User talk:Sreejithk2000/Archive 10

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

asiquai 3

i have been written asiqui 3 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 27.97.241.1 (talk) 00:50, 20 August 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not understand that message. What was it again? --Sreejith K (talk) 03:31, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requires license review

Please check this backlog and do the needy. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:33, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up the backlog, although I don't know whether we should really trust the Bollywood Hungama source. They have lied in the past regarding the ownership of their images. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In a situation where we are not getting any free images for prominent actors, we have a little chances of success by not opting for Bollywood Hungama. Many South Indian actors', in fact superstars' pages lack images for now. Anyways, thanks for your help. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Pictures - Telugu Movie Actors

Hey Sreejith,

I am trying to adding images to a couple of Telugu comedians/actors/actresses wiki pages - But they are taken down due to lack of CR. I see you have added an image of Chiranjeevi which belonged to bolywood Hungama. Did you reach out to them seeking permission to add the image? Looking for suggestions to get images that would be acceptable for uploads. Let me know. Thanks

-kvsrh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvsrh (talk • contribs) 20:27, 18 April 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood Hungama grants us permission to use some of their images under a cc-by-3.0 license. However, this applies only to images at sets, parties, and press meetings, and not screen-caps or photos copyrighted by other sites. Don't just upload any images from there and put this license on it — please check if the said rules apply before you upload. If you find images that satisfy these conditions, upload them to Commons and add {{Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama}} as the copyright tag. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upload chance

Hellow sir, Iam too a keralite, anyway i need a help to upload a photo from the source : http://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/television/Liberty-Depends-Upon-Your-Upbringing-Monica/2015/04/13/article2761328.ece or http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/life-style/itsy-bitsy/from-youtube-to-tv/69451.html ( The actres on picture). Can i upload any of these image as the bottom of the page, its written Copyright@ 2015.? waiting for response.--Roshan014 (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please read Commons:Project scope/Summary to understand what you can and cannot upload to Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review of picture pls help

Hi..Sreejith, Please help review this Ticket# 2015042810006497 for wiki commons permission to upload a picture of Yash Dasgupta. They were clicked by me exclusively. Let me know if more info needed. Thanks MPadma User:Mpadma

Thank you. I have confirmed the OTRS license. In future, please do not add the OTRS tag yourself. We will confirm the license and add it ourself. Thank you for your contribution to Commons. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review files

You are requested to kindly review these files at the earliest: File:Paisa Ho Paisa poster.jpg, File:Amit Sadh.jpg, File:Komal Jha.jpg, File:Radhika Apte.jpg. Please review these files as soon as possible because a tag is placed on these files, stating that a reviewer is required to review these files. If you don't do so, these files will be deleted in 7 days. Kunalforyou (talk) 18:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed these ones, but the first one will have to be deleted. It is a copyrighted movie poster and we do not have permission to upload it in Commons under a free license. --Sreejith K (talk) 01:46, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing my uploaded files. I also noted that you also reviewed the files that I didn't mentioned above. I think you saw my contributions and reviewed the files. That's a great job done by you! But in File:Bhushan Kumar.jpg and File:Tahir Raj Bhasin.jpg images, you added Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama templates, but you didn't passed the licence review. I think you forget to do so. Please take time to review these files also. Also, the deletion tag which you placed on File:Paisa Ho Paisa poster.jpg image, has been removed by an administrator, explaining that "No permission is already there". So, I request you to review that file also. Thanks in advance. I hope you will review my files in the future also, when I will ask you to do so. Regards, KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 04:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review files

Hello and welcome back! You are again requested to review these files: File:Biba Singh.jpg and File:Urvashi Chaudhary.jpg. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 16:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aadu-2015 malayalam.jpg

Hello Sreejithk2000

I received one message from you about the image used in Aadu (film). Here's the link : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aadu-2015_malayalam.jpg

Actually the creators provided me the license for using it.

So can you tell me more whether there's any issues with it?

Regards, Jose Varghese Josu4u

The problem is that we do not have a proof that the creators of the movie gave you permission. I would love to trust you, for the invaluable contributions you are doing for Wikimedia, but Wikimedia mandates proof. Can you ask the creators of the movie to email a proof of permission to COM:OTRS ? --Sreejith K (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pan-Slavic flag.svg

As already discussed in August 2012 (see archive 8) these are not really "the same" in a sense which would usefully allow for file merger. This emerged from the 1848 Prague pan-Slavic conference, or interpretations of the resolutions of the conference, while the Kingdom of Jugoslavia didn't exist until after WW1, so the files cannot be merged. Please don't repeat this tagging. AnonMoos (talk) 19:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Not really sure why it came in my scanner again. I will try to remember it next time

--Sreejith K (talk) 11:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review files

Hello again! You are again requested to review some more new files: File:Rajneesh Duggal photo.jpg and File:Kashmira Irani.jpg. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 15:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 04:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review some more files

You are again requested to review some more files. Here are these: File:Mukul Harish.jpg and File:Anjali Mukhi.jpg. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 15:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 02:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SignalFlagIndia-USNSpec.svg etc

Please revert the duplicate tags on these files. They were uploaded as a set, to be the same as U.S. Navy specifications (not necessarily the same as the ICS flags). It appears as though other people have overwritten some of the ICS SVGs with my versions, but in that case those should be reverted. We can have both. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I will leave that for you. I saw that Wikimedia is reporting them as duplicates. If you feel they are not, then we can keep both. Thanks for clarifying. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do me a favor? Can you check the flag files at User:Sreejithk2000/Duplicates and fix them too? --Sreejith K (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think I got them all. A user copied over a great many of the ICS SVGs with mine. Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:17, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review these files

Hello! Please review some more files: File:Aman Verma.jpg and File:Mugdha Chaphekar.jpg. Thanks in advance. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 15:48, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thank you for your contributions. --Sreejith K (talk) 02:46, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LR required

Could you review these files?

