User talk:Staselnik

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Staselnik!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Unnecessary borders

Hi Staselnik, please do NOT add unnecessary borders. You only force other users to remove them. See Commons:Media for cleanup. Greetings, --

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 08:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Peter Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 08:19, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merkava Mk III tank 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Rjcastillo 14:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamond mine. Mirny in Yakutia. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impessive & good quality. --NorbertNagel 22:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palace of the Governorate. Vatican City State..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for aerial shot --Poco a poco 14:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diamond mine. Mirny in Yakutia. 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:20, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Merkava Mk III tank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Installation of track on Merkava Mk III tank.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please add Geocoding to the image. Halavar (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
  •  Done --Staselnik (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment They seem better : (Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - 188th Brigade Training Day, March 2008-cropped.jpg or Flickr - Israel Defense Forces - Artillery Corps' Cadets Competence Day (15).jpg) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
  • this image is valuable, as shown removal and installation of track on the tank --Staselnik (talk) 12:21, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

You understand: the scope is not adapted. You must say: Installation of track on Merkava Mk III tanks. :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

•  Done --Staselnik (talk) 15:02, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teba, Kemerovo region, Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I miss a general sharpness on the buildings. Also magenta CA present. --Cccefalon 21:16, 28 November 2013 (UTC)  Done corrected --Staselnik 23:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC) Pretty. Mattbuck 21:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient capitals of the columns. Golan Archaeological Museum. Katzrin. Israel. 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:21, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teba (Kemerovo Oblast), under snow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

It is interesting, but the scope is not good IMO. I think you should focus more on the village itself than on the snowy landscape, and link only to one category: Yes the "Teba" category is relevant, but the "snowy landscape in Russia" category is not (there are so many !!!), and for this point of view, maybe yours is not "the best". As for me, I should suggest for a scope : "Teba (Kemerovo Oblast), under snow", and then it could be more easily supported. Thank you.--Jebulon (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)  Comment Agree with Jebulon. If you change the scope, your image should get promotion. Halavar (talk) 13:03, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

•  Done--Staselnik (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
•  Support I've added "under snow" to the scope, hope you will agree:) Halavar (talk) 21:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC) O.K., I agree :)--Staselnik (talk) 09:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dome of Saint Peter's Basilica (exterior).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:25, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statues on the facade of Saint Peter's Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CA, but good --Poco a poco 20:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golan Heights Wind Farm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay for me. DerHexer 23:29, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzrin. Israel. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but there are perspective distortion.--XRay 10:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik 13:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 06:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient ornaments. Golan Archaeological Museum. Katzrin. Israel. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support just ok, a bit unsharp on the edge due to insuffisant DoF --Christian Ferrer 16:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

New Vatican gardens !

Hi Staselnik. I just noticed there were two slights stiching errors on your file : "Gardens_in_the_Vatican_City_01b". As I've already promoted it on the VIC page without noticing these tiny flaws, I fixed them and uploaded a new version. I hope you'll be OK. Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 16:25, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

