User talk:Snowdawg

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Snowdawg!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Fiat 634 102.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fiat 634 102.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fiat 634 102.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 09:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Krup24cmKL35-Puerto Belgrano.png

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Tarnovski-Tsar-Selo.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

152-45 affusto piedistallo.png[edit]

152-45 affusto piedistallo.png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD GA1 (gallery without images or other media files)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

4nn1l2 (talk) 06:21, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Прототип Т-28.jpg[edit]

File:Прототип Т-28.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Объект 112.jpg[edit]

File:Объект 112.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inserting wrong types into aircraft files[edit]

Good afternoon. It has been noticed that you have repeatedly marked aircraft files with wrong type names. A Piaggio P.149 is not a Ryan Navion, a HP Victor is not a Vickers Valiant.

If you are not so familiar with aircraft types or if unsure in individual cases, please simply refrain from inserting "something". Thank you very much for your future co-operation. Regards --Uli Elch (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there have been more: This is clearly not a Chinook, not another Valiant. --Uli Elch (talk) 12:35, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have been having problems with the cat-a-lot interface on my laptop. There are too many thumbnails per page and they're too small, so I lose my place on the page. Also, the pop-up for the category selection takes half the page so I end up with images selected I don't want for batch assignments. Under gadgets, there's a thumbnail resize option which should help.Snowdawg (talk) 16:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply.

Tips for cat-a-lot:

* When you slowly and carefully "grip" the top line of the cat-a-lot box, you see the vertical arrow and are able to draw the vertical length downward, thus reducing it (same like an entire "Windows"-window), or:

* You click onto an empty space within that box and move the entire box to any place on the screen.

* "thumbnails too small": I've set the zoom factor on mine at 125%, and for me the problem is solved. --Uli Elch (talk) 17:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Festung Norwegen 155mm cannon.jpg[edit]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Festung Norwegen 155mm cannon.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 16:34, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sockelflak - German AA cannon.jpg[edit]

File:Sockelflak - German AA cannon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Older versions are found elsewhere on the net.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Mhhossein ^talk 16:46, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Overcat of aircraft[edit]

I have noticed that you have moved a large number of aircraft photographs from Category:Military aircraft in flight to the aircraft type (e.g. Category:North American T-6 Texan with this file) however they are already categorised with that via the registration (civil) or serial (military). I would recommend that you no longer categorise photographs with Cat-a-lot, since it is clear you don't have a clear understanding to ensure an overcat situtation doesn't happen. Bidgee (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And it's OBVIOUS you don't have a clear understanding of who you're patronizing. So go ahead and revert everything or report me for vandalism. Your choice. Snowdawg (talk) 23:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unidentified naval missile launcher[edit]

Could you please have a look at this? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wehrtechnische_Sammlung_der_Bundeswehr_(38928850014).jpg

It is clearly AIM-120, but with a ship based launcher, like the Sea Sparrow.--Arado (talk) 07:25, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can see on the nose of the missile 120A which together with its appearance would lead you to believe it's a AIM-120 derivative. There are land-based variants such as Norwegian Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System or SLAMRAAM. I don't recognize the launcher though.Snowdawg (talk) 17:02, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work[edit]

Good work on the damaged photos, Thanks for your help Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

català ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello. This is a reminder for you that it is important to address the identified issues instead of simply removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions according to our community guidelines. You can have this done automatically for you -- simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

--Sealle (talk) 16:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Once again: Inserting wrong types into aircraft files !![edit]

A year ago, I had asked you NOT to insert wrong type categories into Photo files (see above "Inserting wrong types into aircraft files", 29 July 2018). I wrote: "If you are not so familiar with aircraft types or if unsure in individual cases, please simply refrain from inserting "something"."

Unfortunately, you did not adhere to my friendly advice. for example, you put a completely wrong type category to file G-BBNK, which clearly is not a Beech Baron but a Piper Aztec.

