User talk:Slaunger/Archives/QIC

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2007[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaccinium uliginosum plant 1 upernavik trimmed 2007-07-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potentilla hookeriana upernavik 2007-06-27 1 original.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taraxacum sp upernavik 2007-07-30 1 edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upernavik evening panorama 2007-08-08 cropped sharpened.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nunâ island Upernavik district 2007-08-09 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upernavik cemetary 2007-06-27 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chamerion latifolium upernavik 2007-08-06 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black ice growler texture upernavik 2007-07-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leucanthemum sp ilulissat 2007-08-21 3 edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recently shot Greenland dog upernavik 2007-07-02 edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorte broedre kirke viborg 2007-11-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

2008[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London eye and county hall pano edited 2008-02-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

2009[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katedralskolen viborg 2009-04-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments looks OK --Mbdortmund 22:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Katedralskole Facade 2009-04-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Ianare 06:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sea of water balloons by Slaunger 2009-06-26 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nicely done (you should check your other versions in the description though). Lycaon 05:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC) ✓ Done Thanks for noticing. --Slaunger 06:14, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg kraftvarmeværk 2009-05-25 1-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I prefer this version --Mbdortmund 14:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fryderyk Chopin Baltic Sea 2009-06-30 edit filtered.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments i think it is ok for QI even if there are some color aberations on the sky-LadyofHats 08:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MV Grand Voyager 2009-06-30 filtered.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Iotatau 22:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cow (Fleckvieh breed) Oeschinensee Slaunger 2009-07-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments only name of the cow is missing --Mbdortmund 03:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I've asked about the cow breed at the en reference desk, and it seems like it is the en:Fleckvieh cattle breed. I'll update the page description when I am sure. --Slaunger 10:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A 544 Alholm Bøjden 2009-05-31 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems OK. Airwolf 20:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tinghøj Hammershøj Kvorning 2010-01-08 edit filtered.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. Please nominate this for Featured Picture. --MattiPaavola 20:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you say so. Thanks. --Slaunger 23:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View Dragstrup Vig 2009-08-04 edit filtered.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment The isolated tree branch at top right should be removed IMO. Otherwise very good. Will promote after this has been done. --Cayambe 14:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Fair enough. I love pedantism! --Slaunger 19:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. --Cayambe 20:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Qaqortoq 2008-10-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. There seem to be little white gaps in the upper and lower left corners, though. -- Avenue 16:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well spotted! It is a bad crop after stitching. I will see to it later today. --Slaunger 10:23, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Slaunger 20:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good panorama of an interesting subject; QI to me. I love the colourful houses. -- Avenue 22:40, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guadeloupe creole 2010-03-30.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments , Nice, QI to me.--Avenue 08:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue and white clothes shop Guadeloupe 2010-03-27.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. (Could perhaps be better with ISO 100) --Berthold Werner 10:29, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Info why do you think it would be better à 100 ISO, Some sensor are natively 200 iso and if you use 100 iso, you lose quality --Croucrou 11:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Comment Other way around - low iso gives better quality. Some new dslrs have very good high iso performance but for most of us the lower the better. Regards --Herbythyme 12:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geotrygon montana Parc des Mamelles Guadeloupe 2010-04-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI and useful --Archaeodontosaurus 08:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cow Lamarre 2010-04-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 10:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goats Lamarre 2010-03-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would be happy to support an authetinc creole goat, but otherwise good Clin--Jebulon 11:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moclay Fur Island 2010-08-06 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very interesting, I miss a scale, but it is a very good picture--Jebulon 00:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good point regarding scale: I have considered that as well. I have another shot, where the is a car standing in front of it, and a sign. I might upload that as well as an informative "other version". --Slaunger 07:26, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Christmas street illumination 2010-11-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* Support Good quality with effective use of available light. Pedestrians are illustrated without being obtrusive or raising personality rights issues. I think it is important to include pedestrians, in some manner, in such a picture, and the photographer's decision is reasonable. QI in my opinion. -Wsiegmund 04:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snow on black tire swing 2010-11-30 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fur island diatomaceous earth.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition and contrasts. Some CA towards sides, but generally not on the main feature, so tolerable IMO. --Avenue 08:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sct Mathias xmas illumination 2010-12-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good QI. French translation of the caption added, used now in french WP (here).--Jebulon 22:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2011[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Nørresø East 2009-05-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Tremendous work --Saffron Blaze 08:44, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larvik harbour Kanalkaien 2011-02-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:02, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crane in Larvik harbour 2011-02-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment A bit tilted CCW, please, fix it -- George Chernilevsky 09:22, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are rights. Thanks for noticing. Fixed --Slaunger 17:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK now -- George Chernilevsky 06:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Recently graduated Gymnasium students at Sankt Hans bonfire 2009-06-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting scene, decent quality. The composition seems a bit cluttered (might have been better from a few paces to the right), and the car in the distance is a bit unfortunate, but QI to me. --Avenue 10:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
