User talk:Smihael/February 2013

Welcome to the Commons, Smihael/February 2013!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Brimstone.jpg[edit]

Hi Mihael, this is not a brimstone butterfly (Gonepteryx rhamni). It is possibly Colias crocea. Greetings, --Olei 22:02, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mihael, renaming images is not possible. You should upload the image again with a correct name and tag the misspelled one with {{badname|new file name}}. --Olei 09:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think this. --Mihael Simonič 17:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kword.png[edit]

Hi.
Can you add the version number of KWord to your image? -Mardus 09:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done. Mihael Simonič 16:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition[edit]

Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 21:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Scientist_stub.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

Image:Scientist_stub.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

howcheng {chat} 16:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lokvanj_in_list_cut_0326.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 06:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mittlist Gfaell 02.JPG[edit]

Hi Mihael, you voted for this picture. I would like to inform you that i have added a new edit. What do you think? --Simonizer 20:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Danilo Turk 05.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Danilo Turk 05.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

If you do have permission to upload the image, please send all the documentation to the OTRS. Boricu æ ddie 18:38, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I sent permission message that Türk's site admin have given to ORTS. --Mihael Simonic 19:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Danilo Turk 06.jpg[edit]

File:Danilo Turk 06.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Same problem as with above file. --Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Macro lens for Nikon D series[edit]

An answer to your question on FPC. While I do not have a macro lens right now, I have heard many opinions etc. about them. I would personally recommend that you buy a Sigma prime lens such as the 70mm macro prime, but that of course depends on your financial resources and how much you are willing to spend. If you are looking for a good way to save money, buy an old Zeiss Lens that has manual focus only and is macro and get yourself the adapter (I didn't try this yet, but am seriously considering doing that). The main issue of course depends on whether you want to use for other purposes or not. Feel free to contact me on my user talk page about it, I would be happy to explain more to you. Keep up the good work, --Freedom to share 21:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll see if I get some money this summer... I'm just school student. I see that adapters are very expensive (so this isn't good idea), sometimes they cost more than new entry or midrange class lenses here where I live. I think that this is beacuse of "hungry" sellers who slimly say price in $ is price €, but 1 € is about $1.5. --Mihael Simonic 05:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Baerlauch-etc.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Baerlauch-etc.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rosenzweig

Image:Dovzanova soteska 3.jpg[edit]

Hi Smihael! I've been wading through incomplete deletion requests and noticed your request to have this image deleted has not been taken care of. Will you please provide more information as to why you want it to be deleted? You can provide the info by following the first two steps on the incomplete DR template on the image page. If you have questions, feel free to leave a note on my talk page. Cheers! Brynn (talk!) 22:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin 09[edit]

If you want to come to Berlin we need a permission of your Parents, thats all. --Marcela (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Danilo Turk.jpg[edit]

Hi, could you please confirm the permission to reuse the image via OTRS. That's because the article this image is used in will be nominated for FA. Thanks a lot. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have permission from Danilo Türk campaign website maintainer. I have already send e-mail clips to OTRS, but nothing happened. I can froward you a message I send to OTRS one year ago, reply from OTRS and original message from website maintainer and I'm sure you will solve the problem. With best regards (PS: I don't know what are you asking me that here on Commons, since both of we are active on sl.wiki too?), --Miha (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's just that the image, which I've found through the English Wikipedia, is located on Commons. Please, send me the e-mails so that I can see if I can help here. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenščina[edit]

Zdravo, Miha! Ali mogoče veš, zakaj se na glavni strani pojavlja angleški opis slike, kljub temu, da obstaja slovenski prevod? Ostali napisi so v slovenščini. Če izberem v URL-ju ?uselang=de, vidim npr. nemški opis, če pa ?uselang=sl, pa ne slovenskega. --romanm (talk) 11:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sem malo pogledal po starih redakcijah in vidim, da je treba uporablati {{Potd2}}. lp, --Miha (talk) 20:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Super, hvala! --romanm (talk) 23:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ni za kaj... pa še kdaj :). lp, --Miha (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Short summary in English: romanm asked me to apply Slovenian translations for Potd at Slovenian version of Commons' Main page)

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Crocus vernus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocus vernus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

FP promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bohinjsko jezero 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bohinjsko jezero 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

TUSC token 893345b293debbc9378e486e327ec087[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Slovenian translations needed[edit]

Hi! I contact you as you speak English and Slovenian.