So please STOP inserting wrong informations if not completely sure! Regards --Uli Elch (talk) 09:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain calm and collegial[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

--Bidgee (talk) 03:49, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for one week. The reason for the block is Special:Diff/352427291 (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

--4nn1l2 (talk) 09:50, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:USCGC Taney at night.jpg[edit]

This file has not been uploaded completely due to a software problem (see phab:T190988). Please re-upload it by clicking on "Upload a new version of this file" link below the section titled "File history". Then, please remove the {{Incomplete upload}} tag from the file description page.
At least 30 days after the addition of the tag, volunteers will assess the quality of image and may crop it if being in use or deemed useful. Otherwise, the image may be deleted summarily (CSD#F7).

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:13, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Don't add files that are already properly categorized to more general categories. Avoid COM:OVERCAT. --Sitacuisses (talk) 23:53, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Commons for 2 weeks. The reason for the block is continous overcategorisation after having been asked to refrain from it, and a warning (block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.

--De728631 (talk) 23:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "No reason given"

Decline reason: "No reason was given. Even if we are meant to take the below as a rationale, it both fails to address the issue ("I'm not intentionally overcategorizing these files" is not relevant; overcategorisation may be disruptive irrespective of whether motivated by good or ill intent) and adds failure of good faith ("Or is it your intention and the intention of a few opportunists to deny me something that I enjoy doing so they make me subservient?")--a pondersome tack given your 30 May 2019 block. COM:BLOCK requires an understanding of the issue and a credible commitment to discontinue. Эlcobbola _talk 15:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)"[reply]

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ Simple English ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ हिन्दी ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

I'm not intentionally overcategorizing these files. I'm trying to go through the "Category:Aviation files (check needed)" files and properly identify and categorize them. At the top of that category, it is asking for people to go through and sort them and that's what I'm trying to do. The problem is there are often 100 pictures of an aircraft like a C-47 and it is easy to see they are all the same aircraft from the thumbnail view but what I can't see is what categories they already belong to without viewing each image one by one which is impractical when there are 57,000 files to go through. I can select them all and remove the check needed category but that doesn't mean they are properly categorized or identified. I asked for help because I don't know of any tool or option I can use to make these categories visible when viewing a large number of files. What I was met with were insults and demands instead of help. Show me a tool that I can use to view the categories these files belong to in a thumbnail view and I won't overcategorize. Or is it your intention and the intention of a few opportunists to deny me something that I enjoy doing so they make me subservient? Snowdawg (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It may be impractical to check each of these images individually, but that is exactly what this category "check needed" was made for. Sorting them with cat-a-lot is clearly not the way to go forward here, because most of the time there is no automated way to tell parameters like location, time and previous categorisation from the thumbnail preview. If there was such a way, this very maintenance category wouldn't exist.

That said, all insults and snarky comments I have seen so far in this matter have come from you. Nobody here is trying to deny you anything, let alone make you subservient, but there are certain rules and guidelines in this project that we all need to follow. These overcategorisation edits of yours are clearly causing more trouble than they are helpful – even if they are unintentional. You have been asked previously not to put images into redundant categories, but when people repeatedly remind you of it, you start yelling at them. That is not the kind of attitude we like to have here. De728631 (talk) 00:18, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of this would be happening if there were better tools available. Why can't the categories that an image ALREADY belongs to be displayed beneath the thumbnail with checkboxes instead of having to view each file one by one? That would solve the majority of overcat issues and make it easy to fix files in bulk that are overcategorized. Instead, we have to play games where EVERYONE assumes the worst of everyone's intentions and get into editing wars. But I suppose it's really a much better option to just have an endless supply of banned users instead. Snowdawg (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

