User talk:Stuchka

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stuchka!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:08, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 04:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ДН[edit]

Привіт! Вітаю з Вікі Днем народження! ;-) Бажаю натхнення і приємного творіння прекрасного! ;-)--Nickispeaki (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

-- Щиро дякую ) Stuchka (talk) 21:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Изображения из украинской Википедии[edit]

Для переноса изображений из украинской Википедии лучше использовать инструкции, описанные на uk:ВП:ПЗВС.--Anatoliy (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nechaev ME.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

213.87.137.86 13:10, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 11:04, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

The Category Barnstar
Awarded for your work creating categories for individual people. 99of9 (talk) 02:04, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Переименование[edit]

Здравствуйтеǃ Во всех подкатегориях категории Stamps of the Soviet Union by year можно заменить шаблон типа Soviet Union stamp 1985 CPA 5647.jpg на шаблон 1985 CPA 5647.jpg, то есть просто убрать три первых слова Soviet Union stamp. Как мне сказали в обсуждениях, именно такой короткий шаблон и был утвержден для советских марок (кем и когда, не знаю). Мне он тоже не нравится, как и некоторым другим. Считаю, что название советской марки может быть таким - Soviet stamp CPA <год> #<номер> <очень краткое описание>.jpg. (Надо же, и здесь двоеточия не ставятся с клавиатуры, как и некоторые другие символы и буквы. Кстати, не знаете, почему?) Может быть, в будущем все названия будем менять на такие... --Matsievsky (talk) 09:43, 20 September 2014 (UTC) 1975 --- Filipchenko Soyuz-16 1975 16k.jpg - 1975 CPA 4445 Crop Filipchenko.jpg, Stamp Soyuz-16 Nicolai.jpg - 1975 CPA 4445 Crop Rukavishnikov.jpg, Pushkin with wife by Ulyanov 1975 Soviet stamp 2.jpg - 1975 CPA 4490 and label.jpg, Stamp 1975 4486 bezkupona Soviet stamp a.jpg - 1975 CPA 4486 and label.jpg, Soviet stamp 1975 Tretjakovskaja galerija Vasilev Derevenskaja ulica 2k.JPG - 1975 CPA 4521 and label.jpg. --Matsievsky (talk) 17:02, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Сделано. Stuchka (talk) 17:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1975 --- Sheets RU007.jpg - 1975 CPA 4515 Sheet.jpg, Self portrait of Michelangelo Buonarroti 1975 Soviet stamp.jpg - 1975 CPA 4438 Stamp Maxicard.jpg, 12thBotanicalCongress1975USSRPostCard.jpg - 1975 CPA Postcard 31.jpg. --Matsievsky (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Stuchka (talk) 22:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Дубликаты[edit]