File:Odonata (Insecta) diversity of Salim Ali Bird Sanctuary and its adjacent areas in Thattekkad, Kerala, India.pdf (CC BY 4.0 is mentioned in the PDF and CC BY-SA 4.0 in the webpage.)

File:Heliogomphus promelas - Shenduruni Wildlife Sanctuary - 2014.jpg (1st picture in the link)

File:Heliogomphus promelas - Shenduruni Wildlife Sanctuary - 2014 - 2.jpg (2nd picture in the link)

J e e 03:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 12:24, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! J e e 12:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit protected template

Hi, pls check Template_talk:Upload_Help_notice#Latvian. Thanks :-)--Praveen:talk 19:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Please verify --Sreejith K (talk) 22:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Praveen:talk 18:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete

Please undelete File:Tram stop 136 on The Esplanade in St Kilda (1).jpg so I can see what file name is the correct title. Bidgee (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Can you mark one file as duplicate once you have made your edits? --Sreejith K (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) File:Luna Park (138) tram stop on The Esplanade in St Kilda (1).jpg is the incorrect file (the one that should be deleted). Bidgee (talk) 15:54, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Scenic design photos by Dejan Miladinovic

An image you transferred from enwp is included in a deletion discussion, if you have a moment: Commons:Deletion requests/Scenic design photos by Dejan Miladinovic – czar 22:37, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JustReplace.js

FYI, tweaked the label on the checkbox, the existing wording was confusing. Hope that's ok. Revent (talk) 18:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saw the edit now. Thanks for making the change. I agree to the reason why you made that change. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files awaiting for your review

Hello, these files are awaiting for your review: File:Upen Patel snapped at a screening of All Is Well.jpg, File:Upen Patel at the launch of Magnum ice-cream flavor.jpg, File:Avani Modi inaugurates JJC Utsav Grand Trade & Funfair 2015.jpg, File:Avani Modi walk the ramp at Amante Fashion Show.jpg and File:Avani Modi at the launch of the store Pressto Zapato.jpg. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 06:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 03:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review files

You are kindly requested to pass the review of these files: File:Akshay Oberoi at the premiere of 'Guddu Rangeela'.jpg, File:Akshay Oberoi at the special screening of 'Inside Out'.jpg, File:Akshay Oberoi at the promotion of 'Pizza' at a mall.jpg, File:Ishita Dutta's photoshoot.jpg, File:Ishita Dutta at the meet of film 'Drishyam' at PVR Juhu.jpg, File:Ishita Dutta at the '11th Star Parivaar Awards 2013'.jpg. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 06:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 16:54, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alaska Airlines Logo.svg

File:Alaska Airlines Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

159.49.254.2 23:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review these files

Hello, you are once again welcome to review these files: File:Amruta Khanvilkar at the 'Ajeenkya DY Patil University Marathi Filmfare Awards 2014'.jpg
File:Amruta Khanvilkar at the premiere of Shreyas Talpade starrer 'Baji'.jpg
File:Amruta Khanvilkar at Shreyas Talpade & Jitendra Joshi's birthday bash.jpg
File:Amruta Khanvilkar at the audio release of Marathi film 'Pyaar Vali Love Story'.jpg
File:Amruta Khanvilkar at the audio release of 'Poshter Boyz'.jpg
File:Abhijeet Sawant & Amruta Khanvilkar shoot for their new album 'Farida'.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at Smita Thackeray's birthday bash.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at the special screening of 'Drishyam' at Fun Republic.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at the success bash of 'Mary Kom'.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at special screening of 'NH10'.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at the 'Filmfare Glamour & Style Awards'.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at the audio release of 'Mary Kom'.jpg. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 10:00, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Missed files

I think you missed to review these files. Please review them: File:Amruta Khanvilkar at Shreyas Talpade & Jitendra Joshi's birthday bash.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at the success bash of 'Mary Kom'.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at special screening of 'NH10'.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at the 'Filmfare Glamour & Style Awards'.jpg
File:Darshan Kumar at the audio release of 'Mary Kom'.jpg. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 05:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 14:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review Files

Hello there, please review some of my more uploaded images from Bollywood Hungama:- File:Sapna Pabbi grace 'Renault Sony Guild Awards 2016'.jpg
File:Sapna Pabbi grace 'Sansui Colors Stardust Awards 2015'.jpg
File:Sapna Pabbi grace the premiere of 'Minions'.jpg
File:Sapna Pabbi at the premiere of 'Fast And Furious 7' at PVR Phoenix.jpg
File:Sapna Pabbi grace 60th Filmfare pre-awards party.jpg
File:Imran Abbas at 'Jaanisaar' screening.jpg
File:Imran Abbas & Pernia Qureshi visit Taj Mahal to promote 'Jaanisaar'.jpg
File:Imran Abbas & Pernia Qureshi snapped at Amazon India Couture Week 2015.jpg
File:Imran Abbas at Mr. India 2015.jpg
File:Imran Abbas at the launch of Zee's 'Zindagi' channel.jpg
Thanks in advance. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 07:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 04:58, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review?

