User talk:Spoorjan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

* Comments like only DUTCH please.

* Opmerkingen graag alleen in NEDERLANDS aub.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Spoorjan!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Spoorjan!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:21, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a better version of File:SBB Re 420-11109.JPG?[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Thank you for your submission of File:SBB Re 420-11109.JPG. While all submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar, content? In many cases, the largest and highest resolution possible is the most useful version to have available. (MediaWiki has automatic resizing functionality, so there is no need for multiple versions of the same image at different sizes, users can select any size and the software will generate and cache the needed resolution on the fly.)

If you can supply the same exact image as File:SBB Re 420-11109.JPG at a larger resolution (or media at a higher bitrate, etc.), please just upload it over the original, users will get the new higher quality version with no further effort on your part. If on the other hand, the content is only similar, it is best to select a new image name, as there may be uses already where some aspect of the existing media was key to the usage. In the latter case, if you can provide a crosslink reference to the new image in the older one and vice versa, that will be extremely helpful.

Again, thank you very much for your contribution, it is appreciated.

High Contrast (talk) 10:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicaat[edit]

Hoi Jan, als een foto dubbel is dan kan je {{Duplicate|<naam van andere foto>}} erop plakken, dan wordt de afbeelding vanzelf verwijderd. Multichill (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2010 (UTC) dank voor de info. MVG . -- Jan Oosterhuis 16:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Spoorjan (talk)[reply]

Verwijderen[edit]

Ik weet nog steeds niet hoe ik een afbeelding kan verwijderen. Met Vriendelijke Groet . -- Jan Oosterhuis 11:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Spoorjan (talk)

Is er iemand die hiervoor een tip kan geven. Jan Oosterhuis 21:38, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Spoorjan (talk)

Je zal het middel een "tag" moeten melden: zie de tools aan de linker zijde. Bijvoorbeeld als iets Copyvio is.--Rodejong (talk) 18:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong location[edit]

Hallo, this image wasn't taken on the Milan–Desio tramway, but at Gorgonzola station on the Adda light railway, that was used by tramways between 1968 and 1972. Since then it's part of the metro line M2.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 12:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the picture was taken on the eastern entrance to the station, that was served by tramways to Vaprio until 1978; so the date 1976 should be correct.--Friedrichstrasse (talk) 12:49, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categoriseren bussen van Den Oudsten[edit]

Hallo Spoorjan, ik zag dat je een tijdje geleden deze en een aanverwante wijziging had uitgevoerd. Ik verwelkom het meedenken en -werken aan bestanden die ik heb geplaatst. Ik begrijp alleen niet waarom de brede categorie 'Den Oudsten vehicles' beter zou passen dan de specifiekere categorie 'Den Oudsten buses in the Netherlands'. Kun je dat uitleggen? Groet, Apdency (talk) 18:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hierdoor is inzet per land overzichtelijker. bv Zweden of Griekenland. Spoorjan (talk) 18:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maar dat geldt dan toch voor álle voertuigen van Den Oudsten? M.a.w. de categorie 'Den Oudsten buses in the Netherlands' zou geheel overbodig zijn.
Anderzijds denk ik: het zijn twee ongelijksoortige (niet direct hiërarchisch gerelateerde) categorieën. Dan zou je ze net zo goed alletwee aan de betreffende bestanden kunnen hangen. Apdency (talk) 19:01, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
O, ik zie nu dat je de ene een subcat hebt gemaakt van de andere. Dus toch hiërarchie. Prima oplossing, bedankt. Apdency (talk) 19:51, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verwijderen[edit]

Even een opmerking. Hoewel automatische meldingen verwijderd mogen worden van je overlegpagina, is dit niet het geval met normale overlegonderdelen. Daarom plaats ik mijn bericht terug, met het verzoek, dat je het in je archief plaatst.--Rodejong (talk) 08:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DB-Touchpoint.JPG[edit]

File:DB-Touchpoint.JPG is behouden. Zie de geschiedenis van dit bestand om te zien waarom het is behouden. Met vriendelijke groet --Rodejong (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

color correction[edit]

Why did you remove all the color correct tags I placed? (example) – JBarta (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request to vote in administrator request[edit]