• thank you very much--Staselnik (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gardens in the Vatican City, playground with a monument of St. Peter, the view from the dome of St. Peter's Basilica..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 13:33, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! HaYarkon. Tiberias. Israel. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please have a look to perspective distortion.--XRay 07:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik 01:07, 12 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality (for QI now). --XRay 07:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katzrin. Israel. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but there are perspective distortion.--XRay 10:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik 13:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality (now). --XRay 06:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ancient ornaments. Golan Archaeological Museum. Katzrin. Israel. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support just ok, a bit unsharp on the edge due to insuffisant DoF --Christian Ferrer 16:12, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cities in Lebanon. Khiam. Nabatieh Governorate. View from the south-west, from the territory of Metulla, Israel..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Views of Rome from the dome of Saint Peter's Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mikulov Park. Panoramic view from the north-east side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khiam. Nabatieh Governorate. Lebanon..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Staselnik, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bas-relief above the window. Ostafievo. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Saint Peter's Basilica (exterior). View from the south-east side..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo. --JLPC (talk) 17:48, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Museums in the Vatican City. View from the dome of Saint Peter's Basilica..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikulov Park. Katzrin. Israel. 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Unfortunate (but fixable) crops in the upper part of the picture. --JLPC 17:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik 22:57, 14 December 2013 (UTC)  Comment (Sorry for the delay) - Better now but, please, crop (or clone) the upper left corner. --JLPC 22:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik 23:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Druze village Mas'ada. Lake Ram. Panoramic view from the north-west of Moshav Nimrod..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 17:21, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 19:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Temple Mount 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a slight problem (I'm not sure, see note please) but nice mood and good quality imo. --JLPC 17:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikulov Park. Katzrin. Israel. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 13:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views of Rome from the dome of Saint Peter's Basilica. Via di Porta Cavalleggeri, Via Gregorio VII..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:27, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuznetsk fortress 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway station in Vatican Ciy. View from the dome of Saint Peter's Basilica..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gardens in the Vatican City 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted clockwise. Mattbuck 10:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik 23:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:36, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museums in the Vatican City.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamla 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikulov Park. Katzrin. Israel. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--Staselnik 13:45, 18 December 2013 (UTC) Comment I don't see any improvement. You should give a different description to the different nominations to make the work of review easier --Moroder 18:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)  Done Photo replaced by a new--Staselnik 21:08, 20 December 2013 (UTC) IMO all requests followed up and quality is now good enough (though I am not really convinced that every simple plate deserves to be a QI and it might be a COPVIO to publish the text of a plate without permission). --Cccefalon 07:32, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yarmouk River Valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocodiles in Hamat Gader 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamla 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me it's ok if you correct a bit the perspectives to put the panel on left verticaly straight --Christian Ferrer 00:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik 09:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yarmouk River Valley, Golan Heights, Israel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment That's a description, not a scope. If you want to have several scopes, you need to make several nominations. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:13, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Done--Staselnik (talk) 09:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Well, it's hard to see that river. Halavar (talk) 16:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I had the same reaction, but the scope makes it clear "valley". It seems appropriate.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Looks good now. I removed the "view of", not needed. Yann (talk) 17:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Deir Qeruh, Archaeology site in Golan Height 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --The Photographer 18:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Column capitals. Synagogue. Katzrin ancient village. 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 15:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katzrin ancient village, synagogue..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument "The Tel Aviv foundation". Tel Aviv. Israel. 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 20:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Oil presses. Katzrin ancient village..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very good work didactic and useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golan Archaeological Museum. Katzrin. Israel 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golan Archaeological Museum. Katzrin. Israel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Uba River. Aerial view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment "Aerial view" would be more appropriate. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik (talk) 11:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golan Archaeological Museum. The museum building..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment For the scope, This image file:Golan Archaeological Museum. Katzrin. Israel..jpg is better. The building is best seen. Even if there are "recent archaeological deposits" that spoil the landscape a bit. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:06, 12 January 2014 (UTC)  Done--Staselnik (talk) 14:50, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jordan River valley 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ein Bokek. Panorama..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golan Archaeological Museum. Katzrin. Israel 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to be QI --Halavar 23:06, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ein Bokek. Dead Sea. Israel. 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support with small edit. --Iifar 18:18, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiegel Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:35, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Har Bnei Rasan. Bunker and wind farm..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golan Heights Wind Farm. View from the mountain Har Bnei Rasan..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hammam Musa (Moses' Bath), view toward the Gulf of Suez..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
El-Tor, view from Hammam Musa (Moses' Bath)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rooster. Gallus gallus domesticus. Zoological Center of Tel Aviv-Ramat Gan. Israel. 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! El-Tor. South Sinai. Egypt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 06:12, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rooster. Gallus gallus domesticus. Zoological Center of Tel Aviv-Ramat Gan. Israel. 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saints Peter and Paul church in Tarusa. Russia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:08, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crosspoint bollards (ship part).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers in Israel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (but needs location and categories and also, if you have the information available, information about the bunker. When it was built and who built it (Israel or Syria?). ----ArildV 01:32, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers in Israel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Shot with the 55mm Micro? --Tuxyso 16:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunkers in Israel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Peter the Great Statue.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 21:42, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilyuy Station 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 19:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vilyuy Station 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svetlinskaya Hydroelectric Station pic 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 18:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Holy Trinity. Mirny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 18:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Holy Trinity. Mirny..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirny in Yakutia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mir mine. View from the eastern lookout..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mirny in Yakutia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mirny in Yakutia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 17:07, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Monument to Andrei Rublev in Moscow 01.JPG

And also:

• File:Monument to Andrei Rublev in Moscow 02.JPG

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 19:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gharial in Hamat Gader 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 09:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemal hydroelectric power plant 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rooster. Gallus gallus domesticus. Zoological Center of Tel Aviv-Ramat Gan. Israel. 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golan Heights Winery 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 20:59, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)