Hello sir, I have uploaded an image with proper author and source, now can you review and give licence to it? Here is the image file File:Shahrukh Khan to host 20th Screen Awards 2014.jpg

ARNAB22 ^☎️^📝 20:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the images from Bollywoodlife.com are not in a free domain. We cannot host their images here. If the website administrators can email OTRS stating that their images are under a free license, we can host their images here. Do you think you can talk to them about this? --Sreejith K (talk) 04:22, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry Sir, I dunno about this. So what kind of images I can upload? Can you please tell me about that? And can you also tell me from which websites or domains I can upload images as well as my own works? I am a very new user at Wikipedia as well as Wikimedia Commons. And I wish to talk with them later because of I don't have the knowledge of Wikimedia Commons rules and regulation or terms and conditions. --ARNAB22(talk) 12:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you skipped the first page of the Upload Wizard for your first nine uploads. It contains this image that explains what you can and cannot upload to Commons. For more, see Commons:Project scope/Summary. —LX (talk, contribs) 12:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks LX --Sreejith K (talk) 15:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Connecticut Highway 614.jpg

File:Connecticut Highway 614.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Imzadi 1979 → 20:43, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Call of Juarez logo.jpg

File:Call of Juarez logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review Files

Hello, review these files from Bollywood Hungama

Thanks in advance. KunalForYou ^☎️^📝 13:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 14:30, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent attention

Dear ശ്രീജിത്ത് Sreeejith, Please go through my latest comments and following discussions here. An abnormal number of files and categories would be affected unless more people go spend there time and add their Keep votes in each deletion pages. Also several category trees are disturbed. Please see if you can revert them in bulk and avoid deletions. Thanks. ViswaPrabha (വിശ്വപ്രഭ) (talk) 20:46, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for closely tracking this and closing it in a friendly way. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:45, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Newmacbookpro.jpg

Yours sincerely, –Totie (talk) 02:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Ireland.svg

Is there a way that an admin edit can be done on the file? I need it to reduce the svg code, yet keep the current file colors <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="1200" height="600"> <rect fill="#169b62" width="400" height="600"/> <rect fill="#fff" x="400" width="400" height="600"/> <rect fill="#ff883e" x="800" width="400" height="600"/> </svg>

Thanks in advance! User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 03:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the changes. Please verify. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Verified. Thank you very much! User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 06:19, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files waiting for your review

These are the files of Bollywood Hungama, which need to be reviewed by you:-

Thanks in advance. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 07:32, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 00:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ചിത്രം:കണ്ണൂർ അന്താരാഷ്ട്ര വിമാനത്താവളത്തിലെ റൺവേ & ടെർമിനൽ കെട്ടിടം

(File:Kannur International Airport Runway.jpg),(File:Kannur International Airport Terminal Building.jpg)ഈ രണ്ട് ചിത്രങ്ങളും ഞാൻ നേരിട്ട് സ്വന്തമായി എടുത്ത ചിത്രങ്ങളാണ് ഇപ്പോൾ ഈ രണ്ട് ചിത്രങ്ങളും വ്യക്തത കുറവാണെന്ന് പറഞ്ഞ് വികിമിഡിയ കോമ്മൺസിൽ നിന്നും മായിച്ച് കളയാൻ സാധ്യത ഉണ്ടെന്ന് കണ്ടു.ഇതിന്റെ കുടുതൽ വ്യക്തത ഉള്ള ചിത്രം ലഭിച്ചാൽ ഉടൻ തന്നെ ഞാൻ ഇവിടെ ചേർക്കുന്നതാണ് അതുവരെ ഈ ചിത്രം നിലനിർത്താൻ പറ്റിലെ..?--Arunmohanpavi (talk) 11:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

വ്യക്തത കുറവാണെന്നത് മായ്ക്കാൻ ഒരു കാരണം അല്ല. നല്ല വ്യക്തത ഉള്ള മറ്റ് ചിത്രങ്ങൾ ഉണ്ടെങ്കിൽ മായ്ക്കാൻ പരിഗണിക്കപ്പെട്ടേക്കാം. ഇപ്പോൾ ഈ ചിത്രങ്ങൾ എന്തായാലും മായ്ക്കേണ്ടുന്ന ഒരു അവസ്ഥ ഇല്ല. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elca eucharistic service.jpg

File:Elca eucharistic service.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

El Grafo (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:St.Ignatius_Parish_Hall.jpg

Hi, hoping you can help. This user has nominated the same file for the third time now because it is "an old photo". I wonder if there is a language problem where the user does not understand why the image is not deleted? I am assuming here that they speak Malayalam based on the fact the image is from a village in Kerala, could you leave a message on the request? Thanks in advance. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a note on his talk page. Thank you for letting me know. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ylämaa Church Inside.jpg

So you decided to keep it. As I wrote, it is derivative work of finnish artist Väinö Saikko's altar painting. Sakko died in 1952, so the painting is protected until beginning of 2023. The painting is in no way de-minimis. Additionally, the file was used in fi-Wikipedia article fi:Ylämaan kirkko and as the upploader described here, the main focus of photo is the paining and damages (folds) in it's surface. (Translation of : Ylämaa church altarpiece got tracks when the board was rolled out for the evacuation journey during the last war. Since relegation is such an important part of the history of Ylämaa, it was not required to restore damages). Painting filling 65 % (75 % with the woman) of image is not de minimis. The woman is not the main focus neither church's wall, altar table, Bible, flowers or candles so cropping is not a solution. It's not a general wiew. The solution is to uppload it in fi-wiki, where it can be used in article Väinö Saikko (and in a possible article about the painting) according to fi-wiki guidelines and practices. --Htm (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC) (edited) The is no FOP for artwork in Finland. So please reconsider. Thank you. --Htm (talk) 01:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Renominated to get more opinions from other admins. --Sreejith K (talk) 01:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you.--Htm (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the basis of Finnish law, this photograph is an independent piece of art. [[1]] [[2]] Tvkosone (talk) 20:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review Files from Bollywood Hungama

Hello, these are the files which I have uploaded just now. Kindly please review them:-

Thanks in advance. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 08:39, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 19:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hillsong logo.png

File:Hillsong logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doom mapformat screen.png

