User talk:Shansov.net

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paradise cave.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 15:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sơn La Dam reservoir.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 11:19, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lai Châu Dam.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Why such a small file size? --Cayambe 08:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Động Tam Thanh.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 11:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New level {{User PH-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 00:26, 12 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

PH-4

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nhà tù Côn Đảo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unijuction transistor KT117 (open).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, meets QI for me and is useful for Wikipedia --J. Lunau 11:26, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ba Vì National Park, foggy road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. Minor CAs but acceptable. --XRay 17:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lai Châu Province road construction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:15, 07 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mường Thanh Valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:14, 07 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sơn La Dam.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The sky gradient IMHO is unnatural, can you fix it? --C messier 17:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment Well, for me it looks exactly like it was in real world: light haze and sun at the left, so I'm not sure how I should change it. No posterization or banding in the gradient, as I can see --Shansov.net 21:45, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Top right looks vignetted. More contrast could be better. I proposed another crop to reduce the dominace of the hazy sky. And: What about providing a higher resolution? --Cccefalon 06:44, 4 March 2015 (UTC)  Comment Thanks for your input. I have another shot with less sky, but it looks too tight and not as good. Actually, I like how it looks here, puts things into perspective. As for resolution, my lens at that time was not good enough, so image would be not sharp at the leftmost part --Shansov.net 09:16, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral Thank you for the explanation. However, I am not convinced from the image and stay back. --Cccefalon 19:32, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's ok. Mattbuck 19:45, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ga Tháp Chàm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:53, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ninh Hòa salt production.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Superb image, great colours --Charlesjsharp 12:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suối Ba Hồ 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:52, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Côn Đảo National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Bad weather, but I like this picture. ;-) The quality is good for me. --Hockei 16:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noibai New Terminal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hockei 17:41, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noibai T2 gates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very very small for my taste....but good for the few that I can see --Livioandronico2013 19:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bạc Liêu windpower farm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bạc Liêu skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:31, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pác Bó.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MCC Botanicheskiy Sad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ConDao park dam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phong Nha-Ke Bang cave3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hanoi metro L2 construction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Nikhilb239 06:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pulo Condore island beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Nikhilb239 06:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MCC Ploschad Gagarina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Nikhilb239 06:40, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Phong Nha-Ke Bang cave3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phong Nha-Ke Bang cave3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mường Thanh Valley.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mường Thanh Valley.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Po Klong Garai 00.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 02:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, very good. There's something that may or may not be a dust spot near the right margin fairly close to the top. Also, gopura is the singular of gopuram. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 02:45, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Dust spots removed --Shansov.net 14:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MCC Likhobory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment This is barely 4 Mpix, please upload a larger version. --C messier 16:32, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done by C messier's request --Shansov.net 00:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak support It's not really bigger, also there is some clipping in the clouds, but IMHO acceptable. --C messier 19:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Challenge – Second Place
Congratulations!

Your picture Phong Nha-Ke Bang cave3.jpg won the 2nd place in the Photo Challenge Caves, Mines and Sinkholes, in August 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 04:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hòa Hiệp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Armenak Margarian 21:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trần Thị Lý Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tháp Đồng Dương.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 07:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trần Thị Lý Bridge at daytime.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, metadata would be nice --Trougnouf 04:22, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MM Novoperedelkino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --PtrQs 18:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JR Nishi-Ōyama station at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MM Hovrino turnstiles.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! My Son A1 Yoni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amstetten railway station at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interlaken Ost.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schladming railway station at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meiringen–Innertkirchen railcar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HGe 101 electric locomotive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Whose names are on the locomotive and why? --Ermell 20:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentIt's signed by Die Zentralbahn employees, but I don't know, why --Shansov.net 20:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torture rack.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tobacco kilns, DakLak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit too close, but good for QI in my opinion. --Tournasol7 00:22, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thap Mam Shiva.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, metadata would be nice to have --Trougnouf 19:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mỹ Sơn sanctuary group A.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nandin Tra Kieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:57, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bomb craters, Mỹ Sơn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality photo of the remains of a very sad event. -- Ikan Kekek 02:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]