While I guess it would technically be possible to display the categories for each file in the gallery preview, it would quickly clutter the entire page since many images are a member of some 10 or more categories. So that would be counterproductive again. Anyhow, I'll leave the decision about your unblocking to an uninvolved admin. De728631 (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I just found a gadget in the user preferences: "Gallery details". When activated in the preferences, it provides a link in the toolbox menu to toggle the details in gallery view. This does already list all categories for single images as well as the source code of the file page. I didn't know about this until now, but this might be what you've been looking for. De728631 (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking. I have seen that one before but unfortunately, that's for viewing one file at a time. Here's what I see when sorting files https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Screenshot_of_category.png. What would be really great is if a person could select multiple files in the thumbnail view and either hover over the images or right-click and see their categories. Or for that matter if there was a collapsible category tab under the filename and dimensions. The problem I have been having is I will select 20 images from the same user, with the same subject, same naming scheme and the categories aren't consistent which is a major pain. So I select them and try to use the lowest common denominator for its description but then someone gets bent out of shape that I overcatted 3 out of the 20 images. This is a general problem with the Commons UI and it happens when I try to sort uncategorized files too. I don't mind sorting these images because I enjoy doing that, what I would like is a way to make it more logistically achievable. Snowdawg (talk) 00:46, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of the category is to look at each file one at a time, not move them in bulk. If you were to be unblocked, it would need to done so with restrictions (no auto or semi auto tools to be used for maintenance categories). I do agree, that there was a gadget that gave out the information (e.g. description, source, author, license and categories), which would make reviewing each file quicker but it doesn't exist. Bidgee (talk) 01:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to bother doing anything with maintenance categories anymore. At some point, these backlogs will become too big a burden and the files will just be purged without evaluation. If something exists in those categories and it isn't properly identified, to begin with, it might as well not exist. Snowdawg (talk) 13:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even your admins agree that tools currently do not exist for what I was trying to achieve. Users are encouraged to help clear these backlogs and when they try someone is always horribly offended when something is misspelled, misidentified, or miscategorized even if it wasn't their mistake in the first place. The message is always stop what you're doing because I'm annoyed and if you don't I will call the cops. It's mind-boggling because I deal with things that have been misspelled, misidentified, miscategorized all the time and I have NEVER tracked down the person who did it and demand they stop because it annoys me. Did you ever consider that if someone regularly complains about something procedural like overcategorization or miscategorization that THEY have a problem and NOT the person who did it? Did you ever stop to consider that cynical people are NOT assuming good faith and that YOU are being played to further THEIR agendas? Did you ever stop to consider if there are a dozen generic categories like silver airplane, red rudder, and fixed landing gear that adding the make and model of the aircraft isn't the real issue and that the generic categories should be removed instead? Or is it VIRTUOUS for me to abdicate personal responsibility for fixing things and instead demand other people serve me? If leaves blow into your yard nobody needs to go to prison. Just be a boy scout clean it up and move on. Snowdawg (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Snowdawg,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Snowdawg,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments![edit]

Thank you for uploading images for Wiki Loves Monuments!

However, we have noticed you have not enabled e-mail. To be eligible to win a prize the contest, you need to enable e-mail. This is what to do:

Check the top right of your screen, and log in if you have not done so already
Go to your preferences
Scroll down to Email Options
Enter your email address and click "Allow other users to email me"
Click Save

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Snowdawg,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:LuAZ-969 MLRS.jpg[edit]

File:LuAZ-969 MLRS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Druschba 4 (talk) 22:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:00024794.jpg.1782e3ab261637a78248e06119bbab19.jpg[edit]

File:00024794.jpg.1782e3ab261637a78248e06119bbab19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nigel Ish (talk) 23:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:340 mm Mle 1912 L47 railway French railway gun.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:340 mm Mle 1912 L47 railway French railway gun.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:340 mm Mle 1912 L47 railway French railway gun.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Tæ 14:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Snowdawg, I have deleted your uploads from Category:Canon de 340 modèle 1912 à glissement because there was indication that any of these files had a free licence at worldwarphotos.info. We always need to know if and why each upload is in the public domain, so it is not sufficient to rely on the claims made by such websites that "all materials presented comply with copyright law", and Creative-Commons Zero, as you applied it, apparently was not appropriate either. De728631 (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Their disclaimer can be found here https://www.worldwarphotos.info/photo/ . They didn't indicate which source they came from or who the photographer's name was.Snowdawg (talk) 17:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As I wrote above, that disclaimer is not a valid copyright information for our purposes, and it does not include the Creative Commons Zero licence either. Therefore we can't use these images at Commons. De728631 (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's the source for identification?[edit]

