JPG Så snälla ta bort de två första som är felstavade danielåhskarlsson

Hej Daniel, jag vet att det är dubbletter och de tas hand om automatiskt om man sätter in {{Dupe|filnamn}}. Det kan ta lite tid med raderingen men jag är inte adminstratör så jag kan inte radera dem själv. Se om de är kvar imorn. De borde inte göra det. Med vänlig hälsning, --Svens Welt 15:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

 Done Raderat. Finn Rindahl 16:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Forgot to mention when I wrote here the last time, in cases like above {{Badname}} should preferrably be used instead of dupe. Regards, Finn Rindahl 20:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Löschung

Hallo Svens Welt, ich sehe, dass wegen URV Image:Wagermarke.jpg gelöscht wird. Bitte veranlasse dann dasselbe für Image:Hoeggmarke.jpg. Ich habe beide Bilder zwar selbst fotografiert, aber offensichtlich geht das Urheberrecht weiter als ich gedacht habe. Danke für die Erledigung. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Aloiswuest 13:42, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Aloiswuest, kurz zum Verständnis: ich habe das Bild nicht zur Löschung vorgeschlagen, sondern den Löschantrag vervollständigt und so zusammengebastelt, dass er nicht halbfertig ewig zwischen den Seilen hängt. Ansonsten wäre keine Diskussion pro oder contra Löschung möglich. Du kannst dich gerne in der Löschdiskussion äußern und der Löschantrag heißt ja auch nicht, dass das Bild wirklich gelöscht wird. Viele Grüße, --Svens Welt 18:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Deups tagger

Hello! Firstly, thanks for your work on dupes, keep on. Could you please apply this edit on your monobook.js? That would give you shorter code and better summary "Adding {{Dupe}}. Your help is needed!". Thanks!--OsamaK 12:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Owlhead.jpg image

Hi Swens, I've fixed the author and source info for Image:Owlhead.jpg. Am I supposed to remove the {{no source since . . .}} template from the article or will someone else review this and remove this if it's appropriate?--OnorioCatenacci 19:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi OnorioCatenacci, it's ok if you remove the template. You provided a source and an author, so the case is solved. Thanks. Regards, --Svens Welt 19:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Svens. I'm sorry I misspelled your name.--OnorioCatenacci 20:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

dupe

This barnstar is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of: Image:Original Barnstar.png There should be only one copy of an image (except this one). After getting rid of all the other dupes, you and the other helpers have been speedily awarded. Commons is virtually duplicates free - Thanks for your efforts! Finn Rindahl (talk) 23:35, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --Svens Welt (talk) 09:11, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hollywood.jpg

Please stop to revert the image to the poorer image which is lower in quality, has obstructed visibility, off colors, and smog which creates haze. Thank you, Boereck (talk) 14:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Why don't you choose a different filename? You overwrite another user's image without any notice. What would you think if somebody does the same with your image? Regards, --Svens Welt (talk) 14:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

PS: Moreover the image that you reverted is already available. You uploaded it at Image:HollywoodSign.jpg.

Image:Jagdhof Sommer.jpg & Image:Jagdhof Winter.jpg

Dear Sven, thanks for notifying me about this. I stated that I held all the rights of those two images and that they are now released under the Creative Commons license. Those images were specifically made for me. I hope this is ok. I also removed the No-Permission templates... hope that's OK too. As I said, I hold/held all the rights of those images. medienjaeger (talk) 07:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kloster Herschbach.jpg

Was ist genau das Problem mit diesem Bild? Ich habe die Quelle und den Namen des Autors eingetragen. Was soll ich verändern?

Kelisi von en:WP–Diskussion

Hallo Kelisi, bei diesem Bild stimmen Uploader und Autor in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia nicht überein. Daher ist dort eine Freigabe/permission notwendig. Btw, kannst du in Zukunft http://tools.wikimedia.de/~magnus/commonshelper.php nutzen, wenn du Bilder von lokalen Wikipedias nach Commons verschiebst, denn es gehen sonst sämtliche Links zu den urspünglichen Dateinamen verloren. Viele Grüße, --Svens Welt (talk) 15:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)