User talk:Sikander/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3
File:The twins laugh at something they are watching at our campsite (50094290861).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Governor Sheng (talk) 02:32, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Seminar on cooperation between Finland and Estonia 15.11.2022 (52501795003).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

That's a shame, I really liked how the  Ukraine gov had their own {{President.gov.ua}} template. // sikander { talk } 🦖 14:39, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Toys for Tots 2022 (52553483518).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Heber Down Conservation Area - 201712 - (IMG 4438).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Cineplex Empress Walk cinemas - 20230108.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Belbury (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User talk:Sikander. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
For your Flickr uploads… You don’t stop appearing to me on the Latest files! RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Amazon Go - Seattle (20180804111434).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

File:Mud Fest 2008 (2658549770).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Copeland Forest (20181216130924).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Mud Fest 2008 (2666728679).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Oregon City Track & field - IMG 8818 (52865712870).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Re-creation

It seems that someone had re-created previously deleted content at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:People signing condolence books for Elizabeth II. Is it possible for you to snap {{SD|G4}} on those files? A1Cafel (talk) 08:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

so you now lets someone else do your dirty job?..someone who themselves doesn't understand copyrights?... Stemoc 16:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
@Stemoc: Huh, what are you talking about? The files are tagged as "David Parry/PA Media Assignments" and "Jonathan Hordle/PA Media Assignments" and are not copyright free and were reviewed previously by Admins and deleted because of that. Please educate here Commons:Copyright rules. Cheers. // sikander { talk } 🦖 16:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't matter what its tagged as, its the source that matters, maybe you haven't been following the current drama created by AlCafel, maybe educate yourself first...be his scapegoat then...its your choice.. Stemoc 17:05, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
@Stemoc: Seems like you are claiming to be more knowledgeable than Commons Admins ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ // sikander { talk } 🦖 17:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
commons admins on this project don't actually do due-diligence, do they? ..one person says delete in a DR, they delete..unfortunately the bar is too low to be an admin now...knowledge of policies isn't a requirement apparently..he is trying to get you to speedy delete something that should go through DR as a similar DR he ran involving another photoset of the FCDO on their flickr backfired on him and he is now doubling-down but because he knows if he did it, he will get blocked for good, he found himself a ..well for a better word, a patsy. I assume he messaged you to file the DR but you did it wrong so he did it for you and then realised he can't leave trails so he told you to speedy them?.....yeah mate...its called scapegoating... Stemoc 17:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
@Stemoc: OK, so I'm wrong, A1Cafel is wrong, Admins Fitindia and Túrelio who deleted these files previously are wrong, but you are right and these files should be kept on Commons. My suggestion is that you should start requests here Commons:License review/Requests and Commons:Administrators/Requests here to fix things. Good luck. // sikander { talk } 🦖 18:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
no, you are misinformed, Fitindia didn't do due-diligence and Turelio only saw that it was deleted previously and followed suit, that DR was a farce. A1Cafel has a habit of filing many of those and it ends up creating a bad precedent because unfortunately admins on this project do not follow due diligence, if you don't know what that term means, it means to form their own judgement regardless of the votes after doing a thorough investigation cause majority of people who vote in this DR honestly know nothing about copyrights on this project as well. A1Cafel basically alleged that a UK Govt department laundered license of images it does not own copyrights too which is completely false, you can make those allegations against images that gets taken from flickr accounts of individuals, not government arms. He has done that a few too many times and not just the UK government. His lack of understanding makes him a dangerous individual, but alas admins here refuse to acknowledge the problem here let alone fix it. Not only does he mass-report stuff without even doing his own investigation, he mass-uploads from flickr as well, majority of which fails our own project copyright laws, just look at his talk page (he also removes a lot of Speedy/DR notices against his own uploads regularly) so why would you assume he knows what he is doing? I'm already a licence reviewer and i'm telling you he is wrong. I have directly dealt with the UK government before and the UKMoD.. he may have gotten a lot of free images deleted over the years due to lack of understanding and this project unfortunately has far too many new admins who themselves don't understand copyright policies, remember knowing copyright policies has never been a requirement for being an admin here... Stemoc 07:19, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
@Stemoc: Thank you for explaining meanings of words. Can I ping you when I need English help? As for the rest of your spiel I suggest taking your concerns and complaints to Jimbo. Everyone else seems to be incompetent idiots and will be unable to help you. Good day. // sikander { talk } 🦖 12:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Nguyễn Xuân Phúc - 2016 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Air Canada - Boeing 787-9 - Toronto to Seoul - 20230615 - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Jennifer McKelvie at Collision 2019 (47842559552) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

206.130.173.49 14:33, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Brigitte Macron

Hey, why did you remove some files from Category:Brigitte Macron in 2023? RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

@RodRabelo7: Hi! The same files were in Category:Brigitte Macron and Rosângela Lula da Silva and it was duplicating categories in "in 2023" on both. Although now that I think about it, Rosângela Lula da Silva and Brigitte Macron can meet up again after 2023 so may be that wasn't a good idea. I'll revert. // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:07, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
File:20230712 Rionegro Feria Aeronautica-Juan Cano05511 (53041234592).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 05:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

File:09.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118016789).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 15:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Gliére, Schumann y Stravisnky, por la Sinfónica Juvenil San Martín (53092626908).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Madamebiblio (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

File:06.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53117788276).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:08.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118016864).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:07.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118222775).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:11a.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53118311458).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:10a.Before.Fotografiska.NYC.6Augsut2023 (53117215382).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)