Jastrow and I are working on autotranslating {{Meta information museum}}, the meta-template we use for many museums, like {{Information Louvre}}. Could you please help us find Slovenian translations for every tag name:

   * artist/maker
   * description
   * dimensions
   * credit line
   * accession number
   * location
   * source/photographer
   * references
   * other versions

"Credit line" is mainly about the mode of acquisition: what collection does it come from? Did it join the collections by gift, purchase, on loan, etc.?

Thanks for any help. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answered on Bibi Saint-Pol's talk page. --Miha (talk) 10:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems perfect. Thanks a lot! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 11:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Miha (talk) 11:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Smihael!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 02:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Polzevo 01.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 05.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Margarina.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 07.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 04.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Strunjan-cliffs.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 06.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 00.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belo grozdje.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 02.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Boat on slovenian sea.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Bohinjsko jezero.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Dsc 0137.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 01.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blejski Vintgar 03.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Tara (Buddhism).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

International Photoworkshop[edit]

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010.--Prolineserver (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:GimB.svg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:GimB.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:GimB.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sojna smetana.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sojna smetana.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Sojna smetana.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Funfood ␌ 22:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Assessments/translate/sl[edit]

Hi, do you think you can translate this template? Thanks. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 09:04, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Danilo Turk.jpg[edit]

File:Danilo Turk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Krd 16:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dragon Ljubljana.jpg[edit]

File:Dragon Ljubljana.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Yours sincerely Eleassar ^(t/p) 09:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Dragon Ljubljana.jpg

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VitrazaCerkevSvNikolaj-MurskaSobota1.jpg[edit]

File:VitrazaCerkevSvNikolaj-MurskaSobota1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:VitrazaCerkevSvNikolaj-MurskaSobota1.jpg[edit]

File:VitrazaCerkevSvNikolaj-MurskaSobota1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 03:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Dean Komel.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

File:Dean Komel.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:Dean Komel.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Permission has been forwarded. --Miha (talk) 15:03, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Kulturno sredisce Metelkova.jpg

And also:

File:Slovenski etnografski muzej z zunanjimi površinami.jpg Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leo Souvan.jpg[edit]

File:Leo Souvan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:44, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dean Komel.jpg[edit]

Hi, I've requested the confirmation of the OTRS permission that you have added to File:Dean Komel.jpg, to clear any doubts in the future. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that is fine with me. --Miha (talk) 11:24, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dean Komel.jpg[edit]

File:Dean Komel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 17:54, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Slovensko-hrvaška meja pri Metliki.svg

Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:50, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Konjščica 07.jpg[edit]

File:Konjščica 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:31, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:VisnjaGora - Edo Turnher memorial.jpg

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ne držiš se dogovora, da ne predlagaš zadev za brisanje dokler pravna vprašanja niso razčiščena. --Miha (talk) 13:20, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Višnja Gora.svg[edit]

File:Coat of arms of Višnja Gora.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Symbol of VisnjaGora - gold snail.jpg[edit]

File:Symbol of VisnjaGora - gold snail.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:12, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Visnja Gora-sola.jpg[edit]

File:Visnja Gora-sola.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:15, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:VisnjaGora - Elvez factory.jpg[edit]

File:VisnjaGora - Elvez factory.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ana's Dog.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ana's Dog.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

The link leads nowhere. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:16, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was wrongly transfered: http://sl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Posebno%3ADnevnik&type=upload&user=Ana+Kompan&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= --Miha (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Margarina.jpg[edit]

File:Margarina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 00:01, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:24, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Your e-mail[edit]