Unfortunately I could find no information what kind of 164-mm guns were employed at Chavonne, and neither a single picture of canon de 16 cm Mle 1887 is available online. How did you identify it? Ain92 (talk) 18:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page 202 of Naval Weapons of World War One by Norman Friedman says: "In October 1914, twelve 16cm guns (M1887, M1891 and M1893) were emplaced at Toul, at Verdun, and in the East. They were rendered semi-mobile beginning in the summer of 1916. Of these guns, two were captured at Verdun in February 1916, two in the Chemin des Dames on 27 May 1918, and one on 9 June 1918 after the German offensive at Metz." It's not a real common caliber and the versions which were made from a steel liner with cast iron reinforcing hoops were rated in cm instead of mm. The ones forged from steel were rated in mm. The gun looks like a trunnionless barrel and the sleeve with the trunnions houses a spring rather than hydro-pneumatic recoil system like later guns. Later guns had trunnions and eyelets forged into the barrel and these hooked into hydro-pneumatic recoil cylinders below the barrel like in the 1893 model. So it's probably a M1887.Snowdawg (talk) 19:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had prepared a detailed post about three times as long as your answer linking four French sources at Gallica, I even thought I've sent it, but actually I haven't, then my browser crashed and the post has been lost. =C Do you think you could read French with a dictionary? If yes, please look up some search queries like "cannon de 16" "mle 1887", "cannon de 164,7" "modele 1887" etc. at gallica.bnf.fr, and you will find out that actually all three mentioned guns were made of steel without any cast iron, the French seems to use caliber rated in millimeters and centimeters fully interchangeably and not three but over a dozen of different models of 164-mm naval guns were used on the WWI Western Front since it was such a common naval caliber in France, so I don't think it's possible to identify the gun by a process of elimination. Ain92 (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
According to this book on WWI Railroad artillery "Romanych, Mark (2017-08-24). Railway Guns of World War I. Heuer, Greg, Noon, Steve. London. pp. 5–15. ISBN 9781472816412. OCLC 999616340." the author says that guns rated in centimeters were of mixed construction. Which correlates fairly well with the descriptions from this website which describes the same guns with cast iron construction http://www.fortiffsere.fr/artillerie/index_fichiers/Page2829.htm regarding the Canon de 24 C modèle 1876 which translated says "a cast-iron gun which the tube is made of steel". It also makes a certain amount of sense that the shorter more bulbous guns weighed more and had thicker reinforcing hoops because the cast-iron was less dense than hardened alloy steel. Also with the switch over to nitrocellulose smokeless powders steel was needed because of the more powerful explosives. With the switch to steel guns now weighed less, could be made longer due to greater rigidity, were higher velocity, and longer-ranged. However, French coastal defense guns of the period can be hard to identify because you see model 1887 gun on model 1897 carriage or 1887/1893 gun where the second number indicates when it was modified to use smokeless powder.Snowdawg (talk) 00:36, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I know about the Fortiffsere very well, however we are not speaking about 1870s but 1880s, so I don't trust the railroad artillery book contradicting the French sources. I actually found three sources out of four: sont entièrement en acier (are entirely of steel), a huge list of guns (not going to reproduce it here with comments as I did in the lost post) and one more modification. Note the smokeless powder (Poudre B & BTR) they were designed for from the start: (haven't seen this source before). Ain92 (talk) 20:05, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fatal konsultation.jpg[edit]

File:Fatal konsultation.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: fake license, not own work

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

VLu (talk) 15:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kaiser Wilhelm II. 1915 bei der Verleihung des Eisernen Kreuzes an Karl Neuhof (1891–1943).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Kaiser Wilhelm II. 1915 bei der Verleihung des Eisernen Kreuzes an Karl Neuhof (1891–1943).jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kaiser Wilhelm II. 1915 bei der Verleihung des Eisernen Kreuzes an Karl Neuhof (1891–1943).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 08:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:轢き潰される「研三」.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:轢き潰される「研三」.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:轢き潰される「研三」.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Ju Ta 21:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Italian human-controlled torpedo.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Italian human-controlled torpedo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Italian human-controlled torpedo.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