File:Doom mapformat screen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 05:28, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:HMS Prince of Wales (1902) awaiting scrapping.jpg

File:HMS Prince of Wales (1902) awaiting scrapping.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 07:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eubie Blake Headstone 1024.jpg

File:Eubie Blake Headstone 1024.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Declined split

I declined your split request at File:HDMP28andCFT-3D-overlay.png: "all images were uploaded in quick succession by same uploader, and first two I would nominate for deletion based on poor quality (vs last file that is a clear illustration of same topic)". If you think there is value in the older images, please let me know and I will move them to a separate filename and COM:DR them for wider discussion. DMacks (talk) 03:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

old deletion

Hi S- I just noticed a very old deletion that I think was a mistake here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Kz_2000_tenge_error.jpg&redirect=no The note in the deletion log says the file was a scaled-duplicate. This file is an image of a banknote that had a typo in it. The note looks very similar to the image which replaced it, but it's not the same, and the small difference is important. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakhstani_tenge#2006_series .

Thanks- Staecker (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have restored the file now. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Staecker (talk) 12:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A question about image deletion

I would like to help out with the depopulation of a category at Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_files_with_the_same_name_on_Wikimedia_Commons

I asked a question here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Wikipedia_files_with_the_same_name_on_Wikimedia_Commons

Which has been partially answered but I still have some questions.

I note that we need to check to make sure the file was properly uploaded "(preserving GFDL required history of revisions)" And I'm trying to make sure I understand what that means in the case of an image where there are some earlier versions.

I note that Rob suggests I can use common sense, so in the one case I identified, where a medium resolution image was replaced by a higher resolution image, there is no need to ensure that the medium resolution image is also copied over the Commons.

However, the particular date I chose has three images all moved by you.

I originally thought, in the case of the first image, that you moved over all three versions but I now see that you moved over the oldest version. I see that CanadianDude1 improved the image. I'm not quite sure whether that editor uploaded the new image on both the English Wikipedia and Commons or whether the upload was done on English Wikipedia and someone else moved it over a whether it was uploaded to English Wikipedia and automatically transferred. In any event, if I delete the image on the English Wikipedia the entire history still remains on Commons.

In the case of the second image, the slightly improved image was copied over and not the older image. Per common sense there is no need to bring over the older image.

However, in the case of the third image, the logo was fundamentally changed sometime between 2009 and 2013. Only the more recent version is carried over to Commons, so if I delete the image on the English Wikipedia, the history of the image with the older image will be lost. Is this acceptable? I see that I have an option to bring over the older version (assuming I can track down my TUSC password). Should that be done? If not why not? I understand one could make an argument that the current logo is well the current logo in the old one is no longer needed but the rules suggest we need to maintain the history and by deleting it without moving it over we have erased a bit of the history. I'm happy to do that if it's acceptable at I need to square that with the stated rules.--Sphilbrick (talk) 23:26, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Giants 1961-1974.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Giants 1961-1974.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

CoolCanuck ^eh? 05:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Giants 1976-1999.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Giants 1976-1999.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

CoolCanuck ^eh? 05:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review Files

Hello there! You are required to review these Bollywood Hungama files:-

Thanks in advance. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 05:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket : 2016070710015483

Hi Sreejithk2000,

Can you please help review the OTRS ticket: 2016070710015483

This has been attached to the Yash Dasgupta page

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpadma (talk • contribs) 15:39, 07 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am no longer an OTRS admin. Please ask this question in the COM:OTRS Noticeboard --Sreejith K (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need help

You are kindly required to help with this file File:Jennifer Winget photo.jpg. The problem with the file is that according to Commons' administrators it's like a studio portrait and such images are not accepted by the Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama. I accept by this remark. File:Mandana Karimi.jpg, File:Deepika Padukone image from Bollywood Hungama.jpg, File:Kareena Kapoor - Bollywood hungama.jpg, File:Kareena Kapoor Khan - Bollywood hungama.jpg and File:Sachiin Joshi.jpg are also like studio portraits. The link given to these images (including File:Jennifer Winget photo.jpg) goes to the "Photos" directory of Bollywood Hungama which is not allowed to upload on Commons according to the Bollywood Hungama template. I want to ask when these files haven't marked for deletion why File:Jennifer Winget photo.jpg has been deleted? So you are required to share your views on Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Jennifer Winget photo.jpg. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 04:02, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not from party or event category in Bollywood Hungama and so the OTRS permission does not hold. I have nominated all the images for deletion. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very kind of you if you will also take some time to read the discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bipasha Basu and Karan Singh Grover grace the green carpet ceremony of IIFA 2016.jpg and vote for the file. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨‍👩‍⋡ 04:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out correction.

I have made necessary changes. Delayed though. --Shijiltv (talk) 17:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Shijil. It took me a while to figure out what you were talking about but finally I figured out that you were talking about Special:Diff/78053911 --Sreejith K (talk) 19:16, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for right

Could you check Commons:Requests_for_rights#Praveenp. Campaign will start tomorrow (September 4). Since this is urgent I am asking others also.--Praveen:talk 07:33, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You already got the rights even before I could get to it. Peace.