Zdravo!
Mi morda lahko pojasnis zakaj ta slika ni sporna https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lake_Bondhus_Norway_2862.jpg (glej licenco: CC-BY-NC-ND) in je celo izbrana za sliko lanskega leta(!!), torej jo admini gotovo niso spregledali. V Sloveniji pa brisemo (brises) vse, kar je morda potrebno razsirjati kot NC (kot fotografo delo pa so bili celo PD primeri). Zakaj pri nas ne gre skozi multi licenciranje?
Premisli. Ocitno Zbirka tudi ni tako konsistentna in niti ni res, da je zgolj prosto gradivo; ne vidim razloga, da se brisanje zaradi COM:FOP nadaljuje.
Na tem mestu bi te res se enkrat, vnovic in znova, povsem vljudno pozval, da raje napises kak clanek ali pa se posvetis svojemu studiju, vsaj dokler trdne pravne razlage ne ponudi nekdo, ki je na pravnem podrocju bolj kompetenten. Do takrat bojo zgolj spori, tvoje delo ki je casovno gotovo zelo zahtevno pa sploh ni cenjeno in PMM niti potrebno. Sam si videl, da se ob tako strogi interpreaciji pojavijo sami absurdi (primer z zasebnimi solami, turisticnimi organizacijami), kar gotovo ni bil namen zakona in pravna praksa je, da se razsoja glede na common sense. Vem, za tvoje vzgibe za vzpostavitev Zbirke kot shrambe absolutno prostega gradiva, vendar naj ponovim da je to prekomerna idealizacija, ki ne vodi v izboljsanje stanja. Verjel ali ne, tudi Nemci (ali pa Svicarji, ki si jih tako pogosto radi jemljemo za zgled) niso tako uspesni zaradi tega ker bi bili rigorozno togi oz. zategnjeni kar se lastne zakonodaje tice, temvec gojijo precej flegmaticen odnos in zadeve "lavfajo". Samo Americani (ki ironicno se vedno verjamejo v zgodbo o njihovi svobodi) in njihova politika sirijo paranojo, ki se odseva v nesmiselnih protiteroristinih ukrepih in poslednicnem izgubljanju cedalje vecih svoboscin. Cenzura interneta, omejevanje dostopa do informacij - za vse to je gonja proti teroristom (in piratom) odlicen izgovor (in kamuflaza). Vse to v konci fazi vodi do primerov kot je ta: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AaronSw
Dvomis lahko v nedogled, ce karikiram, lahko dvomimo tudi o tem, da piscal iz Divjih bab ni avtorsko delo nekoga, ki je umrl pred 70 leti (kdo pa ve ali je karbonska metoda datiranja res zanesljiva, kdo pa ve da v muzeju ni kot eksponat morda le kopija originala), ampak velja se vprasati ali ima to kak smisel. Ali to doprinese k napredku civilizacije (kar je svojevrstno poslanstvo Wikimedie)?
Torkat ne pisem Pod lipo, ker sem se odlocil da zaradi casovne stiske zacasno prekinem sodelovanje na projektu, poleg tega pa nima zeljenega ucinka - t.j., da bi se slike nalaga vsaj loklano.
Lp Mihael S.

Hi, Mihael!

I have received your e-mail and find it fair to reply to you regarding the images you mention. Additionally, I'd like to clarify my stance too, although I don't force you or anyone else to adopt it. I think it will be much already if we acknowledge that each one of us has the right to his own opinion and to express it. In a civil manner, of course.

First, as regards the double licensed image, any image is suitable for Commons, as long as at least one of the licenses allows for the commercial usage (see Commons:Multi-licensing). There are also no derivative rights involved in this image, because it is a picture of a landscape, not of some copyrightable object. As to the Divje Babe (image), there is no reason to believe the flute is a modern artwork. Except maybe some fringe theory, but this is not enough to delete an image from Commons. Copies of free objects are also not copyrighted.