VLu (talk) 15:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updates of images of active Commons users[edit]

Hello, if you believe that an image of mine should be improved that please, contact me. As you can read in the description page I discourage users to do so for a row of reasons. The fact that you uploaded a version which was 10 times smaller I'll ignore and assume that it was a mistake and not vandalism. If you do that again then I cannot assume good faith anymore. Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to change the contrast. I was not aware that it was resized. However, after reading your reply please do feel free to take it personally and report it as vandalism.Snowdawg (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read COM:OVERWRITE. Bidgee (talk) 00:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:9 cm Minenwerfer M 14-2.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:9 cm Minenwerfer M 14-2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:9 cm Minenwerfer M 14-2.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 09:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stout Airsedan-1.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stout Airsedan-1.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Stout Airsedan-1.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

rubin16 (talk) 16:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Літак Гітлера (Fw 200C-4 U2 ) на аеродромі в Калинівці. (1942р. або 1943р.). Ганс Баур (особистий пілот Гітлера )зліва, відвернувся від камери.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Літак Гітлера (Fw 200C-4 U2 ) на аеродромі в Калинівці. (1942р. або 1943р.). Ганс Баур (особистий пілот Гітлера )зліва, відвернувся від камери.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (

[[:File:Літак Гітлера (Fw 200C-4 U2 ) на аеродромі в Калинівці. (1942р. або 1943р.). Ганс Баур (особистий пілот Гітлера )зліва, відвернувся від камери.jpg]]

) and the above demanded information in your request.

A.Savin 15:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:DC3 Bell Geospace Sultan Mahmud Airport 2019.jpg[edit]

File:DC3 Bell Geospace Sultan Mahmud Airport 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

E4024 (talk) 19:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo ID[edit]

Hello. I wanted to change the identication of this photo File:The British Army in North-west Europe 1944-45 BU2728.jpg to Fordson WOT6 rather than 8, but I wanted to discuss it with you first (you added Fordson 8). I think it has longer wheelbase, indicating WOT6 (with GS body, like here https://armorama.kitmaker.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=SquawkBox&file=index&req=viewtopic&topic_id=275100&page=1&ord=1 ). And the late style vents on the cab were typical for WOT6, while it is not clear if they were used on WOT8 (which was not numerous variant BTW). Pibwl (talk) 21:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are most likely correct. The model was my best guess.Snowdawg (talk) 21:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:SAB 70.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SAB 70.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ju Ta 15:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.

Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.

Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.

Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.

Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.

Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Приєднуйтеся!

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30[edit]

Переможці спеціальної номінації «Відео» 2020. Автори роликів: Ігор Мартинів, Кирило Венцеславський; Музика: Erik Satie: Gymnopedie No 2 by Kevin MacLeod. Монтаж: Atoly. Ліцензія CC BY-SA 4.0

Привіт!

Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!

Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:

Проміжна статистика
Регіон	К-ть пам'яток	К-ть фото
Севастополь	1	1
АР Крим	12	51
Закарпаття	26	96
Миколаївщина	29	81
Рівненщина	36	186
Херсонщина	36	83
Житомирщина	55	324
Донеччина	57	153
Тернопільщина	62	234
Буковина	75	220
Луганщина	82	90
Львівщина	82	351
Кіровоградщина	88	181
Волинь	98	270
Одещина	115	383
Сумщина	129	414
Дніпропетровщина	139	278
Київ	159	248
Хмельниччина	166	538
Полтавщина	171	594
Харківщина	175	625
Київщина	181	651
Черкащина	186	455
Прикарпаття	240	305
Вінничина	242	775
Запоріжжя	253	317
Чернігівщина	305	519

Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.

Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:

«Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
«Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
«Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
«Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.

Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.

Приєднуйтеся!

Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).

If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.