 Question Thanks for the review. Hmm... a bit cluttered composition you say? Besides the inevitable car in the far background (which I had not noticed till now, there is a road there along the brink of the lake), I do not see any irrelevant elements in the photo? I mean, the students are in the boat to witness the bonfire being lit closely thereafter, so both the boat and the bonfire should be there. Just trying to understand your comment :-) --Slaunger 20:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I should have said cramped, not cluttered. I was thinking of a slightly tight crop above the "witch", and the student's head overlapping the bonfire platform. Relatively minor issues IMO. --Avenue 14:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I understand, and fully agree, thanks :-). --Slaunger 19:20, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View down stairway of slaves Petit-Canal 2010-03-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:55, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WW1 monument Petit-Canal 2010-03-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. QI to me--Lmbuga 19:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stairs of the slaves Petit-Canal 2010-03-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Harrison49 19:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anolis marmoratus Lamarre 2010-04-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Holleday 20:40, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havregrynskugler 2011-12-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice picture--Jebulon 15:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2012[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johan Otto von Spreckelsen name plate at morvilles Gård 2012-05-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bageren er desværre død - så nu bager han ej brød 2012-05-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Root Borgvold 2012-05-21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The composition anc colours seem a bit odd to me. Mattbuck 16:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Opinions differ: It was printed in 9000 copies yesterday in the local newspaper as the pic of the day in 20×14 cm format. As for the composition, the position of the main subject (the tree root) follows the rule of thirds. --Slaunger 19:11, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm entirely agreed with that local newspaper. --Florstein 18:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asmild Kirke 2012-05-28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO. --JLPC 07:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg seen from Søndersø 2012-05-28 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 12:44, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance Hauchske gård Viborg 2012-06-12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO. -- JLPC 22:33, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Margrethe I 2012-06-12 filtered.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:46, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transformer tower Nørreåvej 2012-05-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:34, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citroën DS 21 27 Quai Anatole France license plate blanked 2012-06-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wide crop but very good. --Selbymay 20:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Citroën DS 21 27 Quai Anatole France license plate blanked 2012-06-02 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guard at Sándor Palace Budapest 2012-11-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Hi, Slaunger ! -- Good quality. --JLPC 20:28, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bonsoir JLCP ! Thank You ! --Slaunger 21:01, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nørre Vorupør Coast 2012-11-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing boat Nørre Vorupør 2012-11-18 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality imo --Rjcastillo 22:52, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maagen and Skagerak beached at Nørre Vorupør 2012-11-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hosök tere left 2012-11-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks marginally tilted, because of the perspective, probably. See if you can look into that. Overall, QI for me --Dey.sandip 21:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I have uploaded a new version, where the perspective is improved on the right hand side. The overall perspective correction done is quite dramatic, and it is difficult to entirely avoid weird geometrical distortions in the photo. --Slaunger 21:51, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nørre Vorupør Coast one third sky 2012-11-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 19:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum of Fine Arts Budapest Cézanne exhibition 2012-11-04 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Rjcastillo 22:59, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rusty horseshoes on red painted wood 2012-08-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good but there is a thin white stripe at the top to be cropped before promotion. --Selbymay 09:53, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well spotted, thanks! I have uploaded a new version. --Slaunger 10:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC) Good now. --Selbymay 11:12, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T125 Ebenezer aka Fru Thomsen Nørre Vorupør 2012-11-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Ajepbah 18:05, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fasterna Kyrka 2012-08-05 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moonik 09:09, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Cathedral June 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good job but I'm wondering about the verticals, maybe a slight ccw tilt? --Selbymay 09:49, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm.. I do not think there is a tilt, but the geometry has been very challenging for me on this one, because the field of view is very large. I had to stand quite close to the cathedral to get an unobstructed view (see othe photos in Category:Viborg domkirke). On the limit where keeping verticals vertical and horizontals on the facade horizontal does not really make make sense. Moreoever, I had to position myself off-center to the symmetry line, such that I could stand on some stairs of another building and look over the cars on the parking lot. I have used very many vertical and horizontal control points in the stitch and worked 4-5 hours on finding the best compromise between beding reality and being faithful to the subject. --Slaunger 10:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)  Info I uploaded a new version. A second opinion would be welcome. --Selbymay 14:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