Second, as regards the general point of view about this subject. I am sorry for every image that has to be deleted from Commons, even more so after the case by Irena has shown how useful it may be. But I don't see this as a convincing reason for not striving to create a "free encyclopedia" and a "free collection of images". A project that offers only free content can significantly contribute to the human development and, if influential enough, change the existing practices. Much more than just a repository of all kinds of user-contributed images, which is already available via Google Images (as the web in general).

I believe that if nothing is done, accumulation of such images will in the long run mean the project has become moot, i.e. that it has lost its sense and direction. We may then just mark the mission to create a free sum of human knowledge "failed" and lower the costs of the Foundation and the necessary human work by transferring all the content to Flickr or some other image repository. The correct way to go is in my opinion therefore not to give up our ideals, but to work hard to change the law, and in the meantime, use only the minimum necessary amount of the copyrighted content. Valuable images can be transferred locally or to some other place, because they're all still available. Of course, I'm also willing to contribute additional content to wiki, like uploading my images, writing articles etc. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:42, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it would be fair to publish my original email, so that all can see exactly which cases I was reffering to, although it was meant to be private. I hope you don't mind that I corrected some of my grammar mistakes from the original email. As already mentioned elsewhere I don't really have much time so I will answer to you later. Best regards and thanks for your reply. --Miha (talk) 18:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tara (Buddhism).jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tara (Buddhism).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:27, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zaradi mene se datoteka lahko tudi izbrise. Kipec je od sestre in ga je dobila za nek rojstni dan iz nekega potovanja. Vec ne vem, ampak po tej logiki se lahko izbrise tudi vse druge slike igrac... --Miha (talk) 22:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dobro, saj jo je treba izbrisati. Glej COM:TOYS. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:43, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kako bi pa bilo na primer s kipci Jezusa? Konec koncev gre tukaj tudi za religiozni predmet; je pa seveda avtorska pravica za interpretacijo tudi mozna. Sam sicer nisem poznavalec budizma, vem pa da so upodobitve razlicnih Tar relativno natancno dolocene. Prav tako to ni Mikimiska ®/TM. --Miha (talk) 16:18, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kipci Jezusa so tudi avtorsko zavarovani (smo jih že brisali). Seveda, če misliš, da ne gre za izvirno avtorsko delo, ker se pač dela po kalupu iz xy. stoletja, lahko temu tudi oporekaš na pogovorni strani, vendar moraš za to navesti relevanten sklic. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 19:41, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Primer je mejen, ampak sem oznacil za brisanje. --Miha (talk) 23:40, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Slika šole[edit]

Predlagam, da si prebereš tukaj: "Lastnik s pridobitvijo lastninske pravice na arhitekturnem delu ne pridobi nikakršnih avtorskopravnih upravičenj. On lahko objekt sicer neomejeno funkcionalno uporablja (lahko v njem prebiva, ga daje v najem, obremeni, proda ali podari), nima pa nikakršnih avtorskopravnih upravičenj (npr. do reproduciranja, pravnega varstva v primeru skazitve, itd.) [Riesenkampff, 2009]." --Eleassar ^(t/p) 16:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, hvala. Koristno branje. Torej bi bilo v najslabsem primeru potrebno pridobiti projektansko pogodbo oz. javno narocilo, kjer so doloceni pogoji uporabe.

Imam sicer nekaj pomislekov:

V standardnih pogodbah se na narocnika prenesejo ekskluivne materialne pravice (zaradi katerih npr. tudi ne moremo objaviti knjig recimo Dese Muck, ki je podala soglasje k izdaji dolocene knjige pod prosto CC licenco, vendar pa zalozba v vecini primerov in tudi njenem nosi 5 let ekskluzivne pravice do objave in morebitne ponatise in tako lahko proti avtorjevi volji v tem dogovorjenem obdobju zadrzuje nadaljno rabo). Vprasanje je torej, ali ne moremo poenostaviti postopka in predpostaviti, da je pogodba bila taka oz. graditi na zaupanju, da je "stranka" ravnala odgovorno in da s podpisom zakonsko jamci verodostojnost podatkov.
- Zakaj se namrec lahko brez kateregakoli dokaza verjame meni, kot uporabniku Commonsa, da na skrivaj ne kradem fotografij s fotoaparata mojega cimra (ali pa recimo nekega priznanega fotografa) in tako krsim njegove avtorske pravice?
Clanek navaja tujega avtorja (Riesenkampff J., (2009): Inhalt und Schranken des Eigentums an Werken der Baukunst: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Urheberrechts, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden), kar pomeni da navedba ni nujno v skladju s slovensko zakonodajo. Nisem preprican ali materialne pravice stejejo med avtorskopravna upravicenja (ce dlakocepimo pac sodijo v sorodbe pravice avtorskim pravicam).
Tekst ne opredeli vrsto in nacin reproduciranja, tako natancno kot ZoASP, ki za sliko neke zgradbe uvede posebno kategorijo 2D reprodukcij in eksplicitno dovoli njihovo rabo. V splosnem slike arhitekture niso reprodukcija, saj je slika ce ji odvzamemo dodano umetnisko vrednost s strani fotografa le skupek informacij in ni objekt v realnosti (ni prislo do reproduciranja). To je sicer moje osebno mnenje oz. interpretacija, prav tako kot je je zgolj mnenje nasprotna trditev.

V praksi bi to pomenilo, da kot lastnik svoje hise le-te nisem upravicen fotografirati, cemur pa v praksi ni tako. To so nenapisane izjeme, ki se jih v primerih ko pridejo na sodisce razveljavi z argumentom "zdrave pametni". V nasprotnem primeru pa ima to razsezne in unicujoce posledice (kot je na primer gonja proti piratstvu). Osebno sicer ne zagovarjam nalaganja filmov prek p2p omrezij, vendar po analogiji ni razlike med izposojo v knjiznici in izposojo "na travnikih"; srz problema je pravzaprav isti in nastane ker je vsako odpiranje spletne vsebine po samem protokolu interneta prenos s katerim kar naenkrat nastane "kopija" in s tem po mnenju zaloznikov "reporodukcija". (Pomni, da obstajajo tako odmevni primeri uspesnih miljonskih tozb, kot tudi se vec zavernjenih tozb ravno glede na to predpostavko.)

Ponovno predlagam, da si preberes knjigo uglednega ameriskega pravnika in strokovnjaka na podrocju kolizije digitalnega sveta z avtorkim pravom Lawrenca Lessiga Svobodna kultura, kjer poda vrsto primerov iz zgodovino pravnih sporov glede lastnine in pokaze zakaj je zgoraj omenjeni premislek tako pomemben. Npr. ze na str. 2-3 je primer iz leta 1945 ko se razmah letalskega prometa sploh se ni slutil: "The airplanes, of course, never touched the surface of the Causbys’ land. But if [...] their land reached to “an indeﬁnite extent, upwards [and downwards],” then the government was trespassing on their property, and the Causbys wanted it to stop [becasue their chicken die at a higher rate when planes are present]. [..] Congress had declared the airways public, but if one’s property really extended to the heavens, then Congress’s declaration could well have been an unconstitutional “taking” of property without compensation. The Court acknowledged that “it is ancient doctrine that common law ownership of the land extended to the periphery of the universe.” But [the Court] had no patience for ancient doctrine. [...] [The] doctrine has no place in modern world. [...] Were that not true, every transcontinental ﬂight would subject the operator to countless trespass suits. Common sense revolts at the idea. To recognize such private claims to the airspace would clog these highways, seriously interfere with their control and development in the public interest, and transfer into private ownership that to which only the public has a just claim.".