Ну вот, теперь в 1975 году дубликаты находятся не в разных местах страницы, но рядом, и с ними можно работать. Если есть желание, могу сказать, что нужно делать. --Matsievsky (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вы не спрашивайте, вы сразу пишите). Я всё, что могу сделать сделаю. Stuchka (talk) 22:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибоǃ Но сначала нужно создать категорию для лишних дубликатов. Она обсуждается на моей странице. --Matsievsky (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Так-с. Давай поставим работы на одной паре. Я укажу пару одинаковых марок, из которой одну марку оставляем, а другую удаляем или переносим в категорию плохих марок или как еще получится. Какую марку оставляем, я тоже буду указывать. Идет? --Matsievsky (talk) 13:44, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Это пара 1975 CPA 4457 (1).jpg и 1975 CPA 4457.jpg. Оставляем 1975 CPA 4457 (1).jpg. Это легкий случай, здесь все очевидно. Шаг 1-й. Переименование файлов. Смотрим, правильное ли имя у марки, которую оставляем. В данном случае нет. Поэтому шаг 1-й работает и нужно обменять имена этих файлов. --Matsievsky (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Вот тут возникает проблема... при попытке переименовать файл А в файл Б система говорит, что это имя уже занято, т.к. при переименовании файла происходит не удаление первичного названия, а создание копии файла с новым названием. Попробую спросить на форуме. Stuchka (talk) 16:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Да, возникают проблемы. Выплывает нереальный объем работ, который нужно координировать с администратором (см. тему на форуме). Может обойдемся без таких переименований? Stuchka (talk) 17:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Спрашивай у меня такие вещи, на форуме не надо. Обмен имен - стандартная программистская задача. Делается за 3 переименования через третье имя. Сначала называешь любой из двух файлов каким-нибудь третьим временным именем. Дальше еще два переименования, но уже все понятно. В итоге файлы меняются именами. Стопǃ В данном случае можно за 2 переименования. Файл 1975 CPA 4457.jpg переименовываешь в 1975 CPA 4457 cancelled.jpg (это гашеная марка). Затем 1975 CPA 4457 (1).jpg - в 1975 CPA 4457.jpg. А про объем работ не понял. Посмотрю форум. --Matsievsky (talk) 18:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ты немножко не понял сути проблемы (полагаю, можно на "ты"?))). Когда мы переименовываем файл А в файл Б, мы по сути не меняем название, а создаем копию этого файла (не совсем копию, не знаю как верно объяснить, в общем присваиваем ему новое имя, оставляя при этом существовать старое) с новым именем. Старое имя так же остается "зарезервированным" для этого файла. Т.е. суть в том, что нужно удалять вручную старую копию файла, для того, чтобы на его место записать новый файл. Но вместе с ним удалится и сам итоговый файл, его нужно первично скачать на компьютер и после удаления перезалить, восстановив при этом журнал использований файл и проверив (исправив) все ссылки на него. Надеюсь, что более-менее понятно будет, я , к сожалению, не могу верно сформулировать эту мысль. Stuchka (talk) 18:21, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ты знаешь, а я действительно не понимаю сути проблемы. Дело в том, что я уже неоднократно переименовывал файлы так, как я описал (ну, не сам переименовывал, ставил запросы). Неужели каждый раз тот, кто переименовывал, записывал файл на диск? Кстати, ссылок в данном случае не будет. А, кстати, перед своими запросами на переименование я переносил все ссылки и все категории, кроме одной, если они были, на хороший файл... --Matsievsky (talk) 18:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

в 1975 г. это вроде единственный случай. А в дальнейшем с переименованием по шаблонам надо быть осторожным, что-то придумаем. --Matsievsky (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Можешь переименовать 1975 CPA 4457.jpg в 1975 CPA 4457 cancelled.jpg. А другой файл я поставлю на переименование, кто-то другой переименует. --Matsievsky (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Для файлов 1975 CPA 4471 (1).jpg, 1975 CPA 4479 (1).jpg - 1975 CPA 4481 (1).jpg нужно сделать 1-й шагː переименовать их, заменив символы "(1)" на текст "uneven lighting". --Matsievsky (talk) 20:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Насколько я себе представляю процесс переименования, при переименовании не создается второй физический файл, а появляется новое имя, при этом старое имя остается и с него идет перенаправление. Поскольку осталось старое имя, просто так с этим именем новый файл не запишешь. Нужно удалить это старое имя. --Matsievsky (talk) 20:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Так-с, прошу прощения, вчера немного перебои с интернетом были. Возможно ситуация с переименованиями изменилась? Что мне надо сделать? То, что ты просил - сделала. Нужно ли переименовывать файл File:1975 CPA 4480 (1).jpg? Stuchka (talk) 10:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Да, файл 1975 CPA 4480 (1).jpg пропустила, там тире было. И для файлов с uneven lighting выполним еще 2 шага. 2-й шаг. Страницы, на которые ссылаются файлы uneven lighting, нужно отредактировать. Нужно зайти на эти страницы, найти на них ссылку на этот файл с uneven lighting и поменять имя файла на правильные, то есть удалить uneven lighting. Исключение составляет страница участника, который загрузил файл. Ему оставляем его файл. 3-й шаг. Самый простой. Все категории из файлов с uneven lighting переносим в правильные файлы, то есть файлы без uneven lighting. Исключение составляет личная категория участника, который загрузил файл. Оставляем только одну категорию Stamps of the Soviet Union, 1975, которую в конце переименовываем в нашу категорию Poor quality duplicate stamps of the Soviet Union. А лучше, конечно, удалить эти бракованные файлы. --Matsievsky (talk) 11:41, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Может нам имеет смысл обменяться скайпами для более оперативного реагирования?) Stuchka (talk) 11:49, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Stuchka (talk) 11:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибоǃ Скайп я всегда не любил. А сейчас у меня его и нетː под XP перестал ставиться. И потом, срочности нет. По электронной почте можно отписываться. --Matsievsky (talk) 13:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Да не за что). Я там файлов добавила в 1975 год, и еще осталось немного файлов, которые я боюсь загонять, чтобы не пришлось потом править названия (с карточками). Возможно я тебе их по электронке загоню, а ты на Викисклад отправишь с правильными именами? Stuchka (talk) 14:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Так ты и файлы можешь добавлять? А говорила, в филателии не разбираешься... Моя почта matsievsky.собака.newmail.ru. --Matsievsky (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