An edit I can support as creator - it is an improvement. A second opinion would indeed be welcome. --Slaunger 09:44, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me. --JLPC 08:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

2013[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iceberg near sanderson hope 2007-07-24 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Though a tiny picture. --Martin Falbisoner 17:54, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drejø By from East on Drejø Brovej 2013-07-11 by Slaunger.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Green cast. Please correct --A.Savin 11:43, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. New 'faithful' version from raw uploaded - also sharpened a bit. --Slaunger 06:46, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK --A.Savin 12:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corner between Drejø Brovej and Strædet, facing West, Gammel Elmegaard sign 2013-07-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Tripiers Colmar 2013-07-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A slight perspective correction at the top and then QI for me. --JLPC 17:14, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for noticing! I have updated the image. --Slaunger 18:20, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
QI now. --JLPC 20:31, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harvested barley fields along Bruunshåbvej - Eastern view from tumulus in Oldtidshøjene - Bruunshåb - 2013-08-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 09:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fredet Minde Lille Asmild 2013-08-24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moclay closeup Fur formation 2013-08-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moclay quarry Bette Jens Hyw Fur 2013-08-25 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christianshede Kirke 2014-05-29 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christianshede Kirke 2014-05-29 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vester Kirke 2014-05-29.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Pilgrimscentrum 2014-06-07 Villavej 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Pilgrimscentrum Villavej 10 Western Window roof detail cropped 2014-06-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 17:07, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hald Hovedgard 2014-06-07 edited.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 05:51, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edificio España (Madrid) 2014-02-10 perspective corrected.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly leaning to the left, by the looks of it (compare the windows with a straight edge)Crisco 1492 01:20, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I have uploaded a new version with slightly better perspective corrections. Note the original not corrected 'other version' on the file page. It is challenging to correct! --Slaunger 20:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. QI. --Crisco 1492 01:45, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SAI KZ IV and SAI KZ VIII 2014-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Cccefalon 05:37, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OY-DIZ SAI KZ IV landing Danish Air Show 2014-06-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--ArildV 09:49, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OY-KZS SAI KZ VIII landing at Danish Air Show 2014-06-22 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spectators accumulating at the opening of Danish Air Show 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, though I had reduced the magenta a little bit. --Cccefalon 10:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonov An-2 (LY-BIG, OY-SAK) on display at Danish Air Show 2014-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:21, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Kraftvarmeværk NW view 2014-07-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please remove the disturbance over the eighth fence pole. I made an annotation. --Cccefalon 07:24, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. --Slaunger 08:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LY-BIG Antonov An-2 from below in flight Danish Air Show 2014-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some magenta outlining (see note). The crop feels too tight. Is it possible to recover some space? --Cccefalon 08:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, Cccefalon. I have adressed the magenta outlining in a new upload. I see what you mean regarding the crop. If you see the first uncropped version I uploaded, the crop is indeed very tight at the top, and I have then made it symmetric tight in a subsequent cropped version. I guess I could clone in some more sky to make the crop less tight, as it is very uniform, but I am reluctant to do that. Feel free to oppose due to the crop, if you feel it is too tight for QI. --Slaunger 09:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No need to extend the sky artificially. If there had been more space in your RAW, then ok, but it is not an issue to decline. Thanks for removing the magenta outline, looks better now. --Cccefalon 10:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Kraftvarmeværk N view 2014-07-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aircraft spotters at Danish Airshow 2014-06-22 cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 04:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boeing FA-18F Super Hornet at take off Danish Air Show 2014-06-22 aligned.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F-16 Royal Danish Air Force Diamond Formation at Danish Air Show 2014-06-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hjultorvet and Viborg Museum 2014-07-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 09:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sct Matthias Gade crossing St Sct Mikkels Gade looking to the East towards Viborg Cathedral 2014-07-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:10, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sct Matthias Gade 2014-07-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mønsted kalkgruber exposure fused 2014-07-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:14, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Todbjerg Tower 2014-07-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate Latinerhaven Viborg 2014-07-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stegop 00:21, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Cathedral seen from the gate to Latinerhaven 2014-07-09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Info@Jacek Halicki: , I have slightly cropped the right-hand-side of the photo after your review following a proposal by Cccefalon to remove a partially intruding lamp. Hope