--Sreejith K (talk) 15:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Over-categorization

Hi Sreejithk2000, when you categorize a butterfly picture according to its species, would you please avoid putting it in categories of higher taxonomy levels? For example, since you put this picture in Category:Hypolimnas_bolina, you should not have put it in Category:Nymphalidae and Category:Lepidoptera, because these are parent categories of Category:Hypolimnas_bolina. You can find general guidelines about this in this page. Thank you!--LamBoet (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add the categories, Flickr2Commons did. I usually try to be careful about over categorization. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with this tool, is there a way to prevent it from doing this?--LamBoet (talk) 15:38, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need to talk to the maintainer of the tool User:Magnus Manske --Sreejith K (talk) 16:13, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yes, I see that troubleshooting has to go through this page. Would you please issue a request there, since you are the one uploading all these pictures? Most of them have the same category problem :-( --LamBoet (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs by Dinesh Valke

Hi Sreejith, thanks for uploading works of Dinesh Valke to Commons. Could you add a user category Category:Photographs by Dinesh Valke (like Category:Photographs by David V Raju) on those files? It will easier our maintenance job. J e e 16:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I should have thought about it first

. Now there are 21,103 images and let me see what is the best way to add categories. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:46, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Bots/Work_requests#Photographs_by_Dinesh_Valke --Sreejith K (talk) 17:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Hope someone with a bot will take care of it. Otherwise I can try using COM:VFC when I come back, later. J e e 01:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice you're adding these - but why do you keep persisting in putting Delonyx regia (Fabaceae) photos in Category:Pinaceae? They don't belong there! - MPF (talk) 09:49, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That might have got added when I moved it from flickr to here. I did not add them. My knowledge about that category is pretty much non-existing

--Sreejith K (talk) 21:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:3marqbute.PNG

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:3marqbute.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:3marqbute.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:05, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:3rd Earl of Malmesbury.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:3rd Earl of Malmesbury.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:3rd Earl of Malmesbury.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 23:10, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Intl medical center.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 18:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Alsuhaili plaza.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ras67 (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Sreejithk2000!

Happy New Year!

Sreejithk2000, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:History Wikipedia English SOPA 2012 Blackout2.jpg

Yours sincerely, (t) Josve05a (c) 22:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:CharterSavingsBank Logo.png

File:CharterSavingsBank Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Cloudbound (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Hi Sreejith! Could you review this image from Bollywood Hungama? Thisimage has been used in an FAC which is about to be promoted. I would appreciate your gesture. Thanks.Krish! (talk) 05:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this image is taken during a movie shoot and we do not have permissions of using it in commons. Sorry.

--Sreejith K (talk) 02:53, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Please check Template_talk:User_at_project/core#ml_update :-)--Praveen:talk 14:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Please verify. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.,ദിതാണ് ദത് {{Original uploader}}--Praveen:talk 13:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ml translation of Template:Trimming

Perhaps you like to reflect recent changes in your ml translation of Template:Trimming … Thank you and cheers, --Marsupium (talk) 17:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. I have made changes.

CC: User:Praveenp

--Sreejith K (talk) 03:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request merge

Hi Thank you for your merge. So, could you File:Variant Flag of the Lugansk People's Republic.svg, could you reverse the order of the two versions ? Also, for File:Flag of the Donetsk Republic (Organisation).svg, could you delete my 30 March 2017 version because it was created after an accident. My intention was to put the versions back in order but the bug created a new version. --Panam2014 (talk) 10:08, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For File:Variant Flag of the Lugansk People's Republic.svg, I can't reverse the order. You can revert the file to the previous version if you like.

I have deleted the latest version of File:Flag of the Donetsk Republic (Organisation).svg --Sreejith K (talk) 16:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so what is the solution ? So, if I revert the file, it will be reversed ? Or, could ou delete my version of Lugansk ? --Panam2014 (talk) 16:44, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the file and restored it now. Can you see if everything looks good? --Sreejith K (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Panam2014 (talk) 21:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, File:Flag of the Lugansk.svg is a wrong and primitive version of File:Flag of the Lugansk People's Republic (unofficial, middle 2014).svg who have a better title ? Could you merge the first with the second ? --Panam2014 (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lord Shiva Images - An artistic representation of Lord Shiva and the 12 Jyotirlingas associated with him.jpg

Did Vedsutra (c)-2017 copy wikimedia commons, or did the uploader copy it from Vedsutra? Can you please check the uploader's date and ultimate source details again? Thank you, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can't say where it was uploaded first but Its quite obvious that the uploader does not have copyright of the image. If uploader can send an email to OTRS, we can further investigate. As of now, it looks like copyright violation. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We may want to delete this too... Lord Shiva Images - An artistic representation of Lord Shiva, also called Bholenath and identified as the Destroyer of the Universe.jpg, same website as source and looks like a copyvio. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 19:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 19:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo! You deleted the file:Terracotta vase fragment with relief of Minerva.jpg

You deleted the image, giving the reason that the image is a "violação dos direitos de autor porque os direitos estão protegidos e a obra não foi publicada com uma licença livre.". Now that you have done it, in order to conform protect the property rights, I am certain that you have clicked the link, and obviously have seen underneath of the picture a big 0 (zero), showing "No Copyright". When you were faced with the fact that "The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law." and then saw that the onwer of the picture also said: "You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission." Your brain told you that here is a "violação dos direitos de autor porque os direitos estão protegidos" and deleted my contribution.

Can you, NOW, be so kind as to explain can be possible a "No Copyright" image can be a "violação dos direitos de autor"? Can you tell me how can you decided to delete the image that has "'No Copyright", has "rights"? In which language "No Copyright" direitos estão protegidos? Thanks for your attention.Luizpuodzius (talk) 04:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad. I have restored the file and corrected the license. When I was reviewing the source, I only noticed the website footer. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompted action. It is hard too find people that admit erros. Luizpuodzius (talk) 01:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome

--Sreejith K (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:AR Rajarajavarma.JPG

File:AR Rajarajavarma.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 14:57, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File deletion