Lep pozdrav, --Miha (talk) 20:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nekatere pogodbe uveljavljajo izključen prenos avtorskih pravic, druge neizključen, tretje postavke o tem sploh ne vsebujejo. Dovoljenje je po pravilih Zbirke potrebno za vse gradivo, katerega avtor nisi sam. Poleg tega se briše vse gradivo, o katerem obstaja razumni dvom glede prostosti. Materialne pravice seveda spadajo med avtorske pravice. Članek je napisala slovenska študentka, ki je študirala na UL in diplomirala iz te teme na UL. Domnevam, da če se njene trditve ne bi skladale s slovensko prakso, bi jo najbrž že takrat opozorili, njenega članka pa ne bi objavili v recenzirani reviji. Reprodukcijo opredeljuje tudi na str. 67 levo zgoraj. Glej tudi ta pdf. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:18, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Glej tudi tukaj: "Pogodbeni imetnik posamezne materialne avtorske pravice, ki tako pravico brez avtorjevega dovoljenja prenese naprej na tretjo osebo, je kršitelj avtorske pravice in je že za sam prenos tuje avtorske pravice odgovoren po specialnih določbah ZASP in po splošnih pravilih o povrnitvi škode." Očitno mora torej dovoljenje dati arhitekt, ne pa ravnatelj šole. Ne morem(o) torej potrditi dovoljenja, ki ne vsebuje dokazila o tem, da arhitekt naročniku dovoljuje prenos materialne avtorske pravice reproduciranja na tretje osebe. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:27, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oziroma kar oba skupaj, saj sta oba tako narocnik, kot arhitekt enakopravni pogodbeni stranki. Tako kot lastnik (imetnik materialnih pravic) ocitno krsi avtorksopravno zakonodajo, tudi avtor (v primeru knjig), ne sme tiskati pri vec zaloznikih hkrati. To pomeni tudi, da bi bilo potrebno ponovno pogledati nekatere OTRS tickete, kjer so soglasje dali avtorji zgradb (na primer primer mariborskega stadiona). --Miha (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Menim, da to drži pri izključnem prenosu pravic; pri neizključnem prenosu avtor lahko tiska pri več založbah. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 20:55, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To je ponovno odvisno od pogodbe same. Tule se vrtiva v zacaranem krogu, ker se je potrebno odlociti kater tip pogodbe se privzame kot standardnega. Mimogrede, razsodba ki jo navajas jasno pove, da je (kazenska) odgovornost na pogodbenem imetniku; torej tistemu ki sliko (bodisi protipravno ali po dogovoru) posreduje tretji osebi oz. jo priobci javnosti. Pravzaprav iz tega sledi ravno to kar ves cas trdim, da moramo lastnikovo dovoljenje obravnavati kot pravnomocno (predpostavljati je treba, da je razmerje lastnik-avtor urejeno in se nas v razmerju lastnik-tretja oseba ne tice). --Miha (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Največkrat gre res za izključni prenos pravice; ni pa nujno. Lastnikovo dovoljenje ne more biti pravnomočno, če avtor ni dal privoljenja za posredovanje pravice reproduciranja tretjim osebam. V tem primeru je fotografija kršitev avtorskih pravic in je seveda ne moremo objaviti. Stvari ne moremo kar predpostavljati (glej npr. Commons:License laundering). --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:13, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Si me prehitel z naknadnim urejanjem svojega komentarja, pa vseeno: "če avtor ni dal privoljenja za posredovanje pravice reproduciranja tretjim osebam". To razmerje urejata avtor in imetnik teh pravic. Imetnik teh pravic lahko potem na podlagi tega razpolaga z njimi naprej neodvisno od avtorja, v kolikor je tako doloceno v pogodbi. Torej vprasanje je ali predpostavljamo, da imata avtor in lastnik urejeno razmerje ali to sami dodatno (v korist imetnika pravic) preverjamo, ne glede na to, da sami ne nosimo odgovornosti (za ilustracijo: ali naj podobno kot drzavna birokracija predpostavljamo da so vsi podatki na vlogah neresnicni in jih je treba po veckrat preverjati in zato po novem povsem navadni postopki trajajo tudi po pol leta ali vec). V vsakem primeru pa nekaj (bodisi trditev A ali pa ne-A) predpostavljamo. --Miha (talk) 21:24, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sami nosimo odgovornost za to, da ne ponujamo gradiva, ki ni prosto. Ravno zato pa podatke in dovoljenja preverjamo oz. zahtevamo vsaj izjavo o tem v dovoljenju, ki ga pošlje imetnik avtorskih pravic. Brez tovrstne izjave se ne moremo na nič sklicevati. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 21:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iz Commons:Splošno_zanikanje_odgovornosti: Nihče od avtorjev, sodelavcev, sponzorjev, administratorjev, ali kdo drug, povezan z Wikimedijino zbirko (Wikimedia Commons), ne more biti odgovoren za pojav netočnih ali obrekljivih informacij ali za uporabo informacij, ki so shranjene ali povezane s teh spletnih strani. --Miha (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ne gre za kazensko odgovornost (čeprav tudi ta ni popolnoma izključena), gre za moralno odgovornost. Svoje delo kot prostovoljec OTRS jemljem resno in brez jasne izjave ne želim kot proste odobriti nobene datoteke. Poleg tega ustvarjamo zbirko prostega gradiva, kjer datoteke dvomljive vrednosti nimajo kaj iskati (glej COM:PRP: "Commons’ users aim to build and maintain in good faith a repository of media files which to the best of our knowledge are free or freely-licensed.") --Eleassar ^(t/p) 22:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, upam da ne namigujes na to da bi bil v svojem pocetju nemoralen. Jaz verjamem, da gre za proste slike in menim, da je prevernjanje nepotrebna in nevljudnja paranoja, ki darovalca gradiva razzali s tem, ko se milo receno privzame, da je v prestopku. Tudi to je lahko razumljeno kot neprofesionalen odnos. V tem primeru, sva ugotovila, da tega da je slika prosta ne morem z gotovostjo trditi zato prepuscam dokoncno odlocitev drugim. --Miha (talk) 00:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ne namigujem na nič; povem samo, da ne morem odobriti kot proste datoteke, o kateri obstajajo nejasnosti. Po tvoji logiki seveda odpade vsakršno preverjanje licence prek OTRS, ker je zahteva za dovoljenje "nepotrebna in nevljudnja paranoja, ki darovalca gradiva razzali". Moje mnenje pa je, da večina ljudi ne bere zakonov in se ne spozna na avtorske pravice, zato je treba stvari preveriti oz. pridobiti ustrezno izjavo, preden jih odobrimo kot proste. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 06:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Smihael/February 2013