it does not change your assesment of the photo. -- Slaunger 19:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View to the Northwest from Todbjerg Tower 2014-07-25 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Feuerwache eV Bernburger Strasse 35 Berlin graffiti 2014-07-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a sharp drop of brightness on the right side in the shadow. Despite it is already of good quality, I think, it could be a much better photo, if you crop the right side (see my annotation). What do you think? --Cccefalon 10:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Cccefalon: :✓ Done Good idea! I also took a little of the bottom. --Slaunger 18:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:45, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Refugio Militar Capitan Cobo - Pico Veleta - Sierra Nevada - 2014-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looks a bit dull in thumbnail size, but shows interesting lighting viewed full size. --Smial 22:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Smial: Thanks for the review. I have uploaded a new version, which is 0.3 stops brighter (only a slight difference) reworked from scratched, also changing the projection to 'rectlinear'. Do you think I should brighten it up even more (I like it with the dark clouds in the bg)? --Slaunger 21:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No no no, please no more brightening. I meant "dull" only compared to some very colourful other thumbs on this QI nomination page. In full size the image shows beautiful colours and lighting. -- Smial 22:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monument of Our Lady of the Snows (Francisco López Burgos) at Pico Veleta - Sierra Nevada - 2014-08-07 corrected.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:04, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Refugio militar Capitan Cobo view from SE 2014-08-07..JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment The picture in the note looks sharper than this one. Why don't you nominate it ?. --JLPC 11:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@JLPC: The other one is already QI . The other one is also a stitch of 2x2 photos, thus the better sharpness of that one. This one is a 'normal' single photo shot. --Slaunger 16:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 SupportOK, then ; sorry for my absent-midedness... and for the delay. --JLPC 20:45, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snows Sierra Nevada Seen from downhill 2014-08-07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:27, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cosplayer as Mad Hatter at j-pop-con 2014-03-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Observatorio Mojon del Trigo 2014-08-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alhambra evening panorama Mirador San Nicolas sRGB-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I remember this nice place for the evening shot and the fight with the other photographers for the best location --Cccefalon 11:38, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Info@Cccefalon: : Jebulon has pointed out to me in a private communication that the Generalife, the white building to the left had a yellow cast in the revision you have reviewed. I think he is right, and I have uploaded a new revision to address that. --Slaunger 21:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Travelling irrigation sprinkler 3 2014-05-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Travelling irrigation sprinkler 2 2014-05-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mønsted Kalkgruber Illuminated path with two lightghosts 2014-07-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Granada Cathedral as seen from Alhambra 2014-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality city view, but its a small ccw tilt on the left side. Otherwise very nice.--ArildV 16:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ArildV Well spotted, I had forgotten to add vertical alignment lines in PTGui. New version uploaded, where I have also widened the crop in the right hand side. Thanks for the review. -- Slaunger 18:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC) Im sorry, but now the right part is leaning out. --ArildV 18:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ArildV, it is I who should say sorry for repeatedly wasting your review time. This time, I think it is really ✓ Done. -- Slaunger 18:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC) I discover new details every time! Great now.--ArildV 18:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chainmail making 2014-09-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. (May DoF could be better, but IMO it's OK for this kind of picture.) --XRay 08:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongensbro gravel pit 2014-09-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 22:02, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isbjerget 2014-09-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alhambra Alcazaba tower 2014-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 27 September 2014 (UTC) Are you sure with the color balance ? I feel it a bit yellow/green, with some lack of blue. What do you think ?--Jebulon 20:54, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are right, Jebulon. I got a little carried away with my new knobs in LR trying to increase the glow in the colors of the tower. I have now 'reset' the color modifications. Poco a poco: Please look again. -- Slaunger 21:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, looks better Poco a poco 09:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isbjerget 2 2014-09-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 12:56, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anglers at Vestre Mole Aarhus Havn 2014-09-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dof a bit small, but QI --DXR 20:52, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lely 915 CD Vario Hibiscus hay rake 2014-09-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:19, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detail of wall inside Alcazaba in the Alhambra 2014-08-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestre Landsret single row portrait 2014-10-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:30, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestre Landsret Entrance Sign 2014-10-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:59, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestre Landsret Main Entrance in the evening 2014-10-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 12:37, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg by night 2014-11-04 exposure fused.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Wall remains at Bernauer Str GartenStrasse 2013-11-25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower detail at the Alcazaba (Alhambra) 2014-08-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Odd perspective, but the quality is good enough and it shows the subject well. --Ram-Man 19:35, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graffiti in Berlin Left 2014-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 15:26, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Graffiti Right 2014-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sure, didn't want to be a smart-ass, just precise ;-) --DXR 11:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