Hi Sreejithk2000, please restore File:Krugerrand Gold 1 oz 2015 Revers.jpg, because you didn't consider my veto/question. Kind regards --Hydro (talk) 18:48, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It does not look like we can upload photos of currency from South Africa. See Commons:Currency#South_Africa. But since the copyright only last 50 years, we can restore the file if you think the coin is over 50 years old. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But why was my file deleted and all the others in Category:Krugerrand can stay? --Hydro (talk) 06:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We need to investigate them individually and then delete them if they violate policy. I will put them up for deletion as well. Thanks for pointing out. --Sreejith K (talk) 03:52, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Krugerrand --Sreejith K (talk) 03:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please restore my file until the deletion request ist decided? (It was a lot of work.) --Hydro (talk) 12:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored it for now and added the DR tag --Sreejith K (talk) 15:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Specimen1Obv.jpg

Hi, can you have another look at this DR? The link in the source field does not lead to this image. With a reverse image search I didn't find this image at the usmint site. As far as I can see, we do not have any evidence that this image comes from that website, so that we cannot verify its copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find the exact image, but I see the 2017 coin here. https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-medal-programs/american-eagle/gold-bullion. I will keep looking. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I messaged the customer support and got this reply.

Unfortunately, we do not have the information you requested in our current records. Surviving United States Mint records from that time period have been retired to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) under Record Group 104 and are under its jurisdiction for access and use. You may contact NARA directly through its Web site at www.archives.gov. You might also be able to find this information in “The Official Red Book: a Guide Book of United States Type Coins,” by Q. David Bowers, or in other publications in the Official Red Book Series.

--Sreejith K (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So at this moment we do not have any confirmation that the US Mint would be the actual source of the file, which means that it should be deleted for now. What do you prefer as a next step? The easiest way seems reopening the DR with a link to this conversation. Jcb (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. --Sreejith K (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Specimen1Obv.jpg

File:Specimen1Obv.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DavidBanksPortrait.jpg

File:DavidBanksPortrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Steinsplitter (talk) 18:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:A47 UK Road.png

And also:

File:A423 UK Road.png

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Sreejithk2000, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:PolishAmericans for Ford.jpg

File:PolishAmericans for Ford.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Solaiyar_Dam

Solaiyar Dam has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Shankar Raman (talk) 13:14, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Can you please close the deletion request. Thanks! Liberal Humanist ^{Holla at me!} 06:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check?

This and this :-)--Praveen:talk 16:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit skeptical about MediaWiki:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js/ml. Can you verify? --Sreejith K (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seems correct, but works! Could you copy the code from User:Praveenp/common.js which I formatted exactly like MediaWiki:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js/fr ;-)--Praveen:talk 06:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It should work now. I had to add <source lang=javascript> --Sreejith K (talk) 14:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SyntaxHighlighter seems correct, but translation doesn't work. :-( Is that source tag need to be commented "//<source lang=javascript>"?--Praveen:talk 16:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:6PR 882 Logo.jpg

File:6PR 882 Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:6rph radio logo.png

File:6rph radio logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roopa Ganguly in Chowrasta - Crossroads of Love.jpg

Dear reviewer File:Roopa Ganguly in Chowrasta - Crossroads of Love.jpg needs to be reviewed. It is copyright-protected and owned by Bollywood Hungama. You are requested to provide permission to this upload as it is to be used to enhance the Wikipedia article Roopa Ganguly Ikshya (talk) 14:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How do I contact u

My info on Wikipedia is wrong...need to make some changes Nausheen Ali Sardar (talk) 22:32, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, we can make the change together. Can you please link the Wiki article? --Sreejith K (talk) 00:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baghouse.jpg

File:Baghouse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 21:58, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-closing a DR on your own uploads is an absolute no go. For now I have just reverted your closure, but please make sure you don't do such a thing again. Jcb (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I should not have closed the DR, but your concern is addressed. Not sure why we need to keep the DR open now. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tend to revoke a DR if someone convinces me in the DR that the file can be kept. But after having had to revert your action, I will leave this for somebody else. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no worries. Nothing personal.

--Sreejith K (talk) 16:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File restoration request

Hello, File:Nazim Hussain Nazim.jpg was requested to be deleted by me for some personal reason (problem). Now that problem has been solved. Please restore the File. Thanks for your time! Sinner (talk) 11:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 17:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cup Stand off.jpg

File:Cup Stand off.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Flickerd (talk) 07:39, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ark of the Covenant.jpg

Yours sincerely, — Racconish^☎ 12:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Harringay logo.JPG

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hi. Sorry for my revert. I must have confused it with someone else's intervention. I owe you a nice pic. Take care. --E4024 (talk) 15:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I routinely cleanup my talk page and I got confused when you reverted my edit. Thanks for the Kasap köfte

--Sreejith K (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tweets

I see you deleted the image File:Donald Trump- 'Modern Day Presidential'.png What do you think of the other files in Category:Tweet? --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which other files? The President's tweets are not in a free license, so we cannot host it here in Commons. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I meant in Category:Tweet. A few of the images like File:Ahmed, I'd be happy to show you how we drive the Opportunity rover.jpg make the same assumption as the president's tweets, i.e. that tweets on a personal account are PD whereas others like File:Wikipedia (wikipedia) on Twitter 1337077722837.png seem to be a blatant copyright violation to me. Some like File:Ahmed, you've got a big fan in all of us at The White House.jpg seem to me that they would be PD as they are archived government accounts, but I think that the category as I whole should be examined. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tweets from official handles are in PD. But the ones similar to @realDonaldTrump is not; unless they have specifically release it under a free license. We will have to review the images one by one because some of the tweets I saw in the category are official handles. --Sreejith K (talk) 22:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to suggest Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request as the reason for deleting them would be the same, but I think that what you said is best as some tweets might actually have been written by the uploader. Thanks for your work Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

copyright

I own the copyright of all images i upload to wikimedia commons. Please stop deleting my images or justify yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RightsArt (talk • contribs) 11:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to know that you own the copyright of the images. Can you please request undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests? --Sreejith K (talk) 18:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Puente Chirajara

Hi. The picture you deleted was not taken from me but i got it minutes after the collapse of the bridge from a source on the scene. It is sad to see how this historic work go deleted just because.