Category:KAI KF-21[edit]

Category:KAI KF-21 is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD C2 (unuseful empty category)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Palosirkka (talk) 10:20, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Т-19.jpg[edit]

File:Т-19.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

rubin16 (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Победа после мины.jpg[edit]

File:Победа после мины.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

rubin16 (talk) 14:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

145 Mle 1910 and 145 Mle 1916[edit]

Hello,

How do you differenciate these two guns ? Technically speaking, the 12 canons de 145 mm modèle 1910 sur affût Saint-Chamond used 14cm modèle 1910 naval guns while the modèle 1916 used specifically manufactured guns, but how can I see that?

About File:Military manoeuvres at Fontainebleau -2 (5313380317).jpg and File:Military manoeuvres at Fontainebleau -4 (5313380993).jpg, the Mle 1910s were retired from service in September 1917 so I doubt that the photographed gun is a Mle 1910.

Regards, Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:26, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the MLE 1910 has a square breech and the MLE 1916 has a round breech. Either way it's a best guess.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Canon_de_145_mle_1910_Saint-Chamond#/media/File:Canon_de_145_mm_mod%C3%A8le_1910_sur_affut_Saint-Chamond.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Canon_de_145_L_mle_1916_Saint-Chamond#/media/File:14-7-22,_%C3%A0_Strasbourg,_d%C3%A9fil%C3%A9_militaire,_devant_le_Palais_du_Rhin_(cropped).jpg Snowdawg (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Krupp artillery?[edit]

Hello. How did you guess that the gun in File:Soldats français autour d'un canon court sur le front de Macédoine.jpg was a Krupp model? Thanks. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 15:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The gun uses a horizontal sliding wedge breech which is a hallmark of Krupp guns. It is largely the same as this Krupp breech. I'm guessing that gun is either a 12 cm or 15 cm gun on a garrison mount.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_cm_Kanone_C/73#/media/File:Keilverschluss_Krupp_1879.JPG

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/8_cm_Kanone_C/73#/media/File:Rundkeil_c73.tif Snowdawg (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joli coup d’œil

. Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:28, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Snowdawg

File tagging File:Fiat 634 102.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

152-45 affusto piedistallo.png[edit]

File:Прототип Т-28.jpg[edit]

File:Объект 112.jpg[edit]

Inserting wrong types into aircraft files[edit]

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Festung Norwegen 155mm cannon.jpg[edit]

File:Sockelflak - German AA cannon.jpg[edit]

Overcat of aircraft[edit]

Unidentified naval missile launcher[edit]

Nice work[edit]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

Once again: Inserting wrong types into aircraft files !![edit]

Please remain calm and collegial[edit]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

File:USCGC Taney at night.jpg[edit]

Please stop[edit]

Your account has been blocked[edit]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Please enable e-mail to be eligible to win a prize in Wiki Loves Monuments![edit]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

File:LuAZ-969 MLRS.jpg[edit]

File:00024794.jpg.1782e3ab261637a78248e06119bbab19.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:340 mm Mle 1912 L47 railway French railway gun.jpg[edit]

What's the source for identification?[edit]

File:Fatal konsultation.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Kaiser Wilhelm II. 1915 bei der Verleihung des Eisernen Kreuzes an Karl Neuhof (1891–1943).jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:轢き潰される「研三」.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Italian human-controlled torpedo.jpg[edit]

Updates of images of active Commons users[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:9 cm Minenwerfer M 14-2.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Stout Airsedan-1.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Літак Гітлера (Fw 200C-4 U2 ) на аеродромі в Калинівці. (1942р. або 1943р.). Ганс Баур (особистий пілот Гітлера )зліва, відвернувся від камери.jpg[edit]

File:DC3 Bell Geospace Sultan Mahmud Airport 2019.jpg[edit]

Photo ID[edit]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:SAB 70.jpg[edit]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine[edit]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30[edit]

Category:KAI KF-21[edit]

File:Т-19.jpg[edit]

File:Победа после мины.jpg[edit]

145 Mle 1910 and 145 Mle 1916[edit]

Krupp artillery?[edit]

Navigation menu

Search