I requested for administration. Please vote in my request.Please give your view about me. If you oppose no problem But please vote in this. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators/Requests/sridhar1000 --P. Sridhar Babu (talk) 07:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Wisselverwarming - El-VIII.JPG[edit]

File:Wisselverwarming - El-VIII.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 06:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jaartal[edit]

Zou je een jaartal aan File:WN 7797.JPG kunnen geven? Het lijkt zelf nog voor de Zoetermeerlijn.Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deze bussen zijn rond december 1976 bij Westnederland gekomen en reden tot de opening van de Zoetermeerlijn. Spoorjan (talk) 19:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

tram GT4 in Ulm, date[edit]

Hello Spoorjan,

originally the date was missing at the page of the picture "GT4 in Ulm". In november 2012 I inserted therefore "ca. 1990", you corrected this date in "1977", sending me the message "as a photographer I would know better". I am from Ulm, I know the story of tram and bus at Ulm, and my opinion is still that the first possibility to take this photo was in 1989 (therefore I wrote "ca. 1990"). My arguments: at the left side of the photo you see a bus; this type of bus began service at Ulm in 1985. The tram van with number 1 (in the former period in service at Stuttgart) began service at Ulm in january 1988. At the side of the tram van you see in the window a number "1" (black number with white background) and at the right side of this number the logo "UNV" (Ulm/Neu-Ulmer Verkehrsverbund). This system "UNV" (integration of tickets) existed since may 1989.

Please check once again the date of the picture; are you really sure that is was taken in 1977?

(These informations and dates are taken from the book "100 Jahre Straßenbahn Ulm Neu-Ulm", Daniel Riechers, 1997)

--Matthias Frank (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I can see the date of the photo not retrieve.

Yours sincerely

Spoorjan (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tripperpas-1.JPG[edit]

File:Tripperpas-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terug gezet. Spoorjan (talk) 14:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JurgenNL (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Terug gezet. Spoorjan (talk) 14:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove deletion requests[edit]

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ Nederlands (informeel)‎ ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked for a duration of 1 day[edit]
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 1 day for the following reason: removing {{Delete}} template after warnings.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Steinsplitter (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Totalle onzin. Spoorjan (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nee hoor. U bent meerdere malen gewaarschuwd, maar u blijft het sjabloon verwijderen. JurgenNL (talk) 18:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Discurie verder op https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:Spoorjan

File:CNL E-ticket-III.JPG[edit]

File:CNL E-ticket-III.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Licentie[edit]

Dag Jan,

Deze foto van jou staat in het nieuwe nummer van het (papieren) tijdschrift van Erfgoedvereniging Heemschut (september 2014, bladzijde 8). Leuk, mooie foto, maar jouw naam wordt niet vermeld. Misschien zit je er niet mee, maar ik wou je er even op wijzen. Hartenhof (overleg) 2 sep 2014 11:17 (CEST)

Beste meneer Oosterhuis,


Het RailTV item waar u het over heeft ging over het Open Monumenten Dagen die afgelopen weekend plaatsvonden en hebben wij in samenwerking met Stichting Open Monumentendag geproduceerd voor het niet-commerciële cultuurblok van RailTV. RailTV is een pilot project is van NS en ProRail om het verblijf op het station te verbeteren. In dit cultuur blok geven wij aandacht aan culturele evenementen waarvoor deze instellingen geen vergoeding hoeven te betalen. Voor de items krijgen wij beeldmateriaal aangeleverd via de organisaties waarbij de afspraak is dat zij zelf de rechten hebben geregeld. Uw foto hebben we dan ook via Stichting Open Monumentendag ontvangen omdat in augustus het Busmuseum het monument van de maand was, ervan uitgaande dat de rechten netjes geregeld waren. Blijkbaar is dit niet helemaal goed gegaan en dat vinden wij spijtig. Ik heb uw mail doorgestuurd naar mijn contactpersoon bij de Stichting Open Monumentendag en hoop dat zij u verder kan helpen, zij hebben de foto weer van het Nationaal Busmuseum ontvangen die de foto ook op hun website hebben staan, wellicht wisten zij niet dat ze de foto zonder overleg aan derden mochten leveren. Overigens zal het item niet meer vertoond worden, omdat het evenement voorbij is.