I appreciate if you can take a look to Category:Association_football_logos_of_Colombia There is a lot of copyright violations overthere. --Futbolero (talk) 17:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also files as File:Nac.png and File:Sebastian viera con Atlético Junior en Monteria.png seems as screenshots more as the picture of Puente Chirajara.--Futbolero (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you know who is the copyright owner of File:Puente colapsado Chirajara.jpg, can you ask the owner to send an COM:OTRS permission to commons? Yes, it is sad to loose a picture and I would to see it restored. I will be evaluating and nominating the other pictures for deletion as required --Sreejith K (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Barenjager.jpg

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour

je vous écrit pour le problème que vous avez supprimé le copyright sur la photo de mon arrière grand mère Ana Deleria gomez cette photo actuellement nous reviens de plein droit vue qu'elle a était faite en 1917 et que la limite de droit est de 70 ans maxi 95 ans la photo a 101 ans a ce jour un dépôt a étais déposé sur copyright pour protéger les photos de mes arrières grand parents je suis le petit fils Deleria Francois je ne demande pas le retrais de la photo simplement que son identité soit reconnu et que a présent elle est protéger merci de votre compréhension

cordialement

Deleria Francois — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.166.111.121 (talk) 20:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not speak French, so I had to use google translate to understand your comment. So I am not sure whether I understood you correctly. Looks like you need to send an COM:OTRS email to verify the source and ownership of the image. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Am Spitz 11.JPG

Hi, can you the deletion undo? -- Bwag (talk) 10:58, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I had to reupload the file, move it to the current file name and delete my upload history. Now it looks OK. Can you verify? --Sreejith K (talk) 16:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK. -- Bwag (talk) 22:00, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template Section resolved

Hello, from what I understand the template {{Section resolved}} should not be substituted, at least it is sure that it works when not substituted. — Speravir – 22:54, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it. I will make sure I do not substitute it next time. Thanks for the note.--Sreejith K (talk) 14:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Etr site logo.jpg

File:Etr site logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Review!

Hi Sreejithk2000

Please review the File:Mohit Malik photo.jpg and File:Prachi Tehlan photo.jpg files, author Bollywood Hungama. Thank you - Siddiqsazzad001 (Talk) 08:33, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Split request

Hi there. Can you kindly split File:Gülse Birsel.jpg please? Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 14:43, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've split it to File:Gülse Birsel.jpg and File:Gülse Birsel (2).jpg. Do you need to split the second file as well? --Sreejith K (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, thanks; there is a watermark on that one. --E4024 (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One more request

Hi, good admin. Sorry to abuse your time and work. I have made two short videos (1 m each) but they are in the MP4 format. Somebody out of Commons tried to convert them for upload here but could not succeed. No priority, no hurry; if I sent them to you by mail, could you have a look if you can fix that for me? Have a good week-end. --E4024 (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will try. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:55, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tyvm. I just sent you an e-mail, hoping to get back a message from you (therefore your e-mail address) so that I can send them. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 14:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The videos are already in your mailbox, I believe. Thanks again. --E4024 (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fructus Tower.jpg

File:Fructus Tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Turbojet (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interpelar borrado de archivo

Saludos cordiales y éxitos en tus actividades diarias. Quiero interpelar el borrado de un archivo, puesto que es la imagen que se usó para el cuadro del "Salón Amarillo del Palacio de Carondelete", y la adquisición de la misma estaba explicada en la licencia, a mas de tener mas resolución y cuerpo que la sentencia de copyrigth de 1, además este lienzo será reproducido anterior a la fecha de subida a Commons porque es de licencia libre, por el resto de la vida. El estado ecuatoriano tiene bajo sus normas constitucionales y ratificado en la LOTAIP que la información que poseen es de dominio público... por tanto con todas estas especificaciones no veo el problema de tenerla en Commons. Saludos cordiales.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abdala_Bucaram_Ortiz.jpg

--Berposen (talk) 02:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not speak Spanish, so I am not exactly sure what you meant. Do you mind adding an undeletion request at Commons:Undeletion requests? --Sreejith K (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABBAMAIL logo.JPG

File:ABBAMAIL logo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janice Nicolich on May 27, 1961.jpg

File:Janice Nicolich on May 27, 1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Rusf10 (talk) 20:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prarthana-Behere-at-Marathi-film-premiere-Mitwa.jpg

The file File:Prarthana-Behere-at-Marathi-film-premiere-Mitwa.jpg needs a review from an ADMINISTRATOR. Please check for the file . Ashwini Gadade (talk) 11:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source link is broken. We need the link to the page where the image is included to verify that the image is from an event and is under a free license. Can you please fix the image please? --Sreejith K (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 21:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews for files

Need a review. Ashwini Gadade (talk) 11:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ഇ പി രാജഗോപാലൻ.jpg

File:ഇ പി രാജഗോപാലൻ.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Money of India

Hi, I have restored all money of India: Commons:Deletion requests/Money of India. In the future, please use {{GODL-India}} as a dual license. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cd changer carousel.jpg

File:Cd changer carousel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

küñall (nütramyen) 22:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move

As notified earlier I had issues in login on Commons so I have uploaded a file File:Abhinaya-at-Kuttram-23-audio-launch.jpg on Wikipedia page Abhinaya.Can You move this file from Wikipedia to Commons. 106.78.163.86 08:12, 12 July 2018 (UTC)Ashwini Gadade 12 July 2018[reply]