А откуда у тебя марка с файла 1975 CPA 4438.jpg? Там же блок. Кстати, файл 1975 CPA 4438.jpg надо перелить с именем 1975 CPA 4438 Stamp.jpg. А файл 1975 CPA 4438.jpg надо перелить блоком. --Matsievsky (talk) 17:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Т.е. те марки, которые идут в обрамлении, мы заливаем с обрамлением как марку 19nn CPA xxxx.jpg, саму марку без обрамления как 19nn CPA xxxx Stamp.jpg а марки с отрывной половинкой как 19nn CPA xxxx and label.jpg, я верно понимаю? Блок с этой маркой высылаю тебе), как один из файлов, вызвавших вопросы. Саму марку переименовала. По поводу филателии - я просто нашла каталог с соответствующей нумерацией. Так что с заливкой файлов, полагаю, справлюсь. Stuchka (talk) 18:12, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Да, ты все правильно понимаешь. А марки с оторванной отрывной половинкой просто как 19nn CPA xxxx.jpg. Марки с обрамлением называются блоком. На блоке может быть и не одна марка, а несколько. Или совсем не быть. Отрывная половинка называется купоном. --Matsievsky (talk) 18:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

К работе со следующим годом пока не приступай, я объясню более точный алгоритм, чтобы потом не пришлось менять местами имена... --Matsievsky (talk) 21:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Объясняй алгоритм, а то я уже на 1982г., иду с конца. Stuchka (talk) 21:54, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Поищу пока ночью что-нибудь интересное в некатегоризованных файлах). Stuchka (talk) 22:55, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Переименование категорий[edit]

Сможете переименовать категорию Soviet Union stamp catalogue‎ в категорию Category:Stamps of the Soviet Union and Soviet Russia by CPA numbers?‎ --Matsievsky (talk) 19:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Старую через пару дней удалят. Stuchka (talk) 22:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Это мой первый опыт по переименованию категорий. На старую категорию есть ссылки с других страниц. Что сними делать? --Matsievsky (talk) 00:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Где вы нашли ссылки? Была одна, я её переправила. Stuchka (talk) 07:28, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ага, значит, надо править. В начале переименованной категории 2 ссылки на категории, что я поставил. Эти категории имеют обратные ссылки. Вторую исправил, что с Викиучебника. В Вики 3 каталога марок СССР. Есть и мизерное начало четвертого, который отказываются удалять... --Matsievsky (talk) 09:00, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Понятно, что реакция слегка запоздала, но вот таким рувикипедизмом заниматься не надо ни здесь, ни в en.Wikipedia если когда придётся там работать. Заявления об «ошибочности» с целью подставить под удаление, тем более явно ложные, очень не любят. Переименовали категорию — замечательно, ставим {{Catredirect}} (в принципе, не обязательно туда, куда ушло содержимое) и оставляем грамотным участникам разбираться, что́ там ошибочное или нет. А в ru.Wikipedia большинству просто наплевать и на ссылки извне, и на соблюдение авторства участников, страницы с правками которых попадают под удаление. Там удалистский беспредел не с одними лишь перенаправлениями. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:23, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Сканирование марок[edit]

А как ты сканируешь марки? Там важно добиться естественного цвета. --Matsievsky (talk) 17:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Это не сканы), там же указан источник. Когда (если), будут доступны экземпляры лучшего качества,я как заливщик этих файлов имею право потребовать их быстрого удаления (без процедуры обсуждения). А пока - на безрыбье и рак рыба). Stuchka (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Точноǃ Хороший магазин нашла, там хорошие сканы марок. А зачем удалять? Нужно перезалить сверху. И вряд ли будут лучше. А блока Микеланджело и двух его минилистов по 6 марок там не было? --Matsievsky (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Переименование[edit]