Met vriendelijke groeten,
Redactie RailTV
  • De voorgaande opmerking werd toegevoegd door spoorjan (overleg · bijdragen) 2014-09-15
  • Geen van bopvengenoemde organisaties is eingenaar van negatief, dia of bestand. Het Nationaal Bus Museum vind dat hun voertuig onder beeldrecht valt. Daarom gebruiken ze de foto niet voor eigen gebruik. Hiervoor hebben ze eigen fotograven in dienst die de foto gratis beschibaar stellen. Mijn foto is kennelijk van dus danige invloed om de Licenties van Wikimedia Commons te misbruiken.
  • Ik beschouw dit als een opzettelijke schending van de volgende licenties.
Naamsvermelding – De gebruiker dient bij het werk de door de maker of de licentiegever opgegeven naam te vermelden (maar niet zodanig dat de indruk gewekt wordt dat zij daarmee instemmen met uw werk of uw gebruik van het werk). Spoorjan (talk) 08:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusie: de zin; Ik, de auteursrechthebbende van dit werk, maak het hierbij onder de volgende licenties beschikbaar: heeft geen enkele waarde, en kan beter vervangen worden door; Ik, de auteursrechthebbende van dit werk, staat toe om de foto ten alle tijden zonder enige bronvermelding gebruiken. Ook als er dan wel voor betaald wordt. Spoorjan (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

retroactive license changes[edit]

Please note I had to revert several license changes made to your images, you may add the new license as additional license but you may not replace the PD license.--Denniss (talk) 12:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Niet de licentie aanpassen als ik de voorkeur geef voor naamvermelding van mijn eigen naam; Jan Oosterhuis. Spoorjan (talk) 12:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Read what I wrote, you can't replace the PD license with a new one, it's always possible to add the new license though. I will revert your change within the next hours, if you revert it again I will block you for one day. --Denniss (talk) 12:57, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spoorjan-III.JPG[edit]

File:Spoorjan-III.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 17:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for 3 days. The reason for the block is Your participation in discussions has been problematic lately, see your discussion with Denniss just above for example. you refuse to remain civil but with this personal attack you really crossed the line and therefore I blocked you for the duration of three days. Please remain civil after the block expires. (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Natuur12 (talk) 18:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your email. The servertime is +0 and your local time is +1. You're block will expire in less than one hour. Natuur12 (talk) 18:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rail_Away[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Rail_Away has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Stadler_FLIRT_in_Netherlands[edit]

Category discussion warning

Category:Stadler_FLIRT_in_Netherlands has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Joenit (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Afbeeldingen VDL Citea en Volvo 8900[edit]

Mag ik vragen waarom je mijn afbeeldingen die ik vandaag heb geüpload voor verwijdering hebt genomineerd? BakkertjeWouter (talk) 15:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Voor al je prachtige foto's van het openbaar vervoer verdien jij een ster van verdienste. Ik zie je foto's echt overal in categorieën over het OV. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:58, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Datum?[edit]

Ik neem aan dat dit eerder is dan 2011 (upload datum). Vermoedelijk jaren 70 tijdens de aanleg van de Zoetermeerlijn?Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Datum beelden Nantes[edit]

(en twee anderen) 2012 is de upload datum, maar het lijkt veel eerder. Wel na de regionalisatie van de Franse spoorwegen.Smiley.toerist (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:BTI 524-III.JPG[edit]

Waar is deze foto maken? Dank je, Mackensen (talk) 16:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sinds 1999 heeft de voormalige Lusatian Management Company (LBV), tegenwoordig LMBV voor het vervoer van grind en puin van het grind fabriek in Sutz Hurni en de grindgroeve in Finsterhennen zes 900 mm kiepwagens aangeschaft Deze kiepwagens waren van de Braunkohlewerk Hagenwerder, Tagebau Berzdorf, in de buurt van Görlitz. De kiepwagens van het type TGL 5834 25/900 werden in 1964 gebouwd door de wagon-fabriek in Arad, Roemenië ontworpen door de VEB Bautzen op 25 februari 2006 te Täuffelen, Bahnhof. Spoorjan (talk) 09:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DB 403[edit]

your file File:DB Baureihe 403.0.JPG has a long red line on the right that seems to come from the editing process. do you still have the original file without it? Jonas1015119 (talk) 14:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spoorjan&oldid=811255077"