DXR: Your comment was in no way perceived as smart-ass'ish on my part, but entirely justified. -- Slaunger 15:58, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ampelmann Shop Karl-Liebknecht Strasse 2013-11-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Power Plant 2014-11-17-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe Berlin 2014-07-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe Berlin cropped 2014-07-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion head brass door knocker central Paris 2012-06-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:16, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Top view of Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church 2014-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower of Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church 2014-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:31, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gull 3 at Borgvold Viborg 2015-03-22-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gull at Borgvold Viborg 2015-03-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhammaren observation tower 2015-03-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality to me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gull side view at Borgvold Viborg 2015-03-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good picture. Too much space at right, but seagull seems to be scared because is seeing (or facing) to the short side. The composition represents distrust of gulls IMO --Lmbuga 08:10, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Thanks for the review, Lmbuga. It is a good point you are making regarding the direction the gull is facing and the framing. I actually think you should oppose due to the composition then. -- Slaunger 06:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lund cathedral gallery organ 2015-03-30-4749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lund cathedral interior 2015-03-30-4746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice and good, interesting perspective--Lmbuga 15:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lifeboat station Sandhammaren 2015-03-29-4708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach at Sandhammaren 3 2015-03-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beach at Sandhammaren 2 2015-03-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:37, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Path to Sandhammaren beach 2015-03-29-4707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dom Apoteket Roskilde 2015-03-30-4758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I like the two cars nearly symmetric in the picture --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Station 2015-03-30-4759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It was a mistake, but it's QI and a good picture: Good quality again--Lmbuga 20:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Haha Lmbuga Lo qué pasó aquí? Three times support?? Clin. -- Slaunger 20:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
and   --Lmbuga 20:33, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that is probably the most enthusiastic support I have ever received at QIC, haha. -- Slaunger 20:40, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cygnus olor head closeup Borgvold Viborg 2015-03-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. nice idea. --Hubertl 10:50, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Station 2015-03-30-4761.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 12:32, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Kloster 2015-03-30-4768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice composition --ArildV 11:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Kloster 2015-03-30-4767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --ArildV 11:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windows facade Museum of Contemporary Art Roskilde 2015-03-30-4778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:36, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Kloster 2015-03-30-4770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, same problem with trees ;-) --Moroder 12:50, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hehe, Moroder, yes, some of the same problems, but IMO not nearly as severe. -- Slaunger 12:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pillars in Lund Cathedral 2015-03-30-4756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Technically good quality although I don't really understand the idea behind the composition. --Code 13:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Code: Thanks for your review. This crypt, which may be the oldest existing room in Sweden is especially known for its pillars, so the objective is to illustrate some details of these. --

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Sankt Ols Stræde graffiti 2015-03-30-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Thank you for your link. Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 16:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Kloster 2015-03-30-4765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 13:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Cathedral 2015-03-30-4785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilhelm Topps Minde Roskilde 2015-03-30-4790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Kloster 2015-03-30-4766.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.Im not sure but it might be a very small cw tilt--ArildV 12:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)@ArildV: Well observed! A combination of a very minor tilt and perspective distortion; now fixed. I also fixed a burned area on flagpole adressed with adjustment brush in Lightroom. -- Slaunger 20:39, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Margrethespiret Roskilde Domkirke 2015-03-30-4799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow --Livioandronico2013 21:16, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chr IX Chapel Roskilde Cathedral 2015-03-30-4796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Touzrimounir 20:10, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian IVs Chapel Roskilde Cathedral 2015-04-01-4808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:42, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomb King Chr IX Queen Louise 2015-04-01-4804.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomb King Chr IX Queen Louise 2015-04-01-4804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcophagus Queen Margrethe I 2015-03-31-4810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The blown out Windows on top don't concern me. Its a dark hall after all. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:10, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coat of arms entrance gate Roskilde Priory 2015-03-30-4769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:16, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian IXs Chapel Dome Interior 2015-03-31-4812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Lovely - good quality. --Baresi franco 20:34, 20 April 2015 (UTC) Comment please The minimum resolution for submissions is 4 megapixels?--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:15, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination has more than 16 Mpixels. What is your point???--Slaunger 05:06, 21 April 2015 (UTC)*OK it's a mistake.