Looks like File:Abhinaya-at-Kuttram-23-audio-launch.jpg is already in Commons --Sreejith K (talk) 17:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sreejithk2000, I've been helping them relocate those files to commons. Since I don't usually edit much here, let me know if I need to do anything different with these. — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 22:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

BreadBuddy (talk) 17:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSTA logo.png

File:SSTA logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of UPSI.jpg.png

File:Logo of UPSI.jpg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question on categorization

Re: this edit. I had a look at the Commons:Categories page, and I read up on the bit about using the most specific category to avoid over-categorization. In hindsight, I probably should've searched for duplicates, or at least read up on commons category criteria before creating a redundant category. Would the best course of action in this case be to sort those files into Category:Film actresses from India and Category:Film actors from India, then make Category:Indian Film Actors into a category redirect? Just want to make sure that's the best solution before implementing. — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 22:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I suppose some of these will also belong to either Category:Television actresses from India or Category:Television actors from India. I'll need to go read their articles to figure out which is which... — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 22:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've got them all sorted correctly now. — AfroThundr ^{(u · t · c)} 13:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Sreejithk2000,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Silverscreen Otrs

There exists some images from silverscreen with OTRS ticket and some not.why?can the OTRS be used for all other files of silverscreen alike BollywoodHungama. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashwini Gadade (talk • contribs) 03:32, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm that you can use the ticket at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. Do not use a ticket number blindly. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review

File:Pragya.jpg ,File:Samantha Akkineni along with Naga Chaitanya Akkineni.jpg ,File:Samantha Akkineni with husband Naga Chaitanya.jpg needs a review. Ashwini Gadade (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Ashwini Gadade (talk) 03:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC) Ashwini Gadade (talk) 03:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 16:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

طراح آرم سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع دستی و گردشگری ، استاد مهدی اکبری می باشد

طراح آرم سازمان میراث فرهنگی، صنایع دستی و گردشگری ، استاد مهدی اکبری می باشد ویکی اصلاح کن اولین بار هم ایشان این آرم را در ویکی ثبت کردند! به سوابقتان نگاه کنید لطفا — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.225.129.162 (talk) 10:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As per google translate, this is what you said. The designer of the Cultural Heritage, Handicrafts and Tourism Organization is Mehdi Akbari's professor. The wiki modifier also recorded this logo on the wiki for the first time! Look at yours please. I am not sure what is the context. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack-henderson-signature.gif

File:Jack-henderson-signature.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Dr

File:NTR jr.png was listed for deletion because the source provided was incorrect and a license reviewer listed it for deletion.later it was corrected and review was passed.Please remove dr. Ashwini Gadade (talk) 05:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Sreejith K (talk) 15:49, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality image

Please promote File:Creative photo.jpg as quality images. Ashwini Gadade (talk) 15:35, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The resolution is bad. I don't think this image qualified. If you think this image qualifies, please add the image to Commons:Quality images candidates --Sreejith K (talk) 15:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg

File:'Bridge' by Kenneth Noland, 1964..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

David Eppstein (talk) 03:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theses on the Socialist Rural Question in Our Country.png

File:Theses on the Socialist Rural Question in Our Country.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Finnusertop (talk) 05:51, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Newman-Who's Afraid of Red, Yellow and Blue.jpg

File:Newman-Who's Afraid of Red, Yellow and Blue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Hzh (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:FDC Logo White.png

File:FDC Logo White.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:41, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ZM2014Logo.png

File:ZM2014Logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Signature of RCM Jenkins.png

File:Signature of RCM Jenkins.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samantha Signature.jpg

File:Samantha Signature.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Omotola's signature.jpeg

File:Omotola's signature.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:System608AppleMenu.png

File:System608AppleMenu.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fidelity International.jpg

File:Fidelity International.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Techtri (talk) 16:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:1977 Cabinet of Sri Lanka.jpg

File:1977 Cabinet of Sri Lanka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Obi2canibe (talk) 12:56, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:20070802 John Butler Trio.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:20070802 John Butler Trio.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:20070802 John Butler Trio.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 14:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bolivar Coronado.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bolivar Coronado.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bolivar Coronado.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 11:08, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:James Atkinson Geograph-380269-by-Mark-Hurn.jpg

Hi Sreejithk2000, per the request here, I've taken the liberty to restore this image, which you had deleted back in 2012, as it's covered by FoP-UK. --Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:02, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ആഫ്രിക്കൻ പായൽ1.JPG

File:ആഫ്രിക്കൻ പായൽ1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bucks Fizz on stage.jpg

File:Bucks Fizz on stage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:2168:869B:E900:9A1:291A:3B0D:F17F 06:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Map Problem

Sir, Kannur and Thalassery road joins at Mattnnur not Koothuparamba and continues to coorg..Please edit the Map — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhilashmattanur (talk • contribs) 06:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which map are you talking about? --Sreejith K (talk) 12:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:BrewerBlackbird23.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:BrewerBlackbird23.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:BrewerBlackbird23.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Castillo blanco (talk) 12:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Brewster'sMillions.jpg

Template:File source/layout Castillo blanco (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdala.jpg

I would like to know what is the difference between this action and this action]. Best regards. --Berposen (talk) 18:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Hope Tiger.jpeg

Template:File permission/layout Gareth (talk) 08:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"This also applies if you are the author yourself."

I have asked a question that you may find relevant: Commons:Village pump#"This also applies if you are the author yourself." --Geniac (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that its ok to ask permission if there is a reasonable doubt that the uploader is not the author. But regarding File:Pradipsomasundaran.jpg, why do you think we need explicit permissions? --Sreejith K (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:FalabellaMare&foal.jpg

Template:Idw/layout Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:6rph radio logo.png

Template:Autotranslate Willy1018(talk) 19:28, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]