1975 CPA 4445 (1).png переименовать в 1975 CPA 4445 png.png и затем "удалить" по шагам 2 и 3. --Matsievsky (talk) 17:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ошибка, наверное. Какое имя должно быть у итогового файла? Stuchka (talk) 18:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ну а как еще описать эту марку? Вроде бы формат .png не рекомендуется (или даже запрещен?) для марок. --Matsievsky (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Откуда инфа? Stuchka (talk) 18:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Где-то вычитал, уже не помню. А марку 1975 CPA 4443.jpg нужно перезалить - рваная... --Matsievsky (talk) 18:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Поищу попозже, надо успеть поработать по реальной работе). Ты пока ответь мне, пожалуйста, на вопрос по поводу именования. Чтобы я могла ночью нормально позаливать. Stuchka (talk) 18:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Переименование файла 1975 CPA 4438.jpg в файл 1975 CPA 4438 Stamp.jpg наверно лучше отменить. Потом перезалить файл 1975 CPA 4438.jpg блоком. Потом загрузить марку 1975 CPA 4438 Stanmp.jpg по-новой. --Matsievsky (talk) 20:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Проблема в том, что отменить переименование файла невозможно, мне, по крайней мере. При попытке совершить сей акт, система уведомляет меня, что сию правку уже отменили до меня, но абсолютно ничего при этом не происходит. При попытке принудительно запихнуть блок поверх этой отдельной марки система опять же визирует для блока имя со Stampом. Предлагаю собрать в кучку все необходимые переименования (которые мне неподвластны), а потом одарить ими администраторов, чтобы не мучить их из-за каждой подобной правки. А я потом всё нужное залью. Например, по году. Закончим с 1975-м, вычленим всё на перековку и - к администраторам. Stuchka (talk) 22:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1975 CPA 4445 (1).png предлагаю не морочиться с переименованиями, а просто запихнуть в дубликаты и пусть себе там валяется. Всё равно ведь имя она не занимает. Stuchka (talk) 22:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Согласен. Может, перенесем все обсуждения полностью на электронную почту?

Согласна, думаю, так будет проще. Stuchka (talk) 00:01, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! Words in category titles generally aren't capitalized (except proper names) as in Category:Old Images of Tartu. 2001:7D0:88C2:F401:45EF:4E2D:195F:9DC 14:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sicista-strandi-(kolesnikov)-2004-10-08.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cities in Balta Raion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuriy Kvach (talk) 14:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cities in Ananiv Raion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cities in Artsyz Raion has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Category discussion warning

Category:Cities in Balta Raion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Cities in Artsyz Raion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Cities in Ananiv Raion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


--Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Soviet Union 1967 CPA 3509 stamp (World War II Hero Political Commissar Vasily Klochkov and Feat of the Panfilov's Twenty-Eight Guardsmen with label.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ScriWi (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Category discussion warning

1891 in New York (state) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 22:08, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

2017 in New York (state) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 08:54, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

1892 in New York (state) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 09:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

1891 in New York (state) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Robby (talk) 09:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Kurdish writers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


E4024 (talk) 19:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Link[edit]

Hello.Please link the categories you create with Wikidata, Especially given names ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:39, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019![edit]

Χαίρετε!

Λαμβάνετε αυτό το μήνυμα επειδή συμμετείχατε προηγουμένως στον ετήσιο διαγωνισμό Wiki Loves Monuments στην Ελλάδα. Θα χαρούμε να συμμετάσχετε και φέτος στο Wiki Loves Monuments και να βοηθήσετε να καταγράψετε την τοπική μας κληρονομιά για τις μελλοντικές γενιές.

Μπορείτε να βρείτε περισσότερες λεπτομέρειες στον ιστότοπο Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Ελλάδα. Ή αν έχετε τραβήξει φωτογραφίες σε άλλες χώρες, μπορείτε να ελέγξετε τις διεθνείς επιλογές. Ο διαγωνισμός του τρέχοντος έτους διαρκεί μέχρι τις 30 Σεπτεμβρίου 2019.

Πολλές ευχαριστίες για τη βοήθειά σας για άλλη μια φορά! --Geraki TLG 04:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Photographs by J.D. Lasica has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Geo Swan (talk) 00:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hottentotta hottentotta 1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hottentotta hottentotta 1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 05:05, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Allocyclosa bifurca 28426492.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Allocyclosa bifurca 28426492.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Aculepeira packardi 35315390.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Aculepeira packardi 35315390.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Populated places in Ukraine by municipality has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 08:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]