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 07:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarcophagus of Louise of Great Britain, Roskilde Cathedral, Denmark, 2015-03-31-4813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Royal Tribune, Roskilde Cathedral, Denmark, 2015-03-31-4818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:53, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nave, Roskilde Cathedral, Denmark, 2015-03-31-4819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Dificult picture--Lmbuga 09:59, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AN MPQ-55 HAWK Continuous Wave Acquisition Radar, Stevnsfort Cold War Museum, Denmark, 2015-04-01-4826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The nave in Roskilde Cathedral, Denmark, 2015-03-31-4816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality (maybe a slight barrel distortion, but IMHO, insignificant) --C messier 06:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AN MPQ-50 Pulse Acquisition Radar, Stevnsfort Cold War Museum, Denmark, 2015-04-01-4827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Weak support on the left isn't very sharp but is a small part,if somebody wants can oppose --Livioandronico2013 20:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Livioandronico2013: Thanks for review. I have uploaded a new version, where I have selectively sharpened some semi-soft regions.-- Slaunger 15:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HAWK missile launcher, Stevnfort Cold War Museum, Denmark, 2015-04-01-4830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 20:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AN MPQ-46 High Power Illuminator Radar, Stevnfort Cold War Museum, Denmark, 2015-04-01-4828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 20:51, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underground passage, Stevnsfort Cold War Museum, Denmark-4845.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underground passage, Stevnsfort Cold War Museum, Denmark-4843.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:20, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MIM-14 NIKE Hercules, Stevnsfort Cold War Museum, Denmark-4835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 00:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MIM-23 HAWK transportation, Stevnsfort Cold War Museum, Denmark-4834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 06:27, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MIM-3 NIKE Ajax, Stevnsfort Cold War Museum, Denmark-4836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Møns Klint with beech tree living on the edge 2015-04-01-4868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slight CA at the right above but QI for me -- Spurzem 20:37, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Møns Klint beech trees in gorge 2015-04-01-4864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Interesting atmosphere! --Hubertl 05:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miners shower, Rammelsberg Mining Museum, Harz, Germany, 2015-05-18-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Vertical and sharp enough for me. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 19:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Katedralskole Symmetrical.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Llez 20:54, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underground Flatrod system 2, Rammelsberg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miners change room from corner 1, Rammelsberg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miners change room, Rammelsberg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ich habe schon viele Bilder davon in WP & Co. gesehen, alle alt, schwarzweiß, unscharf, undeutliche Objekte. Dies hier ist jedoch sehr gut! --Ralf Roletschek 20:35, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ralf Roletschek: Vielen dank! Mit Stativ und bei kombinieren drei verschiedene Verschlusszeiten war es möglich. -- Slaunger 20:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)Could be a good FP candidate IMO...--Jebulon 20:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pneumatic drills, Rammelsberg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Underground Flatrod system, Rammelsberg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:18, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entrance, Roeder Gallery, Rammelsberg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 19:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window, Eastern Facade, St Helens Church, Cliffe, Kent, England, 2015-05-06-5145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 22:04, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charnel House at St Helens Church, Cliffe, Kent, England, 2015-05-06-5136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Helens Church, Cliffe, Kent, Kent, 2015-05-06-5133.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be wider crop but its QI.--PetarM 12:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tower, South Facade, St Helens Church, Cliffe, Kent, England, 2015-05-06-5140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--ArildV 07:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Helens Church, Cliffe, Kent, England, 2015-05-06-5139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 23:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bell Inn, Minster-in-Thanet, Kent, England, 2015-05-07-5157.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:07, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polling Station, Minster-in-Thanet, Kent, England, 2015-05-07-5156.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 22:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiserweg Besinnungsweg stone,, Grosser Burgberg, Bad Harzburg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-16-5178.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Grosser Burgberg, Bad Harzburg, Lower Saxony, Germany, 2015-05-16-5166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes logo, Europa-center, Berlin, Germany, 2014-07-12-3346.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tauentzienstraße, Berlin sculpture, Germany, 2014-07-12-3347.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ralf Roletschek I am happy about this, as you are the reak expert on Commons wrt this particular sculpture . -- Slaunger 16:14, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sign, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit, Stresemannstraße 128, Berlin, Germany, 2014-07-13-3374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 22:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahntower, Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, Germany, 2014-07-13-3372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 22:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schöneberger Strasse from Anhalter Bahnhof, Berlin, Germany, 2014-07-13-3368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:18, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Detail, Kollhoff Tower and BahnTower, Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, Germany-3380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--ArildV 22:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sønæs, Søndersø, Viborg, Denmark, 2015-06-14-5437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:26, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facade, Kollhoff Tower, Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, Germany, 2015-07-13-3381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Two beached fishing vessels, Nørre Vorupør, Denmark, 2015-07-09-5588.