Image:Brimstone.jpg[edit]

Image:Kword.png[edit]

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition[edit]

Image:Scientist_stub.jpg[edit]

Image:Lokvanj_in_list_cut_0326.jpg[edit]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mittlist Gfaell 02.JPG[edit]

Image:Danilo Turk 05.jpg[edit]

File:Danilo Turk 06.jpg[edit]

Macro lens for Nikon D series[edit]

Image Tagging Image:Baerlauch-etc.jpg[edit]

Image:Dovzanova soteska 3.jpg[edit]

Berlin 09[edit]

Image:Danilo Turk.jpg[edit]

Slovenščina[edit]

FP promotion[edit]

FP promotion[edit]

TUSC token 893345b293debbc9378e486e327ec087[edit]

Slovenian translations needed[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

International Photoworkshop[edit]

File tagging File:GimB.svg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Sojna smetana.jpg[edit]

Template:Assessments/translate/sl[edit]

File:Danilo Turk.jpg[edit]

File:Dragon Ljubljana.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:VitrazaCerkevSvNikolaj-MurskaSobota1.jpg[edit]

File:VitrazaCerkevSvNikolaj-MurskaSobota1.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Dean Komel.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Leo Souvan.jpg[edit]

File:Dean Komel.jpg[edit]

File:Dean Komel.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Konjščica 07.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

File:Coat of arms of Višnja Gora.svg[edit]

File:Symbol of VisnjaGora - gold snail.jpg[edit]

File:Visnja Gora-sola.jpg[edit]

File:VisnjaGora - Elvez factory.jpg[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ana's Dog.jpg[edit]

File:Margarina.jpg[edit]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Your e-mail[edit]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tara (Buddhism).jpg[edit]

Slika šole[edit]

Navigation menu

Search