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spøttrup Borg turneringsbane 2015-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment See the note. Image should looks better:) --Halavar 14:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Halavar: Good point, ✓ Done -- Slaunger 15:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 16:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spøttrup Castle SE View 2015-07-12-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments What seems right to stand askew but otherwise good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Could benefit much from a little correction of converging lines --Superbass 15:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Famberhorst: , @Superbass: : Thanks for the comments/edit regarding perspective correction. I agree. It is now fixed. -- Slaunger 19:02, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spøttrup Castle Southern Facade 2015-07-12-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spøttrup Castle Eastern Facade 2015-07-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Sorry, but I have to disagree. There's a large blurry part. It seems as if one of the frames was wrongly focused. --Code 08:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well spotted and correct Code. Luckily I have very good overlap between frames in the stitch, and I have now restitched the photo where the OOF frame is masked out. -- Slaunger 16:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better now, thank you! --Code 17:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The trees on the far right and far left are extremely blurry too. Did you not use manual focus for this? Dllu 01:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Bryghus 2016-04-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedeselskabet 2016-04-01-HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sortebrødre Kirke 2016-04-01 mercator.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Yet tilted cw, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 03:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Cccefalon: : Thanks. ✓ Done, also cropped a bit tighter to the right as a non-vertical lamppost to the right gave the impression of a CW tilt, and below to remove a shadow from another lamp. -- Slaunger 19:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC) Comment Far much better than the first version, IMO ! Clin--Jebulon 08:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Generalkommandoen 2016-04-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:48, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oak forest Hald Ege 180 deg pano 2016-05-06-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jackdaw on bicycle handle bars Bustation Amsterdam Sloterdijk 2016-09-12-6540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:16, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EYE Film Institute Amsterdam from tour boat 2016-09-12-6548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shell Tower Amsterdam-Noord from tour boat 2016-09-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NEMO science center from tour boat 2016-09-12-6565.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 02:51, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muziekgebouw aan 't IJ and Mövenpick Hotel Amsterdam from tour boat 2016-09-12-6556.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 20:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Bulldog Rock Shop Singel Amsterdam 2016-09-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rozengracht Prinsengracht corner Amsterdam 2016-09-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Crop at the bottom could be better. --XRay 06:07, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
XRay Agree regarding the bottom crop. Entire car was in frame, but not after perspective correction. -- Slaunger 07:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narrow houses 's-Gravenhekje 2016-09-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments WB looks a little blue and cold, do you think you could do something about that? W.carter 21:22, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
W.carter: ✓ Done. You are right, and at the same time I corrected the description of the scene in the EXIF. I had put in a wrong street name in the first upload.
*Thanks. The wrong street name passed me by totally since I have no clue of Amsterdam's geography. :P Good quality. --W.carter 21:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

2017[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blauwbrug NW side from river Amstel 2016-09-12-6577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joalpe 18:18, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Column Blauwbrug Amstel 2016-09-12-6584.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westerdoksplein Amsterdam 2016-09-12-6597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamps EM Belysning Viborg Denmark 2016-12-30-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Excellent! --W.carter 21:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blauwbrug NW side from river Amstel 2016-09-12-6578.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks ok now --A.Savin 15:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Groenburgwal Staalkade seen from river Amstell 2016-09-12-6581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The far right is a bit soft but since this is a corner it is acceptable IMO. QI. --W.carter 16:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black houseboat Amstelhoeck Amstel 2016-09-12-6583.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharpness diminishes towards both sides, but nevertheless QI to me. --Cayambe 09:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamps EM Belysning Viborg Denmark 2016-12-30-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamps EM Belysning Viborg Denmark 2016-12-30-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamps EM Belysning Viborg Denmark 2016-12-30-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Cluttered,but this is reality here. QI to me. --Cayambe 09:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Cayambe: Yes it is the entire point that it is cluttered. It is like entering a cave of lamps to go into this shop. -- Slaunger 13:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamps EM Belysning Viborg Denmark 2016-12-30-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prinsengracht towads Lekkeresluis from Bridge Prinsenstraat 2016-09-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:09, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houseboat at Prinsengracht 246 2016-09-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:40, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three colonial generals De Bazel Vijzelstraat Amsterdam 2016-09-13-6629.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:43, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Window detail De Bazel Vijzelstraat Amsterdam 2016-09-13-6627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Left upper corner is slightly soft but good enough for QI imo. Good composition.--ArildV 20:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ArildV: I've uploaded a new version, where I have increased sharpness/NR/shadows in the upper left corner. Still QI-acceptable? -- Slaunger 16:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De Bazel facade texture Vijzelstraat Amsterdam 2016-09-13-6630.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couple selfie stick Konigssluis Amsterdam 2016-09-13-6621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Image is slightly tilted to the right. Look at the building in the background, but good quality for me. Do like to improve here.--Famberhorst 06:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Famberhorst: ✓ Done and thanks for the sharp observation. I also fixed a spelling error in the file name. -- Slaunger 16:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neck gables Prinsengracht 1037-1041 Amsterdam 2016-09-13-6634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 00:11, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sailboat and houseboats at Prinsengracht 1027 Amsterdam 2017-09-13-6633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houseboats at Prinsengracht seen from Reguliersgracht Amsterdam 2017-09-13-6635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:19, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Keizersgracht street sign at Vijzelstraat Amsterdam 2016-09-13-6631.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belfry of Munttoren - Muntplein - Amsterdam - 2016-09-13-6642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trams - Muntplein - Amsterdam - 2016-09-13-6643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is quite a bit of green CA around the white parts (mostly windows) on the buildings. In some places it spills over to the brickwork too. Think you can remove that? W.carter 20:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
cart: You are right. My kit zoom lens is terrible at fringing in OOF backgrounds, but I have this magic wand called Lightroom, and I have tried to apply it. I think it has improved, but is it good enough? I do not think the spillover into the brickwork is completely gone though. Hey isn't that just a new kind of bokeh? -- Slaunger 20:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nice try. :) Sorry, the green on the bricks is still there, that's what you use the color change brush in Photoshop for. ;) W.carter 21:20, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
cart: Before I fire up PS and learn to use the color change brush, I just want to make sure you are aware that the bricks next to the windows on Oude Turftmarkt 153 actually have a green tint? (It is only now I realise myself) I know the color bleeds a bit, but it is in the OOF background, so... -- Slaunger 21:34, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Silly me! How could I forget that the bricks at that address are greenish. Good quality. --W.carter 21:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oude Turfmarkt seen from Muntplein - Amsterdam - 2016-09-13-6646.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsterdam Centraal 2016-09-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI. Dmitry Ivanov 20:11, 3 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauge Jensen - Great Dane 1800-.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viborg Cathedral School Eastern Facade as seen from Asmildhøjen Overlund 2017-02-11-7017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 15:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odshøjstien Overlund Viborg Dk 2017-02-11-6950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skovgaard Museum seen from Latinerhaven Viborg Dk-6047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good composition -- Spurzem 22:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen Nørresø panorama at dusk 2017-02-15-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't like the very blurry tree branches at the upper left corner, but I like pretty much everything else. A pretty, high-quality photo. -- Ikan Kekek 10:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blåvandshuk Lighthouse-7073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 21:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bunkers at Blåvands Huk - DK-7071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great light! Good quality. --W.carter 20:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bunkers at Blåvands Huk - DK-7068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Audience Rogers Centre 2017-02-27 7121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CityPlace from Blue Jays Way Toronto 2017-02-27-7122.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not sharp enough for Q1 for me, it might be repairable --Michielverbeek 07:35, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Michielverbeek: : I think sharpness is almost as good as it gets with my gear (5 y old entry level DSLR with kit lens), but I have improved perspective, repaired some issue with moiré and selectively tweaked sharpness/NR. -- Slaunger 14:08, 4 March 2017 (UTC) Difference is small, but large enough for a weak support --Michielverbeek 08:25, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Audience - Toronto - 2017-02-27 - 7124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Summer house destroyed by fire Blåvandshuk Denmark 2017-02-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Block 1 CityPlace Toronto Canada 2017-02-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Difficult light but overall good and no sign of invasion of privacy. Any chance of some slight NR on just the lower shadowy parts of the photo? --W.carter 23:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done -- Slaunger 20:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Much better! :) Good quality. --W.carter 20:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water running Mønsted Limestone Mine 2017-04-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. (But there is typo in both filenames) --A.Savin 11:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, A.Savin. I corrected both file names. -- Slaunger 22:01, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pathway Mønsted Limestone Mine 2017-04-15 7205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:37, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Path Mønsted Limestone Mine 2017-04-15-7199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rudder and propeller Beached fishing vessel Nørre Vorupør Denmark 2017-04-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:18, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Empire Sandy moored at Waterfront Trail Toronto-2017-05-17-7579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rita Coronita - Lone Star Texas Grill - 212 King St W - Toronto 2017-05-18 7597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I get thirst ;-). IMO, very good quality--Rabax63 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rabax63: On a warm summer day this is not bad at all! -- Slaunger 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Slaunger: To the point hit!! --Rabax63 22:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Andrew's Presbytarian Church as seen from Lone Star Texas Grill - Toronto 2017-05-18 7596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toronto skyline from Western Channel, Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport 2017-05-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:31, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New here[edit]